Executive Vice President, Washington, DC Region of Boston Properties since January 2016, with responsibility for all operations, including project development, leasing, construction, property management and administrative activities for our Washington, DC office, with a staff of approximately 181 people; has been responsible for more than 11 million square feet of new development and renovation projects
Various positions at Boston Properties since 1987, including Senior Vice President and Regional Manager and Head of Development of our Washington, DC office
Former director of the Northern Virginia Chapter of NAIOP
Received a BA in Business Administration from Roanoke College, an MA from Hollins College and an MBA from the University of Virginia
Executive Vice President, Boston Region Executive Vice President, Boston Region of Boston Properties since January 2016, with responsibility for overseeing the operation of our existing regional portfolio in the Boston area, which includes the Boston CBD, Cambridge and Waltham/Lexington submarkets and developing new business opportunities in the area
Senior Vice President and Regional Manager of our Boston office from 1999 to 2016
Various positions at Trammell Crow Company from 1982 to 1999, where his career covered high-rise office building leasing and the development of commercial office buildings
| | • Executive Vice President, Boston Region of BXP since January 2016, with responsibility for overseeing the operation of our existing regional portfolio in the Boston area, which includes the Boston CBD, Cambridge and Waltham/Lexington submarkets and developing new business opportunities in the area • Senior Vice President and Regional Manager of our Boston office from 1999 to 2016 • Various positions at Trammell Crow Company from 1982 to 1999, where his career covered high-rise office building leasing and the development of commercial office buildings and shopping centers, including Managing Director and Regional Leader for Trammell Crow Company’s New England region, with responsibility for all commercial office and shopping center operations.operations • Director of the Massachusetts Chapter of NAIOP, the Boston Green Ribbon Commission and the Kendall Square Association • Former chairman of the Back Bay Association • Received a BBA and an MBA from Texas Christian University | Peter V. Otteni Executive Vice President, Co-Head of the Washington, DC Region | | • Executive Vice President, Co-Head of the Washington, DC Region of BXP since January 2022, with joint responsibility for business activities and direct responsibility for overseeing project development, construction and marketing activities for our Washington, DC region • Various positions at BXP since 2000, including Vice President, Development from 2006 to 2016, Senior Vice President and Head of Development from 2017 to 2021 and Senior Vice President, Co-Head of the Washington, DC Region from April 2021 to December 2021 • Member of the Board of Directors of National Capital Area Region for the March of Dimes • Received a BS in Commerce from the University of Virginia and an MBA from the University of North Carolina, Kenan-Flagler Business School |
Director of the Massachusetts Chapter of NAIOP, the Boston Green Ribbon Commission and the Kendall Square Association
Former chairman of the Back Bay Association
Received a BBA and an MBA from Texas Christian University
| | | | | | | | | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement | | 41 47 |
| | | Robert E. Pester Executive Vice President, San Francisco Region |
| • Executive Vice President, San Francisco Region of BXP since January 2016, with responsibility for overseeing existing operations in San Francisco and our other Bay Area properties on the Peninsula and in Silicon Valley, and developing new business opportunities in the area • Senior Vice President and Regional Manager of our San Francisco office from 1998 to 2016 • Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer of Bedford Property Investors, a REIT in Lafayette, California, for which he led the acquisitions and development program from 1994 to 1998 • President of Bedford Property Development, a private West Coast development concern that held more than $2 billion in real estate assets from 1989 to 1998 • A leading commercial real estate broker with Cushman & Wakefield in northern California, from 1980 to 1989, where he last served as Vice President • Licensed California officer and real estate broker • Received a BA in Economics and Political Science from the University of California at Santa Barbara Executive Vice President, San Francisco Region of Boston Properties since January 2016, with responsibility for overseeing existing operations in San Francisco and our other Bay Area properties on the Peninsula and in Silicon Valley, and developing new business opportunities in the area
Senior Vice President and Regional Manager of our San Francisco office from 1998 to 2016
Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer of Bedford Property Investors, a REIT in Lafayette, California, for which he led the acquisitions and development program from 1994 to 1998
President of Bedford Property Development, a private West Coast development concern that held more than $2 billion in real estate assets from 1989 to 1998
A leading commercial real estate broker with Cushman & Wakefield in northern California, from 1980 to 1989, where he last served as Vice President
Licensed California officer and real estate broker
Received a BA in Economics and Political Science from the University of California at Santa Barbara
| Hilary J. Spann Executive Vice President, New York Region | | • Executive Vice President, New York Region of BXP since September 2021 and Head of the New York Region since January 2022 with responsibility for overseeing all aspects of our New York and Princeton, New Jersey activities, including development, acquisitions, leasing and building operations • Various positions at CPP Investments from March 2016 to July 2021, including (1) Managing Director, Head of Real Estate Investments from July 2017 to July 2021, with responsibility for leading all aspects of the real estate business, including investment strategy, talent acquisition and management, and portfolio management, and (2) Managing Director, Head of United States Real Estate Investments from March 2016 to July 2017 • Various positions at the Global Real Assets Group at J.P. Morgan Asset Management, including Managing Director, Head of Northeast Acquisitions, from May 2001 to February 2016 • Governing trustee of the Urban Land Institute (“ULI”) • Member of ULI’s Americas Executive Committee • Director of the ULI Foundation • Received a BS in Architecture and an MA of City Planning both from the College of Architecture at the Georgia Institute of Technology • Studied architecture at the Ecole d’Architecture de Paris – La Villette | John F. PowersJ. Stroman Executive Vice President, Co-Head of the Washington, DC Region | | • Executive Vice President, Co-Head of the Washington, DC Region of BXP since January 2022, with joint responsibility for business activities and direct responsibility for overseeing the leasing, legal and property management activities for our Washington, DC region • Various positions at BXP since 2005, including Vice President, Development from 2011 to 2019, Vice President, Leasing from 2019 to 2020, Senior Vice President Leasing from 2020 to April 2021 and Senior Vice President, Co-Head of the Washington, DC Region of BXP from April 2021 to December 2021 • Received a BS in Civil Engineering from Johns Hopkins University and an MBA, Real Estate Development from the University of North Carolina, Kenan-Flagler Business School |
Executive Vice President, New York Region of Boston Properties since January 2016, with responsibility for overseeing all aspects of our New York and Princeton, New Jersey activities, including development, acquisitions, leasing and building operations
Senior Vice President and Regional Manager of our New York office from January 2014 to January 2016
Chairman of CBRE, Inc. for the New York Tri-State Region, from 2004 to 2016, where he oversaw the strategic direction of CBRE’s Tri-State operations
Joined the Edward S. Gordon Company, which was subsequently merged into CBRE, in 1986, where he developed and managed the Consulting Division into a strong and integral part of the firm’s service delivery
| | platform, which facilitated its sustained leadership in the Manhattan office leasing market; also brokered millions of square feet of transactions, representing both tenants and landlords, led numerous strategic consulting assignments for large corporate occupiers and advised on many ground-up developments
|
Spent eight years at Swiss Bank Corporation (now UBS)
Chairman of Right to Dream, Inc.
Received a BA in Mathematics from St. Anselm College, an MA in Economics from the University of Massachusetts and an MBA from the University of Massachusetts
Studied international economics at the Graduate Institute of International Studies, Geneva
Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary since 2019 and Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Boston Properties from 2003 until 2019, with responsibility for overseeing the legal and risk management departments
Various positions at Boston Properties since 1986; represented Boston Properties in the acquisition of the Prudential Center in Boston and the Embarcadero Center in San Francisco, as well as in the development activities at the Prudential Center
Former attorney in the real estate department at Nutter, McClennen & Fish in Boston
Member of the American College of Real Estate Lawyers and the Boston Bar Association
Speaker for the American College of Real Estate Lawyers, the Association of Corporate Counsel, Massachusetts Continuing Legal Education, NAIOP and Nareit
Received a BA, magna cum laude, from Brown University and a JD, cum laude, from the University of Pennsylvania Law School
| | | | | | | | | | 42
| | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement 48 | | |
| | | | | Frank D. Burt Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary | | • Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary of BXP since 2019 and Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of BXP from 2003 until 2019, with responsibility for overseeing the legal and risk management departments • Various positions at BXP since 1986; represented BXP in the acquisition of the Prudential Center in Boston and the Embarcadero Center in San Francisco, as well as in the development activities at the Prudential Center and at Salesforce Tower in San Francisco • Former attorney in the real estate department at Nutter, McClennen & Fish in Boston • Member of the Board of Governors of American College of Real Estate Lawyers and the Boston Bar Association • Speaker for the American College of Real Estate Lawyers, the Association of Corporate Counsel, Massachusetts Continuing Legal Education, NAIOP and Nareit • Received a BA, magna cum laude, from Brown University and a JD, cum laude, from the University of Pennsylvania Law School | | | Michael R. Walsh Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer | | • Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer of BXP since May 2016, with responsibility for overseeing financial reporting, property accounting and tax compliance and providing transactional support on capital markets activity • Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Paramount Group, Inc., a REIT focused on Class A office properties in New York City, Washington, DC and San Francisco, from March 2015 to March 2016 • Various positions at BXP from 1986 to 2015, including Senior Vice President, Finance and Capital Markets with responsibility for overseeing its accounting, financial reporting, financial analysis and tax functions and participated extensively in investor relations matters • Co-chair of Nareit’s Accounting Committee • Member of Nareit’s Best Financial Practices Council • Received a BS, magna cum laude, from Eastern Nazarene College |
Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer of Boston Properties since May 2016, with responsibility for overseeing financial reporting, property accounting and tax compliance and providing transactional support on capital markets activity
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Paramount Group, Inc., a REIT focused on Class A office properties in New York City, Washington, DC and San Francisco, from March 2015 to March 2016
Various positions at Boston Properties from 1986 to 2015, including Senior Vice President, Finance and Capital Markets with responsibility for overseeing its accounting, financial reporting, financial analysis and tax functions and participated extensively in investor relations matters
Member of Nareit’s Best Financial Practices Council
Received a BS, magna cum laude, from Eastern Nazarene College
| | | | | | | | | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement | | 43 49 |
| | | 5› | | PRINCIPAL AND MANAGEMENT STOCKHOLDERS |
PRINCIPAL AND MANAGEMENT STOCKHOLDERS The table below shows the amount of BXP common stock of Boston Properties, Inc. and units of partnership interest in our Operating Partnership beneficially owned as of February 5, 20214, 2022 by: each of our named executive officers (“NEOs”); all directors and executive officers of Boston Properties Inc.BXP as a group; and each person known by Boston Propertiesus to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock. On February 5, 2021,4, 2022, there were: 155,805,445156,679,794 shares of our common stock outstanding;
16,097,11016,554,998 common units of partnership interest in our Operating Partnership (“common units”) outstanding (other than the common units held by Boston Properties, Inc.), each of which is redeemable for one share of Boston Properties, Inc.’sBXP common stock (if Boston PropertiesBXP elects to issue common stock rather than pay cash upon such redemption);
1,587,9231,711,635 long term incentive units of partnership interest in our Operating Partnership (“LTIP units”) outstanding that were issued as part of our long-term incentive (“LTI”) program, excluding LTIP units issued pursuant to 20192020 Multi-Year Long-Term Incentive Program (“MYLTIP”) awards, 20202021 MYLTIP awards and 20212022 MYLTIP awards, each of which, upon the satisfaction of certain performance and service conditions, is convertible into one common unit; and
73,74483,792 deferred stock units outstanding.
All references in this proxy statement to LTIP units exclude LTIP units issued pursuant to 2019 MYLTIP awards, 2020 MYLTIP awards, 2021 MYLTIP awards and 20212022 MYLTIP awards because the three-year performance periods of these awards had not ended by February 5, 2021.4, 2022. LTIP units issued pursuant to 2019 MYLTIP awards, 2020 MYLTIP awards, 2021 MYLTIP awards and 20212022 MYLTIP awards are collectively referred to herein as “Unearned Performance Awards.” None of our directors or NEOs beneficially owned any preferred units or shares of our preferred stock. | | | | | | | | | | 44
| | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement 50 | | |
| | | 5› | | PRINCIPAL AND MANAGEMENT STOCKHOLDERS |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Common Stock | | | Common Stock and Units | | Name and Address of Beneficial Owner* | | Number of Shares Beneficially Owned(1) | | | Percent of Common Stock (2) | | | Number of Shares and Units Beneficially Owned (1) | | | Percent of Common Stock and Units (3) | | Directors and Named Executive Officers | | Kelly A. Ayotte(4) | | | 213 | | | | * | * | | | 4,109 | | | | * | * | Bruce W. Duncan(5) | | | 21,000 | | | | * | * | | | 26,959 | | | | * | * | Karen E. Dykstra(6) | | | 7,420 | | | | * | * | | | 7,945 | | | | * | * | Carol B. Einiger(7) | | | 29,185 | | | | * | * | | | 38,154 | | | | * | * | Diane J. Hoskins(8) | | | 4,149 | | | | * | * | | | 4,149 | | | | * | * | Joel I. Klein(9) | | | 9,081 | | | | * | * | | | 17,140 | | | | * | * | Douglas T. Linde(10) | | | 259,131 | | | | * | * | | | 554,901 | | | | * | * | Matthew J. Lustig(11) | | | 8,799 | | | | * | * | | | 19,716 | | | | * | * | Owen D. Thomas(12) | | | 63,624 | | | | * | * | | | 402,264 | | | | * | * | David A. Twardock(13) | | | 8,060 | | | | * | * | | | 8,060 | | | | * | * | William H. Walton, III(14) | | | 1,610 | | | | * | * | | | 4,459 | | | | * | * | Raymond A. Ritchey(15) | | | — | | | | * | * | | | 371,015 | | | | * | * | Michael E. LaBelle(16) | | | 11,333 | | | | * | * | | | 135,195 | | | | * | * | Bryan J. Koop(17) | | | 17,919 | | | | * | * | | | 87,145 | | | | * | * | All directors and executive officers as a group (19 persons)(18) | | | 499,708 | | | | * | * | | | 1,912,747 | | | | 1.10 | % | 5% Holders | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The Vanguard Group(19) | | | 22,350,551 | | | | 14.35 | % | | | 22,350,551 | | | | 12.88 | % | BlackRock, Inc.(20) | | | 16,207,690 | | | | 10.40 | % | | | 16,207,690 | | | | 9.34 | % | Norges Bank (The Central Bank of Norway)(21) | | | 13,037,554 | | | | 8.37 | % | | | 13,037,554 | | | | 7.51 | % | State Street Corporation(22) | | | 8,745,065 | | | | 5.61 | % | | | 8,745,065 | | | | 5.04 | % | TCI Fund Management Limited and Christopher Hohn(23) | | | 8,362,038 | | | | 5.37 | % | | | 8,362,038 | | | | 4.82 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Common Stock | | | Common Stock and Units | | Name and Address of Beneficial Owner* | | Number of Shares Beneficially Owned(1) | | | Percent of Common Stock (2) | | | Number of Shares and Units Beneficially Owned (1) | | | Percent of Common Stock and Units (3) | | | Directors and Named Executive Officers(4) | | | | | | | Kelly A. Ayotte | | | 333 | | | | ** | | | | 5,514 | | | | ** | | | | | | | Bruce W. Duncan(5) | | | 21,000 | | | | ** | | | | 28,244 | | | | ** | | | | | | | Carol B. Einiger(6) | | | 30,882 | | | | ** | | | | 41,136 | | | | ** | | | | | | | Diane J. Hoskins | | | 5,434 | | | | ** | | | | 5,434 | | | | ** | | | | | | | Mary E. Kipp | | | 542 | | | | ** | | | | 542 | | | | ** | | | | | | | Joel I. Klein | | | 11,123 | | | | ** | | | | 20,467 | | | | ** | | | | | | | Douglas T. Linde(7) | | | 224,655 | | | | ** | | | | 562,325 | | | | ** | | | | | | | Matthew J. Lustig | | | 10,130 | | | | ** | | | | 22,332 | | | | ** | | | | | | | Owen D. Thomas | | | 63,836 | | | | ** | | | | 464,700 | | | | ** | | | | | | | David A. Twardock | | | 9,564 | | | | ** | | | | 9,564 | | | | ** | | | | | | | William H. Walton, III | | | 2,550 | | | | ** | | | | 6,684 | | | | ** | | | | | | | Raymond A. Ritchey(8) | | | — | | | | ** | | | | 302,328 | | | | ** | | | | | | | Michael E. LaBelle | | | 11,007 | | | | ** | | | | 149,153 | | | | ** | | | | | | | Bryan J. Koop | | | 18,019 | | | | ** | | | | 97,488 | | | | ** | | | | | | | All directors and executive officers as a group (20 persons)(4) | | | 468,751 | | | | ** | | | | 1,914,620 | | | | 1.09% | | | | | | | 5% Holders | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The Vanguard Group(9) | | | 22,978,972 | | | | 14.67% | | | | 22,978,972 | | | | 13.13% | | | | | | | BlackRock, Inc.(10) | | | 17,343,626 | | | | 11.07% | | | | 17,343,626 | | | | 9.91% | | | | | | | Norges Bank (The Central Bank of Norway)(11) | | | 13,037,554 | | | | 8.32% | | | | 13,037,554 | | | | 7.45% | | | | | | | TCI Fund Management Limited and Christopher Hohn(12) | | | 12,458,851 | | | | 7.95% | | | | 12,458,851 | | | | 7.12% | | | | | | | State Street Corporation(13) | | | 10,427,686 | | | | 6.66% | | | | 10,427,686 | | | | 5.96% | |
* | Unless otherwise indicated, the address is c/o Boston Properties, Inc., 800 Boylston Street, Suite 1900, Boston, Massachusetts 02199-8103. |
(1) | The number of shares of BXP common stock “beneficially owned” by each beneficial owner is determined under rules issued by the SEC regarding the beneficial ownership of securities.SEC. This information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. “Number of Shares Beneficially Owned” includes (a) shares of BXP common stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of options that are exercisable on or within 60 days after February 5, 20214, 2022 and (b) the number of shares of BXP common stock issuable to directors upon settlement of deferred stock units on or within 60 days after February 5, 2021.4, 2022. The “Number of Shares and Units Beneficially Owned” includes all shares included in the “Number of Shares Beneficially Owned” column plus the number of shares of BXP common stock for which common units and LTIP units may be redeemed (assuming, in the case of LTIP units, that they have first been converted into common units). Under the limited partnership agreement of the Operating Partnership, the holders of the common units and LTIP units (assuming conversion in full into common units, as applicable) have the right to redeem the units for cash or, at ourBXP’s option, shares of BXP common stock, subject to certain conditions. Except as otherwise noted, each beneficial owner has sole voting and investment power over the shares and units. Holders of common units, LTIP units and deferred stock units are not entitled to vote such units on any of the matters presented at the 20212022 annual meeting. |
(2) | The total number of shares outstanding used in calculating this percentage assumes (a) the exercise of all options to acquire shares of BXP common stock that are exercisable on or within 60 days after February 5, 20214, 2022 held by the beneficial owner and that no options held by other beneficial owners are exercised and (b) the conversion into shares of BXP common stock of all deferred stock units held by the beneficial owner and that no deferred stock units held by other beneficial owners are converted. |
| | | | | | | | | | 2022 Proxy Statement 51 |
| | | 5› | | PRINCIPAL AND MANAGEMENT STOCKHOLDERS |
(3) | The total number of shares outstanding used in calculating this percentage assumes (a) that all common units and LTIP units are presented (assuming conversion in full into common units, if applicable) to the Operating Partnership for redemption and are acquired by Boston PropertiesBXP for shares of BXP common stock, (b) does not separately include outstanding common units held by Boston Properties,BXP, as these common units are already reflected in the |
| | | | | | | | | | | | 2021 Proxy Statement
| | 45
|
| | | 5› | | PRINCIPAL AND MANAGEMENT STOCKHOLDERS |
| denominator by the inclusion of all outstanding shares of common stock, (c) the exercise of all options to acquire shares of BXP common stock that are exercisable on or within 60 days after February 5, 20214, 2022 held by the beneficial owner and that no options held by other beneficial owners are exercised and (d) the conversion into shares of BXP common stock of all deferred stock units the receipt of which has not been deferred to a date later than 60 days after February 5, 2021.4, 2022. |
(4) | Represents 213Includes the number of shares of common stock, shares of common stock underlying exercisable stock options and deferred stock units.units shown in the table below. Also includes, only under the “Number of Shares and Units Beneficially Owned” column, 3,896the number of common units and LTIP units (of which 1,709shown in the table below. Excludes Unearned Performance Awards.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Name | | Common Stock(a) | | | Stock Options | | | Deferred Stock Units(b) | | | Common Units | | | LTIP Units(a) | | | | | | | | | | Kelly A. Ayotte | | | — | | | | — | | | | 333 | | | | — | | | | 5,181 | | | | | | | | Bruce W. Duncan | | | 21,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 7,244 | | | | | | | | Carol B. Einiger | | | 8,000 | | | | — | | | | 22,882 | | | | — | | | | 10,254 | | | | | | | | Diane J. Hoskins | | | 5,434 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | | | Mary E. Kipp | | | 542 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | | | Joel I. Klein | | | — | | | | — | | | | 11,123 | | | | — | | | | 9,344 | | | | | | | | Douglas T. Linde | | | 183,563 | | | | 41,092 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 337,670 | | | | | | | | Matthew J. Lustig | | | — | | | | — | | | | 10,130 | | | | — | | | | 12,202 | | | | | | | | Owen D. Thomas | | | 9,554 | | | | 54,282 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 400,864 | | | | | | | | David A. Twardock | | | 8,895 | | | | — | | | | 669 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | | | William H. Walton, III | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,550 | | | | — | | | | 4,134 | | | | | | | | Raymond A. Ritchey | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 130,570 | | | | 171,758 | | | | | | | | Michael E. LaBelle | | | 11,007 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 138,146 | | | | | | | | Bryan J. Koop | | | 9,752 | | | | 8,267 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 79,469 | | | | | | | | All directors and executive officers as a group (20 persons) | | | 317,423 | | | | 103,641 | | | | 47,687 | | | | 136,360 | | | | 1,309,509 | |
| (a) | Includes the following unvested shares of common stock and unvested LTIP units: Ms. Ayotte — 1,285 LTIP units; Mr. Duncan — 1,285 LTIP Units; Ms. Einiger — 1,285 LTIP units; Ms. Hoskins — 1,285 shares of common stock; Ms. Kipp — 542 shares of common stock; Mr. Klein — 1,285 LTIP units; Mr. Linde — 78,065 LTIP units; Mr. Lustig — 1,285 LTIP units; Mr. Thomas — 114,287 LTIP units; Mr. Twardock — 1,285 shares of common stock; Mr. Walton — 1,285 LTIP units; Mr. Ritchey — 9,992 LTIP units; Mr. LaBelle — 26,615 LTIP units are subject to vesting). and 929 shares of common stock; and Mr. Koop — 20,468 LTIP units. |
| (b) | Excludes 1,921 deferred stock units, the receiptsettlement of which has been deferred to a date later than 60 days after February 5, 20214, 2022 and will be paid out in a lump sum on a specified date or in ten annual installments following the date of the director’s retirement pursuant to deferral elections as follows: Ms. Ayotte — 2,993, Mr. Duncan — 3,625, Ms. Kipp — 29, Mr. Twardock — 29,458 and all directors and executive officers as a specific deferral electiongroup — 36,105 (see ““Compensation of Directors –— Deferred Compensation Program” Program” on page 49)55). |
(5) | RepresentsIncludes 21,000 shares of common stock held indirectly through a trust. Also includes, only under the “Number of Shares and Units Beneficially Owned” column, 5,959 LTIP units (of which 1,709 LTIP units are subject to vesting). Excludes 2,514 deferred stock units, the receipttrust of which has been deferred to a date later than 60 days after February 5, 2021 pursuant to a specific deferral election (see “Compensation of Directors – Deferred Compensation Program” on page 49).Mr. Duncan is the beneficiary and trustee.
|
(6) | Includes 6,934 shares of common stock held directly (of which 1,709 shares are subject to vesting) and 486 deferred stock units. Also includes, only under the “Number of Shares and Units Beneficially Owned” column, 525 LTIP units.
|
(7) | Includes 8,000 shares of common stock held indirectly through a trust of which Ms. Einiger is the beneficiary and 21,185 deferred stock units. Also includes, only under the “Number of Shares and Units Beneficially Owned” column, 8,969 LTIP units (of which 1,709 LTIP units are subject to vesting).trustee. |
(8) | Represents 4,149 shares of common stock (of which 1,709 shares are subject to vesting).
|
(9) | Represents 9,081 deferred stock units. Also includes, only under the “Number of Shares and Units Beneficially Owned” column, 8,059 LTIP units (of which 1,709 LTIP units are subject to vesting).
|
(10)(7) | Includes 180,763 shares of common stock held directly,(x) 700 shares of common stock held by Mr. Linde’s spouse for which Mr. Linde has shared voting and dispositive power and (y) 2,100 shares of common stock held by Mr. Linde’s children, and 75,568 shares of common stock underlying exercisable stock options. Also includes, only under the “Number of Shares and Units Beneficially Owned” column, 295,770 LTIP units (of which 79,487 LTIP units are subject to vesting). Excludes Unearned Performance Awards. Mr. Linde has shared voting and dispositive power with respect to 700 shares of common stock.children. |
(11) | Represents 8,799 deferred stock units. Also includes, only under the “Number of Shares and Units Beneficially Owned” column, 10,917 LTIP units (of which 1,709 LTIP units are subject to vesting).
|
(12) | Includes 9,342 shares of common stock held directly and 54,282 shares of common stock underlying exercisable stock options. Also includes, only under the “Number of Shares and Units Beneficiary Owned” column, 338,640 LTIP units (of which 117,350 LTIP units are subject to vesting). Excludes Unearned Performance Awards.
|
(13) | Includes 7,610 shares of common stock held directly (of which 1,709 shares are subject to vesting) and 450 deferred stock units. Excludes 27,486 deferred stock units, the receipt of which has been deferred to a date later than 60 days after February 5, 2021 pursuant to a specific deferral election (see “Compensation of Directors – Deferred Compensation Program” on page 49).
|
(14) | Includes 1,610 deferred stock units. Also includes, only under the “Number of Shares and Units Beneficially Owned” column, 2,849 LTIP units (of which 1,709 LTIP units are subject to vesting).
|
(15)(8) | Includes, only under the “Number of Shares and Units Beneficially Owned” column, 88,805 common units held directly,(x) 31,265 common units held by a trust of which Mr. Ritchey is a beneficiary and Mr. Ritchey’s spouse is the sole trustee and (y) 10,500 common units held by a grantor retained annuity trust of which Mr. Ritchey is the beneficiary and trustee and 240,445 LTIP units (of which 13,814 LTIP units are subject to vesting). Excludes Unearned Performance Awards.trustee. |
(16) | Represents 11,333 shares of common stock held directly (of which 1,858 shares are subject to vesting). Also includes, only under the “Number of Shares and Units Beneficially Owned” column, 123,862 LTIP units (of which 27,576 LTIP units are subject to vesting). Excludes Unearned Performance Awards.
|
(17) | Includes 2,585 shares of common stock held directly and 15,334 shares of common stock underlying exercisable stock options. Also includes, only under the “Number of Shares and Units Beneficially Owned” column, 69,226 LTIP units (of which 19,364 LTIP units are subject to vesting). Excludes Unearned Performance Awards.
|
(18) | Includes an aggregate of 312,700 shares of common stock, 145,184 shares of common stock underlying exercisable stock options and 41,824 deferred stock units. Also includes, only under the “Number of Shares and Units Beneficially Owned” column, 149,344 common units and 1,263,695 LTIP units. See also Notes (4) – (17) above. Excludes an aggregate of 31,920 deferred stock units, the receipt of which has been deferred by directors to dates later than 60 days after February 5, 2021 pursuant to specific deferral elections (see “Compensation of Directors – Deferred Compensation Program” on page 49). Excludes Unearned Performance Awards.
|
(19)(9) | Information regarding The Vanguard Group (“Vanguard”) is based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed by Vanguard with the SEC on February 10, 2021.9, 2022. Vanguard’s address is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355. The Schedule 13G/A indicates that Vanguard does not have sole voting power with respect to any shares of common stock and has shared voting power with respect to 579,360384,471 shares of common stock, sole dispositive power with respect to 21,371,77722,234,178 shares of common stock and shared dispositive power with respect to 978,774744,794 shares of common stock. |
(20) | | | | | | | | | | | | 2022 Proxy Statement 52 | | |
| | | 5› | | PRINCIPAL AND MANAGEMENT STOCKHOLDERS |
(10) | Information regarding BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”) is based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed by BlackRock with the SEC on January 27, 2021.2022. BlackRock’s address is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055. The Schedule 13G/A indicates that BlackRock has sole voting power with respect to 14,520,63114,959,458 shares of common stock and sole dispositive power with respect to all of the shares of common stock. |
(21)(11) | Information regarding Norges Bank (The Central Bank of Norway) (“Norges Bank”) is based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed by Norges Bank with the SEC on February 1, 2021. Norges Bank’s address is Bankplassen 2, PO Box 1179 Sentrum, NO 0107 Oslo, Norway. The Schedule 13G/A indicates that Norges Bank has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to all of the shares of common stock. |
| | | | | | | | | 46
| | | | | 2021 Proxy Statement
|
| | | 5› | | PRINCIPAL AND MANAGEMENT STOCKHOLDERS |
(22) | Information regarding State Street Corporation (“State Street”) is based solely on a Schedule 13G filed by State Street with the SEC on February 5, 2021. State Street’s address is State Street Financial Center, One Lincoln Street, Boston, MA 02111. The Schedule 13G indicates that State Street has shared voting with respect to 7,517,844 shares of common stock and shared dispositive power with respect to 8,736,685 shares of common stock.
|
(23)(12) | Information regarding TCI Fund Management Limited and Christopher Hohn is based solely on a Schedule 13G13G/A filed jointly by TCI Fund Management Limited and Christopher Hohn with the SEC on February 16, 2021.14, 2022. The address for each of TCI Fund Management Limited and Christopher Hohn is 7 Clifford Street, London, W1S 2FT, United Kingdom. The Schedule 13G13G/A indicates that each of TCI Fund Management Limited and Christopher Hohn havehas shared voting and dispositive power with respect to all of the shares of common stock. |
DELINQUENT SECTION 16(A) REPORTS
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), requires the executive officers and directors of Boston Properties, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of Boston Properties’ equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC and the NYSE. Officers, directors and greater than ten percent beneficial owners are required by SEC regulations to furnish Boston Properties with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. To our knowledge, based solely on our review of the copies of such reports furnished to us and written representations from our officers and directors that no other reports were required during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to our executive officers, directors and greater than ten percent beneficial owners were timely satisfied, except Ms. Hoskins, who failed to timely file two Form 4 reports, each reflecting a purchase of common stock, which purchases were subsequently reflected on a Form 5.
(13) | Information regarding State Street Corporation (“State Street”) is based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed by State Street with the SEC on February 10, 2022. State Street’s address is State Street Financial Center, One Lincoln Street, Boston, MA 02111. The Schedule 13G/A indicates that State Street does not have sole voting or dispositive power with respect to any shares of common stock and has shared voting with respect to 8,362,648 shares of common stock and shared dispositive power with respect to 10,388,227 shares of common stock. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement | | 47 53 |
| | | 6› | | COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS |
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS At our 2019 annual meeting of stockholders, our stockholders approved the Boston Properties, Inc. Non-EmployeeDirector Compensation Plan, (the “Director Compensation Plan”), effective January 1, 2019. The Director Compensation Plan sets forth the cash and equity compensation that is to be paid to our non-employee directors in a specific, formulaic manner. The compensation levels established under the Director Compensation Plan have not changed since 2019. Directors who are also employees of Boston PropertiesBXP or any of its subsidiaries receive no additional compensation for their services as directors. Historically, our Board of Directors has not chosen to review the compensation payable to our non-employee directors on an annual basis; instead, it reviews the compensation every two or three years and when circumstances otherwise dictate. As a result, the current program has remained the same for calendar years 2019, 2020 and 2021. In 2022, our Board approved updates to the compensation payable pursuant to the Director Compensation Plan. These changes implement recommendations that our Compensation Committee made to the full Board based on a comprehensive review of the structure and amount of our existing compensation for non-employee directors. For this review, our Compensation Committee engaged FW Cook. Our Board of Directors believes that the structure and amounts of the new compensation program are fair and in the best interests of all stockholders of the Company. Nevertheless, because of the interests that our non-employee directors have in the establishment of the compensation they receive, our Board determined to seek stockholder approval for the new Director Compensation Plan. Therefore, please see “Proposal 3: Approval of the Boston Properties, Inc. Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan” beginning on page 112 of this proxy statement for more detail on the terms and conditions of the Director Compensation Plan. If our stockholders approve the new plan, it will be effective retroactively to January 1, 2022. COMPONENTS OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION Non-employee directors do not receive meeting attendance fees for any meeting of our Board of Directors or a committee thereof that he or she attends. › CASH COMPENSATIONRETAINERS During 2020,2021, we paid our non-employee directors the following cash compensation pursuant toretainers for Board and committee service under the Director Compensation Plan: | | | | | Role | | Annual Cash
Retainer(1) | | All Non-Employee Directors for Board Services
| | | $85,000 | | Chairman of the Board(2)
| | | $100,000 | | Chair of the Audit Committee(2)
| | | $20,000 | | Members of the Audit Committee
| | | $15,000 | | Chairs of other standing committees(2)(3)
| | | $15,000 | | Members of other standing committees(3)
| | | $10,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Role | | Annual Cash Retainer(1) | | | Committee Chair Retainer(1)(2) | | | Committee Member Retainer(1) | | | | | | All Non-Employee Directors for Board Services | | | $85,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Chairman of the Board(2) | | | $100,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Audit Committee | | | | | | | $20,000 | | | | $15,000 | | | | | | Other Standing Committees(3) | | | | | | | $15,000 | | | | $10,000 | |
(1) | The sum of all cash retainers are payable in quarterly installments in arrears, subject to proration for periods of service less than a full quarter in length. |
(2) | The retainer payable to the Chairman is in addition to all other retainers to which the Chairman may be entitled and the retainer to each committee chair is in addition to the retainer payable to all members of the committee. |
(3) | The term “other standing committees”“Other Standing Committees” includes the Compensation and NCG Committees. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | 2022 Proxy Statement 54 | | |
| | | 6› | | COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS |
Non-employee directors also are reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred to attend Board of Directors and committee meetings. › EQUITY COMPENSATION The Director Compensation Plan providesprovided for grants of equity to non-employee directors in 2021 as follows: Annual Grant.. Each continuing non-employee director is entitled to receive,received, on the fifth business day after the annual meeting of stockholders, an annual equity award with an aggregate value of $150,000. Initial Grant.. Any new non-employee director that iswas appointed to our Board of Directors other than at an annual meeting of stockholders would be entitled to receive,received, on the fifth business day after the appointment, an initial equity award with an aggregate value of $150,000 (prorated based on the number of months from the date the director is first appointed to our Board of Directorsappointment to the first anniversary of the Company’s most recently held annual meeting of stockholders). Annual and initial equity awards arewere made in the form of shares of restricted common stock or, if offeredelected by the Board of Directors and elected by such director, LTIP units (or a combination of both). | | | | | | | | | 48
| | | | | 2021 Proxy Statement
|
| | | 6› | | COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS |
The actual number of shares of restricted common stock or LTIP units that we grant isgranted was determined by dividing the fixed value of the grant by the closing market price of our common stock on the NYSE on the grant date. Annual and initial grants of LTIP units and restricted common stock will vest 100% on the earlier of (1) the first anniversary of the grant date and (2) the date of the next annual meeting of stockholders. Accordingly, on May 28, 2020,27, 2021, the last reported sale price of a share of our common stock on the NYSE was $87.76,$116.65, and we granted each of Mses. Ayotte, Einiger, Dykstra and Hoskins and Messrs. Duncan, Klein, Lustig, Twardock and Walton 1,7091,285 LTIP units or shares of restricted common stock. Additionally, on December 28, 2021, the last reported sale price of a share of our common stock on the NYSE was $115.31 and we granted Ms. Kipp 542 shares of restricted common stock. DEFERRED COMPENSATION PROGRAM In accordance with our Amended and Restated Rules and Conditions for Directors’ Deferred Compensation Program (the “Directors’ Deferred Compensation Program”), non-employee directors may elect to defer all cash retainers otherwise payable to them and to receive the deferred cash compensation in the form of our common stock or in cash following their retirement from our Board of Directors. Each electing director is credited with the number of deferred stock units determined by dividing the amount of the cash compensation deferred during each calendar quarter by the closing market price of our common stock on the NYSE on the last trading day of the quarter. Hypothetical dividends on the deferred stock units are “reinvested” in additional deferred stock units based on the closing market price of the common stock on the cash dividend payment date. Directors may elect to receive payment of amounts in their accounts either in (x) a lump sum of shares of our common stock equal to the number of deferred stock units in a director’s account or (y) ten annual installments following the director’s retirement from our Board of Directors. In addition, non-employee directors who elect a deferred payout following their retirement from the Board may elect to change their notional investment from ourBXP common stock to a deemed investment in one or more measurement funds. This election to convert may only be made after the director’s service on the Board ends, the conversion date must be at least 180 days after the latest issuance date of deferred stock units credited to the director’s account, the election is irrevocable and the director must convert 100% of his or her deferred stock account if any is converted. Payment of a director’s account that has been converted to measurement funds will be in cash instead of shares of our common stock. The measurement funds available to directors are the same as those available to our executives under our Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan. See “Compensation of Executive Officers – Nonqualified Deferred Compensation in 2020”2021” on page 81.98. | | | | | | | | | | 2022 Proxy Statement 55 |
| | | 6› | | COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS |
DIRECTOR STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES | | | | | 5xOur Board believes it is important to align the interests of the directors with those of the stockholders and for directors to hold equity ownership positions in BXP. Accordingly, each non-employee director is expected to retain an aggregate number of shares of our common stock, deferred stock units (and related dividend equivalent rights) in the Company, and LTIP units and common units in the Operating Partnership, whether vested or not, equal to at least five (5) times the value of the then current annual cash retainer paid to non-employee directors for their service on the Board, without respect to service on committees of the Board or as lead independent director or Chairman, as applicable. Until such director complies with the ownership guidelines set forth above, each non-employee director is expected to retain all equity awards granted by the Company or the Operating Partnership (less amounts sufficient to fund any taxes owed relating to such equity awards). The deferred stock units (and related dividend equivalent rights) in the Company and LTIP units and common units in the Operating Partnership shall be valued by reference to the market price of the number of shares of our common stock issuable upon the settlement or exchange | | Director Stock Ownership Requirement Annual Cash Retainer for Board Service 5x
annual cash retainer As of December 31, 2021, on average, our non-employee directors held common stock, deferred stock units and LTIP units with a market value of 26x the annual cash retainer | | |
Our Board believes it is important to align the interests of the directors with those of the stockholders and for directors to hold equity ownership positions in Boston Properties. Accordingly, each non-employee director is expected to retain an aggregate number of shares of our common stock, deferred stock units (and related dividend equivalent rights) in the Company, and LTIP units and common units in the Operating Partnership, whether vested or not, equal to at least five (5) times the value of the then current annual cash retainer paid to non-employee directors for their service on the Board, without respect to service on committees of the Board or as lead independent director or Chairman. Each non-employee director, until such director complies with the ownership guidelines set forth above, is expected to retain all equity awards granted by the Company or the Operating Partnership (less amounts sufficient to fund any taxes owed relating to such equity awards). The deferred stock units (and related dividend equivalent rights) in the Company and LTIP units and common units in the Operating Partnership shall be valued by reference to the market price of the number of shares of our common stock issuable upon the settlement or exchange of such units assuming that all conditions necessary for such settlement or exchange have been met. For shares of our common stock or equity valued by reference to our common stock for purposes of these ownership guidelines, the market price of our common stock used to value such equity shall be the greater of (1) the market price on the date of purchase or grant of such equity or (2) the market price as of the date compliance with these ownership guidelines is measured.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE The following table summarizes the compensation earned by our non-employee directors during the year ended December 31, 2021. | | | | | | | | | | | | | Name | | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash(1) | | | Stock Awards(2) | | | Total | | | | | | Kelly A. Ayotte | | $ | 120,000 | | | $ | 135,000 | | | $ | 255,000 | | | | | | Bruce W. Duncan | | $ | 110,000 | | | $ | 135,000 | | | $ | 245,000 | | | | | | Karen E. Dykstra(3) | | $ | 97,011 | | | $ | 150,000 | | | $ | 247,011 | | | | | | Carol B. Einiger | | $ | 102,899 | | | $ | 135,000 | | | $ | 237,899 | | | | | | Diane J. Hoskins | | $ | 95,000 | | | $ | 150,000 | | | $ | 245,000 | | | | | | Mary E. Kipp(3) | | $ | 3,261 | | | $ | 62,500 | | | $ | 65,761 | | | | | | Joel I. Klein | | $ | 185,000 | | | $ | 135,000 | | | $ | 320,000 | | | | | | Matthew J. Lustig | | $ | 110,000 | | | $ | 135,000 | | | $ | 245,000 | | | | | | David A. Twardock | | $ | 130,000 | | | $ | 150,000 | | | $ | 280,000 | | | | | | William H. Walton, III | | $ | 95,000 | | | $ | 135,000 | | | $ | 230,000 | |
(1) | Mses. Ayotte, Einiger and Kipp and Messrs. Duncan, Klein, Lustig, Twardock and Walton deferred the cash fees they earned during 2021 and received deferred stock units in lieu thereof. The following table summarizes the deferred stock units credited to the director accounts during 2021. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement 56 | | 49
|
| | | 6› | | COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS |
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table summarizes the compensation earned by our non-employee directors during the year ended December 31, 2020.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Name | | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash(1) | | | Stock Awards(2) | | | Total | | Kelly A. Ayotte | | $ | 112,174 | | | $ | 135,000 | | | $ | 247,174 | | Bruce W. Duncan | | $ | 121,535 | | | $ | 135,000 | | | $ | 256,535 | | Karen E. Dykstra | | $ | 102,500 | | | $ | 150,000 | | | $ | 252,500 | | Carol B. Einiger | | $ | 95,000 | | | $ | 135,000 | | | $ | 230,000 | | Diane J. Hoskins | | $ | 95,000 | | | $ | 150,000 | | | $ | 245,000 | | Joel I. Klein | | $ | 185,000 | | | $ | 135,000 | | | $ | 320,000 | | Matthew J. Lustig | | $ | 112,500 | | | $ | 135,000 | | | $ | 247,500 | | David A. Twardock | | $ | 130,000 | | | $ | 150,000 | | | $ | 280,000 | | William H. Walton, III | | $ | 97,649 | | | $ | 135,000 | | | $ | 232,649 | |
(1) | Mses. Ayotte and Einiger and Messrs. Duncan, Klein, Lustig, Twardock and Walton deferred the cash fees they earned during 2020 and received in lieu thereof deferred stock units. The following table summarizes the deferred stock units credited to the director accounts during 2020.
|
| | | | | Name | | Deferred Stock
Units Earned
During 2020(#)2021(#) | | | | Kelly A. Ayotte | | | 1,257.221,092.61 | | | | Bruce W. Duncan | | | 1,357.171,001.33 | | | | Carol B. Einiger | | | 1,062.57934.83 | | | | Mary E. Kipp | | | 28.26 | | | | Joel I. Klein | | | 2,073.691,685.97 | | | | Matthew J. Lustig | | | 1,258.191,001.33 | | | | David A. Twardock | | | 1,460.321,186.59 | | | | William H. Walton, III | | | 1,091.81864.40 | |
(2) | Represents the total fair value of common stock and LTIP unit awards granted to non-employee directors in 2020,2021, determined in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Accounting Standards Codification 718 “Compensation—Stock Compensation” (“ASC Topic 718”), disregarding for this purpose the estimate of forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. A discussion of the assumptions used in calculating these values can be found in Note 16 to our 20202021 audited financial statements beginning on page 178173 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20202021 included in the annual report that accompanied this proxy statement. Our non-employee directors had the following unvested equity awards outstanding as of December 31, 2020:2021: |
| | | | | | | | | Name | | LTIP Units(#) | | | Common Stock (#) | | | | | Kelly A. Ayotte | | | 1,285 | | | | — | | | | | Bruce W. Duncan | | | 1,285 | | | | — | | | | | Karen E. Dykstra | | | — | | | | — | | | | | Carol B. Einiger | | | 1,285 | | | | — | | | | | Diane J. Hoskins | | | — | | | | 1,285 | | | | | Mary E. Kipp | | | — | | | | 542 | | | | | Joel I. Klein | | | 1,285 | | | | — | | | | | Matthew J. Lustig | | | 1,285 | | | | — | | | | | David A. Twardock | | | — | | | | 1,285 | | | | | William H. Walton, III | | | 1,285 | | | | — | |
(3) | On December 16, 2021, Ms. Ayotte—1,709 LTIP units; Mr. Duncan—1,709 LTIP units;Dykstra resigned from the Board of Directors, effective December 20, 2021. On December 20, 2021, the Board appointed Ms. Dykstra—1,709 sharesKipp as a director of restricted common stock;the Company to fill the vacancy created by the resignation of Ms. Einiger—1,709 LTIP units;Dykstra. Accordingly, each of Ms. Hoskins—1,709 sharesDykstra’s and Ms. Kipp’s 2021 compensation was prorated for her respective partial year of restricted common stock; Mr. Klein—1,709 LTIP units; Mr. Lustig—1,709 LTIP units; Mr. Twardock—1,709 shares of restricted common stock;Board and Mr. Walton—1,709 LTIP units.committee service. |
| | | | | | | | | 50
| | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement 57 |
| | | 7› | | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | | | I. EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS This “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” or “CD&A,” sets forth our philosophy and objectives regarding the compensation of our named executive officers (“NEOs”), including how we determine the elements and amounts of executive compensation. When we use the term “Committee” in this CD&A, we mean the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Boston Properties, Inc.Directors. Our NEOs for 20202021 were: | | | | | NameNAME | | TitleTITLE
| | | Owen D. Thomas | | Chief Executive Officer | | | Douglas T. Linde | | President
President | | | Raymond A. Ritchey | | Senior Executive Vice President | | | Michael E. LaBelle | | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer | | | Bryan J. Koop | | Executive Vice President, Boston Region |
I. EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW Our executive compensation program covering our NEOs is designed to attracthave demonstrated exceptional leadership since the beginning of the pandemic as they navigated the evolving economic and retain critical executive talent, motivate behaviors that align with stockholders’ interests and pay for performance. To ensure that pay is competitive with market ranges, we review a benchmarking analysis each year when establishing base salary, annual incentive target opportunities and long-term incentive (“LTI”) target opportunities. More than 90% of our NEOs’ pay is variable and contingent on performance with approximately two-thirds paid in the form of LTI equity compensation. Although target incentive opportunities are setbusiness challenges caused by reference to market, the terms of our incentive plans provide for actual payouts to be above or below target levels depending upon actual performance against pre-determined goals. When we established the target compensation levels for each component of our NEOs’ compensation in early 2020, our Committee did not foresee the widespread, negative impact that the COVID-19 pandemic, would have onincluding global supply-chain disruptions and inflationary pressures. Despite these challenges and the resulting economic volatility that dominated the year, our businessexecutive team, led by our NEOs, continued to successfully execute BXP’s strategies in 2021. Our NEOs deftly guided BXP through the recovery and our stockholders. The unprecedented issues Boston Properties faced dueled the safe return to the global health crisis created a remarkably challenging yearoffice for our NEOs. In additionemployees and tenants. They also produced strong leasing results and growth in diluted Funds from Operations (“FFO”), and strengthened our commitments to the global pandemic, in 2020, major social-justice movementsour ESG priorities, entered new markets and demonstrations highlighted the racial injustices and economic inequities plaguing our society and called for companies to act. There was also a heightened focusexecuted on the importance of environmental and sustainability issues.
Despite the sudden and significant impactsdevelopment pipeline. The Committee remains proud of the pandemic on our business, the Committee did not modify the components or the target compensation levels of our executive compensation program. The Committee also did not modify the 2020 Annual Incentive Plan, including any of its three categories (FFO, leasing, and business and individual goals) or the specific targets within each category established in early 2020. In deciding not to change the program, the Committee prioritized strong alignment with Boston Properties’ investors and their experiences during the pandemic. As the year progressed and the severity of the pandemic became clearer, the Committee supplemented the business and individual goals with additional goals that guided the NEOs in responding thoughtfully and responsibly to the global health crisis and important social and environmental issues.
Our NEOs showed exceptionalextraordinary leadership in addressing all of the significant challenges and issues presented to them in 2020, but with business conditions dominateddemonstrated by the pandemic, they were unable to achieve their FFO and leasing targets under the 2020 Annual Incentive Plan. Our NEOs did not earn any payout under the FFO per share category and only one NEO earned a portion of the target payout for the leasing category; for the third category of the 2020 Annual Incentive Plan, the business and individual goals, each NEO exceeded his goals. As a result, the Committee awarded final bonus payments to our NEOs that ranged from 50% to 75% of target. While these same challenging business conditions had a severe, negative impact on office REITs generally, leading to negative absolute total stockholder returns (“TSR”) across the sector in 2020, the Committee noted that Boston Properties’ TSR for the one-year and three-year periods ending December 31, 2020 placed it at the 80th percentile, or third, among its most directly comparable office peers for both periods. (For a list of these peers, see “– II. Executive Compensation Program – LTI Equity Compensation – 2021 MYLTIP” below.) Although the Committee did not base its decisions on BXP’s relative TSR rankings, the Committee believes they validated the appropriateness of the final bonus payments to our NEOs.
› 2021 PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS The following highlights our strong performance in 2021:(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | Diluted FFO per Share(2)(3) Growth of 4.3% | | | | | | Leased 5.1 Million Square Feet | | | | | | 26.2% Total Stockholder Return | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Delivered 1.7 Million Square Feet of Developments that are 98% leased | | | | | | Same-Property NOI(3) Growth of 5.9% | | | | | | Same-Property NOI – Cash(3) Growth of 5.1% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Newsweek’sAmerica’s Most Responsible Company List (#1 in real estate industry; #31 overall out of 500 companies) | | | | | | Actively Developing 0.9 Million Square Feet of Life Sciences Developments | | | | | | Issued $1.7 Billion in Green Bonds |
(1) | Data as of December 31, 2021. |
(2) | Represents year-over-year growth in diluted FFO per share. |
(3) | For disclosures required by Regulation G, refer to Appendix A to this proxy statement. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement 58 | | 51
|
| | | 7› | | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | | | I. EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW |
The Committee remains proud of the extraordinary leadership demonstrated by› EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM
Compensation Philosophy Our executive compensation program covering our NEOs and their efforts in protecting our tenants’ and employees’ health and safety and preserving our properties, financial condition, culture of excellence and ultimately the Boston Properties’ brand in 2020.is designed to: ›2020 COMPENSATION DECISIONS
As described in detail later in this CD&A, below are the key actions that our Compensation Committee took with respect to our NEOs’ 2020 compensation and the impact of those decisions on 2020 compensation.
| 2020 COMPENSATION DECISION HIGHLIGHTS
| Ø No change in base salary for any of the NEOs
Ø No change to Annual Incentive Plan categories, weightings or goal targets set in January 2020 resulting in bonus payments ranging from 50% to 75% of target
› Supplemented Business and Individual goals to add pandemic-related goals
Ø No change to any outstanding equity plans or awards, including MYLTIP awards granted in 2020
Ø LTI equity compensation as a percentage of total compensation increased to 81% for our CEO and 74% for all of the NEOs as a group (from 72% and 64%, respectively, in 2019)
Ø Granted LTI equity compensation for 2020 performance below target for CEO
Ø Below - target payout of 29% for CEO under 2018 MYLTIP (covering Feb. 2018 – Feb. 2020); CEO realized 36% of aggregate amount reported and expensed for that award
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | % Variable Pay(1) | | % Paid in Equity(1) | | Cash Bonus as % of Target | | 2018 MYLTIP Payout as % of Target(2) | | 93% | | 74% | | 50% | | 29% |
| | | | | | | | | | | % Variable Pay(1) | | % Paid in Equity(1) | | Cash Bonus as % of Target | | 2018 MYLTIP Payout as % of Target(2) | | 91% | | 66% | | 57% | | 29% |
| (1)Ø | Percentages based on 2020 target total direct compensation.attract and retain talented and experienced executives in the commercial real estate markets in which we operate,
|
| (2)Ø | On February 5, 2021,set total compensation opportunities to be competitive with companies in our benchmarking peer group (see “III. Determining Executive Compensation – Compensation Advisor’s Role & Benchmarking Peer Group – Benchmarking Peer Group”), considering the three-year performance periodskill sets required to implement our strategy and the market for such talent,
|
| Ø | align our NEOs’ compensation with the Company’s strategy, business objectives and the creation of long-term value for our stockholders without encouraging unnecessary or excessive risk-taking, |
| Ø | provide NEOs incentives to achieve key corporate and regional goals by linking formulaically annual cash incentive awards to the achievement of those goals, as well as goals set for each individual, and |
| Ø | provide a majority of target total direct compensation opportunity for the Company’s 2018 MYLTIPNEOs in the form of long-term incentive (“LTI”) equity awards, endeda majority of which are performance-based (55% for our CEO) and the final payout was 29%value of target, representing only 36% ofwhich is dependent on BXP’s total stockholder return (“TSR”) over a three-year period, both on a relative basis compared to the reported pay for each of the CEOCompany’s most directly comparable peers and the NEOs as a group.on an absolute basis. |
›2020 SAY-ON-PAY VOTE & STOCKHOLDER OUTREACH
Say-on-Pay Vote
At our 2020 annual meeting of stockholders, approximately 89%Given the competitive nature of the votes cast supported our “Say-on-Pay” advisory vote. These results reflect continued investor supportmarket for labor talent and the fact that many of BXP’s competitors are private enterprises, the Committee reviews and evaluates the competitiveness of our executive compensation program including the changes our Committee made in 2019annually to our executive compensation program based on investor feedback. The 2020 compensation yearensure it is the first year in which the changes made in 2019 were effective, and although COVID-19 unpredictably and unprecedentedly impacted our business and financial results, the Committee determined notdesigned to modify any of the key changes from 2019 to our executive compensation. In doing so, our Committee opted to remain within the original framework of the 2020 Annual Incentive Plan when determining 2020 compensation. We believe this demonstratesachieve the Committee’s commitment to the changes it made in response to investor feedback.objectives.
| | | | | | | | | 52
| | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement 59 |
| | | 7› | | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | | | I. EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW |
Investor Outreach & Feedback
We are firmly committed to learning investors’ perspectives and believe that proactive engagement is an effective means to solicit and receive valuable feedback. This feedback has helped shape our policies and practices. We conduct outreach throughout the year to ensure that management and the Board understand the issues of importance to our investors and address them appropriately. The Board regularly reviews shareholder feedback, which informs Board discussions on a wide range of topics, including our approaches to corporate governance, ESG, human capital management, diversity, equity and inclusion and executive compensation.
In 2020, we engaged directly with our investors in various forums and through different media (including in-person meetings prior to the pandemic and virtual meetings during the pandemic) as part of our outreach program. In addition to discussions in the ordinary course of business, we:
hosted three investor outreach series to meet with existing investors, potential investors in Europe and one dedicated to ESG matters;
| • | | held more than 400 one-on-one meetings with investors at various REIT conferences, including Nareit REITWeek and REITWorld conferences, Citi 2020 Global, Evercore ISI and Bank of America Merrill Lynch 2020 Global Real Estate conferences and the NYSE Real Estate Investor Day;
|
held one-on-one meetings at four non-REIT conferences: the Morgan Stanley Sustainable Futures conference, the Stifel Cross-Sector conference, BofA Financial Futures conference and the Goldman Sachs Financials conference; and
held meetings at other ESG-focused engagements, including numerous one-on-one meetings with ESG-dedicated funds and an investor webinar focused on our efforts related to ESG matters.
In total, we engaged directly with representatives of more than 200 firms, including approximately 50 U.S. and international institutional investors who own, in the aggregate, approximately 45% of the total number of outstanding shares of BXP common stock and approximately 80% of the total number of outstanding shares of BXP common stock held by actively managed funds.
The topics discussed at these meetings varied, but generally focused on the impacts of the pandemic and our responses thereto. Among other things, we heard questions about the long-term impact of the hybrid or partial “work-from-home” trend on demand for office space, the impact of new sublease space on overall supply and rental rates and the financial strength of various industries and sectors (including co-working, retail stores, restaurants, theaters and fitness clubs). We also discussed with them the details of our Health Security Plan for repopulating our buildings. The questions expressed in dialogue with our investors were echoed by REIT analysts and even the media, and they helped guide us in establishing the pandemic-related goals.
In 2020, our Investor Relations team was ranked by Institutional Investor Magazine as #1 among Office REITs and #3 among all REITs in three categories: Best IR program, Best IR Team and Best IR Professional. We believe our Investor Relations team excelled in leading and coordinating these atypical outreach efforts, and the recognition it received is well deserved.
| | | | | | | | | | | | 2021 Proxy Statement
| | 53
|
| | | 7› | | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | | | I. EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW |
› COMPENSATION GOVERNANCE The objectives of our executive compensation program are to attract, retain and motivate executives who have the experience and skills to lead the Company and continue our long-term track record of profitability, growth and TSR. The following table highlights key features of our executive compensation program that demonstrate the Company’s ongoing commitment to promoting stockholder interests through sound compensation governance practices.
| | | | | | | WHAT WE DO | | WHAT WE DON’T DO | | | | |
| | Variable pay is 93% of our CEO’s total target compensation. The vast majority of total compensation is variable (i.e., not guaranteed); salaries comprise a small portion of each NEO’s total compensation opportunity. | |
| | No tax gross-ups.We do not provide any new executive with tax gross-ups with respect to payments made in connection with a change of control. | | | | |
| | Bonus pay linked to pre-established goals. Annual cash bonuses for our NEOs are linked to performance against goals in three categories, and each NEO has target and maximum bonus opportunities. | |
| | No hedging, pledging or short-sales. We do not allow hedging, pledging or short-sales of Company securities. | | | | |
| | Two-thirds of target compensation paid in equity. We align our NEOs with our long-term investors by awarding in 2/3rds of our NEOs’ total target compensation in the form of equity, more than 1/2 of which is in the form of multi-year, performance-based equity awards. | |
| | Risk mitigation factors in compensation policies and procedures. We do not encourage unnecessary or excessive risk taking as a result of our compensation policies; incentive compensation is not based on a single performance metric and we do not have guaranteed minimum payouts. | | | | |
| | Capped bonus and LTI awards. We have caps on annual and long-term incentives. | |
| | No stock option repricing. We do not allow for repricing of stock options. | | | | |
| | Clawback policy. We have a clawback policy that allows for the recovery of previously paid incentive compensation in the event of a financial restatement. | |
| | No full dividends on unearned performance-based LTI awards. Recipients of performance-based LTI equity awards receive only 10% of full dividend unless and until earned. | | | | |
| | Stock ownership guidelines for all executives. We have robust stock ownership guidelines for our executives (for our CEO, 6.0x base salary). | | | | | | | | |
| | Independent compensation consultant. We engage an independent compensation consultant to advise the Committee. | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | 54
| | | | | 2021 Proxy Statement
|
| | | 7› | | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | | | II. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM |
II. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM
›COMPONENTS OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
| | | COMPONENT | | WHY WE PAY IT | | | Base Salary | | Provide a fixed, competitive level of cash compensation that reflects the NEO’s leadership role and the relative market rate for the executive’s experience and responsibilities | | | Annual Cash Incentive | | Reward NEOs for achievement of annual financial, operational and strategic goals that drive stockholder value, thereby aligning our NEOs’ interests with those of our stockholders • Annual cash bonuses for each NEO are linked to performance against goals in three, weighted categories and, each NEO has target and maximum bonus opportunities | | | Performance-Based Equity (MYLTIP) | | Align the interests of our NEOs with those of our stockholders Motivate, retain and reward NEOs to achieve multi-year strategic business objectives that drive both relative and absolute TSR out-performanceoutperformance • Create a direct link between executive pay and relative and absolute TSR performance • Enhance executive officer retention with 100% vesting after completion of three-year performance period (i.e., “cliff vesting”), with one additional year of post-vesting transfer restrictions | | | Time-Based Equity | | Align the interests of our NEOs with those of our stockholders Motivate, retain and reward NEOs to achieve multi-year strategic business objectives that drive absolute TSR out-performanceoutperformance • Create a direct link between executive pay and absolute TSR performance • Enhance executive officer retention with time-based, multi-year vesting schedules for equity incentive awards |
›2020 ANNUAL TARGET COMPENSATION
In the first quarter of each year, the Committee establishes annual target total compensation for each NEO by considering competitive benchmarking data, executive position and level of responsibility and, for executives other than our CEO, our CEO’s recommendation. Targets are reviewed annually and adjusted if determined to be appropriate by the Committee. The Committee may also adjust target compensation to reflect changes in or new responsibilities.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement 60 | | 55
|
| | | 7› | | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
› COMPENSATION GOVERNANCE PRACTICES The following table highlights key features of our executive compensation program that demonstrate the Company’s ongoing commitment to promoting stockholder interests through sound compensation governance practices. | | | | | | | WHAT WE DO | | WHAT WE DON’T DO | | | | | | | 93% of CEO’s total target compensation at risk. The vast majority of total compensation is variable (i.e., not guaranteed); salaries comprise a small portion of each NEO’s total compensation opportunity. | | | | No tax gross-ups.We do not provide any new executive with tax gross-ups with respect to payments made in connection with a change of control. | | | | | | | Bonus pay linked to pre-established goals. Annual cash bonuses for our NEOs are linked to performance against goals in three categories, and each NEO has target and maximum bonus opportunities. | | | | No hedging, pledging or short-sales. We do not allow hedging, pledging or short-sales of Company securities. | | | | | | | Two-thirds of target compensation paid in equity. We align our NEOs with our long-term investors by awarding 2/3 of our NEOs’ total target compensation in the form of equity; for our CEO, 55% of the equity is in the form of performance-based MYLTIP awards (for all other NEOs, 50% is performance-based). | | | | Risk mitigation factors in compensation policies and procedures. Our compensation policies do notencourage unnecessary or excessive risk taking by our NEOs; incentive compensation is not based on a single performance metric, and we do not have guaranteed minimum payouts. | | | | | | | Capped bonus and LTI awards. We have caps on annual and long-term incentives. | | | | No stock option repricing. We do not allow for repricing of stock options. | | | | | | | Clawback policy. We have a clawback policy that allows for the recovery of previously paid incentive compensation in the event of a financial restatement. | | | | No full dividends on unearned performance-based LTI awards. Recipients of performance-based LTI equity awards receive only 10% of full dividends unless and until earned. | | | | | | | Stock ownership guidelines for all executives. We have robust stock ownership guidelines for our executives (for our CEO, 6.0x base salary). | | | | | | | | | | | Independent compensation consultant. We engage an independent compensation consultant to advise the Committee. | | | | |
› 2021 COMPENSATION DECISIONS AND HIGHLIGHTS Despite the continued pandemic-related challenges and volatility in 2021, the Committee used the same approach to managing the pandemic’s impact on our 2021 Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”) as it did for the 2020 AIP (when final bonus payouts ranged from 50% to 75% of target)—i.e., the Committee did not change any of the three categories (diluted FFO per share, leasing and business & individual goals) or the specific targets within each category after they were established. Instead, the Committee prioritized maintaining alignment between our NEOs’ compensation and our investors’ experiences during the pandemic. Our NEOs met those challenges and exceeded the 2021 targets set for the diluted FFO per share and leasing categories, and each NEO met or exceeded a substantial majority of the Business & Individual goals established for him (see “– II. Executive Compensation Program & 2021 Results – Cash Compensation – 2021 Annual Incentive Plan – 2021 NEO Scorecards & Results”). Because each of the NEOs exceeded the targets set for each of the three categories of the 2021 AIP,the cash bonuses paid to our NEOs for 2021 ranged between 129.5%—137.5% of their target bonus amounts. | | | | | | | | | | 2022 Proxy Statement 61 |
| | | 7› | | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
The Committee also noted that BXP’s TSR for the one-year, three-year and five-year periods ending December 31, 2021 placed it at the 98th, 97th and 100th percentile, respectively, among its most directly comparable office REIT peers. (For a list of these peers and the reasons they were selected, see “– II. Executive Compensation Program & 2021 Results – LTI Equity Compensation – Performance-Based Equity Awards – Multi-Year Long-Term Incentive Program (MYLTIP) – 2021 MYLTIP” below.) Although the Committee does not determine target opportunities or actual compensation awards based directly on BXP’s absolute or relative TSR, the Committee believes they validate the appropriateness of the targets set for each component and the amounts paid to our NEOs for 2021. One-, Three- & Five-Year Annualized Total Stockholder Returns | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Annualized Total Stockholder Returns (TSR) as of December 31, 2021 | Company | | 1-Year | | 3-Year | | 5-Year | Douglas Emmett, Inc. | | | | 18.8% | | | | | 2.7% | | | | | 1.3% | | Empire State Realty Trust | | | | -3.5% | | | | | -12.6% | | | | | -13.2% | | Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. | | | | 6.8% | | | | | -1.8% | | | | | -3.4% | | JBG Smith Properties | | | | -5.4% | | | | | -3.6% | | | | | n/a | | Kilroy Realty Corporation | | | | 19.3% | | | | | 4.9% | | | | | 0.8% | | Paramount Group, Inc. | | | | -4.9% | | | | | -9.6% | | | | | -9.4% | | SL Green Realty Corp. | | | | 27.2% | | | | | 2.9% | | | | | -3.1% | | Vornado Realty Trust | | | | 17.8% | | | | | -6.9% | | | | | -8.7% | | 75th Percentile | | | | 18.9% | | | | | 2.8% | | | | | -1.1% | | Median | | | | 12.3% | | | | | -2.7% | | | | | -3.4% | | 25th Percentile | | | | -3.9% | | | | | -7.6% | | | | | -9.1% | | Boston Properties, Inc. | | | | 26.2% | | | | | 4.5% | | | | | 1.5% | | Relative Percentile Rank | | | | 98%-ile | | | | | 97%-ile | | | | | 100%-ile | |
Source: S&P Capital IQ | | | | | | | | 2022 Proxy Statement 62 | | |
| | | 7› | | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
| 2021 COMPENSATION DECISIONAND HIGHLIGHTS | Ø No change in base salary for any of the NEOs Ø No modification to any outstanding equity plans or awards, including MYLTIP awards granted in 2021 Ø Maintained the design and structure of performance-based MYLTIP Ø Maintained LTI equity allocation for our CEO of 55% performance-based and 45% time-based equity Ø Awarded cash bonuses for 2021 to our NEOs ranging between 129.5%—137.5% of their target bonus amounts Ø Below-target payout of 69% of target under the 2019 MYLTIP (covering February 4, 2019—February 4, 2022); CEO realized 63% of the aggregate amount reported and expensed for that award Ø CEO has realized 64% of the reported pay under the five most recently completed MYLTIPs (2015-2019) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | % Variable Pay(1) | | % Paid in Equity(1) | | Cash Bonus as % of Target | | 2019 MYLTIP Payout as % of Target(2) | | 93% | | 75% | | 137.5% | | 69% |
| | | | | | | | | | | % Variable Pay(1) | | % Paid in Equity(1) | | Cash Bonus as % of Target | | 2019 MYLTIP Payout as % of Target(2) | | 91% | | 67% | | 129.5% - 137.5% | | 69% |
| (1) | Percentages based on 2021 target total direct compensation. |
| (2) | On February 4, 2022, the three-year performance period for the Company’s 2019 MYLTIP awards ended. |
› 2021 SAY-ON-PAY VOTE & INVESTOR OUTREACH Say-on-Pay Vote At our 2021 annual meeting of stockholders, approximately 90% of the votes cast supported our “Say-on-Pay” advisory vote. We believe this outcome reflects continued investor support for our executive compensation program, including the changes our Committee made in 2019, based on investor feedback, to implement a more objective, formulaic annual bonus plan starting in 2020. The 2021 compensation year was the second year in which the changes were effective. We believe the continued support of our stockholders is a direct result of our commitment to actively engage with our investors on all matters, including executive compensation, and our responsiveness to feedback received. Investor Outreach & Feedback We are firmly committed to learning investors’ perspectives and believe that proactive engagement is an effective means to solicit and receive valuable feedback. This feedback is important as we shape our policies and practices. We conduct outreach throughout the year to ensure that management and the Board understand the issues of importance to our investors and address them appropriately. The Board regularly reviews stockholder feedback, | | | | | | | | | | 2022 Proxy Statement 63 |
| | | 7› | | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
which informs Board discussions on a wide range of topics, including our approaches to corporate governance, risk oversight, ESG initiatives, human capital management, diversity and inclusion, and executive compensation. In 2021, we engaged directly with our investors in various forums and through different media (including in-person and virtual meetings) as part of our outreach program. In addition to discussions in the ordinary course of business, we participated in numerous conferences throughout the year, including the UBS Global Real Estate CEO/CFO Conference 2021, Nareit Conference, Bank of America 2021 Global Real Estate Conference, Barclays Global Financial Conference, Evercore ISI Conference and the 2021 Citi Conference. We held one-on-one meetings with various investors and potential investors at these conferences and had meaningful dialogue from which we gained helpful insight as to the matters that were at the forefront of our investors’ agendas. In the aggregate, in 2021 we engaged directly with representatives of more than 200 firms, including approximately 110 U.S. and international institutional investors who own, in the aggregate, approximately 62% of the total number of outstanding shares of BXP common stock and approximately 70% of the total number of outstanding shares held by actively managed funds. Through these engagement efforts and discussions with our investors, we received positive overall feedback regarding our executive compensation program and governance practices. This feedback is consistent with the support we received in 2021 on our advisory Say-on-Pay proposal. We believe our engagement efforts have been successful and are pleased that in 2021 Institutional Investor Magazine ranked us #1 among Office REITs and #3 among all REITs in six categories: Best CEO, Best CFO, Best ESG, Best IR program, Best IR Professional and Crisis Management – COVID-19. II. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM & 2021 RESULTS › 2021 ANNUAL TARGET COMPENSATION In January of each year, the Committee establishes a target amount for total compensation for each NEO by considering competitive benchmarking data, position, level of responsibility and experience, and, for executives other than our CEO, our CEO’s recommendation. Targets are reviewed annually and adjusted if the Committee determines that it is appropriate to do so. The Committee may also adjust target compensation to reflect changes in or new responsibilities for a particular executive. In considering the appropriate annual target amounts for each component for 2021, the Committee considered the challenges BXP faced in 2020 as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and management’s responses thereto and the Committee’s decision not to change any of the three categories of the 2020 AIP or the specific targets for the goals within each category after they were established in 2020. In addition, the Committee considered, in particular, our CEO’s and President’s stellar performance against the supplemental pandemic-related goals that the Committee incorporated into the Business & Individual category of the 2020 AIP mid-year. As a result, the Committee approved modest increases in the target LTI equity opportunities for 2021 for Messrs. Thomas and Linde of 2% and 3%, respectively. The targets for all other components of compensation for 2021 remained unchanged for the CEO and President. The Committee did not change the targets for any component of 2021 compensation for any of the other NEOs. The total target direct compensation for 2021 for each NEO was as follows: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Name | | Salary | | | Target Bonus | | | Target LTI Equity | | | Total Target Compensation | | | | | | | Owen D. Thomas | | | $ 900,000 | | | | $ 2,350,000 | | | | $ 9,450,000 | | | | $ 12,700,000 | | | | | | | Douglas T. Linde | | | $ 750,000 | | | | $ 1,900,000 | | | | $ 6,045,000 | | | | $ 8,695,000 | | | | | | | Raymond A. Ritchey | | | $ 740,000 | | | | $ 1,650,000 | | | | $ 4,410,000 | | | | $ 6,800,000 | | | | | | | Michael E. LaBelle | | | $ 510,000 | | | | $ 1,250,000 | | | | $ 1,990,000 | | | | $ 3,750,000 | | | | | | | Bryan J. Koop | | | $ 410,000 | | | | $ 1,250,000 | | | | $ 1,490,000 | | | | $ 3,150,000 | |
| | | | | | | | 2022 Proxy Statement 64 | | |
| | | 7› | | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
Variable or “at-risk” pay, consisting of annual cash bonuses and LTI equity awards, constitutes the vast majority of our executive compensation. We believe that having a significant portion of our executives’ compensation at risk more closely aligns their interests with our long-term interests and those of our stockholders. For our CEO and all NEOs as a group, variable pay for 20202021 was 92.8%93% and 90.5%91%, respectively, of target total compensation.compensation. This emphasis on variable pay allows the Committee to reward good performance and penalize poor performance. For 2020,The following graphics illustrate the targeted mix between fixed pay (base salary) and variable pay incentives (short-term incentives in the form of total directcash bonuses and long-term incentives in the form of both time-based and performance-based LTI equity awards) for our CEO and the NEOs as a group, in each case, based on 2021 target compensation was as follows:levels. Compensation Mix | | | CEO TARGET PAY MIX | | ALL NEOs TARGET PAY MIX(as a group) | | | | | |
The total target direct compensation for each NEO was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Name | | Salary | | | Target Bonus | | | Target LTI Equity | | | Total Target Compensation | | Owen D. Thomas | | | $ 900,000 | | | | $ 2,350,000 | | | | $ 9,250,000 | | | | $ 12,500,000 | | Douglas T. Linde | | | $ 750,000 | | | | $ 1,900,000 | | | | $ 5,850,000 | | | | $ 8,500,000 | | Raymond A. Ritchey | | | $ 740,000 | | | | $ 1,650,000 | | | | $ 4,410,000 | | | | $ 6,800,000 | | Michael E. LaBelle | | | $ 510,000 | | | | $ 1,250,000 | | | | $ 1,990,000 | | | | $ 3,750,000 | | Bryan J. Koop | | | $ 410,000 | | | | $ 1,250,000 | | | | $ 1,490,000 | | | | $ 3,150,000 | |
› CASH COMPENSATION Base Salary The base salary for each NEO is determined by the Committee and is intended to provide a fixed level of compensation that reflects the NEO’s leadership role and the relative market rate for similarly situated executives in the NEO’s position. The Committee determines whether to adjust base salaries based on a range of factors, including benchmark versus peers and changes in individual duties and responsibilities. Any increases to base salaries are generally determined in January of the compensation year and become effective in February of the compensation year. For 2021, base salaries remained unchanged. For 2022, the Committee modestly increased the base salaries of the NEOs for the first time in three years. | | | | | | | | | | | | | Name | | 2020 Salary | | 2021 Salary | | % Change | | | 2022 Salary | | | | | | | Owen D. Thomas | | $900,000 | | $900,000 | | | — | | | | $925,000 | | | | | | | Douglas T. Linde | | $750,000 | | $750,000 | | | — | | | | $775,000 | | | | | | | Raymond A. Ritchey | | $740,000 | | $740,000 | | | — | | | | $750,000 | | | | | | | Michael E. LaBelle | | $510,000 | | $510,000 | | | — | | | | $525,000 | | | | | | | Bryan J. Koop | | $410,000 | | $410,000 | | | — | | | | $425,000 | | | | | | | Total | | $3,310,000 | | $3,310,000 | | | — | | | | $3,400,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | 56
| | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement 65 |
| | | 7› | | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | | | II. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM |
The Committee did not increase the base salary of any NEO for 2021 and has not changed the base salary for any NEO since 2019.
| | | | | | | | | Name | | 2020 Salary | | 2019 Salary | | % Change | | Owen D. Thomas | | $900,000 | | $900,000 | | | — | | Douglas T. Linde | | $750,000 | | $750,000 | | | — | | Raymond A. Ritchey | | $740,000 | | $740,000 | | | — | | Michael E. LaBelle | | $510,000 | | $510,000 | | | — | | Bryan J. Koop | | $410,000 | | $410,000 | | | — | | | | | | Total | | $3,310,000 | | $3,310,000 | | | — | |
2020 Annual Incentive Plan
Program Design and Structure In January 2020, based largely on feedback received from our investors in 2019, the Committee established the 2020 Annual Incentive PlanAIP under which annual cash bonuses payable to our executive officers are directly linked to the achievement of specific, pre-established goals. The structure of our 2021 AIP remained generally the same except for small shifts in weighting between categories, as described in more detail below. Under the plan,2021 AIP, each NEO hashad a target bonus opportunity expressed in a fixed dollar amount. Actual earned amounts under the plan may range from zero (0) to 150% of target, depending on performance versus the annual goals in each category, with payout interpolated for performance between levels. | | | Performance Level for Each Category | | Payout (% of Target) | | | >= Maximum | | 150% | | | Target | | 100% | | | Threshold | | 50% | | | <Threshold | | 0 |
We use a “scorecard” approach for our bonus determinations. This approach is intended to reflect a comprehensive analysis by the Committee of corporate, regional and individual performance based on performance in three categories: (1) diluted FFO per Share, (2) Leasing and (3) Business and& Individual goals. Diluted FFO per Share. The Committee selecteddiluted FFO per share was selected as a key financial metric for the 2020 Annual Incentive Plan2021 AIP because it is the earnings metric most commonly used by investors and analysts to evaluate our performance on an absolute basis and relative to other REITs. As such, the Committee considers this to be the corporate component of the scorecard as it is an objective,important, company-wide performance metric that is objective and drives near-term business strategies. The diluted FFO per share goal is subject to adjustment for acquisitions, dispositions, financings, lease terminationsearly debt redemption charges, and similar transactions and circumstances. Leasing. The Committee established specific leasing goals, starting at the property level, rolling up by region and then aggregating to corporate leasing goals, as the second component. The leasing goals were then categorized as short-term leasing and total leasing goals to encourage the executives to focus on current addressable vacancies and near-term roll-over, and to avoid scenarios in which leasing goals are met solely due to unexpected early renewals. The Committee selected this category because it linksis an objective measures ofmeasure that is fundamental to the Company’s short-term and long-term success and links corporate, regional and individual performance by formula to the amounts paid. The leasing goals are measured at the regional level for regional EVPs and the Company level for corporate executives. Business & Individual Goals. Business goals include milestone-oriented objectives related to management of capital expenditures and G&A expense, acquisitions, dispositions, delivering development and construction projects on time and budget, and achieving the desired returns on cost,investments, securing entitlements for future development projects, launching new developments, the opportunistic use of joint ventures, securing entitlements, and/or launching new developments.and the management of capital expenditures and G&A expense. Business goals are based on regional priorities for the regional EVPs. For the CEO and President, business goals include a relevant subset of those regional goals, as well as goals related to overall corporate strategy and executive management of the Company. For the CFO, business goals relate to balance sheet management, capital raising, and other finance departmentFinance Department priorities. Individual goals include leadership and professional development goals, diversity initiatives, succession planning and other ESG priorities for each executive. The Compensation Committee considers absolute and/or relative performance outcomes against Company and Business and& Individual goals and objectives, as well as the context in which they were achieved (including, e.g., degree of difficulty, importance to BXP, headwinds and tailwinds during the year and other similar factors). | | | | | | | | | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement 66 | | 57
|
| | | 7› | | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | | | II. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM |
One of the Committee’s primary objectives when establishing Business & Individual goals each year, including in 2021, is to set annual goals that meaningfully advance the Company’s strategy for sustainable, long-term growth and value creation despite the short-term window for assessing performance against these goals. In some cases, actual performance against these Business & Individual goals may not be assessed quantitatively. In addition, the relative importance of some goals may be greater in one year than in another depending on the circumstances at the time the Committee establishes the goals. For the 2020 compensation year, the Committee set the weighting of each category equally for all NEOs except for Mr. LaBelle. The following table summarizes2021 AIP, the performance measurement categories and weightings under the Annual Incentive Plan for 2020.weighting of each category were as follows: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Weightings | | | | Weightings | | | Annual Incentive Performance Measures | | Thomas | | | Linde | | LaBelle(1) | | Ritchey | | Koop | | | Thomas | | | Linde | | LaBelle | | Ritchey | | Koop | | | FFO per Share | | | 33.3 | % | | | 33.3 | % | | 33.3 | % | | 33.3 | % | | 33.3 | % | | | 30 | % | | | 30 | % | | 30 | % | | 30 | % | | 30 | % | | Leasing (Short-Term and Total) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Overall BXP | | | 33.3 | % | | | 33.3 | % | | 16.7 | % | | | | | | | 30 | % | | | 30 | % | | 30 | % | | | | | DC Region(2) | | | | | | | | 24.8 | % | | | | LA Region(2) | | | | | | | | 8.5 | % | | | | | DC Region(1) | | | | | | | | | 20 | % | | | | LA Region(1) | | | | | | | | | 10 | % | | | | Boston Region | | | | | | | | | | 33.3 | % | | | | | | | | | | 30 | % | | Business & Individual Goals | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Overall BXP | | | 33.3 | % | | | 33.3 | % | | | | | | | | | 40 | % | | | 40 | % | | | | | | | | Finance | | | | | | 50.0 | % | | | | | | | | | | 40 | % | | | | | | DC Region + LA Region | | | | | | | | 33.3 | % | | | | | | | | | | 40 | % | | | | Boston Region | | | | | | | | | | 33.3 | % | | | | | | | | | | 40 | % | | Total | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
(1) | For all NEOs except Mr. LaBelle, the weighting of each category is equal (33.3% for each of FFO per Share, Leasing and Business and Individual goals). For Mr. LaBelle, the weightings are 33.3% for FFO per share, 16.7% for leasing and 50% for business & individual goals. In determining Mr. LaBelle’s weightings for each category, the Committee considered, among other things, his reduced role in leasing relative to Messrs. Thomas and Linde and his direct role in and responsibility for the Finance Department of the Company.
|
(2) | Mr. Ritchey’s leasing goal (weighted 33.3%30% in total) is evenly split between short-term and total leasing (16.7%(15% each) and, consistent with all other NEOs, but is further bifurcated between the Washington, DC and Los Angeles regions based on the square footage of each region’s portfolio as follows: short-term: 70%10% Washington, DC / 30%5% Los Angeles; total: 79%10% Washington, DC / 21%5% Los Angeles. |
NEOs’ ResponseAs part of the Committee’s annual executive compensation process, in January 2021, the Committee reviewed and reassessed the AIP, including its categories and weightings. As part of this review, the Committee considered the structure and design of annual bonus plans of its benchmarking peers, and noted that, of the thirteen peers that disclosed the details of their bonus plans, a substantial majority (approximately 70%) provided for maximum payout percentages of 200% of target, compared to the World Health Crisismaximum opportunity for our NEOs under the AIP of 150% of target.
Based on its review of the AIP, the Committee concluded that the categories were appropriate, but that more weight should be given to the Business & Individual Goals (from 33.3% to 40%) because they are broader, more strategic in nature and Important Socialimportant to our sustainable, long-term growth and Environmental Issues Atvalue creation. Therefore, for the time we filed2021 AIP, the Committee determined that it was advisable to modestly adjust the weight allocated to the Business & Individual goals for 2021 for Messrs. Thomas, Linde, Ritchey and Koop (from 33.3% to 40%) and to correspondingly adjust the allocations to the other two categories (from 33.3% to 30%). The Committee also adjusted the category weightings for Mr. LaBelle, our CFO, to align with the other NEOs. These changes were disclosed prospectively in our 2020 proxy statement,statement.
2021 NEO Scorecards & Results Set forth in the COVID-19 pandemic was in its infancyfollowing tables is a summary of each NEO’s performance measures and in lightweightings, with specific threshold, target and maximum goals for each of the rapidly changing business environmentdiluted FFO per share and fluid nature ofleasing performance measures, and the potential implications onprincipal Business & Individual goals, along with each NEO’s performance results for 2021. In setting the Company’s business, the Committee reserved its right to re-evaluate the categories and targets, as appropriate, in light of the pandemic’s actual impact on Boston Properties. Soon thereafter, Americans witnessed the social movements that spotlighted racial and social injustices that plague society that calledtarget for action, and we experienced a much-heightened awareness of the importance of environmental and sustainability issues. Despite the sudden and significant impact of the global pandemic on our business, the Committee prioritized maintaining a strong alignment with our shareholders’ interests and decided not to modify any aspects of the executive compensation program despite the unexpected and unprecedented economic and social conditions. In deciding not to change the 2020 Annual Incentive Plan,diluted FFO per share goal for 2021, the Committee considered (1) the importanceongoing pandemic that was still materially and adversely impacting businesses across the U.S., including that of demonstrating its commitment toour tenants, which could directly impact our financial results, including FFO. With that in mind, the more formulaic bonus plan in its first year, (2) whether doing so would disrupt the alignment of interests between our NEOs and investors and (3) whether choosing not to do so would negatively impact retention and incentives. AsCommittee set a result, our NEOs earned no payout under thediluted FFO per share category and only one NEO earned a portion of the potential payout for the leasing category and it was below target.
For the third performance category under the 2020 Annual Incentive Plan, the Committee established Business and Individual goals for each NEO in January 2020. This category represented 33.3% of the potential payout opportunity for each NEO other than Mr. LaBelle (for whom it represented 50%). As it became clear that the pandemic was causing severe strain on the economy, our tenants and our business, the Board shifted its priorities for management and the Committee appended to each NEO’s Business and Individual goals a set of pandemic-related goals intended to assess and reward the NEOs for their success in meeting those priorities.
| | | | | | | | | 58
| | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement 67 |
| | | 7› | | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | | | II. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM |
In determining that our NEOs exceeded their pandemic-related goals,target of $6.53 per share, which, if achieved, would have represented growth of approximately 4% compared to 2020. The Committee believed the target was rigorous yet achievable despite the economic conditions and continued uncertainties due to the pandemic.
For the leasing goal, the Committee notedconsidered the following achievements: although physical occupancy was low, allchallenged leasing environment in 2020 and early 2021 across the real estate sector and for office properties throughoutREITs, in particular. The Committee could not predict with any certainty the Boston Properties portfolio remained openduration and severity the pandemic would have on leasing activities through 2021. As a result, the Committee determined that using historical leasing levels would not be appropriate or reasonable for tenants,
in early April 2020, we formed a Health Security Task Force compriseddetermining targets for the leasing goal. Therefore, the Committee focused primarily on vacant and near-term rollover space when setting the target of Boston Properties’ employees, as well as outside experts in health care, industrial hygiene, cleaning and security,
in May 2020, the Heath Security Task Force issued a Heath Security Plan for repopulating the workplace, which provided a framework for health security at BXP’s office properties, including enhanced cleaning and disinfection, air and water quality protocols, physical distancing, screening and personal protective equipment (PPE) requirements,
following the release of the Health Security Plan in early May, our NEOs and management teams conducted town halls and one-on-one sessions with tenants across BXP’s regions to support their office repopulation processes, which slowly began in June in Boston,
our NEOs demonstrated remarkable discipline and flexibility in maximizing rent collections while concurrently addressing tenants’ needs:
| › | for the month of April 2020, the first full month of COVID-19 restrictions, we collected approximately 97% of the total rent due April 1 from office tenants, and collections among all tenants were approximately 93%
|
| › | by the fourth quarter of 2020, collections from office tenants had improved to a strong 99.7%, and collections from all tenants were 99.1%,
|
when appropriate, our NEOs worked with our tenants (primarily in retail businesses) that were in financial distress to modify lease agreements and otherwise provide relief in light of the economic downturn. During 2020, these lease modification agreements covered approximately 4.73.2 million square feet
| › | although some of the lease modifications were deferrals under which we expect the tenant will pay us in full primarily in 2021, the majority of the lease modifications involved extending the lease term (in some cases for a year or more) or providing for a period of time where the tenant will only pay percentage rent
|
| › | as a result of the lease modification agreements that extended the lease terms, we expect to see an increase in the cash rent we will receive in the future,
|
in elevating our focus on diversity and equity, we constituted our Diversity and Inclusion Committee in early 2020. Our NEOs demonstrated strong commitment of leasing to fostering its success and supportedchallenge executives to achieve leasing results despite the D&I Committee in promoting diversity both within BXP and indifficult environment. While the communities in which we operate
| › | the D&I Committee set its focus on (1) recruitment and development, (2) Company policies and (3) community outreach
|
| › | the D&I Committee has met and expects to meet regularly with our full Board of Directors, and
|
| › | in early May 2020, we issued $1.25 billion of 3.250% senior unsecured notes that mature in 2031, and we used the net proceeds to repay amounts borrowed under our revolving line of credit and to bolster our liquidity.
|
Although it was nottarget for the 2021 leasing goal represented a factor in assessing our NEOs’ performance against their pandemic-related goals,decrease from the Committee noted that Boston Properties and its NEOs were ranked #1 among all office REITs by Institutional Investors Magazine in 2020 in the category “Crisis Management amid COVID-19.” They also ranked #1 in the following categories:
Overall All-American Executive Team,
Despite the severe, negative impacts of the pandemic on office REITs generally, which led to negative absolute total stockholder returns across the sectoramount actually leased in 2020, the Committee also notedtook into account that Boston Properties’ TSR(1) actual 2020 leasing results included less than one quarter of pre-pandemic leasing activity and more than three quarters of significantly muted leasing activity, and (2) the outlook for leasing activity for 2021 suggested continued deterioration of market conditions (e.g., more supply from developed properties, more space available for sublet and less overall demand).
Based on the one-year and three-year periods ending December 31, 2020 placed it at the 80th percentile, or third, among its most directly comparable office peers for both periods. (For a list of these peers, see “– LTI Equity Compensation – 2021 MYLTIP” below.) Although the Committee did not base its decisions on BXP’s relative TSR rankings,foregoing, the Committee believes they validated the appropriateness ofperformance targets for the final bonus payments to our NEOs.2021 AIP were rigorous and challenging, but achievable. | | | | | | | | | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement 68 | | 59
|
| | | 7› | | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Owen D. Thomas | Performance Category | | Weighting | | | | | Threshold | | Target | | Maximum | | 2021 Results | | Category Payout % | | | | | | | | | FFO per Share | | | | | | | | $6.20 | | $6.53 | | $6.86 | | $6.76(1) | | 135% | Leasing (in million square feet) | | | | | Short-term | | | 2.45 | | 3.06 | | 3.68 | | 3.72 | | 150% | | | Total | | | 2.56 | | 3.20 | | 3.84 | | 4.94 | Business & Individual Goals | | | | | | | 130% |
| | II. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAMKey 2021 Business & Individual Goals |
Set forth in the following tables is a summary of each NEO’s performance measures and weightings, with specific threshold, targets and maximum
| ✓+ | Provide leadership to management team to complete 2021 operational, capital and ESG goals for each of the FFO per share and leasing performance measures, and the principal business, individual and pandemic-related goals, along with each NEO’s performance results for 2020. |
| ✓+ | Lead full review of BXP strategy and present to the Board of Directors |
| ✓+ | Form Strategic Capital Program as an additional source of private equity funding |
| ✓+ | Complete new investments through Strategic Capital Program |
| ✓+ | Collaborate with BXP’s President to hire a new leader for the New York Region |
| ✓ | Finalize and meet specified diversity and inclusion goals and initiatives |
| ✓ | Enter the Seattle market with a new acquisition |
| X | Expand LA Region footprint |
| ✓ | Establish the BXP Life Sciences Advisory Board (“LSAB”) |
| ✓+ | Grow BXP’s life sciences business |
| X | Execute specified asset sales of more than $500 million |
| ✓ | Facilitate company-wide professional development and employee engagement initiatives, including leadership programs and town halls |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Owen D. Thomas | Performance Category | | Weighting | | Payout (% of target) | | | Threshold 50% | | Target 100% | | Maximum 150% | | 2020 Results | | Category Payout % | | | | | | | | | FFO per Share | | | | | | | | $7.35 | | $7.55 | | $7.75 | | $6.29(1) | | 0% | Leasing (in million square feet) | | | | | Short-term | | | 3.2 | | 3.6 | | 4.4 | | 1.7 | | 0% | | | Total | | | 5.0 | | 5.6 | | 6.9 | | 3.7 | Business & Individual Goals | | | |
| The Committee assessed Mr. Thomas’ performance against his business, individual and pandemic-related goals and determined that he exceeded his goals and earned the maximum award for this category. | | 150.0% |
| | | | | | | | Business goals included:
• Execute capital raising strategy to fund future investments
• Manage G&A, capital expenditures and credit ratings
• Complete identified transactions
• Deliver identified development projects in-service
| | Individual goals included:
• Make contributions to increase workforce diversity
• Increase employee engagement
• Oversee and manage employees, including the execution of succession plans
| | Pandemic-related goals included:
• Demonstrate strong leadership during pandemic and demands of remote work
• Ensure health security of BXP employees and customers
• Maximize rent collections
• Optimize leasing outcomes
• Ensure active development projects remain on schedule and on budget
| | | TOTAL ANNUAL INCENTIVE PAYOUT AS A % OF TARGET = 50.0% Assessment |
After assessing Mr. Thomas’ performance against his Business & Individual goals, the Committee concluded that he achieved substantially all of the goals established for him, many of which he exceeded. In particular, the Committee noted that Mr. Thomas: (1) | For all NEOs, represents Diluted FFO per share. For disclosures required by Regulation G, refer to pages 101 through 104 of our 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
|
successfully led a detailed review of BXP’s corporate strategy with our Board of Directors. This review considered every facet of BXP’s business in light of the evolving economic conditions resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. | | | | | | | | | 60
| | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement 69 |
| | | 7› | | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
envisioned and established our Strategic Capital Program, a partnership with large institutional investors that enhances BXP’s access to private capital and overall investment capacity. BXP quickly utilized the Strategic Capital Program in two separate transactions in 2021 – the acquisitions of Safeco Plaza in Seattle, Washington, and 360 Park Avenue South in the Midtown South submarket of Manhattan, New York. These transactions marked BXP’s entry into a new market and submarket, respectively, thereby expanding BXP’s geographic footprint for future growth. envisioned and established BXP’s new LSAB to support BXP’s growing life sciences business and secured two highly regarded and knowledgeable industry veterans to serve as the LSAB’s initial members. grew BXP’s life sciences business through two acquisitions aggregating more than 570,000 square feet and commenced four life sciences development/redevelopment projects. | • | | II. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAMfinalized and met specified diversity and inclusion goals and initiatives (see “Human Capitaland Sustainability — Human Capital” beginning on page 41). |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Douglas T. Linde | Performance Category | | Weighting | | Payout (% of target) | | | Threshold 50% | | Target 100% | | Maximum 150% | | 2020 Results | | Category Payout % | | | | | | | | | FFO per Share | | | | | | | | $7.35 | | $7.55 | | $7.75 | | $6.29 | | 0% | Leasing (in million square feet) | | | | | Short-term | | | 3.2 | | 3.6 | | 4.4 | | 1.7 | | 0% | | | Total | | | 5.0 | | 5.6 | | 6.9 | | 3.7 | Business & Individual Goals | | | |
| The Committee assessed Mr. Linde’s performance against his business, individual and pandemic-related goals and determined that he exceeded his goals and earned the maximum award for this category. | | 150.0% |
| • | | successfully advanced BXP’s ESG and sustainability efforts and maintained BXP’s leadership position in the real estate industry. Among other ESG achievements in 2021, BXP was (1) named to Newsweek’s America’s Most Responsible Companies list, ranking #1 in the real estate industry and increasing its overall ranking to #31 out of the 500 companies included on the list (BXP ranked #56 in 2020), (2) named to the inaugural Forbes Green Growth 50 list, ranking #4 among the top 50 companies that are reducing greenhouse gas emissions while growing profits and (3) ranked #3 Best ESG among all REITs and #1 among office REITs by Institutional Investor Magazine. |
personally recruited a new leader for the New York Region. The Committee also noted that Mr. Thomas was individually recognized by Institutional Investor Magazine, ranking as the #3 Best CEO among all REITs and #1 among office REITs. Based on Mr. Thomas’ achievement of substantially all of his Business & Individual goals, many of which he exceeded, the Committee determined that Mr. Thomas earned 130% of target for this category. | | | | | | | | Business goals included:
• Execute capital raising strategy to fund future investments
• Manage G&A, capital expenditures and credit ratings
• Complete identified transactions
• Deliver identified development projects in-service
| | Individual goals included:
• Make contributions to increase workforce diversity
• Manage Information Technology department’s execution of target objectives
• Increase employee engagement
| | Pandemic-related goals included:
• Demonstrate strong leadership during the pandemic and demands of remote work
• Ensure health security of BXP employees and customers
• Maximize rent collections
• Optimize leasing outcomes
• Ensure active development projects remain on schedule and on budget
| | | TOTAL ANNUAL INCENTIVE PAYOUT AS A % OF TARGET = 50.0%137.5% |
(1) | Represents diluted FFO per share after adjusting for certain transactions in accordance with the terms of the 2021 AIP. For disclosures required by Regulation G, refer to Appendix A to this proxy statement. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement 70 | | 61
|
| | | 7› | | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Douglas T. Linde | Performance Category | | Weighting | | | | | Threshold | | Target | | Maximum | | 2021 Results | | Category Payout % | | | | | | | | | FFO per Share | | | | | | | | $6.20 | | $6.53 | | $6.86 | | $6.76(1) | | 135% | Leasing (in million square feet) | | | | | Short-term | | | 2.45 | | 3.06 | | 3.68 | | 3.72 | | 150% | | | Total | | | 2.56 | | 3.20 | | 3.84 | | 4.94 | Business & Individual Goals | | | | | | | 130% |
| | II. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAMKey 2021 Business & Individual Goals |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Raymond A. Ritchey | Performance Category | | Weighting | | Payout (% of target) | | | Threshold 50% | | Target 100% | | Maximum 150% | | 2020 Results | | Category Payout % | | | | | | | | | FFO per Share | | | | | | | | $7.35 | | $7.55 | | $7.75 | | $6.29 | | 0% | Leasing (in million square feet) | | | | | Short-term | * | | | | | | | | | | | | | DC: | | | 1.1 | | 1.3 | | 1.6 | | 1.2 | | DC: 65.6% | | | LA: | | | 0.5 | | 0.6 | | 0.7 | | 0.1 | | LA: 0% | | | Total | * | | | | | | | | | | | | | DC: | | | 1.8 | | 2.0 | | 2.5 | | 1.9 | | DC: 70.1% | | | LA: | | | 0.5 | | 0.6 | | 0.7 | | 0.1 | | LA: 0% | | * For more detail on the weightings for Mr. Ritchey’s leasing goal, see page 58. | | | | | Business & Individual Goals | | | |
| The Committee assessed Mr. Ritchey’s performance against his business, individual and pandemic-related goals and determined that he exceeded his goals and earned the maximum award for this category. | | 150.0% |
| ✓ | Provide leadership to management team to complete 2021 operational, capital and ESG goals, including close oversight and monitoring of progress towards company-wide leasing, development and capital spending goals |
| ✓+ | Supervise BXP’s Information Systems Department’s efforts and new technology initiatives |
| ✓ | Oversee the Diversity & Inclusion Committee to finalize and meet specified goals and initiatives |
| ✓ | Execute new office and life sciences investments in specified regions |
| ✓ | Collaborate with BXP’s CEO to hire a new leader for the New York Region |
| ✓+ | Mentor and manage the new regional leaders in New York and Washington, DC in their new leadership roles |
| ✓ | Successfully execute company-wide professional development initiatives, including property management leadership and life sciences programs |
| X | Execute asset sales of more than $500 million |
| ✓+ | Actively engage new and existing stockholders |
| ✓+ | Grow BXP’s life sciences business |
| ✓ | Assist BXP’s CEO to establish the BXP Life Sciences Advisory Board |
After assessing Mr. Linde’s performance against his Business & Individual goals, the Committee concluded that he achieved all but one of the goals established for him, several of which he exceeded. In particular, the Committee noted that Mr. Linde: provided direct oversight of progress toward achieving company-wide leasing, development and capital spending goals. �� | | | | | | | | | | Business goals included:
• Assess new development and business opportunities in the DC and LA regions
• Complete identified transactions
| | Individual goals included:
• Make contributions to increase workforce diversity
• Expand focus on strategy and building and maintaining relationships
• Maintain mentoring and leadership roles
| | Pandemic-related goals included:
• Demonstrate strong leadership during the pandemic and demands of remote work
• Ensure health security of BXP employees and customers
• Maximize rent collections
• Optimize leasing outcomes
• Ensure active development projects remain on schedule and on budget
| | | TOTAL ANNUAL INCENTIVE PAYOUT AS A % OF TARGET = 66.9%
|
| | | | | | | | | 62
| | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement 71 |
| | | 7› | | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | | | II. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Michael E. LaBelle | Performance Category | | Weighting | | Payout (% of target) | | | Threshold 50% | | Target 100% | | Maximum 150% | | 2020 Results | | Category Payout % | | | | | | | | | FFO per Share | | | | | | | | $7.35 | | $7.55 | | $7.75 | | $6.29 | | 0% | Leasing* (in million square feet) | | | | | Short-term | | | 3.2 | | 3.6 | | 4.4 | | 1.7 | | 0% | | | Total | | | 5.0 | | 5.6 | | 6.9 | | 3.7 | | | * Mr. LaBelle’s leasing goal (weighted 16.7% in total) is evenly split between short-term and total leasing (8.35% each). | | | Business & Individual Goals | | | |
| The Committee assessed Mr. LaBelle’s performance against his business, individual and pandemic-related goals and determined that he exceeded his goals and earned the maximum award for this category. | | 150.0% |
meaningfully contributed to growing BXP’s life sciences business through his direct involvement in transactions in the Waltham, MA submarket. supervised BXP’s Information Systems Department and its new technology initiatives to improve security and enhance operations. established company-wide professional development initiatives, including property management leadership and life sciences programs, and assisted the CEO in establishing the BXP LSAB. oversaw the Diversity & Inclusion Committee to finalize specified goals and initiatives, including goals related to hiring, engagement and outreach, and completed a number of leases with minority-owned businesses. worked with the CEO to successfully recruit a new leader for the New York Region and mentored the new regional leaders in New York and Washington, DC Regions. Based on Mr. Linde’s achievement of all but one of his Business & Individual goals, several of which he exceeded, the Committee determined that Mr. Linde earned 130% of target for this category. | | | | | | | | Business goals included:
• Execute capital raising strategy to fund future investments
• Manage credit ratings
• Develop strategy for 2021 debt maturities
• Complete identified transactions
• Enhance ESG disclosures in SEC
filings and Sustainability Report
| | Individual goals included:
• Make contributions to increase workforce diversity
• Manage and maintain effectiveness and productivity of Finance Department
• Advance employee succession plans through mentoring
| | Pandemic-related goals included:
• Demonstrate strong leadership during the pandemic and demands of remote work
• Ensure health security of BXP employees and customers
• Manage operating expenses tightly
• Support tenant collection and pandemic-related restructuring activities from financial perspective
| | | TOTAL ANNUAL INCENTIVE PAYOUT AS A % OF TARGET = 75.0%137.5% |
(1) | Represents diluted FFO per share after adjusting for certain transactions in accordance with the terms of the 2021 AIP. For disclosures required by Regulation G, refer to Appendix A to this proxy statement. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement 72 | | 63
|
| | | 7› | | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | | | II. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Raymond A. Ritchey | Performance Category | | Weighting | | | | | Threshold | | Target | | Maximum | | 2021 Results | | Category Payout % | | | | | | | | | FFO per Share | | | | | | | | $6.20 | | $6.53 | | $6.86 | | $6.76(1) | | 135% | Leasing(2) (in million square feet) | | | | | Short-term | | | | | | | | | | | | | | DC: | | | 0.59 | | 0.74 | | 0.89 | | 0.89 | | 150% | | | LA: | | | 0.33 | | 0.41 | | 0.50 | | 0.61 | | | Total | | | | | | | | | | | | DC: | | | 0.66 | | 0.82 | | 0.93 | | 1.09 | | | LA: | | | 0.33 | | 0.41 | | 0.50 | | 0.62 | Business & Individual Goals | | | | | | | 130% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Bryan J. Koop Key 2021 Business & Individual Goals |
Performance
Category
| | Weighting✓ | | Payout (% of target) | | + | Threshold
50%
| | Target
100%
| | Maximum
150%
| | 2020
Results | | Category
Payout % | | | | | | | | | FFO per Share
| | | | | | | | $7.35 | | $7.55 | | $7.75 | | $6.29 | | 0% | Leasing
(Develop regional strategy for life sciences business in million square feet)Washington, DC
| |
| | | Short-term | | | 0.5 | | 0.6 | | 0.8 | | 0.08 | | 0% | | | Total | | | 1.1 | | 1.3 | | 1.5 | | 0.8 | Business &
Individual Goals
| |
| |
| The Committee assessed Mr. Koop’s performance against his
business, individual and pandemic-related goals and
determined that he exceeded his goals and earned the
maximum award for this category.
| | 150.0% |
| ✓ | Actively promote diversity within BXP with specific actions |
| ✓ | Continue mentorship of LA and Seattle regional managers |
| ✓ | Provide strong mentorship and leadership to leasing teams across all regions |
| ✓ | Restructure or amend two specified transactions on satisfactory terms |
| X | Complete sale of specified assets in Springfield, Virginia |
| ✓ | Complete new investment in Seattle region |
| X | Complete new investment in LA region |
| ✓+ | Provide leadership to regional team to execute three specified transactions in Reston, Virginia |
| ✓ | Achieve specified ESG goals |
| ✓+ | Assist in leadership transition in Washington, DC |
| ✓ | Assist CEO and President in selection of new leadership for New York region |
| | | | Business goals included:
• Deliver identified projects in the Boston region
• Maintain schedule and budget for development projects in Boston region
| | Individual goals included:
• Make contributions to increase workforce diversity
• Exhibit strong management skills and refine new business initiatives within region
• Provide consultation support to other regions related to retail activities
| | Pandemic-related goals included:
• Demonstrate strong leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic and demands of remote work
• Ensure health security of BXP employees and customers
• Maximize rent collections
• Optimize leasing outcomes
• Ensure active development projects remain on schedule and on budget
| | | TOTAL ANNUAL INCENTIVE PAYOUT AS A % OF TARGET = 50.0% Assessment |
Based on the foregoing,After assessing Mr. Ritchey’s performance against his Business & Individual goals, the Committee awarded annual cash bonusesconcluded that he achieved substantially all of the goals established for him. In particular, the Committee noted the positive impact of Mr. Ritchey’s continued mentorship of key BXP personnel, including the leasing teams across all of BXP’s regions. Mr. Ritchey serves as an important mentor for the newer regional managers in Los Angeles and Seattle, as well as to the NEOsCo-Heads of the Washington, DC Region as they transitioned into their leadership roles during 2021. He also assisted in recruiting the new leader for 2020 as follows:the New York Region. In addition, Mr. Ritchey continued to play a key role in specific transactions, including BXP’s entry into the Seattle, WA market through the acquisition of Safeco Plaza, and other transactions in the Washington, DC Region.
| | | | | | | Name | | 2020 Actual Annual Incentive | | 2020 Target Annual Incentive | | 2020 Actual as % of Target | Owen D. Thomas | | $1,175,000 | | $2,350,000 | | 50.0% | Douglas T. Linde | | $950,000 | | $1,900,000 | | 50.0% | Raymond A. Ritchey | | $1,103,850 | | $1,650,000 | | 66.9% | Michael E. LaBelle | | $937,500 | | $1,250,000 | | 75.0% | Bryan J. Koop | | $625,000 | | $1,250,000 | | 50.0% |
| | | | | | | | | 64
| | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement 73 |
| | | 7› | | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
Based on Mr. Ritchey’s achievement of substantially all of his Business & Individual goals, the Committee determined that Mr. Ritchey earned 130% of target for this category. | | | | | | | II. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM TOTAL ANNUAL INCENTIVE PAYOUT AS A % OF TARGET = 137.5% |
(1) | Represents diluted FFO per share after adjusting for certain transactions in accordance with the terms of the 2021 AIP. For disclosures required by Regulation G, refer to Appendix A to this proxy statement. |
(2) | Mr. Ritchey’s leasing goal (weighted 30% in total) is evenly split between short-term and total leasing (15% each), consistent with all other NEOs, but is further bifurcated between the Washington, DC and Los Angeles regions based on square footage as follows: short-term: 10% Washington, DC / 5% Los Angeles; total: 10% Washington, DC / 5% Los Angeles. |
| | | | | | | | 2022 Proxy Statement 74 | | |
| | | 7› | | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Michael E. LaBelle | Performance Category | | Weighting | | | | Threshold | | Target | | Maximum | | 2021 Results | | Category Payout % | | | | | | | | | FFO per Share | | | | | | $6.20 | | $6.53 | | $6.86 | | $6.76(1) | | 135% | Leasing (in million square feet) | | | | Short-term | | 2.45 | | 3.06 | | 3.68 | | 3.72 | | 150% | | Total | | 2.56 | | 3.20 | | 3.84 | | 4.94 | Business & Individual Goals | | | | | | 110% |
| | Key 2021 Business & Individual Goals |
| ✓ | Complete redemption of 4.125% senior unsecured notes maturing in May 2021 in Q1 2021 |
| ✓ | Execute specified refinancings, including BPLP’s $1.5 billion credit facility |
| ✓ | Evaluate and develop plans for other specified financings, including the possible early redemption(s) of unsecured notes, as market conditions permit |
| ✓ | Enhance ESG reporting, including disclosures related to human capital management, diversity and inclusion, pandemic response/health security efforts and supplier and vendor engagement initiatives |
| ✓ | Advance climate-related disclosure alignment with TCFD and complete risk assessment |
| ✓ | Complete solar-related projects at two specified properties |
| X | Complete four non-deal roadshows (“NDRs”), including two focused specifically on ESG NDRs |
| ✓+ | Attend at least two generalist conferences |
| ✓ | Create new touchpoints to attract new investors |
| ✓ | Actively promote diversity within BXP and with suppliers, vendors and other third parties with specific actions |
| ✓ | Support private equity efforts, including the establishment of the Strategic Capital Program and acquisitions through the program |
| ✓ | Maintain the health and safety of BXP employees as offices repopulate |
| | | | | | | | | | 2022 Proxy Statement 75 |
| | | 7› | | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
After assessing Mr. LaBelle’s performance against his Business & Individual goals, the Committee concluded that he achieved substantially all of the goals established for him; travel restrictions and other pandemic-related factors made it impossible for him to achieve the two goals that were not met. In particular, the Committee noted Mr. LaBelle’s achievements in managing BXP’s balance sheet, including successfully refinancing the Company’s debt maturities and advancing BXP’s ESG and diversity and inclusion initiatives. Mr. LaBelle successfully executed two green bond offerings totaling approximately $1.7 billion in aggregate principal amount, the net proceeds of which will be fully allocated to “eligible green projects.” Mr. LaBelle proactively procured a minority- and woman-owned bank to act as co-manager in both of the green bond offerings. In addition, he executed numerous other financings, including the refinancing of BPLP’s $1.5 billion credit facility, which added a sustainability-linked pricing component, and a $1.0 billion CMBS loan. Mr. LaBelle also played a key leadership role in enhancing BXP’s disclosures related to human capital, diversity and inclusion and health security in BXP’s public SEC filings and its annual ESG report. He advanced BXP’s goal of achieving alignment with the TCFD framework for disclosing climate-related risks by enhancing TCFD disclosures in the 2021 ESG Report, as well as engaging an independent provider of science-driven insights and analytics on climate risk to assist the Company in assessing the portfolio’s potential climate-related risks. The Committee also noted that Mr. LaBelle was individually recognized by Institutional Investor Magazine, ranking as the #3 Best CFO among all REITs and #1 among office REITs, and he was instrumental to BXP’s rankings as #3 Best ESG and #3 Best IR Program among all REITs and #1 Best ESG and #1 Best IR Program among office REITs. Based on Mr. LaBelle’s achievement of substantially all of his Business & Individual goals, the Committee determined that Mr. LaBelle earned 110% of target for this category. | | | | | | | TOTAL ANNUAL INCENTIVE PAYOUT AS A % OF TARGET = 129.5% |
(1) | Represents diluted FFO per share after adjusting for certain transactions in accordance with the terms of the 2021 AIP. For disclosures required by Regulation G, refer to Appendix A to this proxy statement. |
| | | | | | | | 2022 Proxy Statement 76 | | |
| | | 7› | | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Bryan J. Koop | Performance Category | | Weighting | | | | | Threshold | | Target | | Maximum | | 2021 Results | | Category Payout % | | | | | | | | | FFO per Share | | | | | | | | $6.20 | | $6.53 | | $6.86 | | $6.76(1) | | 135% | Leasing (in million square feet) | | | | | Short-term | | | 0.60 | | 0.75 | | 0.90 | | 0.89 | | 148% | | | Total | | | 0.62 | | 0.77 | | 0.92 | | 1.39 | Business & Individual Goals | | | | | | | 130% |
| | Key 2021 Business & Individual Goals |
| ✓+ | Complete the approval process for and/or commence the construction of three specified projects in the Boston region |
| ✓+ | Manage the schedules of and/or deliver four specified development projects in the Boston Region |
| X | Develop or complete plans for two specified projects |
| ✓ | Complete pre-development work for two specified projects |
| ✓ | Complete sale of specified suburban assets |
| ✓ | Develop strategy for growing life sciences business in the Boston Region |
| ✓ | Achieve continued strong rent collections |
| ✓ | Achieve specified ESG goals |
| ✓+ | Actively promote diversity with specific actions |
| ✓ | Assist in completion of update to BXP Health Security Plan |
| ✓ | Maintain the health and safety of BXP employees as offices repopulate |
| ✓+ | Determine and execute on plans for cleaning, ventilation and security for repopulation of offices at various phases based on governmental and health officials’ guidance |
| | | | | | | | | | 2022 Proxy Statement 77 |
| | | 7› | | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
After assessing Mr. Koop’s performance against his Business & Individual goals, the Committee concluded that he achieved substantially all of the goals established for him. He played a key role in developing a strategy for growing BXP’s life sciences business in the Boston Region, and he successfully oversaw a significant volume of pre-development, development and investment activity in the Boston Region. In addition, Mr. Koop played a key leadership role in maintaining BXP’s position as a leader in health security, contributing to BXP’s Health Security Plan 2.0 update, and he formulated plans for office repopulations that addressed cleaning practices, air ventilation and general health security. Mr. Koop also meaningfully advanced diversity and inclusion and ESG initiatives, including the creation of new opportunities related to hiring, internship and volunteering, youth workshops and art installments throughout the Boston Region. Based on Mr. Koop’s achievement of substantially all of his Business & Individual goals, the Committee determined that Mr. Koop earned 130% of target for this category. | | | | | | | TOTAL ANNUAL INCENTIVE PAYOUT AS A % OF TARGET = 136.9% |
(1) | Represents diluted FFO per share after adjusting for certain transactions in accordance with the terms of the 2021 AIP. For disclosures required by Regulation G, refer to Appendix A to this proxy statement. |
Based on the foregoing, the Committee awarded annual cash bonuses to the NEOs for 2021 as follows: | | | | | | | Name | | 2021 Target Annual Incentive | | 2021 Actual Annual Incentive | | 2021 Actual as % of Target | | | | | Owen D. Thomas | | $2,350,000 | | $3,231,250 | | 137.5% | | | | | Douglas T. Linde | | $1,900,000 | | $2,612,500 | | 137.5% | | | | | Raymond A. Ritchey | | $1,650,000 | | $2,268,750 | | 137.5% | | | | | Michael E. LaBelle | | $1,250,000 | | $1,618,750 | | 129.5% | | | | | Bryan J. Koop | | $1,250,000 | | $1,711,250 | | 136.9% |
| | | | | | | | 2022 Proxy Statement 78 | | |
| | | 7› | | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
Changes for 20212022 Annual Incentive Plan As part of the Committee’s annual executive compensation process, the Committee reviewed and reassessed the annual cash incentive program,AIP, including its structure. Based on that review, the Committee concluded that the overall structure and categories were appropriate, but that market practice among peers was that more weight should be givenan adjustment to the Businessweightings of the leasing component for Mr. Ritchey and Individual Goals. For 2021,the regional EVPs would be appropriate so that their respective leasing goals would increase in weighting to 40%, split evenly between short-term and total leasing, and the diluted FFO per share component would be weighted 20%. The Committee believes this change will better link pay with performance for Mr. Ritchey and the regional EVPs because their opportunities to impact leasing outcomes are greater than their impact on diluted FFO per share for BXP as a whole. Therefore, the Committee changedestablished the weightingweightings of the categories under the Annual Incentive Plan for Mr. LaBelle so that it is the same for all five NEOs, and changed the weightings of the categories so they will be FFO per Share – 30%, Leasing – 30% and Business and Individual goals – 40%.2022 AIP as follows: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Annual Incentive Performance Measures | | Thomas | | Linde | | LaBelle | | Ritchey | | Regional EVPs | FFO per Share | | | | 30% | | | | | 30% | | | | | 30% | | | | | 20% | | | | | 20% | | Leasing (Short-Term and Total) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Overall BXP | | | | 30% | | | | | 30% | | | | | 30% | | | | | | | | | | | | Regional | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 40% | | | | | 40% | | Business & Individual Goals | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Overall BXP | | | | 40% | | | | | 40% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Finance | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 40% | | | | | | | | | | | | Regional | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 40% | | | | | 40% | | Total | | | | 100.0% | | | | | 100.0% | | | | | 100.0% | | | | | 100.0% | | | | | 100.0% | |
› LTI EQUITY COMPENSATION The equity component of our NEOs’ compensation is driven to a significant extent by our TSR through LTI equity awards consisting of a mix of time-based and performance-based awards. Allocation of LTI Awards 2020 Performance Grants The Committee approved LTI equity awards to NEOs for 2020 performance as a mix of performance-based MYLTIP awards and time-based, full-value equity awards. The MYLTIP awards were denominated in a fixed number of LTIP unitunits and granted on February 2, 2021. The Committee maintained the same allocations of performance-based equity as a percentage of total LTI equity for all of our NEOs in 2019 and 2020. Thus, the CEO’s allocation remained 55% performance-based and 45% time-based, and the other NEOs’ allocations remained 50% performance-based and 50% time-based. In light of the economic circumstances and challenges the NEOs faced in 2020, including the sudden shift in priorities, the Committee awarded the dollar values set forth below for performance-based and time-based equity awards to the NEOs in 2021 for performance in 2020. The Committee awarded Messrs. Thomas and Linde the same dollar value in LTI equity awards for 2020 performance as it awarded in 2020 for 2019 performance, the result of which was an award of less than target for each, and it awarded Mr. Ritchey his target for LTI equity in acknowledgment of his continued leadership in the Washington, DC and Los Angeles regions and his leadership and mentorship of leasing teams company-wide. The Committee assessed Messrs. LaBelle and Koop’s performance in 2020 as strong and awarded each LTI equity that was above target. | | | | | | | | | | 2022 Proxy Statement 79 |
| | | 7› | | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
The following table sets forth the dollar values of the time-based and performance-based equity awards granted to NEOs on January 29, 2021 and February 1, 2021, respectively: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Executive | | Total LTI Equity Awards | | | Total LTI Equity Awards as % of Target | | | Performance- Based LTI Equity Awards | | | % of Total Equity Awards | | | Time-Based LTI Equity Awards | | | % of Total Equity Awards | | | | | | | | | Owen D. Thomas | | | $ 9,050,000 | | | | 98% | | | | $ 4,977,500 | | | | 55% | | | | $ 4,072,500 | | | | 45% | | | | | | | | | Douglas T. Linde | | | $ 5,655,000 | | | | 97% | | | | $ 2,827,500 | | | | 50% | | | | $ 2,827,500 | | | | 50% | | | | | | | | | Raymond A. Ritchey | | | $ 4,410,000 | | | | 100% | | | | $ 2,205,000 | | | | 50% | | | | $ 2,205,000 | | | | 50% | | | | | | | | | Michael E. LaBelle | | | $ 2,189,000 | | | | 110% | | | | $ 1,094,500 | | | | 50% | | | | $ 1,094,500 | | | | 50% | | | | | | | | | Bryan J. Koop | | | $ 1,788,000 | | | | 120% | | | | $ 894,000 | | | | 50% | | | | $ 894,000 | | | | 50% | | | | | | | | | Total | | | $23,092,000 | | | | 100% | | | | $11,998,500 | | | | 52% | | | | $11,093,500 | | | | 48% | |
The 2021 MYLTIP awards have a three-year performance period (February 2, 2021 to February 1, 2024), and an additional one-year, post-vesting holding period (see “– Performance-Based Equity Awards – Multi-Year Long-Term Incentive Program (MYLTIP) – 2021 MYLTIP – Other Features of 2021 MYLTIP”below). Following completion of the three-year performance period, the Committee will determine the final payout based on computations from our independent valuation consultant for this plan, and if the number of units initially awarded exceeds the number of units ultimately earned, then the excess will be forfeited. Therefore, while the award of 2021 MYLTIP units was partially in recognition for performance in 2020, award recipients must continue to perform over the three-year term of the 2021 MYLTIP in order to earn and vest in any of the MYLTIP units and hold the units for an additional year. As a result, recipients must generally remain employed for four years before they may monetize the awards. Time-Based Equity Awards The time-based LTI equity awards granted to the NEOs for 20202021 performance consisted of LTIP units or restricted shares of our common stock that generally vest ratably over a four-year period (25% per year), subject to acceleration in certain circumstances (e.g., retirement, death or disability, and certain qualifying terminations following a change in control). See “– Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control – Retirement Eligibility Provisions for LTI Equity Awards.” Performance-Based Equity Awards – Multi-Year Long-Term Incentive Program (MYLTIP) The performance-based portion of LTI equity awards areis granted under our Multi-Year Long-Term Incentive Program, or “MYLTIP.” MYLTIPs are awarded to provide incentives for long-term performanceoutperformance and focus over a multi-year period. The design of the MYLTIP awards links the ultimate payouts directly by formula to our TSR over a three-year measurement period. 2020 MYLTIP
Under the 2020 MYLTIP:
the Company’s relative TSR performance is measured against a single index – the FTSE Russell Nareit Office Index (the “Nareit Office Index”) (which is adjusted to include Vornado Realty Trust because it is a publicly-traded office REIT that we consider one of our most directly comparable peers despite being categorized as a diversified REIT by FTSE Nareit);
the awards are denominated in LTIP units; and
relative TSR is the sole determinant of how many LTIP units are earned and eligible to vest; there are no absolute TSR modifiers that can increase or decrease the final payout.
For 2020 MYLTIP awards, the number of LTIP units that can be earned, whether in whole, in part or not at all, is based on levels of payout opportunity ranging from zero to 200% of the target number of LTIP units issued, on a straight-line basis depending on relative TSR performance compared to the Nareit Office Index (as adjusted) as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement 80 | | 65
|
| | | 7› | | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | | | II. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM |
CEO Reported vs. Realized Pay
The following graph shows for our CEO (1) the reported values of the MYLTIP awards granted between 2015—2020 as of their respective grant dates, (2) the actual realized pay for each of the MYLTIP awards granted between 2015—2018 for which the measurement periods have ended and (3) the interim valuations as of December 31, 2020 for the 2019 and 2020 MYLTIP awards:
| (1) | Interim Valuation amounts and Payout as % of Reported Pay percentages shown for the 2019 and 2020 MYLTIP are estimates as of December 31, 2020 based on interim valuations performed by our independent valuation consultant. Actual results could differ materially from the interim valuations.
| |
2021 MYLTIP InThe performance-based portion of LTI equity awards for 2020 performance was granted on February 2, 2021 in the Committee, with the assistanceform of FW Cook, undertook a comprehensive review of all facets of the MYLTIP plan design to help ensure that it successfully links executive pay and long-term performance and is therefore effective in motivating, retaining and rewarding our NEOs. In its review, the Committee considered whether the peer group(s) against which the Company’s performance is assessed is comprised of the appropriate peers, particularly in light of the impact of COVID-19 on the office REIT sector, as well as the appropriate metric(s) on which to assess performance.
After consideration, the Committee modified the design of the 2021 MYLTIP so that it nowawards. The 2021 MYLTIP consists of two, equally weighted components, each of which provides a payout opportunity ranging from zero to 200% of a target number of LTIP units based on
| | | | | | | | | 66
| | | | | 2021 Proxy Statement
|
| | | 7› | | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | | | II. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM |
BXP’s relative and absolute TSR performance over a three-year performance period. The objectives of theperiod (February 2, 2021 MYLTIP program are (1) retention (similar to time-based equity awards), (2) alignment with stockholders and (3) pay-for-performance. The Committee believes that, particularly in light of COVID-19, the performance targets are rigorous, but achievable, and challenge our executive team to achieve strong performance over time, on both an absolute and relative basis. The Committee added the second component, in part, to limit the scenarios in which our investors may suffer losses due to a decline in absolute TSR while our NEOs realize outsized payouts for relative TSR. As a result, BXP performance above the maximum goal under the Relative TSR component does not automatically result in a payout equal to the maximum 200% of target because the total payout would be offset, e.g., if performance is below target under the Absolute TSR component. The Committee concluded that this “offsetting” feature helps align our NEOs’ interests with our stockholders, while also providing incentives to outperform our peers.through February 1, 2024). The first componentOne-half (50%) of the 2021 MYLTIP which represents one-half (50%) oftarget grant value was awarded in the target grant-date value, retains the basic structure of the 2020 MYLTIP awards. The numberform of LTIP units that can be earned under this component ranges from zero to 200% of the target number of LTIP units, based on BXP’s three-year, annualized relative TSR (“rTSR”) performance compared to an index. Under this component, 100%index of peer companies as follows:
| | | | | BXP Annualized TSR Relative to Index | | Percentage of Target MYLTIP Units that are Earned | | | >= +1,000 basis points | | 200% | | | 0 basis points | | 100% | | | <= -1,000 basis points | | Zero |
Payout for performance between levels outlined in the target LTIP unitstable above will be earned if the Company’s TSR equals the index TSR; the maximum 200% of the target number of LTIP units will be earned if the Company’s rTSR is at least 1,000 basis points greater than the index; and no LTIP units will be earned if the Company’s rTSR is more than 1,000 basis points less than the index. For rTSR performance between -1,000 basis points and +1,000 basis points, the number of LTIP units earned will be determined using linear interpolation.interpolated on a straight-lined basis. For purposes of measuring relative performance, the 2021 MYLTIP awards provide that BXP’s TSR shall be compared to the TSR of a custom peer group index (the “Custom Index”) consisting of the following nine (9) office REITs: | | | | | | Custom Index | | | | Columbia Property Trust | | Douglas Emmett, Inc. | Empire State Realty Trust (1) | | Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. | | Paramount Group, Inc. | | | | Douglas Emmett, Inc. | | JBG Smith Properties | | Kilroy Realty Corporation | Paramount Group, Inc.
| | SL Green Realty Corp. | | | | Empire State Realty Trust | | Kilroy Realty Corporation | | Vornado Realty Trust |
| | (1) | In December 2021, Columbia Property Trust completed a merger that subsequently resulted in its delisting on the NYSE and its removal from the Custom Index under the terms of the program. |
The purpose of using a peer group is to provide a mechanism for comparing our relative performance against competitors,competitors; however, the Company does not have a directly comparable peer in the public market and often competes with larger, privately-capitalized companies for which performance data is not readily available, if at all. The FTSE Nareit Office Index, which has been the comparative index used in recent years, includes more than 20 REITs, more than half of which are not direct competitors due to geographic regions, type of product (Central Business District vs. Suburban), asset quality or size. The Custom Index was selected to include only office REITs that are most similar to the Company in terms of asset type, asset quality, and having full-scale operations in one or more of the U.S. gateway markets in which the Company operates. For purposes of determining the TSR of the Custom Index, the weighting ascribed to each company in the Custom Index is fixed as of the grant date based on its relative market capitalization at that time; in contrast, the 2020 MYLTIP and prior programs determined the relative weight of each constituent annually and used the average of each constituent’s annual weightings over the performance period. In deciding to change the weighting methodology, the Committee considered that market practice is to fix the weightings at the plan inception. The Committee back-tested our performance versus the Custom Index. From February 6, 2018 through February 5, 2021, which was the performance period for the 2018 MYLTIP, our annualized TSR was 235 bps above the Custom Index, which would have resulted in payout of 123.5% of the target LTIP units. However, our absolute TSR was negative over that period. To align management with our stockholders and hold them more accountable for our absolute TSR, the 2021 MYLTIP includes an absolute TSR component, as described below. If the absolute TSR component had also been in effect, the resulting payout would have been reduced to approximately 87.7% of target.time.
| | | | | | | | | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement | | 67 81 |
| | | 7› | | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | | | II. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM |
The second component represents the remaining one-half (50%) of the 2021 MYLTIP target grant-dategrant value ofwas awarded in the 2021 MYLTIP. The numberform of LTIP units that can be earned under this component ranges from zero to 200% of the target number of LTIP units, based on BXP’s non-annualized,cumulative absolute TSR (“aTSR”) during the three-year performance period. Under thisperiod as follows: | | | | | BXP Cumulative aTSR | | Percentage of Target MYLTIP Units that are Earned | | | >= +60% | | 200% | | | +10% | | 100% | | | <= -40% | | Zero |
Payout for performance between levels outlined in the table above will be interpolated on a straight-lined basis. The Committee added the aTSR component 100%during its re-design of the target LTIP units will be earned ifMYLTIP in 2020, in part, to limit the Company achieves an aTSRscenarios in which our investors may suffer losses due to a decline in absolute TSR while our NEOs realize above-target payouts for relative TSR. As a result, BXP performance above the maximum goal under the rTSR component does not automatically result in a payout equal to +1,000 basis points; the maximum 200% of target LTIP units willbecause the total payout would be earnedoffset if performance is below target under the Company achieves an aTSR of +6,000 basis points or greater; and the threshold percentagecomponent. The Committee concluded that this “offsetting” feature helps align our NEOs’ interests with our stockholders, while also providing incentives to earn any LTIP units is an aTSR of greater than -4,000 basis points. If the Company’s aTSR is greater than -4,000 basis points but less than +6,000 basis points, then the number of LTIP units earned will be determined using linear interpolation.outperform our peers. | Ø | Other Changes toFeatures of 2021 MYLTIP Design |
DividendsDistributions. Consistent with previous MYLTIP programs, duringDuring the three-year performance period holders of 2021 MYLTIP Units are not entitled to receive full dividendsdistributions on the 2021 MYLTIP Units. Instead, to support the units’ characterization as profits interests for tax purposes, the holders of the units are entitled to receive only a partial dividenddistribution on each unit equal to 10% of the full dividend payable on a share of BXP common stock. Unlike prior MYLTIP programs, however, following the completion of the three-year performance period,In addition, BXP will also make a “catch-up” cash payment on the 2021 MYLTIP Units that are ultimately earned in an amount equal to the regular and special distributions,dividends, if any, declared during the performance period on BXP common stock, less the distributions actually paid to holders of 2021 MYLTIP Units during the performance period on all of the awarded 2021 MYLTIP Units.
Post-vesting Transfer Restrictions. Subject to the provisions on “Qualified Retirement” and the other terms of the award agreement, after the completion of the three-year performance period all earned 2021 MYLTIP Units shall be deemed “vested“,“vested,“ but they may not be converted, redeemed, sold or otherwise transferred for one additional year after the end of the performance measurement period. Therefore, 100% of earned awards, if any, shall vest as of February 1, 2024, but may not be monetized until February 1, 2025. Allocation of LTI Awards
20202021 Performance Grants
The Committee approved LTI equity awards to NEOs for 20202021 performance as a mix of time-based, full-value equity awards and performance-based MYLTIP awards, and time-based, full-value equity awards.as further detailed below. The 2022 MYLTIP awards were denominated in a fixed number of LTIP units and granted as of February 2, 2021,1, 2022. For the date of initial grant. Thethird consecutive year, the Committee maintained the same allocation of performance-based equity as a percentage of total LTI equity for our CEO as in 2019 for 2020, so his allocation remained 55%(55% performance-based and 45% time-based. Fortime-based) and for the other NEOs the Committee maintained the allocation at 50%(50% performance-based and 50% time-based.time-based). In light of the economic circumstances and challenges the NEOs faced in 2020, including the sudden shift in priorities, the Committee awarded the dollar values set forth below for performance-based and time-based equity awards to the NEOs in 2021 for performance in 2020. The Committee awarded Messrs. Thomas and Linde the same dollar value in LTI equity awards for 2020 as was awarded last year for 2019 performance, the result of which was an award of less than target for each, and awarded Mr. Ritchey his target LTI equity awards in acknowledgment of his continued leadership in the Washington, DC and Los Angeles regions. The Committee assessed Messrs. LaBelle and Koop’s performance in 2020 as strong and awarded each LTI equity that was above target.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Executive | | Total LTI Equity Awards | | | Total LTI Equity Awards as % of Target | | Performance- Based LTI Equity Awards | | | % of Total Equity Awards | | | Time-Based LTI Equity Awards | | | % of Total Equity Awards | | Owen D. Thomas | | | $ 9,050,000 | | | 98% | | | $ 4,977,500 | | | | 55% | | | | $ 4,072,500 | | | | 45% | | Douglas T. Linde | | | $ 5,655,000 | | | 97% | | | $ 2,827,500 | | | | 50% | | | | $ 2,827,500 | | | | 50% | | Raymond A. Ritchey | | | $ 4,410,000 | | | 100% | | | $ 2,205,000 | | | | 50% | | | | $ 2,205,000 | | | | 50% | | Michael E. LaBelle | | | $ 2,189,000 | | | 110% | | | $ 1,094,500 | | | | 50% | | | | $ 1,094,500 | | | | 50% | | Bryan J. Koop | | | $ 1,788,000 | | | 120% | | | $ 894,000 | | | | 50% | | | | $ 894,000 | | | | 50% | | | | | | | | | Total | | | $23,092,000 | | | 100% | | | $11,998,500 | | | | 52% | | | | $11,093,500 | | | | 48% | |
| | | | | | | | | 68
| | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement 82 | | |
| | | 7› | | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | | | II. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM |
TheBased on the NEOs’ strong performance, especially in light of the continued economic challenges during 2021, the Committee awarded the dollar values set forth below for performance-based portion of LTIand time-based equity awards for 2020 performance was grantedto the NEOs in the form of 2021 MYLTIP awards, which have a three-year performance period (February 2, 2021 to February 1, 2024), and an additional year of post-vesting restrictions on transfer. The dollar values of the awards were converted into a fixed number of MYLTIP units on the initial grant date, and the number of units initially granted equals 200% of the target number of units, and it is the maximum number of units that may be earned. Following completion of the three-year performance period, the Committee will determine the final payout based on computations from our independent valuation consultant for this plan, and if the number of units initially awarded exceeds the number of units ultimately earned, then the excess will be forfeited. The units determined to be earned shall vest 100% as of the final day of the performance period, but shall be subject to an additional one-year, no-sale holding period. Therefore, while the award of 2021 MYLTIP units is partially in recognition2022 for performance in 2020,2021, which reflect 100% of each NEO’s target LTI award recipients must continue to perform over the three-year term of the 2021 MYLTIP program in order to earn and vest in any of the MYLTIP units and must generally remain employed for the three years to earn the full amount. value.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Executive | | Total LTI Equity Awards | | | Performance- Based LTI Equity Awards | | | % of Total Equity Awards | | | Time-Based LTI Equity Awards | | | % of Total Equity Awards | | | | | | | | Owen D. Thomas | | | $ 9,450,000 | | | | $ 5,197,500 | | | | 55% | | | | $ 4,252,500 | | | | 45% | | | | | | | | Douglas T. Linde | | | $ 6,045,000 | | | | $ 3,022,500 | | | | 50% | | | | $ 3,022,500 | | | | 50% | | | | | | | | Raymond A. Ritchey | | | $ 4,410,000 | | | | $ 2,205,000 | | | | 50% | | | | $ 2,205,000 | | | | 50% | | | | | | | | Michael E. LaBelle | | | $ 1,990,000 | | | | $ 995,000 | | | | 50% | | | | $ 995,000 | | | | 50% | | | | | | | | Bryan J. Koop | | | $ 1,490,000 | | | | $ 745,000 | | | | 50% | | | | $ 745,000 | | | | 50% | | | | | | | | Total | | | $23,385,000 | | | | $12,165,000 | | | | 52% | | | | $11,220,000 | | | | 48% | |
The aggregate target number of units for NEOs is approximately 137,688105,564 LTIP units and an aggregate payout opportunity ranging from zero to a maximum of 275,376211,128 LTIP units. The baseline share price for 20202022 MYLTIP awards was $90.73$113.194 (the average closing price per share of our common stock on the NYSE for the five trading days prior to and including February 2, 2021)1, 2022). The 20212022 MYLTIP awards are generally amortized into earnings over the three-year plan period under the graded vesting method, unless accelerated in certain circumstances such as a “Qualified Retirement” as defined under “– Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control – Retirement Eligibility Provisions for LTI Equity Awards.” Under the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Accounting Standards Codification 718 “Compensation – Stock Compensation” (“ASC Topic 718”),718, we expect that 20212022 MYLTIP awards to NEOs will have an aggregate value of approximately $12.0$12.8 million. 2019 Performance Grants2022 MYLTIP
The following table sets forth the dollar values of the performance-based and time-based equity awards granted to NEOs in February 2020 for performance in 2019:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Executive | | Total LTI Equity Awards | | | Performance-Based LTI Equity Awards | | | % of Total Equity Awards | | | Time-Based LTI Equity Awards | | | % of Total Equity Awards | | Owen D. Thomas | | | $ 9,050,000 | | | | $ 4,977,500 | | | | 55% | | | | $ 4,072,500 | | | | 45% | | Douglas T. Linde | | | $ 5,655,000 | | | | $ 2,827,500 | | | | 50% | | | | $ 2,827,500 | | | | 50% | | Raymond A. Ritchey | | | $ 4,240,000 | | | | $ 2,120,000 | | | | 50% | | | | $ 2,120,000 | | | | 50% | | Michael E. LaBelle | | | $ 1,945,000 | | | | $ 972,500 | | | | 50% | | | | $ 972,500 | | | | 50% | | Bryan J. Koop | | | $ 1,370,000 | | | | $ 685,000 | | | | 50% | | | | $ 685,000 | | | | 50% | | | | | | | | Total | | | $22,260,000 | | | | $11,582,500 | | | | 52% | | | | $10,677,500 | | | | 48% | |
The performance-based portion of LTI equity awards for 20192021 performance was granted on February 1, 2022 in the form of 20202022 MYLTIP awards, which have a three-year performance period (February 4, 2020 to February 3, 2023),awards. The structure and an additional year of time-based vesting. The dollar valuesdesign of the awards were converted into a fixed number of2022 MYLTIP units onis the initial grant date, and the number of units initially granted equals 200%same as that of the target number of units, and2021 MYLTIP, except Columbia Property Trust is not included in the custom peer group index because it iswas acquired prior to the maximum number of units that may be earned. Following completioncommencement of the three-year performance period, the Committee will determine the final payout based on computations from our independent valuation consultant for this plan, and if the number of units initially awarded exceeds the number of units ultimately earned, then the excess will be forfeited. Therefore, while the award of 2020 MYLTIP units was partially in recognition for performance in 2019, award recipients must continue to perform over the three-year term of the 2020 MYLTIP program in order to earn and vest in any of the MYLTIP units and must generally remain employed for the four years to earn the full amount.plan. | | | | | | | | | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement | | 69 83 |
| | | 7› | | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
Realized Pay vs. Reported Pay for MYLTIP Awards The total compensation of our NEOs as reported in the 2021 Summary Compensation Table is calculated in accordance with SEC rules, which require us to show the grant date fair value of equity and equity-based awards. The Committee believes realized pay better measures compensation for an annual period as compared to reported pay because a significant portion of our NEOs’ compensation consists of long-term, equity-based MYLTIPs. The ability of our executive officers to realize value from MYLTIP awards is contingent on the achievement of certain performance milestones. As a result, reported pay includes the accounting value of MYLTIP awards granted in the given period, which may or may not be realized in the future. As illustrated in the following charts, our CEO realized approximately 63% of the reported pay for all MYLTIP awards granted since 2015 for which the measurement periods have ended. | | | | | | | | 2022 Proxy Statement 84 | | III. DETERMINING EXECUTIVE |
| | | 7› | | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
III. DETERMINING EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION › PROCESS FOR DETERMINING EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION StartingConsistent with the prior year’s process, in 2020, and in response to shareholder feedback,January 2021, our Committee established target total direct compensation opportunities for each of our NEOs consisting of base salary, target annual cash incentive, and target long-term incentive grant value. When establishing target total direct compensation levels, the Committee considered a variety of factors, including:
industry and market conditions; the Company’s financial and strategic performance, on both an absolute basis and versus competitors; market compensation data among comparable companies; individual executive past performance, future potential, roles and responsibilities, experience, retention risk, and succession planning; total NEO compensation over time, both on an awarded basis and on a realized basis after forfeitures; and current and evolving practices and trends among our peers and the market generally especially in light of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on global and national economies, and other input received from FW Cook. The Committee evaluated the pre-established performance goals under the Annual Incentive Plan to determine earned annual incentives for 20202021 (refer to page 64)78). The Committee determined LTI equity grant values earned for 20202021 (granted in 2021)2022) with reference to the targets established at the beginning of the year (refer to page 68)pages 82-83). The ultimate earned value of these LTI equity awards will be based on the performance of our stock, as well as performance versus the relative and absolute TSR components under the 20212022 MYLTIP. › COMPENSATION ADVISOR’S ROLE & BENCHMARKING PEER GROUP Compensation Advisor’s Role The Committee monitors the effectiveness of our executive compensation program on an ongoing basis. For it to be effective, among other things, we believe it is necessary for compensation to be competitive with other large public real estate companies with which we compete for executive talent. The Committee uses industry peer group data as one tool in assessing and determining pay for our executive officers. Other REITs, however, both in the office sector and in other sectors, are not always comparable to us because of differences in underlying business fundamentals. Peer group data is intended to provide the Committee with insight across the peer group into market pay levels for each element of compensation and total target compensation of executive officers having similar titles and responsibilities to our NEOs, market trends, “best” governance practices, and overall industry performance. The median (50th percentile) serves as a reference point and indicator of competitive market trends and the Committee uses it as the starting point when setting our executive compensation. However, market data is one of many factors the Committee considers when setting target pay opportunities. In 2020,2021, the Committee again retained FW Cook to serve as its independent, third-party compensation consultant. FW Cook reports directly to the Committee and does not provide services to management that are not under the Committee’s purview. A representative of FW Cook attends meetings of the Committee, as requested, and communicates with the Committee Chair and management between meetings. Consistent with its charter and as required by SEC rules and NYSE listing standards, prior to retaining FW Cook as its consultant, the Committee considered all factors relevant to FW Cook’s independence from management. FW Cook advises the Committee on the reasonableness of executive compensation levels in comparison with those of other similarly situated companies, consults on the structure of our executive compensation program to optimally support our business objectives and advises the Committee on executive compensation trends among REITs and the broader market. | | | | | | | | | | 2022 Proxy Statement 85 |
| | | 7› | | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
Benchmarking Peer Group FW Cook (1) advised the Committee that size, as measured by total capitalization, best depicts the scale, complexity and breadth of the Company’s operations, as well as the amount of capital and assets managed, and therefore is the most appropriate scope measure for peer company selection and (2) reviewedselection. Following a review of the peer group for 20192020, FW Cook recommended, and recommended that the | | | | | | | | | 70
| | | | | 2021 Proxy Statement
|
| | | 7› | | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | | | III. DETERMINING EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Committee maintainagreed, to update the same peer group for 2020. Based on that advice,2021 to remove two REITs – Equity Residential and Public Storage – and replace them with Douglas Emmett, Inc. and Kilroy Realty Corporation. As a result, the Committee selected the same peer group for benchmarking 2020 executive compensation that it used for 2019. That peer group consists of sixteen publicly traded real estate companies that are of comparable size to the Company in terms of total capitalization and assets, irrespective of property focus. Notably, fourteenthirteen out of the sixteen members of this Benchmarking Peer Group also listed Boston PropertiesBXP as a peer company in their 20202021 proxy statements. The following table provides the names and key information for each peer company: | Company | | Sector | | Location | | | Total Capitalization (in millions)(1) | | | Sector | | Location | | | Total Capitalization (in millions)(1) | | | Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. | | Office | | | Pasadena, CA | | | $ | 33,988 | | | Office | | | Pasadena, CA | | | $ | 47,308 | | American Tower Corporation (REIT) | | Specialty | | | Boston, MA | | | $ | 137,133 | | | | American Tower Corporation | | | Specialty | | | Boston, MA | | | $ | 189,310 | | | AvalonBay Communities, Inc. | | Multifamily | | | Arlington, VA | | | $ | 30,132 | | | Multifamily | | | Arlington, VA | | | $ | 43,572 | | | Digital Realty Trust, Inc. | | Specialty | | | Austin, TX | | | $ | 56,308 | | | Specialty | | | Austin, TX | | | $ | 67,116 | | Equity Residential | | Multifamily | | | Chicago, IL | | | $ | 31,307 | | | | Douglas Emmett, Inc. | | | Office | | | Santa Monica, CA | | | $ | 11,945 | | | Essex Property Trust, Inc. | | Multifamily | | | San Mateo, CA | | | $ | 22,547 | | | Multifamily | | | San Mateo, CA | | | $ | 30,302 | | | Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. | | Hotel | | | Bethesda, MD | | | $ | 16,583 | | | Hotel | | | Bethesda, MD | | | $ | 18,129 | | | Kilroy Realty Corporation | | | Office | | | Los Angeles, CA | | | $ | 12,207 | | | Prologis, Inc. | | Industrial | | | San Francisco, CA | | | $ | 96,667 | | | Industrial | | | San Francisco, CA | | | $ | 149,760 | | Public Storage | | Self-Storage | | | Glendale, CA | | | $ | 47,025 | | | | Regency Centers Corporation | | Shopping Center | | | Jacksonville, FL | | | $ | 11,952 | | | Shopping Center | | | Jacksonville, FL | | | $ | 16,930 | | | Simon Property Group, Inc. | | Regional Mall | | | Indianapolis, IN | | | $ | 59,516 | | | Regional Mall | | | Indianapolis, IN | | | $ | 86,482 | | | SL Green Realty Corp. | | Office | | | New York, NY | | | $ | 10,451 | | | Office | | | New York, NY | | | $ | 10,278 | | | UDR, Inc. | | Multifamily | | | Highlands Ranch, CO | | | $ | 17,564 | | | Multifamily | | | Highlands Ranch, CO | | | $ | 26,172 | | | Ventas, Inc. | | Health Care | | | Chicago, IL | | | $ | 30,811 | | | Health Care | | | Chicago, IL | | | $ | 33,012 | | | Vornado Realty Trust | | Office | | | New York, NY | | | $ | 17,144 | | | Office | | | New York, NY | | | $ | 19,154 | | | Welltower Inc. | | Health Care | | | Toledo, OH | | | $ | 42,188 | | | Health Care | | | Toledo, OH | | | $ | 54,117 | | | Median | | | | | | $ | 31,059 | | | | | | | $ | 31,657 | | | Average | | | | | | $ | 41,332 | | | | | | | $ | 50,987 | | | Boston Properties, Inc. | | | | | | $ | 31,782 | | | Office | | | Boston, MA | | | $ | 35,021 | | | Relative Percentile Rank | | | | | | | 55%-ile | | | | | | | | 55%-ile | |
Source: Market Intelligence, a Division of S&P Global. Data as of December 31, 2020. 2021. (1) | Total capitalization includes debt and the book value of any preferred stock. |
The benchmarking review was based, in part, on information disclosed in the peer companies’ proxy statements filed in 20202021 (the latest year for which comprehensive data were publicly available). | | | | | | | | 2022 Proxy Statement 86 | | |
| | | 7› | | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
› ROLE OF MANAGEMENT IN COMPENSATION DECISIONS Our CEO and President make recommendations to the Committee on the compensation of the other executive officers, and our CEO makes recommendations to the Committee on the compensation of our President, in each case, based on their assessment of performance versus corporate and individual goals and a variety of other factors (e.g., compensation history, tenure, responsibilities, market data for competitive positions and retention concerns). All executive compensation decisions are made by the Committee. | | | | | | | | | | | | 2021 Proxy Statement
| | 71
|
| | | 7› | | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | | | IV. OTHER COMPENSATION POLICIES |
IV. OTHER COMPENSATION POLICIES › DOUBLE-TRIGGER ACCELERATION OF VESTING OF EQUITY AWARDS UPON A CHANGE OF CONTROL All time-based equity awards made after 2014 include “double-trigger” vesting, meaning that, if there is a “change of control” and the awards are not otherwise cancelled in connection with the change of control transaction, then they only become fully vested if, within 24 months after the change of control, the executive’s employment is terminated by the Company or its successor without “cause” or the executive resigns for “good reason.” We believe that this policy regarding acceleration of vesting upon a change of control is in line with current best practice while also continuing to remove potential disincentives for executives to pursue a change of control transaction that would benefit stockholders. Although certain senior officers, including our CEO, were entitled to single-trigger vesting under their employment agreements, the Committee requested, and those executives voluntarily agreed, to the change. The Committee believes that this demonstrates its and management’s responsiveness to stockholders and that the policy addresses two key objectives: | • | | Aligning executives’ interests with stockholders’ interests:When a change of control may be imminent, it is important to ensure that executives’ interests are aligned with stockholders to maximize stockholder value. |
| • | | Minimizing conflicts of interest:Double-trigger vesting in the context of a potential change of control (1) reduces distraction and the risk that executives leave the Company before a transaction is completed and (2) prevents executives from receiving a windfall because executives’ time-based equity vests only if their employment is terminated. |
› CLAWBACK POLICY We have a formal “clawback” policy, which allows us to recoup from all executive officers and certain other specified officers’ incentive compensation paid on the basis of financial results that are subsequently restated. Under the policy, if we are required to prepare an accounting restatement due to material non-compliance with any financial reporting requirement, the Committee may require those officers to repay or forfeit “excess compensation,” which includes annual cash bonus and long-term incentive compensation in any form (including stock options, restricted stock and LTIP units, whether time-based or performance-based) received by them during the three-year period preceding the publication of the restated financial statements, that the Committee determines was in excess of the amount that they would have received had such compensation been determined based on the financial results reported in the restated financial statements. The Committee may take into accountconsider any factors it deems reasonable in determining (1) whether to seek recoupment of previously paid excess compensation, (2) the amount of excess compensation to recoup from each individual officer, which may reflect whether the Committee concluded that he or she engaged in wrongdoing or committed grossly negligent acts or omissions, and (3) the form of the compensation to be recouped. The Committee intends to periodically review this policy and, as appropriate, conform it to any applicable final rules adopted pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. ›GROSS-UP FOR EXCESS PARACHUTE PAYMENTS In January 2014, we adopted a formal “no tax gross-up” policy with respect to our senior executives. Pursuant to this policy, we will not make or promise to make any tax gross-up payment to any senior executive in the future, other | | | | | | | | | | 2022 Proxy Statement 87 |
| | | 7› | | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
than payments in accordance with obligations existing at the time of the policy’s adoption or pursuant to arrangements applicable to our management employees generally, such as a relocation policy. All of the employment agreements that we have entered into with senior executives since 2013, including our original and current employment agreements with our CEO, Mr. Thomas, do not provide for tax gross-up payments. Accordingly, this policy formalized the Committee’s then-existing practice with respect to tax gross-ups. In addition, our Senior Executive Severance Plan and Executive Severance Plan provide that executives who become eligible to participate in these plans will not be entitled to any tax gross-up payments under the plans. › POLICY CONCERNING HEDGING AND PLEDGING TRANSACTIONS We prohibit all employees, including our executive officers, and directors from engaging in short sales and derivative transactions, purchasing our securities on margin and pledging our securities as collateral for a loan. Transactions such as | | | | | | | | | 72
| | | | | 2021 Proxy Statement
|
| | | 7›
| | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | | | IV. OTHER COMPENSATION POLICIES |
purchases and sales of publicly traded put and call options, short sales, hedging transactions such as prepaid variable forwards, equity swaps and collars create a heightened compliance risk or could create the appearance of misalignment between management and stockholders. In addition, securities held in a margin account or pledged as collateral may be sold without consent if the owner fails to meet a margin call or defaults on the loan, thus creating the risk that a sale may occur at a time when an employee or director is aware of material, non-public information or otherwise is not permitted to trade in Company securities. › MANDATORY MINIMUM EQUITY OWNERSHIP POLICY FOR SENIOR EXECUTIVES To align senior management with our stockholders and demonstrate to the investment community that our senior management is personally committed to our continued financial success, we have a policy that requires the following officer positions to maintain equity ownership equal to a multiple of their base salaries as follows: | | | Title | | Multiple of Base Salary | | | Chief Executive Officer | | 6.0x | | | President | | 5.0x | | | Senior Executive Vice President | | 5.0x | | | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer | | 3.0x | | | Executive Vice President, Regional Manager | | 2.0x | | | Senior Vice President | | 1.5x |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CEO Mandatory Minimum | | | | | |
| | CEO Actual Stock Ownership | | | 6x Base Salary | | | | | | 35x53x Base Salary | | |
If an executive’s ownership falls below the applicable guideline due solely to a decline in the value of our common stock, the executive will not be required to acquire additional shares to meet the guideline, but he or she will be required to retain all shares then held (except for shares withheld to pay withholding taxes or the exercise price of options) until such time as the executive again attains the target multiple. Employees who are hired or promoted to senior management positions will have a five-year period beginning on January 1 of the year following their appointment to achieve this ownership requirement. Exceptions may be made for significant extenuating personal circumstances. The types of securities that will be counted toward the equity ownership requirement include shares of our common stock, common units and LTIP units (excluding performance-based LTIP units until and unless they have been earned), in each case both vested and unvested, as well as shares acquired and held through our stock purchase and dividend reinvestment plans. Stock options will not be counted. | | | | | | | | 2022 Proxy Statement 88 | | |
| | | 7› | | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
› LTIP UNITS Since 2003, we have used a class of partnership interests in our Operating Partnership, called long-term incentive units, or LTIP units, as a form of equity-based award for annual long-term incentive equity compensation. LTIP units are designed to qualify as “profits interests” in the Operating Partnership for federal income tax purposes, meaning that initially they are not economically equivalent in value to a share of our common stock, but over time can increase in value to one-for-one parity with common stock by operation of special tax rules applicable to profits interests. LTIP units are designed to offer executives a long-term incentive comparable to restricted stock, while allowing them to enjoy a more favorable income tax treatment. Each LTIP unit awarded is deemed equivalent to an award of one share of common stock reserved under our incentive equity plan. The key difference between LTIP units and restricted stock is that at the time of award, LTIP units do not have full economic parity with common units, but can achieve such parity over time upon the occurrence of specified events in accordance with partnership tax rules. Until and unless such parity is reached, the value that an executive will realize for a given number of vested LTIP units is less than the value of an equal number of shares of our common stock. | | | | | | | | | | | | 2021 Proxy Statement
| | 73
|
| | | 7› | | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | | | IV. OTHER COMPENSATION POLICIES |
Under the MYLTIP awards, during the performance period, holders of LTIP units will receive distributions equal to one-tenth (1/10th) of the amount of regular quarterly distributions paid on a common unit, but will not receive any special distributions. After the end of the performance period, holders of earned LTIP units, both vested and unvested, will be entitled to receive distributions in an amount per LTIP unit equal to the distributions, both regular and special, payable on a common unit (which equal per share dividends (both regular and special) on our common stock). Beginning withFor the 2021 MYLTIP awards and 2022 MYLTIP awards, following the completion of thetheir respective three-year performance period,periods, BXP will also make a “catch-up” cash payment on the 2021 MYLTIP UnitsLTIP units that are ultimately earned in an amount equal to the regular and special distributions,dividends, if any, declared during the performance period on BXP common stock, less the distributions actually paid to holders of 2021 MYLTIP Unitsawards and 2022 MYLTIP awards, respectively, during the applicable performance period on all of the awarded 2021 MYLTIP Units.corresponding LTIP units. LTIP units awarded with time-based vesting conditions only, both vested and unvested, are entitled to receive distributions in an amount per LTIP unit equal to the distributions, both regular and special, payable on a common unit. › EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS We have employment agreements with each of our NEOs. (See “Compensation of Executive Officers – Employment Agreements.”) For NEOs other than Mr. Thomas, these agreements provide for a certain level of severance, generally the sum of base salary plus the prior year’s cash bonus, 12 additional months of vesting in equity-based awards and participation in our health plan for up to 12 months, in the event of a termination of employment by us without cause or by the executives for good reason. The employment agreement with Mr. Thomas provides for stipulated severance benefits in lieu of participation in severance plans for which other NEOs are eligible. In return, each NEO agrees, during the term of employment and for one year thereafter, not to compete with us, solicit our tenants or employees or interfere with our relationship with our tenants, suppliers, contractors, lenders, employees or with any governmental agency. We believe that these agreements are fair to the NEOs and to our stockholders and, because the severance benefits are negotiated at the time of the agreement, avoid the need for protracted negotiations in the event of termination. › CHANGE IN CONTROL ARRANGEMENTS We have an employment agreement with Mr. Thomas that provides him with cash severance and certain benefits in the event of his termination under certain circumstances within 24 months following a change in control. Although Mr. Thomas was entitled to “single-trigger” vesting upon a change in control under his original employment agreement, he has agreed to be subject to the “double-trigger” vesting policy adopted for all time-based LTI equity awards made after 2014. We also have two change in control severance plans, one for our President, Senior Executive Vice President and Executive Vice Presidents, and the other for our Senior Vice Presidents and those Vice Presidents with ten (10) or more years of tenure with us. These plans also provide cash severance and certain benefits in the | | | | | | | | | | 2022 Proxy Statement 89 |
| | | 7› | | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
event of termination of employment under certain circumstances within 24 months following a change in control. The two change in control severance plans are “double trigger” arrangements, providing severance benefits only upon involuntary termination or constructive termination of the executive officer following a change in control. (See “Compensation of Executive Officers – Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control”) Officers who became eligible under the two severance plans described above prior to their amendment in January 2014 upon adoption by the Committee of a formal “no tax gross-up” policy are entitled to a gross-up payment in the event they become subject to the 20% golden parachute excise tax. This was market practice when these plans were adopted in 1998. Mr. Thomas is not entitled to a tax gross-up payment under his employment agreement. In our experience, change in control cash severance protection for executive officers is common in the REIT industry. Our Committee believes it is fair to provide severance protection in the event of an involuntary termination or constructive termination of employment following a change in control because very often senior manager positions are eliminated following a change in control. The Committee believes that agreeing in advance to provide severance benefits in the event of an involuntary termination or constructive termination of employment following a change in control helps reinforce and encourage the continued attention and dedication of senior management to their assigned duties without distraction in the face of an actual or threatened change in control and helps ensure that management is motivated to negotiate the best consideration for our stockholders. For treatment of equity awards in the event of a change in control, please see “– Double-Trigger Acceleration of Vesting of Equity Awards upon a Change of Control” above. | | | | | | | | | 74
| | | | | 2021 Proxy Statement
|
| | | 7› | | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | | | IV. OTHER COMPENSATION POLICIES |
› PERQUISITES We provide Messrs. Linde, Ritchey and Koop a monthly car allowance of $750 and we provide all of our executive officers a designated parking space. Mr. Thomas’ employment agreement provides that he is entitled to the use of a Company-owned or leased vehicle, but Mr. Thomas has declined this benefit at all times since 2013. Apart from these arrangements, we do not provide any other perquisites to our executive officers. › DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN We offer a deferred compensation plan that permits our executives to defer up to 20% of their base salaries and bonuses. The amounts deferred are not included in the executive’s current taxable income and, therefore, are not currently deductible by us. The executives select from a limited number of mutual funds, which serve as measurement funds, and the deferred amounts are increased or decreased to correspond to the market value of the mutual fund investments. Because the measurement funds are publicly traded securities, we do not consider any of the earnings credited under the deferred compensation plan to be “above market.” We do not provide any matching contribution to any executive officer who participates in this plan, other than a limited amount to make up for any loss of matching contributions under our Section 401(k) plan. We have made this plan available to our executives in order to ensure that our benefits are competitive. See “Compensation of Executive Officers – Nonqualified Deferred Compensation in 2020.2021.” › RETIREMENT AND HEALTH AND WELFARE BENEFITS We have never had a traditional or defined benefit pension plan. We maintain a Section 401(k) retirement plan in which all salaried employees can participate, which provides a Company matching contribution of 200% of the first 3% of compensation contributed to the plan (utilizing earnings not in excess of an amount established by the Internal Revenue Service ($285,000290,000 in 2020)2021)). Other benefits, such as health and dental plans, group term life insurance, short- and long-term disability insurance and travel accident insurance, are also available generally to all of our salaried employees. Our executives participate in Company-sponsored benefit programs available broadly to generally all of our salaried employees, including our employee stock purchase plan and our Section 401(k) plan. | | | | | | | | 2022 Proxy Statement 90 | | |
| | | 7› | | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
› DEDUCTIBILITY OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION The Committee’s policy is to consider the tax treatment of compensation paid to our executive officers while simultaneously seeking to provide our executives with appropriate rewards for their performance. Under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), a publicly-held corporation may not deduct compensation of more than $1 million paid to any “covered employee.” To the extent that compensation paid to our executive officers is subject to and does not qualify for deduction under Section 162(m), our Committee is prepared to exceed the limit on deductibility under Section 162(m) to the extent necessary to establish compensation programs that we believe provide appropriate incentives and reward our executives relative to their performance. Because we qualify as a REIT under the Code, we generally distribute at least 100% of our net taxable income each year and therefore do not pay federal income tax. As a result, the possible loss of a federal tax deduction would not be expected to have a material impact on us. › ACCOUNTING FOR STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION We account for stock-based awards in accordance with the requirements of ASC Topic 718. | | | | | | | | | | | | 2021 Proxy Statement
| | 75
|
| | | 7› | | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | | | IV. OTHER COMPENSATION POLICIES |
› ASSESSMENT OF COMPENSATION-RELATED RISKS The Committee is responsible for overseeing the risks relating to compensation policies and practices affecting senior management on an ongoing basis. The Committee believes that, because of the following factors, there is a low likelihood that our compensation policies and practices would encourage excessive risk-taking: | Risk Mitigation Factors | • our policies and programs are generally intended to encourage executives to focus on long- termlong-term objectives; • overall compensation is maintained at levels that are competitive with the market; • the mix of compensation rewardsbalances cash and equity compensation, incentives for short-term and long-term performance, with a significant at-risk component;and financial, strategic and market-based measures; • annual cash bonuses for executives are linked to performance against goals in three categories with specific weightings and each executive has target and maximum bonus opportunities; • long-term equity incentives align management’s interests with those of stockholders with the performance-based component rewarding both absolute and relative TSR performance and being capped at 200% of target shares; • except for those employees who satisfy the conditions for Qualified Retirement, all equity awards are subject to multi-year vesting (see “– Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control – Retirement Eligibility Provisions for LTI Equity Awards”); • executive officers are subject to minimum stock ownership guidelines and limitations on trading in our securities, including prohibitions on hedging and pledging; and • a clawback policy permits the Company to recoup compensation paid on the basis of financial results that are subsequently restated. |
› EQUITY AWARD GRANT POLICY We have a policy that annual grants to employees are approved by the Committee in late January or early February of each year, with an effective grant date immediately following the closing of the NYSE on the second trading day after we publicly release financial results for the prior year. We believe this policy provides the necessary certainty and transparency for both employees and stockholders, while allowing the Committee desired flexibility. Our Committee approves equity awards in dollar values. To the extent these awards are paid in the form of full-value awards (either shares of restricted stock and/or LTIP units), the number of shares/units granted is calculated by dividing the dollar value of the approved awards by the closing market price on the NYSE of a share of our common | | | | | | | | | | 2022 Proxy Statement 91 |
| | | 7› | | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
stock on the effective date of grant. To the extent these awards are made in the form of stock options, the number of shares underlying option grants is determined by dividing the dollar value of the approved awards by the grant-date fair value of the option, as calculated by an independent valuation expert in accordance with ASC Topic 718 .718. The Equity Award Grant Policy does not apply to performance-based equity awards such as the MYLTIP because of the different considerations that apply to the granting of such awards. For example, consistent with our past practice when granting multi-year, performance-based equity awards, the Committee determined that the 20212022 MYLTIP baseline share price, from which TSR performance is measured, should be based on the average closing stock price for the five trading days prior to and including the effective date of grant. V. COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT The Compensation Committee of Boston Properties has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement. Submitted by the Compensation Committee: Kelly A. Ayotte, Chair Carol B. Einiger David A. Twardock William H. Walton, III | | | | | | | | | 76
| | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement 92 | | |
| | | 8› | | COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS |
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE The following table shows the compensation for each of our NEOs in accordance with Item 402(c) of Regulation S-K. | | Name and Principal Position | | Year | | Salary ($) | | Bonus ($)(1) | | Stock Awards ($)(2) | | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(6) | | All Other Compensation ($)(7) | | Total ($)(8) | | | Year | | Salary ($) | | Bonus ($)(1) | | Stock Awards ($)(2) | | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(6) | | All Other Compensation ($)(7) | | Total ($) | | Owen D. Thomas Chief Executive Officer | | 2020 | | | 900,000 | | | | — | | | 8,644,379 | (3) | | 1,175,000 | | | 17,910 | | 10,737,289 | | | 2021 | | | $ | 900,000 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 8,745,377 | (3) | | $ | 3,231,250 | | | $ | 17,910 | | | $ | 12,894,537 | | | | 2019 | | | 898,077 | | | 2,550,000 | | | 8,452,063 | (4) | | | — | | | 17,460 | | 11,917,600 | | | | 2020 | | | $ | 900,000 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 8,644,379 | (4) | | $ | 1,175,000 | | | $ | 17,910 | | | $ | 10,737,289 | | | | 2018 | | | 875,000 | | | 2,875,000 | | | 7,927,786 | (5) | | | — | | | 17,160 | | 11,694,946 | | | | 2019 | | | $ | 898,077 | | | $ | 2,550,000 | | | $ | 8,452,063 | (5) | | $ | — | | | $ | 17,460 | | | $ | 11,917,600 | | Douglas T. Linde President | | 2020 | | | 750,000 | | | | — | | | 5,373,381 | (3) | | 950,000 | | | 35,310 | | 7,108,691 | | | 2021 | | | $ | 750,000 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 5,443,503 | (3) | | $ | 2,612,500 | | | $ | 35,310 | | | $ | 8,841,313 | | | | 2019 | | | 748,077 | | | 2,095,000 | | | 5,211,300 | (4) | | | — | | | 34,680 | | 8,089,057 | | | | 2020 | | | $ | 750,000 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 5,373,381 | (4) | | $ | 950,000 | | | $ | 35,310 | | | $ | 7,108,691 | | | | 2018 | | | 725,000 | | | 2,180,000 | | | 5,163,416 | (5) | | | — | | | 34,380 | | 8,102,796 | | | | 2019 | | | $ | 748,077 | | | $ | 2,095,000 | | | $ | 5,211,300 | (5) | | $ | — | | | $ | 34,680 | | | $ | 8,089,057 | | Raymond A. Ritchey Senior Executive Vice President | | 2020 | | | 740,000 | | | | — | | | 4,028,000 | (3) | | 1,103,850 | | | 34,326 | | 5,906,176 | | | 2021 | | | $ | 740,000 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 4,079,250 | (3) | | $ | 2,268,750 | | | $ | 34,326 | | | $ | 7,122,326 | | | | 2019 | | | 738,462 | | | 1,820,000 | | | 3,990,000 | (4) | | | — | | | 33,876 | | 6,582,338 | | | | 2020 | | | $ | 740,000 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 4,028,000 | (4) | | $ | 1,103,850 | | | $ | 34,326 | | | $ | 5,906,176 | | | | 2018 | | | 720,000 | | | 2,080,000 | | | 4,278,466 | (5) | | | — | | | 33,576 | | 7,112,042 | | | | 2019 | | | $ | 738,462 | | | $ | 1,820,000 | | | $ | 3,990,000 | (5) | | $ | — | | | $ | 33,876 | | | $ | 6,582,338 | | Michael E. LaBelle Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | | 2020 | | | 510,000 | | | | — | | | 1,848,139 | (3) | | 937,500 | | | 26,310 | | 3,321,949 | | | 2021 | | | $ | 510,000 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,139,966 | (3) | | $ | 1,618,750 | | | $ | 26,310 | | | $ | 4,295,026 | | | | 2019 | | | 509,231 | | | 1,295,000 | | | 1,916,801 | (4) | | | — | | | 25,680 | | 3,746,712 | | | | 2020 | | | $ | 510,000 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,848,139 | (4) | | $ | 937,500 | | | $ | 26,310 | | | $ | 3,321,949 | | | | 2018 | | | 500,000 | | | 1,450,000 | | | 1,973,150 | (5) | | | — | | | 25,380 | | 3,948,530 | | | | 2019 | | | $ | 509,231 | | | $ | 1,295,000 | | | $ | 1,916,801 | (5) | | $ | — | | | $ | 25,680 | | | $ | 3,746,712 | | Bryan J. Koop Executive Vice President, Boston Region | | 2020 | | | 410,000 | | | | — | | | 1,301,500 | (3) | | 625,000 | | | 35,310 | | 2,371,810 | | | 2021 | | | $ | 410,000 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,653,900 | (3) | | $ | 1,711,250 | | | $ | 35,310 | | | $ | 3,810,460 | | | | 2019 | | | 409,231 | | | 1,370,000 | | | 1,235,000 | (4) | | | — | | | 34,680 | | 3,048,911 | | | | 2020 | | | $ | 410,000 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,301,500 | (4) | | $ | 625,000 | | | $ | 35,310 | | | $ | 2,371,810 | | | | 2018 | | | 400,000 | | | 1,550,000 | | | 1,257,523 | (5) | | | — | | | 34,380 | | 3,241,903 | | | | 2019 | | | $ | 409,231 | | | $ | 1,370,000 | | | $ | 1,235,000 | (5) | | $ | — | | | $ | 34,680 | | | $ | 3,048,911 | |
(1) | Represent cash bonuses paid to the NEOs in recognition of performance in the year reported. Such2019. These bonuses were paid in the subsequent year (e.g., the bonuses paid in recognition of performance in 2019 were paid in 2020).early 2020. |
(2) | A discussion of the assumptions used in calculating these values can be found in Note 16 to our 20202021 audited financial statements beginning on page 178173 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20202021 included in the annual report that accompanied this proxy statement. |
(3) | Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of time-based restricted common stock and LTIP unit awards and 20202021 MYLTIP awards, all of which were granted in 2020,2021, determined in accordance with ASC Topic 718, disregarding for this purpose the estimate of forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. The following table sets forth (a) the grant date fair values for the time-based restricted common stock and LTIP unit awards, (b) the grant date fair values for the 20202021 MYLTIP awards based upon the probable outcome of the performance conditions as of the grant date for the awards and (c) the maximum values of the 20202021 MYLTIP awards as of the date of grant, assuming that the highest levels of performance conditions are achieved. To have value, the 20202021 MYLTIP awards require the Company to achieve relative and absolute total stockholder return thresholds. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis –— II. Executive Compensation Program – & 2021 Results — LTI Equity Compensation” beginning on page 65.79. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | NEO | | Time-Based Awards Grant Date Value | | | 2021 MYLTIP Awards Grant Date Value | | | 2021 MYLTIP Awards Maximum Value | | | | | | Mr. Thomas | | $ | 3,767,877 | | | $ | 4,977,500 | | | $ | 10,338,539 | | | | | | Mr. Linde | | $ | 2,616,003 | | | $ | 2,827,500 | | | $ | 5,872,817 | | | | | | Mr. Ritchey | | $ | 1,874,250 | | | $ | 2,205,000 | | | $ | 4,579,934 | | | | | | Mr. LaBelle | | $ | 1,045,466 | | | $ | 1,094,500 | | | $ | 2,273,360 | | | | | | Mr. Koop | | $ | 759,900 | | | $ | 894,000 | | | $ | 1,856,879 | |
| | | | | | | | | | 2022 Proxy Statement 93 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | NEO | | Time-Based Awards Grant Date Value | | | 2020 MYLTIP Awards Grant Date Value | | | 2020 MYLTIP Awards Maximum Value | | Mr. Thomas | | $ | 3,666,879 | | | $ | 4,977,500 | | | $ | 10,643,375 | | Mr. Linde | | $ | 2,545,881 | | | $ | 2,827,500 | | | $ | 6,046,077 | | Mr. Ritchey | | $ | 1,908,000 | | | $ | 2,120,000 | | | $ | 4,533,257 | | Mr. LaBelle | | $ | 875,639 | | | $ | 972,500 | | | $ | 2,079,496 | | Mr. Koop | | $ | 616,500 | | | $ | 685,000 | | | $ | 1,464,682 | |
| | | 8› | | COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS |
(4) | Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of time-based restricted common stock and LTIP unit awards and 20192020 MYLTIP awards, all of which were granted in 2019,2020, determined in accordance with ASC Topic 718, disregarding for this purpose the estimate of forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. |
(5) | Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of time-based restricted common stock and LTIP unit awards and 20182019 MYLTIP awards, all of which were granted in 2018,2019, determined in accordance with ASC Topic 718, disregarding for this purpose the estimate of forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | 2021 Proxy Statement
| | 77
|
| | | 8› | | COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS |
(6) | RepresentsFor amounts earnedshown for 2021, represents amounts paid in cash in 2022 for performance in 2021 under the 2021 Annual Incentive Plan. For amounts shown for 2020, represents amounts paid in cash in 2021 for performance in 2020 under the 2020 Annual Incentive Plan paid in 2021 for performance in 2020.Plan. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis –— II. Executive Compensation Program – & 2021 Results — Cash Compensation” beginning on page 56.65.
|
(7) | The table below shows the components of “All Other Compensation” for 2020,2021, which include the life insurance premiums paid by the Company for group term life insurance, our matchmatching contribution for each individual who made 401(k) contributions, and the car allowances provided to Messrs. Linde, Ritchey and Koop and the costs to the Company of providingthe parking spaces provided to Messrs. Linde, Ritchey, LaBelle and Koop. The amounts shown for car allowances in the table below reflect the aggregate cost to the Company without deducting costs attributable to business use. The components of “All Other Compensation” for 20182019 and 20192020 for each of the NEOs were reported in our 20192020 and 20202021 proxy statements, respectively. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | NEO | | Life Insurance | | | 401(k) Company Match | | | Car Allowance | | | Parking | | | Total | | | | | | | | Mr. Thomas | | $ | 810 | | | $ | 17,100 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 17,910 | | | | | | | | Mr. Linde | | $ | 810 | | | $ | 17,100 | | | $ | 9,000 | | | $ | 8,400 | | | $ | 35,310 | | | | | | | | Mr. Ritchey | | $ | 810 | | | $ | 17,100 | | | $ | 9,000 | | | $ | 7,416 | | | $ | 34,326 | | | | | | | | Mr. LaBelle | | $ | 810 | | | $ | 17,100 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 8,400 | | | $ | 26,310 | | | | | | | | Mr. Koop | | $ | 810 | | | $ | 17,100 | | | $ | 9,000 | | | $ | 8,400 | | | $ | 35,310 | |
(8) | The amount shown in the “Total” column for each NEO equals the sum of all columns of the Summary Compensation Table.
|
GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS IN 2020
The following table provides information about the awards granted to our NEOs during the year ended December 31, 2020.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Date of Compensation Committee Approval (1) | | | Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards | | | Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards | | | All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#)(4) | | | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($)(5) | | Name | | Grant Date | | | Threshold ($)(2) | | | Target ($)(2) | | | Maximum ($)(2) | | | Threshold (#)(3) | | | Target (#)(3) | | | Maximum (#)(3) | | Owen D. Thomas | | | — | | | | 1/22/2020 | | | | 1,175,000 | | | | 2,350,000 | | | | 3,525,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | 1/31/2020 | | | | 1/22/2020 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 28,409 | | | | 3,666,879 | | | | | 2/4/2020 | | | | 1/22/2020 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 36,813 | | | | 73,626 | | | | — | | | | 4,977,500 | | Douglas T. Linde | | | — | | | | 1/22/2020 | | | | 950,000 | | | | 1,900,000 | | | | 2,850,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | 1/31/2020 | | | | 1/22/2020 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 19,724 | | | | 2,545,881 | | | | | 2/4/2020 | | | | 1/22/2020 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 20,912 | | | | 41,824 | | | | — | | | | 2,827,500 | | Raymond A. Ritchey | | | — | | | | 1/22/2020 | | | | 825,000 | | | | 1,650,000 | | | | 2,475,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | 1/31/2020 | | | | 1/22/2020 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 14,788 | | | | 1,908,000 | | | | | 2/4/2020 | | | | 1/22/2020 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 15,679 | | | | 31,359 | | | | — | | | | 2,120,000 | | Michael E. LaBelle | | | — | | | | 1/22/2020 | | | | 625,000 | | | | 1,250,000 | | | | 1,875,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | 1/31/2020 | | | | 1/22/2020 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 6,784 | | | | 875,639 | | | | | 2/4/2020 | | | | 1/22/2020 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 7,192 | | | | 14,385 | | | | — | | | | 972,500 | | Bryan J. Koop | | | — | | | | 1/22/2020 | | | | 625,000 | | | | 1,250,000 | | | | 1,875,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | 1/31/2020 | | | | 1/22/2020 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 4,778 | | | | 616,500 | | | | | 2/4/2020 | | | | 1/22/2020 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 5,066 | | | | 10,132 | | | | — | | | | 685,000 | |
(1) | For a discussion of the Company’s policy with respect to the effective grant dates for annual equity-based awards, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – IV. Other Compensation Policies – Equity Award Grant Policy” on page 76.
|
(2) | Represents the potential payout at threshold, target and maximum for 2020 performance under the 2020 Annual Incentive Plan, as described under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – II. Executive Compensation Program – Cash Compensation.” The actual bonuses received under the 2020 Annual Incentive Plan by each NEO are reported in the Summary Compensation Table on page 77 in the column “Non-Equity Incentive Compensation.”
|
(3) | Represents 2020 MYLTIP awards for each NEO. Performance-based vesting of 2020 MYLTIP awards will be measured on the basis of BXP’s annualized, compounded TSR over a three-year measurement period ending February 3, 2023 relative to the annualized, compounded total return of the FTSE Nareit Office Index (adjusted to include Vornado Realty Trust). See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – II. Executive Compensation Program – LTI Equity Compensation – 2020 MYLTIP.”
|
| | | | | | | | | 78
| | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement 94 | | |
| | | 8› | | COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS |
GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS IN 2021 The following table provides information about the awards granted to our NEOs during the year ended December 31, 2021. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Date of Compensation Committee Approval (1) | | | Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards | | | Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity
Incentive Plan Awards | | | All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#)(4) | | | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($)(5) | | Name | | Grant Date | | | Threshold ($)(2) | | | Target ($)(2) | | | Maximum ($)(2) | | | Threshold (#)(3) | | | Target (#)(3) | | | Maximum (#)(3) | | Owen D. Thomas | | | — | | | | 1/20/2021 | | | $ | 1,175,000 | | | $ | 2,350,000 | | | $ | 3,525,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | | 1/29/2021 | | | | 1/20/2021 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 44,620 | | | $ | 3,767,877 | | | | | 2/2/2021 | | | | 1/20/2021 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | | — | | | | 57,119 | | | | 114,238 | | | | — | | | $ | 4,977,500 | | Douglas T. Linde | | | — | | | | 1/20/2021 | | | $ | 950,000 | | | $ | 1,900,000 | | | $ | 2,850,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | | 1/29/2021 | | | | 1/20/2021 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 30,979 | | | $ | 2,616,003 | | | | | 2/2/2021 | | | | 1/20/2021 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | | — | | | | 32,447 | | | | 64,893 | | | | — | | | $ | 2,827,500 | | Raymond A. Ritchey | | | — | | | | 1/20/2021 | | | $ | 825,000 | | | $ | 1,650,000 | | | $ | 2,475,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | | 1/29/2021 | | | | 1/20/2021 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 24,159 | | | $ | 1,874,250 | | | | | 2/2/2021 | | | | 1/20/2021 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | | — | | | | 25,303 | | | | 50,607 | | | | — | | | $ | 2,205,000 | | Michael E. LaBelle | | | — | | | | 1/20/2021 | | | $ | 625,000 | | | $ | 1,250,000 | | | $ | 1,875,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | | 1/29/2021 | | | | 1/20/2021 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 11,991 | | | $ | 1,045,466 | | | | | 2/2/2021 | | | | 1/20/2021 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | | — | | | | 12,560 | | | | 25,120 | | | | — | | | $ | 1,094,500 | | Bryan J. Koop | | | — | | | | 1/20/2021 | | | $ | 625,000 | | | $ | 1,250,000 | | | $ | 1,875,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | | 1/29/2021 | | | | 1/20/2021 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 9,795 | | | $ | 759,900 | | | | | 2/2/2021 | | | | 1/20/2021 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | | — | | | | 10,259 | | | | 20,518 | | | | — | | | $ | 894,000 | |
(1) | For a discussion of the Company’s policy with respect to the effective grant dates for equity-based awards, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – IV. Other Compensation Policies – Equity Award Grant Policy” beginning on page 91. |
(2) | Represents the potential payout at threshold, target and maximum for 2021 performance under the 2021 Annual Incentive Plan, as described under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – II. Executive Compensation Program & 2021 Results – Cash Compensation.” The actual bonuses paid to each NEO under the 2021 Annual Incentive Plan are reported in the Summary Compensation Table on page 93 in the column “Non-Equity Incentive Compensation” for 2021. |
(3) | Represents 2021 MYLTIP awards for each NEO. Performance-based vesting of 2021 MYLTIP awards will be measured on the basis of BXP’s relative and absolute TSR performance over a three-year performance period ending February 1, 2024. The 2021 MYLTIP awards consist of two, equally weighted components. The first component of the 2021 MYLTIP awards represents one-half (50%) of the target grant date value. The number of LTIP units that can be earned under this component ranges from zero to 200% of the target number of LTIP units, based on BXP’s annualized relative TSR performance compared to the TSR of a custom peer group index (the “Custom Index”). The second component represents the remaining one-half (50%) of the target grant date value. The number of LTIP units that can be earned under this component ranges from zero to 200% of the target number of LTIP units, based on BXP’s cumulative absolute TSR during the performance period. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – II. Executive Compensation Program & 2021 Results – LTI Equity Compensation – 2021 MYLTIP.” During the three-year performance period, holders of 2021 MYLTIP awards are entitled to receive only a partial distribution on each unit equal to 10% of the regular dividend payable on a share of BXP common stock. Following the completion of the three-year performance period, BXP will also make a “catch-up” cash payment on the 2021 MYLTIP awards that are ultimately earned, if any, in an amount equal to the regular and special distributions, if any, declared during the performance period on an equal number of shares of BXP common stock, less the distributions actually paid to holders of 2021 MYLTIP awards during the performance period on all of the awarded 2021 MYLTIP awards. |
(4) | Stock awards were made in the form of shares of restricted common stock and/or LTIP units at the election of each NEO. Each NEO elected to receive all LTIP units. Dividends are payable on restricted common stock and distributions are payable on the LTIP units to the same extent and on the same date that dividends and distributions are paid on Boston PropertiesBXP common stock and common units of our Operating Partnership, |
| | | | | | | | | | 2022 Proxy Statement 95 |
| | | 8› | | COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS |
| respectively. Grantees of restricted common stock pay $0.01 per share and grantees of LTIP units pay $0.25 per unit. The awards generally are scheduled to vest over a four-year period with 25% vesting on January 15 of each year beginning January 15, 2021,2022, based on continued employment through such date, subject to acceleration under certain circumstances. An employee who had attained age 65 or attained age 62 with 20 years of service with us prior to February 1, 2019 became fully vested in all time-based LTI equity awards granted on January 31, 2020.29, 2021. Mr. Ritchey satisfied this policy and is fully vested in his time-based LTI equity award granted on January 29, 2021. All other employees will become fully vested uponwhen the employee retires after the date on which the sum of the employee’s years of service plus age (which must be at least 58) equals or exceeds 70 (the so-called “Rule of 70”) and satisfies the other conditions of a “Qualified Retirement” as defineddescribed under “– Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control – Retirement Eligibility Provisions for LTI Equity Awards” below. Each of Messrs. Linde and Koop satisfied the Rule of 70 and is eligible for a Qualified Retirement with respect to his time-based LTI equity award granted on January 29, 2021. |
(5) | The amounts included in this column represent the grant date fair valuevalues of the LTIP unit awards and 20202021 MYLTIP awards determined in accordance with ASC Topic 718, disregarding for this purpose the estimate of forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. A discussion of the assumptions used in calculating these values can be found in Note 16 to our 20202021 audited financial statements beginning on page 178173 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20202021 included in the annual report that accompanied this proxy statement. |
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT 20202021 FISCAL YEAR-END The following table sets forth information regarding outstanding equity awards held by our NEOs as of December 31, 20202021 pursuant to Item 402(f) of Regulation S-K. | | | Option Awards(1) | | Stock Awards(1) | | | Option Awards(1) | | | Stock Awards(1) | | Name | | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable | | Option Exercise Price ($) | | Option Expiration Date | | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)(2) | | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(3) | | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)(4) | | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(3) | | | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable | | | Option Exercise Price ($) | | | Option Expiration Date | | | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)(2) | | | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) (3) | | | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)(4) | | | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(3) | | Owen D. Thomas | | 54,282 | | | 95.69 | | | 4/2/2023 | | | 91,118 | | | 8,613,385 | | | 99,987 | | | 9,451,771 | | | | 54,282 | | | $ | 95.69 | | | | 4/2/2023 | | | | 99,068 | | | $ | 11,410,652 | | | | 186,835 | | | $ | 21,519,655 | | Douglas T. Linde | | 34,476 | | | 100.77 | | | 2/3/2022 | | | 60,500 | | | 5,719,065 | | | 61,036 | | | 5,769,733 | | | | 41,092 | | | $ | 98.46 | | | | 2/1/2023 | | | | 66,768 | | | $ | 7,690,338 | | | | 107,869 | | | $ | 12,424,351 | | | | 41,092 | | | 98.46 | | | 2/1/2023 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | Raymond A. Ritchey | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | 9,749 | | | 921,573 | | | 46,111 | | | 4,358,873 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 4,066 | | | $ | 468,322 | | | | 83,462 | | | $ | 9,613,153 | | Michael E. LaBelle | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | 23,236 | | | 2,196,499 | | | 20,928 | | | 1,978,324 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 24,962 | | | $ | 2,875,123 | | | | 40,288 | | | $ | 4,640,372 | | Bryan J. Koop | | 7,067 | | | 100.77 | | | 2/3/2022 | | | 10,918 | | | 1,032,079 | | | 13,918 | | | 1,315,669 | | | | 8,267 | | | $ | 98.46 | | | | 2/1/2023 | | | | 16,941 | | | $ | 1,951,264 | | | | 30,901 | | | $ | 3,559,177 | | | | 8,267 | | | 98.46 | | | 2/1/2023 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | |
(1) | This table does not include LTIP unit and restricted common stock awards granted in January 20212022 and 20212022 MYLTIP awards granted in February 2021.2022. Those grants are described above under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” Stock options have not been granted since 2013. All stock options were fully vested as of January 15, 2017. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | 2021 Proxy Statement
| | 79
|
| | | 8› | | COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS |
(2) | The following table sets forth the number of unvested time-based LTIP units and/or shares of restricted common stock, and unvested LTIP units earned under the 20172018 MYLTIP plan, held by each NEO as of December 31, 2020.2021. |
| Award/Grant Date(a) | | Mr. Thomas | | | Mr. Linde | | | Mr. Ritchey(d) | | | Mr. LaBelle | | | Mr. Koop(d) | | | Mr. Thomas | | | Mr. Linde | | | Mr. Ritchey(d) | | | Mr. LaBelle | | | Mr. Koop(d) | | | Time-Based Awards(b) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/3/2017 | | | 3,283 | | | | 2,284 | | | | — | | | | 1,607 | | | | — | | | | 2/2/2018 | | | 16,130 | | | | 10,349 | | | | — | | | | 3,823 | | | | — | | | | 8,065 | | | | 5,175 | | | | — | | | | 1,912 | | | | — | | | 2/6/2018 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 975 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 488 | | | | — | | | 2/1/2019 | | | 25,014 | | | | 15,423 | | | | — | | | | 5,574 | | | | 3,717 | | | | 16,676 | | | | 10,282 | | | | — | | | | 3,716 | | | | 2,478 | | | 1/31/2020 | | | 28,409 | | | | 19,724 | | | | — | | | | 6,784 | | | | 4,778 | | | | 21,307 | | | | 14,793 | | | | — | | | | 5,088 | | | | 3,584 | | 2017 MYLTIP Award(c) | | | 18,282 | | | | 12,720 | | | | 9,749 | | | | 4,473 | | | | 2,423 | | | | 1/29/2021 | | | | 44,620 | | | | 30,979 | | | | — | | | | 11,991 | | | | 9,795 | | | 2018 MYLTIP Award(c) | | | | 8,400 | | | | 5,539 | | | | 4,066 | | | | 1,767 | | | | 1,084 | |
| (a) | The vesting of time-based LTI equity awards and performance-based LTI equity awards is subject to acceleration under certain circumstances and other exceptions discussed below under “– Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in ControlControl.”. |
| | | | | | | | 2022 Proxy Statement 96 | | |
| | | 8› | | COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS |
| (b) | Time-based LTI equity awards are scheduled to vest ratably over four years, with 25% of the total award vesting on January 15 of each year beginning January 15 in the year following the grant, based on continued employment through such date. |
| (c) | On February 6, 2020,5, 2021, the measurement period for the 20172018 MYLTIP awards ended and the Company’s TSR was sufficient for employees to earnplan participants earned and therefore becomebecame eligible to vest in a portion of the 20172018 MYLTIP awards. Fifty percent (50%) of these earned 20172018 MYLTIP awards vested on February 6, 20205, 2021 and 50% vested on February 6, 2021.5, 2022. |
| (d) | AllAs of December 31, 2021, all of Mr. Ritchey’s time-based LTI equity awards were fully vested as of December 31, 2020 and all of Mr. Koop’s time-based LTI equity awards granted prior to January 1, 2019 were fully vested as of December 31, 2020 because each satisfied the conditions for retirement eligibility for these awards. These policies are described below under “– Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control – Retirement Eligibility Provisions for LTI Equity AwardsAwards.”.
|
(3) | The market value of these holdings is based on the closing price of ourBXP common stock as reported on the NYSE on December 31, 20202021 of $94.53$115.18 per share. |
(4) | The following table sets forth the number of unearned performance-based LTI equity awards held by each NEO as of December 31, 2020.2021. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Award(a) | | Mr. Thomas | | | Mr. Linde | | | Mr. Ritchey | | | Mr. LaBelle | | | Mr. Koop | | 2018 MYLTIP Award(b) | | | 27,390 | | | | 18,060 | | | | 13,256 | | | | 5,760 | | | | 3,535 | | 2019 MYLTIP Award(c) | | | 35,784 | | | | 22,064 | | | | 17,176 | | | | 7,975 | | | | 5,317 | | 2020 MYLTIP Award(d) | | | 36,813 | | | | 20,912 | | | | 15,679 | | | | 7,193 | | | | 5,066 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Award (a) | | Mr. Thomas | | | Mr. Linde | | | Mr. Ritchey | | | Mr. LaBelle | | | Mr. Koop | | | | | | | | 2019 MYLTIP Award(b) | | | 35,784 | | | | 22,064 | | | | 17,176 | | | | 7,975 | | | | 5,317 | | | | | | | | 2020 MYLTIP Award(c) | | | 36,813 | | | | 20,912 | | | | 15,679 | | | | 7,193 | | | | 5,066 | | | | | | | | 2021 MYLTIP Award(d) | | | 114,238 | | | | 64,893 | | | | 50,607 | | | | 25,120 | | | | 20,518 | |
| (a) | The vesting of performance-based LTI equity awards is subject to acceleration under certain circumstances discussed below under “– Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in ControlControl.” below. |
| (b) | On February 6, 2018, these5, 2019, the NEOs received 20182019 MYLTIP awards. In accordance with SEC rules, the number of equity incentive plan2019 MYLTIP awards reported in this table is based on achieving “threshold” performance goals.“target” performance. If our performance continued throughduring the end of theentire performance period athad been the same rate as had occurredour performance from the beginning of the performance period through December 31, 2020,2021, our NEOs would have earned an amount below threshold. 2018 MYLTIP awards earned based on performance are scheduled to vest 50% on February 5, 2021between threshold and 50% on February 5, 2022, based on continued employment through such date.target. The measurement period for assessing performance ended on February 5, 2021.4, 2022. The annualized TSR for the same period for the FTSE Russell Nareit Office Index (adjusted to include Vornado Realty) was -2.21%, for the Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index was 8.31%2.48% and for the Company was -4.92%-0.65%. As a result, the final valuation for the awards was determined to be 29.1773%69% of target, or an aggregate of approximately $3.8$6.8 million for the NEOs as a group. |
| (c) | On February 5, 2019, these NEOs received 2019 MYLTIP awards. The measurement period for assessing performance ends on February 4, 2022. In accordance with SEC rules, Fifty-percent (50%) of the number of equity incentive plan awards is based on achieving “target” performance goals. If our performance continued through the end of the performance period at the same rate as had occurred from the beginning of the performance period through December 31, 2020, our NEOs would earn an amount between threshold and target.earned 2019 MYLTIP awards earned based on performance are scheduled to vest 50%vested on February 4, 2022 and the remaining 50% is scheduled to vest on February 4, 2023, based on continued employment through such date.
|
| (d)(c) | On February 4, 2020, thesethe NEOs received 2020 MYLTIP awards. The measurement period for assessing performance ends on February 3, 2023. In accordance with SEC rules, the number of equity incentive plan2020 MYLTIP awards reported in this table is based on achieving “target” performance goals.performance. If our performance had continued throughduring the end of theentire performance period atwere the same rate as had occurredour performance from the beginning of the performance period through December 31, 2020,2021, our NEOs would earn an amount between threshold and target. Fifty-percent (50%) of the number of earned 2020 MYLTIP awards, earned based on performance areif any, is scheduled to vest 50% on February 3, 2023 and 50% is scheduled to vest on February 3, 2024, based on continued employment through such date. |
| (d) | On February 2, 2021, the NEOs received 2021 MYLTIP awards. The measurement period for assessing performance ends on February 1, 2024. In accordance with SEC rules, the number of 2021 MYLTIP awards reported in this table represents the sum of the LTIP units that would be earned based on achieving (i) “maximum” performance with respect to the portion of the LTIP units eligible to be earned based on absolute TSR and (ii) “maximum” performance with respect to the portion of the LTIP units eligible to be earned based on relative TSR. If our absolute and relative TSR performance during the entire performance period are the same as our performance from the beginning of the performance period through December 31, 2021, our NEOs would earn (i) a number of LTIP units that is between target and maximum based on absolute TSR and (ii) a number of LTIP units equal to maximum based on TSR relative to the Custom Index. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – II. Executive Compensation Program & 2021 Results – LTI Equity Compensation – Performance-Based Equity Awards – Multi-Year Long-Term Incentive Program (MYLTIP) – 2021 MYLTIP.” Subject to the provisions on “Qualified Retirement” and the other terms of the award agreement, after the completion of the three-year performance period all earned awards shall be deemed “vested,“ but may not be converted, redeemed, sold or otherwise transferred for one additional year after the end of the performance measurement period. Therefore, 100% of earned awards, if any, shall vest as of February 1, 2024, based on continued employment through such date, but may not be monetized until February 1, 2025. |
| | | | | | | | | 80
| | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement 97 |
| | | 8› | | COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS |
20202021 OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED
The following table sets forth the aggregate number of options to purchase shares of our common stock exercised by our NEOs in 20202021 and the aggregate number of shares of common stock and LTIP units that vested in 2020. The Value Realized on Exercise is the product of (1) the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the date of exercise minus the exercise price, multiplied by (2) the number of shares of common stock underlying the exercised options. The Value Realized on Vesting is the product of (1) the closing price on the NYSE of a share of our2021. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Name | | Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) | | | Value Realized on Exercise(1) | | | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) | | | Value Realized on Vesting(2) | | | | | | | Owen D. Thomas | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | 53,470 | | | $ | 5,006,824 | | | | | | | Douglas T. Linde | | | 34,476 | | | $ | 614,081 | | | | 35,788 | | | $ | 3,349,906 | | | | | | | Raymond A. Ritchey | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | 37,973 | | | $ | 3,477,538 | | | | | | | Michael E. LaBelle | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | 13,798 | | | $ | 1,293,976 | | | | | | | Bryan J. Koop | | | 7,067 | | | $ | 118,302 | | | | 5,940 | | | $ | 554,565 | |
(1) | The Value Realized on Exercise is the product of (1) the fair market value of a share of BXP common stock on the date of exercise minus the exercise price, multiplied by (2) the number of shares of common stock underlying the exercised options. |
(2) | The Value Realized on Vesting is the product of (1) the closing price on the NYSE of a share of BXP common stock on the vesting date (or, if the vesting date was not a trading day, the immediately preceding trading date), multiplied by (2) the number of shares and LTIP units vesting. In each case, the value realized is before payment of any applicable taxes and brokerage commissions. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Name | | Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) | | | Value Realized on Exercise | | | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) | | | Value Realized on Vesting | | Owen D. Thomas | | | — | | | | — | | | | 57,198 | | | $ | 8,067,183 | | Douglas T. Linde | | | 27,455 | | | $ | 1,587,136 | | | | 38,819 | | | $ | 5,479,164 | | Raymond A. Ritchey | | | — | | | | — | | | | 34,119 | | | $ | 4,887,658 | | Michael E. LaBelle | | | 16,337 | | | $ | 617,061 | | | | 15,798 | | | $ | 2,220,867 | | Bryan J. Koop(1) | | | — | | | | — | | | | 14,592 | | | $ | 1,801,210 | |
(1) | Mr. Koop attained age 62 with 20 years of service on August 18, 2020. As a result, all of his unvested time-based LTI awards granted prior to January 1, 2019 automatically vested.
|
NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION IN 20202021 We provide our executives with the opportunity to defer up to 20% of their base salaries and cash bonuses. Deferrals are credited with earnings or losses based upon the executive’s selection of one or more of 2829 measurement funds, which are all publicly traded mutual funds. Executives may change their selection of measurement funds on a daily basis. The table below summarizes the annual rates of return for the year ended December 31, 20202021 for the 2829 measurement funds: | | | | | Name of Fund | | 20202021 Rate of Return (%) | | | | American Beacon Small Cap Value Fund Class Institutional | | | 3.9628.15 | | | | Artisan Mid Cap Fund Institutional Class | | | 57.0510.60 | | | | Dodge & Cox Income Fund | | | 9.30-0.91 | | | | Dodge & Cox International Stock Fund | | | 0.9211.03 | | | | Oakmark Equity Andand Income Fund Investor Class | | | 8.0921.55 | | | | PIMCO Low Duration Fund Institutional Class | | | 3.29-0.68 | | | | T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund | | | 13.3026.04 | | | | T. Rowe Price Growth Stock Fund | | | 34.6020.03 | | | | T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund | | | 9.9624.53 | | | | T. Rowe Price Retirement 2005 Fund | | | 10.838.05 | | | | T. Rowe Price Retirement 2010 Fund | | | 11.418.75 | | | | T. Rowe Price Retirement 2015 Fund | | | 12.039.54 | | | | T. Rowe Price Retirement 2020 Fund | | | 12.57 | | T. Rowe Price Retirement 2025 Fund
| | | 13.92 | | T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund
| | | 15.02 | | T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund
| | | 16.13 | | T. Rowe Price Retirement 2040 Fund
| | | 17.0810.47 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement 98 | | 81
|
| | | 8› | | COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS |
| | | | | Name of Fund | | 20202021 Rate of Return (%) | | | | T. Rowe Price Retirement 2025 Fund | | | 11.88 | | | | T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund | | | 13.55 | | | | T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund | | | 15.08 | | | | T. Rowe Price Retirement 2040 Fund | | | 16.35 | | | | T. Rowe Price Retirement 2045 Fund | | | 17.6417.20 | | | | T. Rowe Price Retirement 2050 Fund | | | 17.6317.35 | | | | T. Rowe Price Retirement 2055 Fund | | | 17.5117.29 | | | | T. Rowe Price Retirement 2060 Fund | | | 17.4517.41 | | | | T. Rowe Price Retirement 2065 Fund | | | 18.18 | | | | T. Rowe Price Retirement Balanced Fund | | | 11.008.38 | | | | Vanguard FTSE Social Index Fund Admiral | | | 21.5927.71 | | | | Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund Admiral Shares | | | 18.9617.73 | | | | Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Admiral Shares | | | 7.41-1.67 | | | | Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares | | | 10.218.62 | | | | Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Shares | | | 20.0825.73 | | | | Virtus Duff & Phelps Real Estate Securities Fund Class I | | | -0.1347.15 | |
BenefitsAccount balances under the deferred compensation plan are generally paid (1) in a lump sum upon the executive’s termination of employment prior to attainment of retirement age (as defined in the plan to be age 55 with five years of service) or the executive’s death, or (2) in a lump sum upon the executive’s actual retirement or annual installments for a period of up to 15 years following such retirement (as previously selected by the executive at the time of deferral) upon the executive’s retirement.. Payment will generally start or be made by January 15 following the year of termination or retirement, or six months after the executive’s termination or retirement, whichever is later. Executives may also at the time of deferral elect a fixed distribution date, which must be at least five years after the end of the calendar year in which amounts are deferred. The deferred compensation plan also permits an in-service withdrawal of the executive’s account balance attributable to pre-2005 deferrals, subject to a withdrawal penalty equal to 10% of the amount withdrawn.
The following table shows deferrals made by our NEOs tounder the deferred compensation plan during the year ended December 31, 2020,2021, the earnings and withdrawals/distributions during the year, and the aggregate account balance of each NEO under the deferred compensation plan as of December 31, 2020.2021. | Name | | Executive Contributions in 2020(1)(2) | | | Registrant Contributions in 2020 | | | Aggregate Earnings in 2020 | | | Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions
| | | Aggregate Balance at 12/31/2020(3) | | | Executive Contributions in 2021 (1)(2) | | | Registrant Contributions in 2021 | | Aggregate Earnings in 2021 | | | Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions | | Aggregate Balance at 12/31/2021(3) | | | Owen D. Thomas | | $ | 186,923 | | | | — | | | $ | 247,622 | | | | — | | | $ | 1,746,748 | | | $ | 180,000 | | | $— | | $ | 257,179 | | | $— | | $ | 2,183,927 | | | Douglas T. Linde | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | $ | — | | | $— | | $ | — | | | $— | | $ | — | | | Raymond A. Ritchey | | | — | | | | — | | | $ | 629,566 | | | | — | | | $ | 4,674,386 | | | $ | — | | | $— | | $ | 808,194 | | | $— | | $ | 5,482,580 | | | Michael E. LaBelle | | | — | | | | — | | | $ | 253,923 | | | $ | 199,519 | | | $ | 1,220,377 | | | $ | — | | | $— | | $ | 240,095 | | | $— | | $ | 1,460,472 | | | Bryan J. Koop | | $ | 228,266 | | | | — | | | $ | 294,960 | | | | — | | | $ | 2,314,995 | | | $ | 155,250 | | | $— | | $ | 221,051 | | | $— | | $ | 2,691,296 | |
(1) | These amounts do not include any contributions out of bonus payments that were made in February 20212022 in recognition of performance in 2020. |
(2) | Of the amounts reported in the contributions column, (a) all of Mr. Thomas’ contributions and $63,866 of Mr. Koop’s contributions are also included in the Summary Compensation Table as salary for 2020 and (b) $164,400 of Mr. Koop’s contributions are also included in the Summary Compensation Table as bonus for 2019 that was paid in 2020.
|
(3) | Of the amounts reported in the aggregate balance column, (a) $186,923 of Mr. Thomas’ aggregate balance and $63,866 of Mr. Koop’s aggregate balance are also included in the Summary Compensation Table as salary for 2020; (b) $179,615 of Mr. Thomas’ aggregate balance and $49,108 of Mr. Koop’s aggregate balance are also included in the Summary Compensation Table as salary for 2019, (c) $175,000 of Mr. Thomas’ aggregate balance, $72,000 of Mr. Ritchey’s aggregate balance and $48,000 of Mr. Koop’s aggregate balance are also included in the Summary Compensation Table as salary for 2018, (d) $164,400 of Mr. Koop’s contributions are also included in the Summary Compensation Table as bonus for 2019 that was paid in 2020, and (e) $416,000 of Mr. Ritchey’s aggregate balance and $186,000 of Mr. Koop’s aggregate balance are also included in the Summary Compensation Table as bonus for 2018 that was paid in 2019. In each case, the amounts disclosed in this footnote are the amounts originally contributed and do not reflect subsequent gains/losses on investment after the date of contribution.2021.
|
| | | | | | | | | 82
| | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement 99 |
| | | 8› | | COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS |
(2) | Of the amounts reported in the “Executive Contributions” column, (a) all of Mr. Thomas’ contributions and $61,500 of Mr. Koop’s contributions are also included in the Summary Compensation Table as salary for 2021 and (b) $93,750 of Mr. Koop’s contributions are also included in the Summary Compensation Table in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column as bonus for 2020 that was paid in 2021. |
(3) | The following table details the amounts in the “Aggregate Balance” column that are reported in the “Salary,” “Bonus” and “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” columns of the Summary Compensation Table. In each case, the amounts disclosed in this table are the amounts originally contributed and do not reflect subsequent gains/losses after the date of contribution. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Name | | Salary for 2021 | | | Salary for 2020 | | | Salary for 2019 | | | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation for 2020 (paid in 2021) | | | Bonus for 2019 (paid in 2020) | | | | | | | | Mr. Thomas | | $ | 180,000 | | | $ | 186,923 | | | $ | 179,615 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | | | | | | Mr. Linde | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | | | | | | Mr. Ritchey | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | | | | | | Mr. LaBelle | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | | | | | | Mr. Koop | | $ | 61,500 | | | $ | 63,866 | | | $ | 49,108 | | | $ | 93,750 | | | $ | 164,400 | |
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS We have employment agreements with each of our NEOs. The material terms of these agreements are summarized below. › SUMMARY OF OWEN D. THOMAS’ EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT We originally hired Mr. Thomas to be our CEO effective April 2, 2013. The initial term of Mr. Thomas’ employment agreement was three years, with automatic one-year renewals commencing on the third and fourth anniversaries of the effective date unless prior written notice of termination was given. The term of Mr. Thomas’ original employment agreement expired on April 2, 2018 on which date we entered into a new employment agreement with him. The following is a summary of Mr. Thomas’ current employment agreement: Term and Duties April 2, 2018 through June 30, 20232023. There is no automatic renewal provision. As CEO, Mr. Thomas reports directly to the Board of Directors, and he must devote substantially all of his working time and efforts to the performance of his duties. Our Board agreed to continue to nominate Mr. Thomas for re-election to the Board of Directors for so long as he remains CEO, and heMr. Thomas has agreed to resign from the Board upon termination of employment. | • | | Mr. Thomas may participate as an officer or director of, or advisor to, any organization that is not engaged in commercial real estate activities (e.g., Nareit) and also engage in religious, charitable or other community activities, provided that they do not materially restrict his ability to fulfill his obligations to us as an officer.CEO. Mr. Thomas may also continue serving on the Board of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and may engage in “Minority Interest Passive Investments,” which are defined as acquiring, holding and exercising the voting rights associated with an investment made through (1) a non-controlling, minority interest in an entity or (2) the lending of money, in either case with the purpose or intent of obtaining a return on such investment but without management of the property or business to which the investment directly or indirectly relates and without any business or strategic consultation by Mr. Thomas. |
| | | | | | | | 2022 Proxy Statement 100 | | |
| | | 8› | | COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS |
Compensation and Benefits | • | | Annual base salary of $875,000, subject to annual review, and may be increased but not decreased.decreased in the discretion of the Compensation Committee. Mr. Thomas’ current base annual salary is $900,000$925,000 (see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – II. Executive Compensation Program & 2021 Results – Cash Compensation” beginning on page 56)65). |
Target annual bonus equal to 250% of his annual base salary in effect from time to time, with the actual amount to be determined atin the discretion of the Compensation Committee. IncentiveLTI equity awards in an amountamounts determined at the discretion of the Compensation Committee based on Company and individual performance and competitive peer group information. LTI equity awards may be provided in the form of stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units and/or LTIP units and may be subject to time-based or performance-based vesting, or both, as determined byin the discretion of the Compensation Committee.
ParticipationEligible to participate in all of our employee benefit plans orand programs as in effect from time to time for our senior executive employees, including medical/dental insurance, life insurance, disability insurance and deferred compensation plans, plusplans.
Mr. Thomas is entitled to the use of a Company-owned or leased automobile.automobile, a benefit he has declined every year since becoming CEO. Severance Benefits and Retirement Eligibility | • | | Mr. Thomas’ employment with us is at-will, but his employment agreement provides for certain payments and benefits to him upon his separation from the Company in certain circumstances (see “– Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control” below). |
| | | | | | | | | | | | 2021 Proxy Statement
| | 83
|
| | | 8› | | COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS |
| • | | Mr. Thomas’ employment agreement provides for the acceleration of vesting of all equity awards granted after April 2, 2018 upon attainment of age 62 with 10 years of service (see “– Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control” below). |
Mr. Thomas is not entitled to participate in any of the Company’s change in control severance plans or programs. As such, Mr. Thomasprograms, and he is not entitled to receive any tax gross-up payments. In the event that any payment or benefit to be paid or provided to Mr. Thomas would be subject to the golden parachute excise tax under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code, the payments and benefits will be reduced to the extent necessary to avoid the imposition of the excise tax if doing so would result in a greater after-tax benefit to Mr. Thomas. The expiration of Mr. Thomas’ agreement on June 30, 2023 will not constitute or result in a termination of employment by the Company without cause, and the severance provisions (other than retirement eligibility and related benefits) shall not apply. Restrictive Covenants While he is an officer and until the later of (1) one year after the termination of his employment for any reason or (2) the latest date of full vesting of any performance-based LTI equity award, Mr. Thomas is prohibited from: | › | | engaging, participating or assisting, directly or indirectly, in the acquisition, development, construction, operation, management, or leasing of any commercial real estate property of a type which is the subject of a significant portion of the Company’s business (measured as at least 10% of the Company’s revenues on a trailing 12-month basis) at the time of termination of his employment; |
| › | | intentionally interfering with the Company’s relationships with its tenants, suppliers, contractors, lenders or employees or with any governmental agency; or |
| › | | competing for, soliciting or diverting the Company’s tenants or employees, either for himself or any other business, person or entity. |
Mr. Thomas is also subject to confidentiality requirements and post-termination litigation and regulatory cooperation obligations.
In addition, theThe non-competition covenant shall not apply if Mr. Thomas’ employment is terminated following a change in control (as defined in the Boston Properties, Inc. 20122021 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, as amended from time to time (the ”2012“2021 Plan”)).
Mr. Thomas is also subject to confidentiality requirements and post-termination litigation and regulatory cooperation obligations. | | | | | | | | | | 2022 Proxy Statement 101 |
| | | 8› | | COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS |
› SUMMARY OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS WITH MESSRS. LINDE, RITCHEY, LABELLE AND KOOP We also have employment agreements with the other NEOs – i.e., Messrs. Linde, Ritchey, LaBelle and Koop – under which each has agreed to devote substantially all of his business time to our business and affairs. The initial term of each of these employment agreements was two years beginning November 29, 2002 (January 24, 2008 in the case of Mr. LaBelle), with automatic one-year renewals commencing on the second anniversary of the start of the initial term and each anniversary date thereafter unless written notice of termination is given at least 90 days prior to such date by either party. The base salary for each of these NEOs is reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee and may be increased but not decreased in its discretion. Each NEO is also eligible to receive a cash bonus and equity-based compensation to be determined at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. Similar to Mr. Thomas’ employment agreement, the other NEOs’ employment agreements contain non-competition, non-interference and non-solicitation restrictions (which shall not apply if the NEO’s employment is terminated following a change in control (as defined in the senior executive severance plan)Company’s Senior Executive Severance Plan discussed below)) and permit them to participate as an officer or director of, or advisor to, any charitable or other tax exempt organization only and theonly. The geographic scope of the noncompetition provision in each employment agreement is limited to our markets at the time of termination of theirthe NEO’s employment. In consideration for the benefits and protections afforded by the employment agreements, each of these NEOs agreed to confidentiality, non-competition, non-interference and non-solicitation covenants and to provide to the Company post-termination litigation and regulatory cooperation. These NEOs’ employment with us is at-will, but their employment agreements also provide for certain payments and benefits to them upon separation from the Company in certain circumstances as described below under “– Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.” below. | | | | | | | | | 84
| | | | | 2021 Proxy Statement
|
| | | 8› | | COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS |
POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL Each NEO has the right to receive severance and other benefits in the event of a termination of his employment under different circumstances pursuant to their employment agreements (discussed under “– Employment Agreements” above) and, except for Mr. Thomas, the Company’s Senior Executive Severance Plan. In addition, our LTI equity award agreements (including performance-based MYLTIP awards) provide for the vesting and forfeiture of LTI equity awards under different circumstances.termination scenarios. The availability, nature and amount of severance and other benefits differ depending on whether the triggering event is: a termination by the Company without “cause” (as defined in the applicable agreement or plan) or by the NEO with “good reason” (as defined in the applicable agreement or plan) prior to a change in control, a termination by the Company without “cause” or by the NEO with “good reason” within 24 months following a change in control, a change in control without termination, a termination due to death or disability, or Upon a voluntary termination by the NEO, other than for “good reason” or a qualified retirement, or a termination by the Company with “cause,” the NEOs areNEO is not entitled to any additional or special payments under any plan, agreement or arrangement, and any unvested LTI equity awards will be immediately forfeited. | | | | | | | | 2022 Proxy Statement 102 | | |
| | | 8› | | COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS |
› EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS AND CHANGE IN CONTROL SEVERANCE PLAN The following chart summarizes payments and benefits (1) our CEO is eligible to receive under his employment agreement and (2) the NEOs other than our CEO are eligible to receive under their respective employment agreements and our Senior Executive Severance Plan. NEOs other than our CEO participate in our Senior Executive Severance Plan, whereas the severance and benefits to which our CEO is entitled following a termination within twenty-four (24) months after a change in control are provided in his employment agreement. | | | | | Scenario | | Component(1) | | | | Termination by the Company without “Cause” or by the NEO for “Good Reason” without a Change in Control(2) | | Bonus | | • All NEOs: Target bonus prorated for the number of days employed in the year of termination | | Cash Severance | | • Mr. Thomas: 2x the sum of his base salary plus the amount of cash bonus, if any, received or payable with respect to the preceding year (but not less than his target bonus) | | | | • Other NEOs: 1x the sum of base salary plus amount of cash bonus, if any, received or payable with respect to the preceding year | | Time-Based LTI Equity Awards | | • Mr. Thomas: Additional 24 months of vesting | | • Other NEOs: Additional 12 months of vesting | | Health Benefits | | • Participation by the NEO, his spouse and dependents, subject to payment of premiums at active employees’ rate | | | | • Mr. Thomas: Up to 24 months • Other NEOs: Up to 12 months |
| | | | | | | | | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement | | 85 103 |
| | | 8› | | COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS |
| | | | | Scenario | | Component(1) | | | | Termination by the Company without “Cause” or by the NEO for “Good Reason” within 24 Months after a Change in Control | | Bonus | | • Mr. Thomas: Target bonus prorated for the number of days employed in the year of termination | | • Other NEOs: Not applicable | | Cash Severance | | • Mr. Thomas: Lump-sum payment equal to 3x the sum of (a) Mr. Thomas’ base salary plus (b) the amount of his average annual cash bonus (or his target bonus, if greater) with respect to the three calendar years preceding the change in control (or his target bonus, if greater) | | • Other NEOs: Lump-sum payment equal to 3x the sum of (a) the NEO’s base salary plus (b) the amount of his average annual cash bonus with respect to the three calendar years preceding the change in control | | Time-Based LTI Equity Awards | | • Full vesting for all NEOs | | Health Benefits | | • Participation by the NEO, his spouse and dependents for up to 36 months, subject to payment of premiums at active employees’ rate | | Other Benefits | | • Financial counseling, tax preparation assistance and outplacement counseling for up to 36 months | | Tax Gross-Up Payment | | • Mr. Thomas is not entitled to receive any tax gross-up payments from the Company.payments. In the event that any payment or benefit would be subject to the golden parachute excise tax under Section 280G of Internal Revenue Code, the payments and benefits will be reduced to the extent necessary to avoid the imposition of such excise tax if the reduction would result in a greater after-tax benefit to Mr. Thomas. | | | | • Other NEOs are entitled to receive a tax gross-up payment in the event they become subject to the golden parachute excise tax (as discussed above under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – IV. Other Compensation Policies – Gross-Up for Excess Parachute Payments” on page 72)87). | | | | Termination due to Death or Disability | | Bonus | | • TargetLump-sum equal to the NEO’s target bonus prorated for number of days employed in the year of termination | | Time-Based LTI Equity Awards | | ���• Full vesting for all NEOs
| | Health Benefits | | • Participation by the NEO, his spouse and dependents for up to 18 months, subject to payment of premiums at active employees’ rate |
(1) | Performance-based LTI equity awards are governed by the relevant award agreements. The treatment of these awards under certain termination scenarios, including a change in control, is described under “– Performance-Based LTI Equity Awards” and “– Retirement Eligibility Provisions for LTI Equity Awards” below. |
(2) | Receipt of these payments and benefits (other than the prorated target bonus) is subject to the NEO’s execution of a general release of claims withagainst us. |
| | | | | | | | 2022 Proxy Statement 104 | | |
| | | 8› | | COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS |
› DOUBLE-TRIGGER ACCELERATION OF VESTING OF EQUITY AWARDS UPON A CHANGE INOF CONTROL Time-based LTI equity award agreements include “double-trigger” vestingprovisions, meaning that, if there is a “change in control” (as defined in the 20122021 Plan) and the awards are not otherwise cancelled in connection with the change in control transaction, then they only become fully vested if, within 24 months after the change in control, the NEO’s employment is terminated by the Company or its successor without “cause” or the NEO resigns for “good reason.” | | | | | | | | | 86
| | | | | 2021 Proxy Statement
|
| | | 8› | | COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS |
› PERFORMANCE-BASED LTI EQUITY AWARDS The treatment of performance-based LTI equity awards (e.g., MYLTIP awards) upon certain terminations of employment or a change in control is governed by the NEOs’ relevant award agreements. The following chart summarizes the treatment of these awards under each scenario assuming it occurs prior to the end of the applicable three-year performance period. | | | Scenario | | Treatment of Award | | | Termination by the Company without “Cause” or by the NEO for “Good Reason” without a Change in Control | | • The number of LTIP units the NEO will earn, if any, will be determined at the end of the applicable three-year performance period based on our performance and will then be prorated based on the portion of the three-year performance period during which the NEO was employed by us. • Any earned LTIP Units will not be subject to forfeiture but the NEO will not be permitted to transfer the LTIP units until they otherwise would have vested under the terms of the awards. | | | Termination due to Death or Disability | | • The number of LTIP units the NEO will earn, if any, will be determined at the end of the applicable three-year performance period based on our performance. • Any earned LTIP units will not be prorated due tobased on service time and will be fully vested. | | | Change in Control Without Termination | | • The number of LTIP units the NEO will earn, if any, will be determined as of the date of the change in control based on our performance through such date. • Any earned LTIP units will not be prorated due tobased on service time and will be fully vested. |
In the case of each of the foregoing scenarios following the end of the applicable three-year performance period, any LTIP units that had been earned prior to the date of such termination or change in control will become fully vested, but, in the case of a termination by the Company without “cause” or by the NEO for “good reason” without a change in control, the NEO will not be permitted to transfer the LTIP units until they otherwise would have vestedthe right to transfer the LTIP units under the terms of the awards. › RETIREMENT ELIGIBILITY PROVISIONS FOR LTI EQUITY AWARDS Retirement Provisions Mr. Thomas. Pursuant to Mr. Thomas’ employment agreement, all award agreements for LTI equity grantedaward agreements after April 2, 2018 shall provide that if Mr. Thomas is employed by us when he attains age 62 and has completed at least ten (10) years of employment with us, then his time-based LTI equity awards and performance-based LTI equity awards that are earned will vest in full (without any proration of the award based on service time). The full number of LTIP units Mr. Thomas earns (if any) under any performance-based LTI equity awards for which the performance period has not ended will be determined in the same manner and at the same time as otherwise would | | | | | | | | | | 2022 Proxy Statement 105 |
| | | 8› | | COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS |
have been the case if he had remained employed through the full performance period for the applicable award, including, without limitation, with respect to performance hurdles and lapse of restrictions on transfer, without any proration of the award due to service time, and with all service-based vesting requirements deemed satisfied, so long as he agrees to be bound by the post-employment non-competition, non-interference and non-solicitation covenants (which are otherwise applicable until the later of (1) one (1) year following termination and (2) the latest date of full vesting of any performance-based LTI equity award). NEOs other than Mr. Thomas. The agreements governing time-based LTI equity awards and performance-based LTI equity awards granted to NEOs other than Mr. Thomas provide that the time-based LTI equity awards and performance-based LTI equity awards that are earned will fully vest when the employee retires after the date on which the sum of the employee’s years of service plus age (which must be at least 58) equals or exceeds 70 (the so-called “Rule of 70”) (“Qualified Retirement”); provided that the NEO satisfies the other conditions of a “Qualified Retirement,” which require the employee to: (1) give prior written notice to the Company of his retirement (for NEOs, six (6) months’ notice is required), (2) enter into a separation agreement with the Company and (3) remain employed by the Company until the retirement date specified in such notice, unless employment is terminated by the Company without “cause” or by the employee for “good reason.” | | | | | | | | | | | | 2021 Proxy Statement
| | 87
|
| | | 8› | | COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS |
If an NEO retires after satisfying the conditions for a Qualified Retirement, the number of LTIP units the NEO earns (if any) under performance-based LTI equity awards will be determined in the same manner and at the same time as otherwise would have been the case if he had remained employed through the entire performance period for the applicable award, including with respect to performance hurdles and lapse of restrictions on transfer, without any proration of the award due to service time. Any earned, unvested LTIP units will no longer be subject to forfeiture but the NEO will not be permitted to transfer the LTIP units until they otherwise would have vestedthe right to transfer the LTIP units under the terms of the awards. Pre-2019 Policy Time-based LTI equity awards granted prior to 2019 provide that when an employee attains age 65, or attains age 62 and completes 20 years of service with us, the employee becomes fully vested in all time-based LTI equity awards (the “Pre-2019 Policy”). In addition, time-based LTI awards made to employees who, on or prior to January 31, 2019, attained age 65 or attained age 62 with 20 years of service are “grandfathered” under the Pre-2019 Policy such that subsequent time-based LTI awards will continue to be fully vested on the date of grant. NEOs Eligible for Retirement as of December 31, 20202021 Based on their respective ages and tenure as of December 31, 2020:2021: Each of Messrs. Ritchey and Koop is eligible for a Qualified Retirement with respect to awards granted in 2020 and subsequent thereto.
| • | | Each of Messrs. Linde, Ritchey and Koop is eligible for a Qualified Retirement (i.e., they satisfied the Rule of 70) with respect to all time-based and performance based LTI equity awards granted in 2019 and thereafter. |
Mr. Ritchey satisfied the Pre-2019 Policy and is grandfathered under such policy with respect to his time-based LTI equity awards. Therefore, all of Mr. Ritchey’s time-based equity awards were fully vested as of December 31, 20202021 and subsequent awards will continue to vest on the grant date. Mr. Koop attained age 62 with 20 years of service on August 18, 2020, and as a result, all of Mr. Koop’s unvested time-based equity awards that were granted prior to January 1, 2019 fully vested on that date. › ESTIMATED PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL
The following tables show the potential payments and benefits that would have been provided to our NEOs assuming each scenario occurred on December 31, 2020.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Scenario | | Payments and Benefits Upon Termination | | Owen D. Thomas | | | Douglas T. Linde | | | Raymond A. Ritchey | | | Michael E. LaBelle | | | Bryan J. Koop | | Involuntary Not for Cause or Good Reason Termination | | Bonus | | $ | 2,350,000 | | | $ | 1,900,000 | | | $ | 1,650,000 | | | $ | 1,250,000 | | | $ | 1,250,000 | | | Severance | | $ | 6,900,000 | | | $ | 2,845,000 | | | $ | 2,560,000 | | | $ | 1,805,000 | | | $ | 1,780,000 | | | Unvested Equity Awards(1)(2) | | $ | 6,482,395 | | | $ | 2,859,533 | | | $ | 921,573 | | | $ | 1,137,385 | | | $ | 459,038 | | | 2018 MYLTIP Awards(1)(3) | | $ | 1,652,730 | | | $ | 1,089,752 | | | $ | 799,853 | | | $ | 347,587 | | | $ | 213,288 | | | 2019 MYLTIP Awards(1)(3) | | $ | 708,522 | | | $ | 436,849 | | | $ | 340,071 | | | $ | 157,916 | | | $ | 105,237 | | | 2020 MYLTIP Awards(1)(3) | | $ | 84,153 | | | $ | 47,806 | | | $ | 35,833 | | | $ | 16,431 | | | $ | 11,573 | | | Benefits Continuation | | $ | 48,523 | | | $ | 24,261 | | | $ | 22,056 | | | $ | 24,261 | | | $ | 22,056 | | | Total | | $ | 18,226,323 | | | $ | 9,203,201 | | | $ | 6,329,386 | | | $ | 4,738,580 | | | $ | 3,841,192 | |
| | | | | | | | | 88
| | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement 106 | | |
| | | 8› | | COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Scenario | | Payments and Benefits Upon Termination | | Owen D. Thomas | | | Douglas T. Linde | | | Raymond A. Ritchey | | | Michael E. LaBelle | | | Bryan J. Koop | | Involuntary Not for Cause or Good Reason Termination Following Change in Control(4) | | Bonus | | $ | 2,350,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | Severance | | $ | 10,550,000 | | | $ | 8,460,000 | | | $ | 8,200,000 | | | $ | 5,600,000 | | | $ | 5,430,000 | | | Unvested Equity Awards(1)(2) | | $ | 8,613,385 | | | $ | 5,719,065 | | | $ | 921,573 | | | $ | 2,196,499 | | | $ | 1,032,079 | | | 2018 MYLTIP Awards(1)(3) | | $ | 1,708,913 | | | $ | 1,126,798 | | | $ | 827,043 | | | $ | 359,403 | | | $ | 220,538 | | | 2019 MYLTIP Awards(1)(3) | | $ | 1,116,305 | | | $ | 688,273 | | | $ | 535,796 | | | $ | 248,803 | | | $ | 165,806 | | | 2020 MYLTIP Awards(1)(3) | | $ | 278,391 | | | $ | 158,149 | | | $ | 118,541 | | | $ | 54,355 | | | $ | 38,285 | | | Benefits Continuation | | $ | 72,784 | | | $ | 75,214 | | | $ | 68,598 | | | $ | 75,214 | | | $ | 68,598 | | | Other Benefits(5) | | $ | 150,000 | | | $ | 150,000 | | | $ | 150,000 | | | $ | 150,000 | | | $ | 150,000 | | | Excise Tax Gross-Up(6) | | | — | | | $ | 4,364,986 | | | $ | 3,865,898 | | | $ | 2,747,823 | | | $ | 2,647,611 | | | Total | | $ | 24,839,778 | | | $ | 20,742,485 | | | $ | 14,687,449 | | | $ | 11,432,097 | | | $ | 9,752,917 | | Change in Control Without Termination | | 2018 MYLTIP Awards(1)(3) | | $ | 1,708,913 | | | $ | 1,126,798 | | | $ | 827,043 | | | $ | 359,403 | | | $ | 220,538 | | | 2019 MYLTIP Awards(1)(3) | | $ | 1,116,305 | | | $ | 688,273 | | | $ | 535,796 | | | $ | 248,803 | | | $ | 165,806 | | | 2020 MYLTIP Awards(1)(3) | | $ | 278,391 | | | $ | 158,149 | | | $ | 118,541 | | | $ | 54,355 | | | $ | 38,285 | | | Total | | $ | 3,103,609 | | | $ | 1,973,220 | | | $ | 1,481,380 | | | $ | 662,561 | | | $ | 424,629 | | Death or Disability | | Bonus | | $ | 2,350,000 | | | $ | 1,900,000 | | | $ | 1,650,000 | | | $ | 1,250,000 | | | $ | 1,250,000 | | | Unvested Equity Awards(1)(2) | | $ | 8,613,385 | | | $ | 5,719,065 | | | $ | 921,573 | | | $ | 2,196,499 | | | $ | 1,032,079 | | | 2018 MYLTIP Awards(1)(3) | | $ | 1,708,913 | | | $ | 1,126,798 | | | $ | 827,043 | | | $ | 359,403 | | | $ | 220,538 | | | 2019 MYLTIP Awards(1)(3) | | $ | 1,116,305 | | | $ | 688,273 | | | $ | 535,796 | | | $ | 248,803 | | | $ | 165,806 | | | 2020 MYLTIP Awards(1)(3) | | $ | 278,391 | | | $ | 158,149 | | | $ | 118,541 | | | $ | 54,355 | | | $ | 38,285 | | | Benefits Continuation | | $ | 36,392 | | | $ | 36,392 | | | $ | 33,084 | | | $ | 36,392 | | | $ | 33,084 | | | Total | | $ | 14,103,386 | | | $ | 9,628,677 | | | $ | 4,086,037 | | | $ | 4,145,452 | | | $ | 2,739,792 | | Qualified Retirement | | Unvested Equity Awards(1)(2) | | | — | | | | — | | | $ | 921,573 | | | | — | | | $ | 1,032,079 | | | 2018 MYLTIP Awards(1)(3) | | | — | | | | — | | | $ | 827,043 | | | | — | | | $ | 220,538 | | | 2019 MYLTIP Awards(1)(3) | | | — | | | | — | | | $ | 535,796 | | | | — | | | $ | 165,806 | | | 2020 MYLTIP Awards(1)(3) | | | — | | | | — | | | $ | 118,541 | | | | — | | | $ | 38,285 | | | Total | | | — | | | | — | | | $ | 2,402,953 | | | | — | | | $ | 1,456,708 | |
› ESTIMATED PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL The following tables show the potential payments and benefits to which our NEO, would have been entitled assuming each scenario occurred on December 31, 2021. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Scenario | | Payments and Benefits Upon Termination | | Owen D. Thomas | | | Douglas T. Linde | | | Raymond A. Ritchey | | | Michael E. LaBelle | | | Bryan J. Koop | | Involuntary Not for Cause or Good Reason Termination | | Bonus | | $ | 2,350,000 | | | $ | 1,900,000 | | | $ | 1,650,000 | | | $ | 1,250,000 | | | $ | 1,250,000 | | | Severance | | $ | 6,500,000 | | | $ | 1,700,000 | | | $ | 1,843,850 | | | $ | 1,447,500 | | | $ | 1,035,000 | | | Unvested Equity Awards(1)(2) | | $ | 8,022,863 | | | $ | 3,286,085 | | | $ | 468,322 | | | $ | 1,234,499 | | | $ | 687,164 | | | 2019 MYLTIP Awards(1)(3) | | $ | 2,074,763 | | | $ | 1,279,222 | | | $ | 995,904 | | | $ | 462,384 | | | $ | 308,293 | | | 2020 MYLTIP Awards(1)(3) | | $ | 1,239,743 | | | $ | 704,210 | | | $ | 527,993 | | | $ | 242,253 | | | $ | 170,580 | | | 2021 MYLTIP Awards(1)(3) | | $ | 3,492,982 | | | $ | 1,984,216 | | | $ | 1,547,393 | | | $ | 768,060 | | | $ | 627,352 | | | Benefits Continuation | | $ | 48,570 | | | $ | 24,285 | | | $ | 22,078 | | | $ | 24,285 | | | $ | 22,078 | | | Total | | $ | 23,728,921 | | | $ | 10,878,018 | | | $ | 7,055,540 | | | $ | 5,428,981 | | | $ | 4,100,467 | | Involuntary Not for Cause or Good Reason Termination Following Change in Control(4) | | Bonus | | $ | 2,350,000 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | Severance | | $ | 9,750,000 | | | $ | 7,475,000 | | | $ | 7,223,850 | | | $ | 5,212,500 | | | $ | 4,775,000 | | | Unvested Equity Awards(1)(2) | | $ | 11,410,652 | | | $ | 7,690,338 | | | $ | 468,322 | | | $ | 2,875,123 | | | $ | 1,951,264 | | | 2019 MYLTIP Awards(1)(3) | | $ | 2,143,269 | | | $ | 1,321,460 | | | $ | 1,028,788 | | | $ | 477,651 | | | $ | 318,473 | | | 2020 MYLTIP Awards(1)(3) | | $ | 1,950,458 | | | $ | 1,107,916 | | | $ | 830,678 | | | $ | 381,131 | | | $ | 268,369 | | | 2021 MYLTIP Awards(1)(3) | | $ | 11,587,094 | | | $ | 6,582,145 | | | $ | 5,133,090 | | | $ | 2,547,858 | | | $ | 2,081,095 | | | Benefits Continuation | | $ | 72,856 | | | $ | 75,286 | | | $ | 68,663 | | | $ | 75,286 | | | $ | 68,663 | | | Other Benefits(5) | | $ | 150,000 | | | $ | 150,000 | | | $ | 150,000 | | | $ | 150,000 | | | $ | 150,000 | | | Excise Tax Gross-Up(6) | | $ | — | | | $ | 7,828,545 | | | $ | 6,338,379 | | | $ | 4,010,242 | | | $ | 3,656,217 | | | Total | | $ | 39,414,329 | | | $ | 32,230,690 | | | $ | 21,241,770 | | | $ | 15,729,791 | | | $ | 13,269,081 | | Change in Control Without Termination | | 2019 MYLTIP Awards(1)(3) | | $ | 2,143,269 | | | $ | 1,321,460 | | | $ | 1,028,788 | | | $ | 477,651 | | | $ | 318,473 | | | 2020 MYLTIP Awards(1)(3) | | $ | 1,950,458 | | | $ | 1,107,916 | | | $ | 830,678 | | | $ | 381,131 | | | $ | 268,369 | | | 2021 MYLTIP Awards(1)(3) | | $ | 11,587,094 | | | $ | 6,582,145 | | | $ | 5,133,090 | | | $ | 2,547,858 | | | $ | 2,081,095 | | | Total | | $ | 15,680,821 | | | $ | 9,011,521 | | | $ | 6,992,556 | | | $ | 3,406,640 | | | $ | 2,667,937 | |
| | | | | | | | | | 2022 Proxy Statement 107 |
| | | 8› | | COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Scenario | | Payments and Benefits Upon Termination | | Owen D. Thomas | | | Douglas T. Linde | | | Raymond A. Ritchey | | | Michael E. LaBelle | | | Bryan J. Koop | | Death or Disability | | Bonus | | $ | 2,350,000 | | | $ | 1,900,000 | | | $ | 1,650,000 | | | $ | 1,250,000 | | | $ | 1,250,000 | | | Unvested Equity Awards(1)(2) | | $ | 11,410,652 | | | $ | 7,690,338 | | | $ | 468,322 | | | $ | 2,875,123 | | | $ | 1,951,264 | | | 2019 MYLTIP Awards(1)(3) | | $ | 2,143,269 | | | $ | 1,321,460 | | | $ | 1,028,788 | | | $ | 477,651 | | | $ | 318,473 | | | 2020 MYLTIP Awards(1)(3) | | $ | 1,950,458 | | | $ | 1,107,916 | | | $ | 830,678 | | | $ | 381,131 | | | $ | 268,369 | | | 2021 MYLTIP Awards(1)(3) | | $ | 11,587,094 | | | $ | 6,582,145 | | | $ | 5,133,090 | | | $ | 2,547,858 | | | $ | 2,081,095 | | | Benefits Continuation | | $ | 36,428 | | | $ | 36,428 | | | $ | 33,116 | | | $ | 36,428 | | | $ | 33,116 | | | Total | | $ | 29,477,901 | | | $ | 18,638,287 | | | $ | 9,143,994 | | | $ | 7,568,191 | | | $ | 5,902,317 | | Qualified Retirement | | Unvested Equity Awards(1)(2) | | $ | — | | | $ | 7,094,282 | | | $ | 468,322 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,951,264 | | | 2019 MYLTIP Awards(1)(3) | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,321,460 | | | $ | 1,028,788 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 318,473 | | | 2020 MYLTIP Awards(1)(3) | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,107,916 | | | $ | 830,678 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 268,369 | | | 2021 MYLTIP Awards(1)(3) | | $ | — | | | $ | 6,582,145 | | | $ | 5,133,090 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,081,095 | | | Total | | $ | — | | | $ | 16,105,803 | | | $ | 7,460,878 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 4,619,201 | |
(1) | Restricted common stock, LTIP units and LTIP units that would have been earned pursuant to 2018 MYLTIP awards, 2019 MYLTIP awards, 2020 MYLTIP awards and 20202021 MYLTIP awards are valued based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2020,2021, which was $94.53$115.18 per share. |
(2) | Includes the following unvested shares of restricted common stock and LTIP units (including outstanding performance-based LTI equity awards for which the three-year performance period has ended and that have been earned (i.e., 20172018 MYLTIP awards)) that would have vested upon the occurrence of each triggering event: |
| • | | Involuntary not for cause termination or a good reason termination prior to a change in control: Mr. Thomas — 68,575– 69,655 LTIP units; Mr. Linde — an aggregate of 30,250– 28,530 LTIP units and shares of restricted common stock;units; Mr. Ritchey — 9,749– 4,066 LTIP units; Mr. LaBelle —– an aggregate of 12,03210,718 LTIP units and shares of restricted common stock; and Mr. Koop — 4,856– 5,966 LTIP units. |
| • | | Involuntary not for cause termination or a good reason termination within 24 months following a change in control and death or disability: Mr. Thomas — 91,118– 99,068 LTIP units; Mr. Linde — an aggregate of 60,500– 66,768 LTIP units and shares of restricted common stock;units; Mr. Ritchey — 9,749– 4,066 LTIP units; Mr. LaBelle —– an aggregate of 23,23624,962 LTIP units and shares of restricted common stock; and Mr. Koop — 10,918– 16,941 LTIP units. |
| • | | Qualified Retirement: Mr. Linde – 61,593 LTIP units; Mr. Ritchey — 9,749– 4,066 LTIP units and Mr. Koop — 10,918– 16,941 LTIP units. |
(3) | As of December 31, 2020,2021, the three-year performance periods had not ended for the 2018 MYLTIP awards, 2019 MYLTIP awards, and 2020 MYLTIP awards or 2021 MYLTIP awards. The values set forth above relating to the number of LTIP units that would have been earned in the event of a Qualified Retirement, involuntary not for cause termination/good reason termination, death or disability assume our performance for the three-year performance periodperiods under the 2018 MYLTIP awards, 2019 MYLTIP awards, and 2020 MYLTIP awards continued atand 2021 MYLTIP awards is the same annualized rate as we experiencedour performance from the first day of the respective performance period through December 31, 20202021 with proration, as applicable, but are not discounted to reflect the fact that such LTIP units would not be earned until a later date and would be subject to continuing transfer restrictions in the case of Qualified Retirement and involuntary termination prior to a change in control. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | The value of the 2021 Proxy StatementMYLTIP awards also includes a “catch-up” cash payment on the 2021 MYLTIP awards that are ultimately earned in an amount equal to the regular and special distributions declared from the first day of the performance period through December 31, 2021 on an equal number of shares BXP common stock, less the distributions actually paid to holders of 2021 MYLTIP awards on all of the awarded 2021 MYLTIP awards.
| | 89
|
| | | 8› | | COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS |
(4) | Assumes termination occurs simultaneously with a change in control. |
(5) | Includes outplacement services valued at 15% of the sum of current base salary plus bonus with respect to the immediately preceding year up to a maximum of $75,000 paid in a lump sum, and financial counseling and tax preparation services valued at $25,000 per year for 36 months. |
| | | | | | | | 2022 Proxy Statement 108 | | |
| | | 8› | | COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS |
(6) | Under his employment agreement, Mr. Thomas is not entitled to receive tax gross-up payments in the event he becomes subject to the golden parachute excise tax. Instead, if any payment or benefit to be paid or provided to Mr. Thomas would be subject to the golden parachute excise tax, the payments and benefits will be reduced to the extent necessary to avoid the imposition of such tax if such reductiondoing so would result in a greater after-tax benefit to Mr. Thomas. The amounts set forth in the table above have not been adjusted to reflect any such reduction that might apply. |
The above discussion and the amounts shown in the above tables do not include payments and benefits to the extent they have been earned prior to the termination of employment or are provided on a non-discriminatory basis to salaried employees upon termination of employment. These include: | • | | accrued salary and vacation pay; |
| • | | distribution of plan balances under our 401(k) plan and the non-qualified deferred compensation plan (see “– Nonqualified Deferred Compensationin 20202021” for the plan balances of each NEO under the non-qualified deferred compensation plan); and |
life insurance proceeds in the event of death. PAY RATIO DISCLOSURE As required by SEC regulations, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our employees and the annual total compensation of Mr. Thomas, our CEO: For 2020,2021, our last completed fiscal year: the median of the annual total compensation of all employees of the Company (other than our CEO) was $108,126;$123,647; and the annual total compensation of our CEO, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table on page 77,93, was $10,737,289.$12,894,537. Based on this information, for 2020,2021, the ratio of the annual total compensation of Mr. Thomas to the median of the annual total compensation of all other employees was99 104 to 1. The median employee that was used for purposes of calculating the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the median of the total compensation of all employees is the same employee that was identified for purposes of our 2021 disclosure. There has been no change in our employee population or employee compensation arrangement since that median employee was identified that we believe would significantly impact our pay ratio disclosure. We identified the median employee by totaling (1) cash compensation (i.e., wages, overtime and bonus) as reflected on our payroll records for 2020 and (2) the value of LTI equity awards that were granted in 2020 and subject to time-based vesting, for all individuals, excluding our CEO, who we employed on December 31, 2020 (whether on a full-time, part-time, temporary or seasonal basis). In addition, we annualized the wages of full-time employees who were hired during 2020 but did not work for us the entire fiscal year. We did not make any other assumptions, adjustments, or estimates with respect to total cash compensation or LTI compensation. After identifying the median employee, weWe calculated annual total compensation for 20202021 for the median employee using the same methodology we use for our NEOs as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table.
| | | | | | | | | 90
| | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement 109 |
| | | 8› | | COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS |
As of December 31, 2020,2021, we employed 740734 full-time and 109 part-time employees, all of whom are located in the United States. The average tenure of our employee population was 9.810.0 years. The average tenure of our officers and non-officers was 18.218.8 years and 8.78.5 years, respectively. Our employees are organized into the following functions: | | | | | | | Function | | Number of Employees | | | | Accounting | | | 9685 | | | | Accounting Operations | | | 1617 | | | | Administrative Management | | | 1917 | | | | Construction | | | 4642 | | | | Development | | | 2526 | | | | Executive Management | | | 1211 | | | | Finance & Capital Markets | | | 2829 | | | | Human Resources | | | 11 | |
| | | | | | | Function | | Number of Employees | | | | Information Systems | | | 3534 | | | | Internal Audit | | | 34 | | | | Leasing | | | 3128 | | | | Legal | | | 37 | | | | Marketing | | | 24 | | | | Property Management | | | 373375 | | | | Risk Management | | | 3 | |
SEC regulations permit registrants to use reasonable estimates and certain prescribed alternative methodologies. As a result, our calculation of the CEO pay ratio may differ from the calculations used by other companies and may not be comparable. COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
The Compensation Committee of Boston Properties has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.
Submitted by the Compensation Committee:
Kelly A. Ayotte, Chair
Carol B. Einiger
David A. Twardock
William H. Walton, III
| | | | | | | | | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement 110 | | 91
|
| | | 9› | | PROPOSAL 2: ADVISORY VOTE ON NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION |
PROPOSAL 2: ADVISORY VOTE ON NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION Section 14A(a)(1) of the Exchange Act generally requires each public company to include in its proxy statement a separate resolution subject to a non-binding stockholder vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s NEOs, as disclosed in its proxy statement pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, not less frequently than once every three years. This is commonly known as a “Say-on-Pay” proposal or resolution. At our 2017 annual meeting of stockholders, our stockholders voted on among other matters, a proposal regarding the frequency of holding a non-binding, advisory vote on the compensation of our NEOs. More than 85% of the votes cast on the frequency proposal were cast in favor of holding a non-binding, advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s NEOs every year, which was consistent with the recommendation of our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors considered the voting results with respect to the frequency proposal and other factors, and the Board of Directors currently intends for the Company to hold a non-binding, advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s NEOs every year until the next required advisory vote on the frequency of holding the non-binding, advisory vote on the compensation of our NEOs, which will occur not later thanat the 2023 annual meeting of stockholders. Accordingly, we will ask our stockholders to vote “FOR” the following resolution at the 20212022 annual meeting: “RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed in this proxy statement pursuant to the Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion, is hereby APPROVED.” The vote is advisory, and therefore not binding on Boston Properties,BXP, our Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee. However, our Board of Directors and our Compensation Committee value the opinions of our stockholders and intend to take into accountwill consider the results of the vote when considering future compensation decisions for our NEOs. VOTE REQUIRED The affirmative vote of a majority of shares of common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on this proposal is required for the approval of this proposal. Abstentions shall be included in determining the number of shares present and entitled to vote on the proposal, thus having the effect of a vote against the proposal. Broker non-votes, if any, are not counted in determining the number of shares present and entitled to vote and will therefore have no effect on the outcome. | | | | | ✓ | | Recommendation of the Board | | The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the approval of the compensation paid to the Company’s NEOs as disclosed in this proxy statement. Properly authorized proxies solicited by the Board of Directors will be voted THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE“FOR” this proposal unless instructions to the
COMPENSATION PAID TO THE COMPANY’S NEOS AS DISCLOSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT. PROPERLY
AUTHORIZED PROXIES SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS WILL BE VOTED FOR THIS PROPOSAL
UNLESS INSTRUCTIONS TO THE CONTRARY ARE GIVEN.contrary are given. |
| | | | | | | | | 92
| | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement 111 |
| | | 10› | | PROPOSAL 3: APPROVAL OF THE BOSTON PROPERTIES, INC. 2021 STOCK INCENTIVENON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PLAN |
PROPOSAL 3: APPROVAL OF THE BOSTON PROPERTIES, INC. 2021 STOCK INCENTIVENON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PLAN On March 18, 2021, following the recommendationPROPOSAL
Our Compensation Committee and Board of the Compensation Committee,Directors last reviewed our non-employee director compensation in 2019, or three years ago. In early 2022, our Board of Directors approved the Boston Properties, Inc. 2021 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2021 Plan”), subjectamendments to the Director Compensation Plan, which sets forth the cash and equity compensation that is to be paid to our non-employee directors in a specific, formulaic manner. Although we are not legally required to seek or receive stockholder approval for the Director Compensation Plan, we are submitting the plan to stockholders for approval. If approved by the stockholders, the Director Compensation Plan shall become effective retroactively to January 1, 2022. The Director Compensation Plan implements recommendations that our Compensation Committee made to the full Board following a comprehensive review of the structure, form and amounts of our existing compensation for non-employee directors. For the 2022 review, our Compensation Committee engaged FW Cook to help ensure that our non-employee director compensation remains competitive and is generally consistent with “best practices.” Our Compensation Committee also sought recommendations from FW Cook regarding compensation for the role of Lead Independent Director. The Director Compensation Plan does not reserve any additional shares of BXP common stock for issuance; all equity grants made under the Director Compensation Plan must be made pursuant to the 2021 Plan or another separately approved equity plan. Our Board of Directors believes that the structure, form and amounts included in the amended Director Compensation Plan for our non-employee directors, are fair and in the best interests of our stockholders. The 2021 Plan will become effective if and whenNevertheless, because of the interests that our non-employee directors have in the establishment of the compensation they receive for their service as our directors, our Board of Directors also determined that it is approved by ouradvisable to submit the amended Director Compensation Plan to stockholders and it will replacefor their approval. Our Board unanimously recommends that stockholders vote FOR the Company’s existing equity plan, originally adopted in 2012 (the “Prior Plan”). From and after the effective date of the 2021 Plan, no further awards will be made under the PriorDirector Compensation Plan. We believe that having an equity incentive plan in place
| | | | | Recommendation of the Board | | The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the approval of the Boston Properties, Inc. Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan. Properly authorized proxies solicited by the Board of Directors will be voted “FOR” this proposal unless instructions to the contrary are given. |
BACKGROUND Our non-employee director compensation is critical to our abilityintended to attract, retain and motivate employees in aappropriately compensate highly competitive marketplacequalified individuals to serve on our Board of Directors. Historically, our Compensation Committee and Board of Directors have not reviewed our non-employee director compensation on an annual basis – instead choosing to ensure thatreview the Company’scompensation every two or three years – and the current compensation program is structured in a manner that aligns employee interests with the success of the Company. By adopting the 2021 Plan, we will be able to continue using equity awards to attract, retain and motivate employees.has remained unchanged since 2019. The following highlights key reasons why we believe stockholders should approve the 2021 Plan:
› Reasonable Plan Cost
We requested a reasonable number of shares of common stock – 5,400,000 shares less one (1) share for every one (1) share that was granted after March 4, 2021 under the Prior Plan. Following the effective date of the 2021 Plan, no awards may be granted under the Prior Plan.
Awards would not have a substantially dilutive effect (issuance of all shares is 3.1% the sum of the number of shares of common stock and common units of partnership interest in our Operating Partnership of outstanding as of the record date).
› Stockholder-Friendly Plan Features
Liberal share recycling shall be limited to full-value awards; shares of stock tendered or withheld upon the exercise of a stock option or stock appreciation right for tax withholding, net settlement or exercise payment shall not be added back.
No evergreen feature providing for automatic increases.
| • | | We may not reprice stock options, nor exchange “underwater” stock options (i.e., options for which the exercise price is greater than the market value of the underlying common stock) for another award or cash, without stockholder approval.
|
No liberal change in control definition.
› Responsible Grant Practices by the Company
Our Compensation Committee designs our executive compensation program to be competitive with our peers.
Low three-year average burn rate
Performance-based equity awards (in the form of LTIP units) for executive officers are tied to performance metrics, such as TSR, over three-year, overlapping measurement periods.
55% of our Chief Executive Officer’s LTI equity awards (and 50% of our other NEO’s LTI equity awards) for 2020 consisted of performance-based MYLTIP awards earned based on TSR performance over a three-year performance period.
Time-based restricted stock and LTIP unit awards generally vest ratably over four years for all executive officers.
Robust stock ownership requirements for our executive officers.
“Double-trigger” acceleration of vesting upon change in control, which requires a qualified termination of employment following a change in control before vesting of time-based equity awards is accelerated for executive officers.
Our clawback policy applies to equity awards granted to executive officers and certain other specified officers.
| | | | | | | | | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement 112 | | 93
|
| | | 10› | | PROPOSAL 3: APPROVAL OF THE BOSTON PROPERTIES, INC. 2021 STOCK INCENTIVENON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PLAN |
| | | | | ✓ | | THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE BOSTON
PROPERTIES, INC. 2021 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN. PROPERLY AUTHORIZED PROXIES SOLICITED BY THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS WILL BE VOTED FOR THIS PROPOSAL UNLESS INSTRUCTIONS TO THE CONTRARY ARE
GIVEN.
|
Shares AvailableBecause of this practice and the fact that our Compensation Committee targets compensation levels that are competitive with the median of the Benchmarking Peer Group, the total compensation payable to our non-employee directors tends to fall below the median in years following our most recent review until the program is benchmarked again. This is consistent with FW Cook’s findings.
In determining the amount and type of non-employee director compensation that we pay, our Compensation Committee received a comparative benchmarking analysis of non-employee director compensation for Issuancethe same Benchmarking Peer Group used by our Compensation Committee when benchmarking executive compensation, and Outstanding Awards Under the 2021 Plan, the number of shares of common stock to be available for issuance for new awards will be 5,400,000 shares less one (1) share for every one (1) shareit received and evaluated advice from FW Cook that was granted after March 4, 2021 underdeveloped on the Prior Plan. Followingbasis of a targeted competitive approach and FW Cook’s expertise in recent trends and developments in non-employee director compensation generally. In connection with this analysis and evaluation (1) FW Cook advised that the effective datecompensation currently paid to our non-employee directors, on an individual basis and on an aggregate basis, is below the median of our Benchmarking Peer Group, and the 2021additional compensation currently paid to our non-executive Chairman is below the 25th percentile for similarly-situated board chairs based on role and responsibilities; (2) our Compensation Committee sought to target compensation levels that would be competitive with the median of our Benchmarking Peer Group and the recommendations made by FW Cook were consistent with that goal; and (3) with respect to additional compensation payable to the Lead Independent Director, FW Cook advised our Compensation Committee that the compensation provided in the Director Compensation Plan no awards may be granted underaligns with the Prior Plan.median of our Benchmarking Peer Group for similarly-situated lead independent directors based on role and responsibilities.
› Overhang asAs a result of March 4, 2021
The following table sets forth, asthis review, the Compensation Committee recommended, and our Board of March 4, 2021:Directors approved,
all outstanding stock options granted pursuantan increase of $25,000 to our equity compensation plans (including the weighted average exercise price and weighted average remaining term),annual cash retainer payable to the Chairman of the Board, if one is selected, from $100,000 to $125,000,
the numberestablishment of sharesan annual cash retainer for the Lead Independent Director, if one is selected, in the amount of common stock subject to all outstanding unvested full value awards granted pursuant to our equity compensation plans, the number of shares of common stock to be available for issuance of new awards under the 2021 Plan,$50,000, and
an increase of $15,000 in the total numbervalue of outstanding sharesthe annual equity retainer that each non-employee director is entitled to receive, from $150,000 to $165,000. All other terms and conditions of common stockthe annual equity retainer, including the vesting schedule, will remain unchanged. FW Cook did not recommend, and common unitsthe Compensation Committee did not make, any other changes to the plan. Our Board of Directors believes the Director Compensation Plan provides appropriate compensation that is competitive with the median of our Benchmarking Peer Group and aligns the interests of our non-employee directors and our stockholders in the future success of the Company. Accordingly, our Operating Partnership (other than common units heldBoard unanimously recommends that our stockholders vote to approve the Director Compensation Plan. SUMMARY OF THE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PLAN The following description of the Director Compensation Plan is a summary only and is qualified in its entirety by Boston Properties)reference to the full text of the Director Compensation Plan that is attached hereto as Appendix B. › Compensation Payable under the Director Compensation Plan The Director Compensation Plan provides that each non-employee director shall be entitled to the compensation described below while serving as a director. Our directors who are also employees are not entitled to receive compensation under the Director Compensation Plan. We currently have nine non-employee directors. | | | | | Overhang Detail | | Status as of March 4, 2021 | | Stock options outstanding
| | | 297,558 | | Weighted-average exercise price
| | | $98.80 | | Weighted-average remaining term
| | | 0.86 years | | Unvested full value shares outstanding(1)
| | | 1,329,611 | | Proposed shares reserved under 2021 Plan(2)
| | | 5,400,000 | | Total Common Stock and Common Units outstanding(3)
| | | 171,916,558 | |
(1) | Includes (x) 486,716 LTIP units and 67,680 restricted shares of common stock that remain subject to vesting based solely on continued employment or service and (y) 775,215 LTIP units granted pursuant to 2019, 2020 and 2021 MYLTIP Awards, which remain subject to performance-based vesting conditions in addition to vesting conditions based on continued employment or service.
|
(2) | Proposed share reserve is subject to reduction for any awards granted under the Prior Plan after March 4, 2021. Upon stockholder approval of the 2021 Plan, no awards may be granted under the Prior Plan.
|
(3) | Includes 155,858,332 shares of common stock and 16,058,226 common units in our Operating Partnership outstanding as of March 4, 2021. Excludes 1,576,297 LTIP units outstanding as of March 4, 2021 and common units in our Operating Partnership held by Boston Properties.
|
Other than the foregoing and vested LTIP units (or common units into which they were converted) and vested deferred stock units that were outstanding but not yet settled or exchanged for shares of common stock, no other awards pursuant to which shares of common stock were issuable under any of our existing or prior equity compensation plans, including the Prior Plan, were outstanding as of March 4, 2021.
| | | | | | | | | 94
| | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement 113 |
| | | 10› | | PROPOSAL 3: APPROVAL OF THE BOSTON PROPERTIES, INC. 2021 STOCK INCENTIVENON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PLAN |
Burn Rate
The following table sets forth information regarding historical awards granted during 2018, 2019 and 2020, and the corresponding “burn rate,” which is defined as the number of stock options and time-based, full value shares/units granted plus the number of performance-based, full-value shares/units earned in a year divided by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock and common units outstanding for that year, for each of the last three fiscal years:
› Burn Rate Detail: 2018-2020Cash Compensation | | | | | | | | | | | | | Award Type | | 2018 | | | 2019 | | | 2020 | | Stock options granted (A) | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | Time-based, full-value shares/units granted(1) (B) | | | 232,481 | | | | 216,998 | | | | 249,101 | | Performance-based, full-value shares/units earned(2) (C) | | | 28,771 | | | | 106,599 | | | | 123,979 | | Total (A+B+C) | | | 261,252 | | | | 323,597 | | | | 373,080 | | Weighted-average common shares + units(3) (D) | | | 171,912,377 | | | | 172,199,852 | | | | 172,642,577 | | Burn Rate ((A+B+C)/D) | | | 0.15% | | | | 0.19% | | | | 0.22% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Role | | Annual Cash Retainer(1) | | | Committee Chair Retainer(1)(2) | | | Committee Member Retainer(1) | | | | | | All Non-Employee Directors for Board Services | | $ | 85,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Chairman of the Board(2) | | $ | 125,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Lead Independent Director(2) | | $ | 50,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Audit Committee | | | | | | | $20,000 | | | | $15,000 | | | | | | Other Standing Committees(3) | | | | | | | $15,000 | | | | $10,000 | |
(1) | Time-based, full-value shares/units granted consistsThe sum of all restricted stock awards, deferred stock units and LTIP units granted during the applicable year that, upon grant, either were vested or werecash retainers are payable in quarterly installments in arrears, subject to vesting based solely on continued employment or service.proration for periods of service less than a full quarter in length.
|
(2) | Performance-based, full-value shares/units earned consists ofThe retainer payable to the Chairman, if one is selected, and the Lead Independent Director, if one is selected, is in addition to all LTIP units forother retainers to which performance-based vesting occurred with respectthe Chairman or Lead Independent Director may be entitled, and the retainer payable to a performance period that ended during such year even ifeach committee chair is in addition to the LTIP units remained subjectretainer payable to vesting based on continued employment or service. All performance-based, full-value awards granted or earned during 2018 – 2020 were LTIP unit awards. 2018 performance-based, full-value shares/units earned reflects LTIP units earned from the 2015 MYLTIP awards. 2019 performance-based, full-value share/units earned reflects LTIP units earned from the 2016 MYLTIP awards. 2020 performance-based full-value share/units earned reflects LTIP units earned from the 2017 MYLTIP awards. The following table provides further detail regarding performance-based, full-value awards that were granted, earned, forfeited and outstanding during 2018, 2019 and 2020:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2018 | | | 2019 | | | 2020 | | Unearned at beginning of period(a)(b) | | | 1,239,978 | | | | 1,211,816 | | | | 951,850 | | Units granted(b) | | | 342,659 | | | | 220,734 | | | | 203,278 | | Units earned | | | 28,771 | | | | 106,599 | | | | 123,979 | | Units forfeited(c) | | | 342,050 | | | | 374,101 | | | | 271,760 | | Unearned at end of period(a)(b) | | | 1,211,816 | | | | 951,850 | | | | 759,389 | |
| (a) | Includes the outstanding number of LTIP units subject to performance-based vesting.
|
| (b) | For performance-based LTIP unit awards granted prior to 2019, the number of LTIP units that could be earned was based on a dollar amount earned divided by an averageall members of the closing prices of our common stock measured at the end of the performance period. As a result, the number of LTIP units issued was an estimate of the maximum number of LTIP units that could be earned based on certain assumptions. The number of units granted and unearned is based on the number of LTIP units actually issued and outstanding, respectively.
|
| (c) | Represents LTIP units forfeited (based on the number initially issued, which, for awards granted prior to 2019, was an estimate of the maximum number of LTIP units that could be earned based on certain assumptions) upon determination of performance-based vesting or due to termination of employment or service relationship.committee.
|
(3) | For each applicable year, representsThe term “Other Standing Committees” includes the weighted-average number of shares of common stock of the CompanyCompensation and common units in our Operating Partnership (other than common units held by Boston Properties) outstanding during the year. Because the Company is a REIT that conducts substantially all of its operations through the Operating Partnership, both shares of common stock of the Company and common units in our Operating Partnership not owned by Boston Properties are included for purposes of calculating our burn rate. Each common unit in our Operating Partnership is exchangeable into shares of common stock on a one-for-one basis, subject to certain conditions.NCG Committees.
|
Under the Director Compensation Plan, non-employee directors will not receive meeting attendance fees for any meeting of our Board of Directors or a committee thereof that he or she attends. › Equity Compensation Each continuing non-employee director is entitled to receive, on the fifth business day after each annual meeting of stockholders, a number of shares of restricted common stock or, if elected by such director, LTIP units (or a combination of both) valued at $165,000. These grants will vest on the earlier of (1) the first anniversary of the grant date and (2) the date of the next annual meeting of stockholders, in each case subject to potential acceleration as set forth in the 2021 Plan or the applicable award agreement. In addition, any new non-employee director that is appointed to our Board of Directors other than at an annual meeting of stockholders is entitled to receive, on the fifth business day after the appointment, a number of shares of restricted common stock or, if elected by such director, LTIP units (or a combination of both) valued at $165,000 (prorated based on the number of months from the date the director is first appointed to our Board of Directors to the first anniversary of the Company’s most recently held annual meeting of stockholders). These grants will vest on the earlier of (1) the first anniversary of the grant date and (2) the date of the next annual meeting of stockholders, in each case subject to potential acceleration as set forth in the 2021 Plan or the applicable award agreement. Annual and initial grants of restricted common stock or, if elected by the director, LTIP units (or a combination of both) under the Director Compensation Plan are determined by a formula. The actual number of shares of restricted common stock or LTIP units that we grant is determined by dividing (1) the fixed value of the grant by (2) the closing market price of our common stock on the NYSE on the grant date. The closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on April 1, 2022 was $130.24. › Deferral of Compensation Each non-employee director may elect to defer all cash retainers payable to him or her in accordance with the 2021 Plan and our Directors’ Deferred Compensation Program. For a description of the current terms of this deferral program, see “Compensation of Directors” beginning on page 54 of this proxy statement. | | | | | | | | | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement 114 | | 95
|
| | | 10› | | PROPOSAL 3: APPROVAL OF THE BOSTON PROPERTIES, INC. 2021 STOCK INCENTIVENON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PLAN |
› Amendments and Termination Our Board of Directors reserves the right to amend or terminate the Director Compensation Plan at any time in its sole discretion. › Non-Exclusivity The Director Compensation Plan is not intended to be exclusive and will not prevent our Board of Directors from adopting other or additional compensation arrangements with respect to any non-employee director(s). However, our Board of Directors has not adopted any other compensation arrangements for its non-employee directors. › Plan Administration The Director Compensation Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee. SummaryNEW PLAN BENEFITS
No cash or equity compensation has yet been issued under the amended Director Compensation Plan. For a discussion regarding current director compensation and director compensation for 2021, see “Compensation of 2021 PlanDirectors” beginning on page 54 of this proxy statement. The following description of certain material features oftable discloses the 2021 Plan is intendedcash and equity that would have been paid to be a summary only. This summary is qualified in its entirety by the full text of the 2021 Plan that is attached hereto as Appendix A. Shares of Common Stock Available. The maximum number of shares of common stock to be available for issuance for new awards will be 5,400,000 shares less one (1) share for every one (1) share that was granted after March 4,2021 under the Prior Plan. Following the effective date of the 2021 Plan, no awards may be granted under the Prior Plan. Based solely on the closing price of our common stock as reported on the NYSE on March 24, 2021, the maximum aggregate market value of the 5,400,000 shares that could potentially be issued under the 2021 Plan is $554,850,000.
Shares of common stock underlying awards granted under the 2021 Plan or the Prior Plan that are forfeited, canceled or otherwise terminated (other than by exercise) will be added back to the shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2021 Plan. Additionally, with respect to full-value awards under the 2021 Plan or the Prior Plan (i.e., an award other than a stock option, stock appreciation right or partnership unit with an economic structure similar to that of a stock option or stock appreciation right), shares tendered, held back or otherwise reacquired to cover tax withholding and shares previously reserved for issuance pursuant to such an award to the extent that such shares are not issued and are no longer issuable pursuant to such an award (e.g., in the event that a full-value award that may be settled in cash or by issuance of shares of Stock is settled in cash) will be added back to the shares available for issuance under the 2021 Plan. Shares of common stock tendered or held back for taxes or to cover the exercise price of an option or stock appreciation right will not be added back to the reserved pool under the 2021 Plan. Upon the exercise of a stock appreciation right that is settled in shares of common stock, the full number of shares of common stock underlying the award will be charged to the reserved pool. In the event we repurchase shares of common stock on the open market, the shares shall not be added to the shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2021 Plan.
In addition, in connection with the acquisition of another company, the Company may assume outstanding awards granted by another company as if they had been granted under the 2021 Plan or grant awards under the 2021 Plan in substitution of such outstanding awards, in each case, to the extent the applicable award recipient is eligible to be granted such an award under the 2021 Plan. Any shares of common stock issued pursuant to such assumed or substituted awards will not reduce the number of shares authorized for grant under the 2021 Plan.
Plan Administration. The 2021 Plan will be administered by either the Compensation Committee, the Board or by such other committee of the Board performing the functions of the Compensation Committee (in either case, the “Administrator”). The Administrator has full power to select, from among the individuals eligible for awards, the individuals to whom awards will be granted, to make any combination of awards to participants, to determine the specific terms and conditions of each award, subject to the provisions of the 2021 Plan, to accelerate the exercisability or vesting of any award, to interpret the 2021 Plan and awards granted thereunder, and to otherwise administer the 2021 Plan and the awards granted thereunder. Subject to applicable law, the Administrator, in its sole discretion, may delegate to our Chief Executive Officer, all or part of the Administrator’s authority and duties with respect to the granting of awards to individuals who are not subject to the reporting and other provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act, subject to certain limitations.
Types of Awards. The types of awards permitted under the 2021 Plan include stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock unit awards, restricted stock awards, unrestricted stock awards, dividend equivalent rights, cash-based awards and other equity-based awards. Subject to the overall limit on the number of shares that may be issued under the 2021 Plan, shares of common stock may be issued up to such maximum number pursuant to any type of award; provided that no more than 5,400,000 shares of common stock (plus, to the extent permitted by the Code, any shares added back to the 2021 Plan as described above) may be issued in the form of incentive stock options.
Eligibility. All officers, employees, non-employee directors consultants and advisors ofas a group during 2021 if the Company and its subsidiaries will be eligible to receive awards under the 2021 Plan. Personsamended Director Compensation Plan had been in place at that time. Only non-employee directors are eligible to participate in the 2021Director Compensation Plan.
› Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan will be those officers, employees, non-employee directors, consultants and advisors of the Company and its subsidiaries as selected from time to time by the Administrator, as well as such other persons selected from time to time by the Administrator to whom issuances of shares | | | | | | | | | | | 96Name and Position
| | Dollar Value ($)(1) | | | 2021 Proxy Statement
| Number of Units | |
| | | 10›Non-Employee Director Group (9 directors)
| | PROPOSAL 3: APPROVAL OF THE BOSTON PROPERTIES, INC. 2021 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN | 2,560,000 | | | | — | (1) |
under the 2021 Plan may be registered and permitted under applicable securities laws. As of March 24, 2021, approximately 700 individuals would have been eligible to participate in the 2021 Plan had it been effective on such date. All persons who are eligible to receive awards form a single class under the 2021 Plan, as awards are made on a discretionary basis and the terms of the 2021 Plan do not distinguish among various eligible persons.
Adjustments for Stock Dividends, Stock Splits, Etc. The 2021 Plan requires the Administrator to make appropriate equitable adjustments to the number and kind of shares of common stock that are subject to issuance under the 2021 Plan, to certain limits in the 2021 Plan, and to any outstanding awards under the 2021 Plan, as well as equitable adjustments to the purchase price or exercise price, as applicable, of outstanding awards under the 2021 Plan, to reflect any reorganization, recapitalization, reclassification, stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split or similar change in the Company’s capital stock, including as a result of any merger or consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company.
Treatment of Awards in Certain Transactions. In the event of a “Transaction,” as defined in the 2021 Plan, the Board or the board of directors of any corporation assuming the obligations of the Company, may, in its discretion, take any one or more of the following actions as to outstanding awards under the 2021 Plan: provide that the awards may be assumed or substituted, or upon written notice to participants provide that all awards will terminate upon consummation of the Transaction. In the event that awards are not assumed or substituted, except as otherwise provided by the Compensation Committee in the award agreement or other agreement between the holder of an award and the Company, upon the effective time of the Transaction, all awards will become vested and exercisable and vested awards, other than stock options, shall be fully settled in cash or in kind at such appropriate consideration as determined by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion after taking into account the consideration payable per share pursuant to the Transaction, or the “merger price”, and all stock options shall be fully settled in cash or in kind in an amount equal to the difference between the merger price and the exercise price of the options; provided that each participant may be permitted to exercise all outstanding options within a specified period determined by the Compensation Committee prior to the Transaction.
Term. No awards may be granted under the 2021 Plan ten years or more after the date of stockholder approval, and no incentive stock options may be granted after the tenth anniversary of the date the 2021 Plan is approved by the Board.
Repricing. The Administrator may not, without stockholder approval, reduce the exercise price of outstanding stock options or stock appreciation rights or effect repricing through cancellation and re-grants or cancellation of stock options or stock appreciation rights in exchange for cash or other awards, other than as a result of a proportionate adjustment made in connection with a reorganization, recapitalization, reclassification, stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split, or other similar event.
Stock Options. The 2021 Plan permits the granting of (1) options intended to qualify as incentive stock options under Section 422 of the Code and (2) options that do not so qualify. Options granted under the 2021 Plan will be non-qualified stock options if they fail to qualify as incentive stock options or exceed the annual limit on incentive stock options. Non-qualified stock options may be granted to any persons eligible to receive incentive stock options and to non-employee directors, consultants and advisors. Incentive stock options may be granted only to employees of the Company or any subsidiary. To qualify as incentive stock options, options must meet additional federal tax requirements, including a $100,000 limit on the value of shares of common stock subject to incentive stock options that first become exercisable by a participant in any one calendar year.
The exercise price of each option will be determined by the Administrator but may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of our shares of common stock on the date of grant, subject to certain exceptions set forth in the 2021 Plan. The term of each option will be fixed by the Administrator and may not exceed ten years from the date of grant. The Administrator will determine at what time or times each option may be exercised. Options may be made exercisable in installments and the exercisability of options may be accelerated by the Administrator. Options may be exercised in whole or in part by giving written or electronic notice to the Company. Upon exercise of options, the option exercise price must be paid in full either in cash, by certified or bank check or other instrument acceptable to the Administrator or by delivery (or attestation to the ownership following such procedures as we may prescribe) of shares of common stock that are not subject to restrictions under any Company plan. Subject to applicable law, the exercise price may also be delivered to the Company by a broker pursuant to irrevocable instructions to the broker from the optionee. In addition, the Administrator may permit non-qualified stock options to be exercised using a net exercise feature which reduces the number of shares of common stock issued to the optionee by the number of shares of common stock with a fair market value equal to the exercise price.
| | | | | | | | | | (1) | |The “Dollar Value ($)” column includes equity awards valued at $165,000 per non-employee director, totaling $1,485,000 in the aggregate. The number of shares of common stock or LTIP Units issued would have been determined based on the closing price of the common stock on the NYSE on the fifth business day after our annual meeting of stockholders. The “Dollar Value ($)” column also includes the amount of cash compensation that would have been deferred in accordance with elections made by our non-employee directors pursuant to the 2021 Proxy Statement
| | 97Plan and our Directors’ Deferred Compensation Program.
|
| | | 10› | | PROPOSAL 3: APPROVAL OF THE BOSTON PROPERTIES, INC. 2021 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN |
Stock Appreciation Rights. The Administrator may award stock appreciation rights to participants subject to such conditions and restrictions as the Administrator may determine, provided that the exercise price may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of our shares of common stock on the date of grant, subject to certain exceptions set forth in the 2021 Plan. Stock appreciation rights are settled in cash or shares of common stock. In addition, no stock appreciation right shall be exercisable more than ten years after the date the stock appreciation right is granted.
Restricted Stock Units. Restricted stock unit awards are payable in the form of shares of common stock (or cash, to the extent explicitly provided in the award agreement) and may be subject to such conditions and restrictions as the Administrator may determine. These conditions and restrictions may be based on, among other things, the achievement of certain performance goals and/or continued employment or service with the Company through a specified vesting period. To the extent permitted by the Administrator, restricted stock units may be deferred to one or more dates specified in the applicable award certificate or elected by the grantee. Restricted stock unit awards with a deferred settlement date may be referred to as “deferred stock unit awards.” In addition, in the Administrator’s sole discretion, and subject to the participant’s compliance with the procedures established by the Administrator, it may permit a participant to make an advance election to receive cash compensation otherwise due in the form of a restricted stock unit award.
Restricted Stock. The Administrator may award shares of common stock to participants subject to such conditions and restrictions as the Administrator may determine. These conditions and restrictions may include the achievement of certain pre-established performance goals and/or continued employment or service through a specified restriction period. If the lapse of restrictions with respect to the shares of common stock is tied to attainment of vesting conditions, any cash dividends paid by the Company during the vesting period will be retained by, or repaid by the grantee to, the Company until and to the extent the vesting conditions are met with respect to the award; provided, that to the extent provided for in the applicable award agreement or by the Administrator, an amount equal to such cash dividends retained or repaid by the grantee may be paid by the grantee upon the lapsing of such restrictions.
Unrestricted Stock. The 2021 Plan gives the Administrator discretion to grant stock awards free of any restrictions. Unrestricted stock may be granted to any participant in recognition of past services or other valid consideration and may be issued in lieu of cash compensation due to such participant.
Dividend Equivalent Rights. Dividend equivalent rights are awards entitling the grantee to current or deferred payments equal to cash dividends on a specified number of shares of common stock. Dividend equivalent rights may be settled in cash or stock and are subject to other conditions as the Administrator shall determine. Dividend equivalent rights may be granted to any grantee as a component of an award or as a freestanding award. Unless provided by the Administrator, dividend equivalent rights may be paid currently, be deemed reinvested in additional shares of stock, which may thereafter accrue additional dividend equivalents, or may otherwise accrue.
Other Equity-Based Awards. The Administrator may grant units in the Company’s Operating Partnership or other units or any other membership or ownership interests (which may be expressed as units or otherwise) in a subsidiary, with any stock being issued in connection with the conversion of (or other distribution on account of) an interest granted under the provisions of the 2021 Plan.
Cash-Based Awards. The Administrator may grant cash-based awards, such as annual cash bonuses, under the 2021 Plan. The cash-based awards may be subject to the achievement of one or more performance criteria selected by the Administrator, including those specifically referenced in the definition of Performance Criteria in the 2021 Plan. Cash-based awards may be paid in cash or shares of common stock. Cash-based awards that are only payable or actually paid in cash are not subject to and will have no impact on the number of shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2021 Plan.
Tax Withholding. Participants in the 2021 Plan are responsible for the payment of any federal, state or local taxes that we are required by law to withhold upon any exercise, vesting or settlement of awards, as applicable. Subject to approval by the Administrator, participants may elect to have the tax withholding obligations satisfied by authorizing the Company to withhold shares of common stock to be issued (or, in the case of a restricted stock award, to reacquire shares previously issued pursuant to such award). Additionally, the Administrator may provide for mandatory share withholding up to the required withholding amount. The Administrator may also require tax withholding obligations to be satisfied by an arrangement where shares issued pursuant to an award are immediately sold and proceeds from such sale are remitted to the Company in an amount to satisfy such tax withholding obligations.
| | | | | | | | | 98
| | | | | 2021 Proxy Statement
|
| | | 10› | | PROPOSAL 3: APPROVAL OF THE BOSTON PROPERTIES, INC. 2021 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN |
Amendments and Termination. Generally, under current NYSE rules, all material amendments to the 2021 Plan, including those that materially increase the number of shares of common stock available (other than an increase solely to reflect a reorganization, recapitalization, reclassification, stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split or similar change), expand the types of awards available or the persons eligible to receive awards, extend the term of the 2021 Plan, change the method of determining the exercise price of options or delete or limit any provision prohibiting the repricing of options, must be approved by our common stockholders. The Board may determine to make amendments subject to the approval of the common stockholders for purposes of complying with the rules of the NYSE or to preserve the qualified status of incentive stock options. Otherwise, our Board may amend or discontinue the 2021 Plan at any time, provided that no such action will materially and adversely affect the rights under any outstanding awards without the holder’s consent.
United States Federal Income Tax Consequences – Options and Stock Appreciation RightsVOTE REQUIRED
The following is a summary of the principal federal income tax consequences of certain transactions under the 2021 Plan relating to options and stock appreciation rights. It does not describe all federal tax consequences under the 2021 Plan, nor does it describe state or local tax consequences. Incentive Stock Options. No taxable income is generally realized by the optionee upon the grant or exercise of an incentive stock option. If shares of common stock issued to an optionee pursuant to the exercise of an incentive stock option are sold or transferred after two years from the date of grant and after one year from the date of exercise, then (1) upon sale of such shares of common stock, any amount realized in excess of the option price (the amount paid for the shares of common stock) will be taxed to the optionee as a long-term capital gain, and any loss sustained will be a long-term capital loss, and (2) we will not be entitled to any deduction for federal income tax purposes. The exercise of an incentive stock option will give rise to an item of tax preference that may result in alternative minimum tax liability for the optionee.
If shares of common stock acquired upon the exercise of an incentive stock option are disposed of prior to the expiration of the two-year and one-year holding periods described above, generally: (1) the optionee will realize ordinary income in the year of disposition in an amount equal to the excess (if any) of the fair market value of the shares of common stock at exercise (or, if less, the amount realized on a sale of such shares of common stock) over the option price thereof; and (2) we will be entitled to deduct such amount. Special rules will apply where all or a portion of the exercise price of the incentive stock option is paid by tendering shares of common stock.
If an incentive option is exercised at a time when it no longer qualifies for the tax treatment described above, the option is treated as a non-qualified option. Generally, an incentive option will not be eligible for the tax treatment described above if it is exercised more than three months following termination of employment (or one year in the case of termination of employment by reason of disability). In the case of termination of employment by reason of death, the three-month rule does not apply.
Non-Qualified Stock Options. No taxable income is generally realized by the optionee upon the grant of a non-qualified stock option. Generally: (1) at exercise, ordinary income is realized by the optionee in an amount equal to the difference between the option exercise price and the fair market value of the shares of common stock on the date of exercise, and we receive a tax deduction for the same amount; and (2) at disposition, appreciation or depreciation after the date of exercise is treated as either short-term or long-term capital gain or loss depending on how long the shares of common stock have been held. Special rules will apply where all or a portion of the exercise price of the non-qualified stock option is paid by tendering shares of common stock. Upon exercise, the optionee will also be subject to Social Security taxes on the excess of the fair market value over the exercise price of the option.
Stock Appreciation Rights. No income will be recognized by a recipient upon the grant of either tandem or freestanding stock appreciation rights. For the year in which the stock appreciation right is exercised, the recipient will generally be taxed at ordinary income rates on the amount equal to the cash received plus the fair market value of any unrestricted shares received on the exercise.
| | | | | | | | | | | | 2021 Proxy Statement
| | 99
|
| | | 10› | | PROPOSAL 3: APPROVAL OF THE BOSTON PROPERTIES, INC. 2021 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN |
Parachute Payments. The vesting of any portion of an option or stock appreciation right that is accelerated due to the occurrence of a change in control may cause a portion of the payments with respect to such accelerated awards to be treated as “parachute payments,” as defined in the Code. Any such parachute payments may be non-deductible to us, in whole or in part, and may subject the recipient to a non-deductible 20% federal excise tax on all or a portion of such payment (in addition to other taxes ordinarily payable).
Limitation on Deductions. Under Section 162(m) of the Code, the Company’s deduction for awards under the 2021 Plan may be limited to the extent that any “covered employee” (as defined in Section 162(m) of the Code) receives compensation in excess of $1 million a year.
New Plan Benefits
Because the grant of awards under the 2021 Plan is within the discretion of the Administrator, we cannot determine the dollar value or number of shares of common stock that will in the future be received by or allocated to any participant in the 2021 Plan.
Vote Required
Under our Charter and By-laws, the affirmative vote of a majority of shares of common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on this proposal is required for the approval of the 2021Director Compensation Plan. Abstentions shall be included in determining the number of shares present and entitled to vote on the proposal, thus having the effect of a vote against the proposal. Broker non-votes, if any, are not counted in determining the number of shares present and entitled to vote and will therefore have no effect on the outcome.
EquityOur Board of Directors has approved the compensation for our non-employee directors set forth above, subject to stockholder approval of the Director Compensation Plan. If approved by our stockholders, the Director Compensation Plan Informationwill be effective retroactively to January 1, 2022 . In the event that the Director Compensation Plan is not approved by stockholders, our existing non-employee director compensation will remain in effect. Our Board of Directors and our Compensation Committee value the opinions of our stockholders and, if the Director Compensation Plan is not approved, then the Board will consider the results of the vote and views expressed by our stockholders in determining future compensation for our non-employee directors.
| | | | | | | | | | 2022 Proxy Statement 115 |
| | | 10› | | PROPOSAL 3: APPROVAL OF THE BOSTON PROPERTIES, INC. NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PLAN |
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION The following table summarizes the Company’sBoston Properties, Inc.’s equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2020.2021. | Plan category | | Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights | | Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights | | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) | | Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights | | Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights | | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) | | | | (a) | | (b) | | (c) | | (a) | | (b) | | (c) | | | Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1) | | | | 3,886,774 | (2) | | $ | 96.97 | (2) | | | 8,069,531 | (3) | | | 3,847,139 | (2) | | $ | 97.01 | (2) | | | 5,355,702 | (3) | | Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders(4) | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | 78,152 | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | 68,305 | | | Total | | | | 3,886,774 | | | $ | 96.97 | | | | 8,147,683 | | | | 3,847,139 | | | $ | 97.01 | | | | 5,424,007 | |
(1) | Includes information related to the Boston Properties, Inc. 1997 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, the Boston Properties, Inc. 2012 Stock Option and Incentive Plan and the Prior2021 Plan. |
(2) | Includes (a) 351,561103,641 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options (all of which are vested and exercisable), (b) 1,336,1151,485,376 LTIP units (914,572(1,001,475 of which are vested) that, upon the satisfaction of certain conditions, are convertible into common units, which may be presented to the Operating PartnershipBPLP for redemption and acquired by usBXP for shares of ourits common stock, (c) 1,366,7431,399,834 common units issued upon conversion of LTIP units, which may be presented to the Operating PartnershipBPLP for redemption and acquired by usBXP for shares of ourits common stock, (all of which are vested), (d) 336,195 LTIP units issued in the form of 2018 MYLTIP awards that, upon the satisfaction of certain conditions, are convertible into common units, which may be presented to the Operating Partnership for redemption and acquired by us for shares of our common stock, (e) 219,916 LTIP units issued in the form of 2019 MYLTIP awards that, upon the satisfaction of certain conditions, are convertible into common units, which may be presented to the Operating PartnershipBPLP for redemption and acquired by usBXP for shares of ourits common stock, (f)(e) 203,278 LTIP units issued in the form of 2020 MYLTIP awards that, upon the satisfaction of certain conditions, are convertible into common units, which may be presented to the Operating PartnershipBPLP for redemption and acquired by usBXP for shares of ourits common stock, (f) 352,021 2021 MYLTIP awards that, upon the satisfaction of certain conditions, are convertible into common units, which may be presented to BPLP for redemption and acquired by BXP for shares of its common stock and (g) 72,96683,073 deferred stock units (all of which are vested) which were granted pursuant to elections by certain of ourBXP’s non-employee directors to defer all cash compensation to be paid to such directors and to receive their deferred cash compensation in shares of ourBXP’s common stock upon their retirement from ourits Board of Directors. |
| | | | | | | | | 100
| | | | | 2021 Proxy Statement
|
| | | 10› | | PROPOSAL 3: APPROVAL OF THE BOSTON PROPERTIES, INC. 2021 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN |
| Does not include 55,61675,949 shares of restricted stock, as they have been reflected in ourBXP’s total shares outstanding. Because there is no exercise price associated with LTIP units, common units, 2018 MYLTIP awards, 2019 MYLTIP awards, 2020 MYLTIP awards, 2021 MYLTIP awards or deferred stock units, such awardsshares are not included in the weighed-average exercise price calculation. |
(3) | Represents awards available for issuance under the Prior Plan. “Full-value” awards (i.e., awards other than stock options) are multiplied by a 2.32 conversion ratio to calculate the number of shares available that are used for each full-value award (and thus the number that remains available) under the Prior Plan, as opposed to a 1.0 conversion ratio for each stock option awarded under the Prior2021 Plan. |
(4) | Includes information related to the 1999 Non-Qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP). The ESPP was adopted by ourthe Board of Directors of BXP on October 29, 1998. The ESPP has not been approved by ourBXP’s stockholders. All ofThe ESPP is available to all our employees that are eligible to participate inemployed on the ESPP.first day of the purchase period. Under the ESPP, each eligible employee may purchase shares of our common stock at semi-annual intervals each year at a purchase price equal to 85% of the average closing prices of ourBXP common stock on the NYSE during the last ten business days of the purchase period. Each eligible employee may contribute no more than $10,000$25,000 per year to purchase our common stock under the ESPP. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement 116 | | 101
|
| | | 11› | | PROPOSAL 4: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM |
PROPOSAL 4: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the independent registered public accounting firm retained to audit our consolidated financial statements. The Audit Committee has selected and appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm to audit our consolidated financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2021.2022. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has audited our consolidated financial statements continuously since our initial public offering in June 1997. In order to ensure continuing auditor independence, the Audit Committee periodically considers whether there should be a regular rotation of the independent registered public accounting firm. Further, in conjunction with the mandated rotation of the PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s lead engagement partner, the Audit Committee and its Chair were directly involved in the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s lead engagement partner. The members of the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors believe that the continued retention of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interests of Boston PropertiesBXP and its stockholders. Although ratification by stockholders is not required by law or by our By-laws, the Audit Committee believes that submission of its selection to stockholders is a matter of good corporate governance. Even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time if the Audit Committee believes that such a change would be in the best interests of Boston PropertiesBXP and its stockholders. If our stockholders do not ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Audit Committee will consider that fact, together with such other factors it deems relevant, in determining its next selection of independent auditors. We expect that a representative of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP will attend the annual meeting of stockholders, will have an opportunity to make a statement if he or she desires to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions. | | | | | ✓ | | THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE RATIFICATION OF THERecommendation of the Board
| | The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the ratification of the appointment
APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERSof PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDas the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBERthe year ending December 31, 2021. PROPERLY AUTHORIZED2022. Properly authorized proxies solicited by the Board of Directors
PROXIES SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS WILL BE VOTED FOR THIS PROPOSAL UNLESS
INSTRUCTIONS TO THE CONTRARY ARE GIVEN.will be voted “FOR” this proposal unless instructions to the contrary are given. |
| | | | | | | | | 102
| | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement 117 |
| | | 11› | | PROPOSAL 4: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM |
FEES TO INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM The Audit Committee is responsible for the audit fee negotiations associated with the retention of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”). Aggregate fees for professional services rendered by PwC for the years ended December 31, 20202021 and 20192020 were as follows: | | | | 2020 | | 2019 | | | 2021 | | | 2020 | | Audit Fees | | | | | | | | | Recurring audit, quarterly reviews and accounting assistance for new accounting standards and potential transactions | | $ | 2,733,710 | | | $ | 2,681,649 | | | $ | 2,519,781 | | | $ | 2,733,710 | | Comfort letters, consents and assistance with documents filed with the SEC and securities offerings | | 189,000 | | | 168,644 | | | 200,000 | | | | 189,000 | | Subtotal | | 2,922,710 | | | 2,850,293 | | | 2,719,781 | | | | 2,922,710 | | Audit-Related Fees | | | | | | | | | Audits required by lenders, joint ventures, tenants and other attestation reports | | 416,648 | | | 447,575 | | | 386,648 | | | | 416,648 | | Tax Fees | | | | | | | | | Recurring tax compliance and REIT and other compliance matters | | 524,332 | (1) | | 444,241 | | | 474,511 | | | | 524,332 | (1) | Tax planning and research | | 62,025 | | | 55,999 | | | 53,445 | | | | 62,025 | | State and local tax examinations | | 8,937 | | | 28,307 | | | 4,360 | | | | 8,937 | | Subtotal | | 595,294 | | | 528,547 | | | 532,316 | | | | 595,294 | | All Other Fees | | | | | | | | | Software licensing fee | | 2,756 | | | 2,756 | | | 4,206 | | | | 2,756 | | Total | | $ | 3,937,408 | | | $ | 3,829,171 | | | $ | 3,642,951 | | | $ | 3,937,408 | |
(1) | Includes an annual subscription fee for tax allocation software of $50,000 for 2019 but billed in 2020. |
AUDIT AND NON-AUDIT SERVICES PRE-APPROVAL POLICY The Audit Committee has approved a policy concerning the pre-approval of audit and non-audit services to be provided by PwC, our independent registered public accounting firm. The policy requires that all services provided by PwC to us, including audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services, must be pre-approved by the Audit Committee. In some cases, pre-approval is provided by the full Audit Committee for up to a year, relates to a particular category or group of services and is subject to a particular budgeted maximum. In other cases, specific pre-approval is required. The Audit Committee has delegated authority to the Chair of the Audit Committee to pre-approve additional services, and any such pre-approvals must then be communicated to the full Audit Committee. The Audit Committee approved all audit and non-audit services provided to us by PwC during the 20202021 and 20192020 fiscal years, and none of the services described above were approved pursuant to Rule 2-01(c)(7)(i)(c) of Regulation S-X, which relates to circumstances where the Audit Committee pre-approval requirement is waived. VOTE REQUIRED The affirmative vote of a majority of shares of common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on this proposal is required for the ratification of the appointment of PwC. Abstentions shall be included in determining the number of shares present and entitled to vote on the proposal, thus having the effect of a vote against the proposal. Broker non-votes, if any, are not counted in determining the number of shares present and entitled to vote and will therefore have no effect on the outcome. | | | | | | | | | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement 118 | | 103
|
| | | 11› | | PROPOSAL 4: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM |
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT The members of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Boston Properties, Inc. submit this report in connection with the committee’s review of the financial reports for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20202021 as follows: 1. | The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the audited financial statements for Boston Properties, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.2021. |
2. | The Audit Committee has discussed with representatives of PwC the matters required to be discussed with the Audit Committee by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and the SEC. |
3. | The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent accountant required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with the independent accountant the independent accountant’s independence. |
Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to our Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20202021 for filing with the SEC. The Audit Committee operates pursuant to a charter that was approved by our Board of Directors. A copy of the Audit Committee Charter is available onin the Investors section of our website at http:https://www.bxp.cominvestors.bxp.com/ under the heading “Corporate Governance.“Governance.” Submitted by the Audit Committee: David A. Twardock, Chair Bruce W. Duncan KarenMary E. DykstraKipp
| | | | | | | | | 104
| | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement 119 |
| | | 12› | | INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING |
INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING
ATTENDING THE VIRTUAL ANNUAL MEETING
Our preference is to hold an in-person annual meeting. However, due to the ongoing public health concerns resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and to support the health and well-being of our stockholders, employees and community, this year’s annual meeting will be a virtual meeting conducted via live audio webcast. We have structured our virtual annual meeting to provide stockholders the same rights as if the meeting were held in person, including the ability to vote shares electronically during the meeting and ask questions in accordance with the rules of conduct for the meeting.
All stockholders of record of shares of common stock of Boston Properties at the close of business on March 24, 2021, which is referred to in this proxy statement as the “record date,” or their designated proxies, are authorized to attend the annual meeting. Cameras, recording devices and other electronic devices will not be permitted and attendees may be subject to other security precautions.
› MEETING ACCESS
In order to attend the virtual annual meeting, you must be a holder of Boston Properties stock as of March 24, 2021. To participate in the virtual annual meeting, visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/BXP2021 and enter your unique 16-digit voting control number found on your proxy card, email, notice of internet availability of proxy materials or voting instruction form. The annual meeting is scheduled to begin at 9:00 a.m., Eastern Time, on May 20, 2021. Online access will open at 8:45 a.m. Eastern Time to allow time for you to log in and test your device’s audio system. We encourage you to access the meeting prior to the start time. If you encounter any difficulties accessing the virtual annual meeting during the check-in or meeting time, please call the technical support number that will be posted on the virtual annual meeting website. Technical support will be available starting at 8:45 a.m. Eastern Time and until the end of the meeting.
› SUBMITTING QUESTIONS
If you wish to submit a question during the annual meeting, type your question into the “Submit a question” field, and click “Submit.” Questions may be submitted beginning at 8:45 a.m. Eastern Time. We will endeavor to answer as many questions submitted by stockholders as time permits. We reserve the right to exclude questions regarding topics that are not pertinent to meeting matters or company business. If we receive substantially similar questions, we may group such questions together and provide a single response to avoid repetition. Responses to questions relevant to meeting matters that we do not have time to respond to during the meeting will be posted to our Investor Relations website following the meeting. Questions regarding personal matters or matters not relevant to meeting matters will not be answered.
› VOTING DURING THE VIRTUAL ANNUAL MEETING
You will be able to vote your shares electronically during the annual meeting, except that if you hold shares through a Shareworks account, voting instructions for those shares must be submitted by May 17, 2021 at 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time. Voting online during the annual meeting will replace any previous votes. See “– How to Vote” below for additional information on voting.
› ADDITIONAL MEETING INFORMATION
In the event of technical difficulties with the virtual annual meeting, we expect that an announcement will be made on www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/BXP2021. If necessary, the announcement will provide updated information regarding the date, time, and location of the annual meeting. Any updated information regarding the annual meeting will also be posted on our Investor Relations website at http://www.bxp.com/proxy.
A replay of the annual meeting webcast, including the Q&A portion of the annual meeting, will be available on www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/BXP2021 for at least 30 days following the annual meeting.
| | | | | | | | | | | | 2021 Proxy Statement
| | 105
|
| | | 12› | | INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING |
NOTICE OF INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS
In order to both save money and help conserve natural resources, we are making this proxy statement and our 2020 Annual Report, including a copy of our annual report on Form 10-K and financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020, available to our stockholders electronically via the Internet instead of mailing the full set of printed proxy materials, in accordance with the rules of the SEC. On or about April 5, 2021, we began mailing to many of our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (“Notice”) containing instructions on how to access this proxy statement and our annual report online, as well as instructions on how to vote. Also on or about April 5, 2021, we began mailing printed copies of these proxy materials to stockholders that have requested printed copies. If you received a Notice by mail, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials in the mail unless you request a copy. Instead, the Notice instructs you on how to access and review all of the important information contained in the proxy statement and annual report. The Notice also instructs you on how you may vote via the Internet. If you received a Notice by mail and would like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting such materials included in the Notice. Our 2020 annual report is not part of the proxy solicitation material.
PURPOSE OF THE ANNUAL MEETING
At the annual meeting, stockholders will be asked to vote upon the matters set forth in the accompanying notice of annual meeting, including the election of directors, an advisory resolution on named executive officer compensation, the approval of the Boston Properties, Inc. 2021 Stock Incentive Plan and the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm.
PRESENTATION OF OTHER MATTERS AT THE ANNUAL MEETING
We are not currently aware of any other matters to be presented at the 2021 annual meeting other than those described in this proxy statement. If any other matters not described in this proxy statement are properly presented at the meeting, any proxies received by us will be voted in the discretion of the proxy holders.
STOCKHOLDERS ENTITLED TO VOTE
If you were a stockholder of record as of the close of business on March 24, 2021, you are entitled to receive notice of the annual meeting and to vote the shares of common stock held as of the close of business on the record date. Each stockholder is entitled to one vote for each share of common stock you held as of the close of business on the record date. Holders of common units, LTIP units, preferred stock and deferred stock units are not entitled to vote such securities on any of the matters presented at the 2021 annual meeting.
QUORUM FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING
The presence, virtually or by proxy, of holders of at least a majority of the total number of outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote is necessary to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the annual meeting. As of the record date, there were 156,074,135 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the annual meeting. Each share of common stock outstanding on the record date is entitled to one vote on each matter properly submitted at the annual meeting and, with respect to the election of directors, one vote for each director to be elected. Abstentions or “broker non-votes” (i.e., shares represented at the meeting held by brokers, as to which instructions have not been received from the beneficial owners or persons entitled to vote such shares and with respect to which, on one or more but not all matters, the broker does not have discretionary voting power to vote such shares) will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present for the transaction of business at the annual meeting.
| | | | | | | | | 106
| | | | | 2021 Proxy Statement
|
| | | 12› | | INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING |
HOW TO VOTE
› VOTING DURING THE VIRTUAL ANNUAL MEETING
If you are a stockholder of record and attend the virtual annual meeting you may vote your shares of common stock electronically during the annual meeting using your 16-digit control number on your proxy card or Notice of Internet Availability, except that if you hold shares through a Shareworks account, voting instructions for those shares must be submitted by May 17, 2021 at 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time. See “ – Voting Shares Registered Directly in the Name of the Stockholder or Held in Shareworks” below. If you hold your shares of common stock in “street name” (i.e., your shares are held in an account maintained by a bank, broker or other nominee) and your voting instruction form or Notice of Internet Availability indicates that you may vote those shares through the http://www.proxyvote.com website, then you may vote at the annual meeting with the 16-digit control number indicated on your voting instruction form or Notice of Internet Availability. Voting online during the meeting will replace any previous votes. If you hold your shares of common stock in street name and you do not have a 16-digit control number, you will need to obtain a “legal proxy” from the bank, broker or other nominee that holds your shares of common stock of record to attend, participate in and vote at the annual meeting.
› VOTING SHARES REGISTERED DIRECTLY IN THE NAME OF THE STOCKHOLDER OR HELD IN SHAREWORKS
If you hold your shares of common stock in your own name as a holder of record with our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., you may instruct the proxy holders named in the proxy card how to vote your shares of common stock in one of the following ways:
Vote by Internet. You may vote via the Internet by following the instructions provided in the Notice or, if you received printed materials, on your proxy card. The website for Internet voting is printed on the Notice and also on your proxy card. Please have your Notice or proxy card in hand. Internet voting is available 24 hours per day until 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on May 19, 2021. You will receive a series of instructions that will allow you to vote your shares of common stock. You will also be given the opportunity to confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded.
If you vote via the Internet, you do not need to return your proxy card.
| • | | Vote by Telephone. If you received printed copies of the proxy materials, you also have the option to vote by telephone by calling the toll-free number listed on your proxy card. Telephone voting is available 24 hours per day until 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on May 19, 2021. When you call, pleasehave your proxy card in hand. You will receive a series of voice instructions that will allow you to vote your shares of common stock. You will also be given the opportunity to confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded. If you did not receive printed materials and would like to vote by telephone, you must request printed copies of the proxy materials by following the instructions on your Notice.
|
If you vote by telephone, you do not need to return your proxy card.
Vote by Mail.If you received printed materials, and would like to vote by mail, then please mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it promptly in the postage-paid envelope provided. If you did not receive printed materials and would like to vote by mail, you must request printed copies of the proxy materials by following the instructions on your Notice.
If you are a Boston Properties employee or former employee holding shares of common stock on the Shareworks equity portal, the control number you receive on your Notice or proxy card also covers shares of common stock held in your Shareworks account. You may vote these shares via the Internet, by telephone or by completing and returning a proxy card as described above. Your submission of voting instructions for shares of common stock held in your Shareworks account instructs the plan administrator how to vote those shares; it does not result in the appointment of a proxy to vote those shares. Instructions regarding shares held in your Shareworks account must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on May 17, 2021.
› VOTING BY PROXY FOR SHARES REGISTERED IN STREET NAME
If your shares of common stock are held in street name, then you will receive instructions from your broker, bank or other nominee that you must follow in order to have your shares of common stock voted.
| | | | | | | | | | | | 2021 Proxy Statement
| | 107
|
| | | 12› | | INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING |
REVOKING PROXY INSTRUCTIONS
You may revoke your proxy at any time before it has been exercised by:
filing a written revocation with the Secretary of Boston Properties, Inc., 800 Boylston Street, Suite 1900, Boston, Massachusetts 02199-8103;
submitting a new proxy by telephone, Internet or proxy card after the time and date of the previously submitted proxy; or
attending the virtual annual meeting and voting electronically during the meeting.
If you are a stockholder of record as of the record date attending the virtual annual meeting, you may vote electronically during the meeting whether or not a proxy has been previously given, but your presence (without further action) at the virtual annual meeting will not constitute revocation of a previously given proxy.
ACCESSING BOSTON PROPERTIES’ PROXY MATERIALS ELECTRONICALLY
This proxy statement and our 2020 annual report are available at http://www.bxp.com/proxy. Instead of receiving copies of our future annual reports, proxy statements, proxy cards and, when applicable, Notices of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, by mail, we encourage you to elect to receive an email that will provide electronic links to our proxy materials and also will give you an electronic link to the proxy voting site. Choosing to receive your future proxy materials online will save us the cost of producing and mailing the proxy materials or Notices of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to you and help conserve natural resources. You may sign up for electronic delivery by visiting http://www.bxp.com/proxy.
HOUSEHOLDING
If you and other residents at your mailing address own shares of common stock in street name, your broker, bank or other nominee may have sent you a notice that your household will receive only one annual report, Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, notice of annual meeting and/or proxy statement. This procedure, known as “householding,” is intended to reduce the volume of duplicate information stockholders receive and also reduce our printing and postage costs. Under applicable law, if you consented or were deemed to have consented, your broker, bank or other nominee may send one copy of our annual report, Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, notice of annual meeting and/or proxy statement to your address for all residents that own shares of common stock in street name. If you wish to revoke your consent to householding, you must contact your broker, bank or other nominee. If you are receiving multiple copies of our annual report, Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, notice of annual meeting and/or proxy statement, you may be able to request householding by contacting your broker, bank or other nominee.
If you wish to request extra copies free of charge of our 2020 annual report or proxy statement, please send your request to Investor Relations, Boston Properties, Inc., 800 Boylston Street, Suite 1900, Boston, Massachusetts 02199-8103; call us with your request at (617) 236-3822; or visit our website at http://www.bxp.com.
EXPENSES OF SOLICITATION
The cost of solicitation of proxies will be borne by Boston Properties. In an effort to have as many votes cast at the annual meeting as possible, special solicitation of proxies may, in certain instances, be made personally or by telephone, electronic communication or mail by one or more employees of Boston Properties. We also may reimburse brokers, banks, nominees and other fiduciaries for postage and reasonable clerical expenses of forwarding the proxy material to their principals who are beneficial owners of shares of our common stock. In addition, MacKenzie Partners, Inc., a proxy solicitation firm, has been engaged by Boston Properties to act as proxy solicitor and will receive a fee of $7,500 plus reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses.
| | | | | | | | | 108
| | | | | 2021 Proxy Statement
|
OTHER MATTERS CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS The Board of Directors has adopted a Related Person Transaction Approval and Disclosure Policy for the review, approval or ratification of any related person transaction. This written policy provides that all related person transactions must be reviewed and approved by a majority of the independent directors of our Board of Directors in advance of us or any of our subsidiaries entering into the transaction; provided that, if we or any of our subsidiaries enters into a transaction without recognizing that such transaction constitutes a related person transaction, the approval requirement will be satisfied if such transaction is promptly reviewed, approved and ratified by a majority of the independent directors of our Board of Directors. If any related person transaction is not approved or ratified by a majority of the independent directors of our Board, then to the extent permitted under applicable law, management shall use all reasonable efforts to amend, cancel or rescind the transaction. In addition, any related person transaction previously approved by a majority of the independent directors of our Board or otherwise already existing that is ongoing in nature shall be reviewed by a majority of the independent directors of our Board annually to ensure that such related person transaction has been conducted in accordance with the previous approval granted by such independent directors, if any, and remains appropriate. The term “related person transaction” refers to a transaction required to be disclosed by us pursuant to Item 404 of Regulation S-K (or any successor provision) promulgated by the SEC other than a transaction for which an obligation to disclose under Item 404 of Regulation S-K (or any successor provision) arises solely from the fact that a beneficial owner of more than 5% of a class of the Company’s voting securities (or an immediate family member of any such beneficial owner) has an interest in the transaction, must be reviewed and approved by a majority of the disinterested directors on our Board of Directors in advance of us or any of our subsidiaries entering into the transaction; provided that if we or any of our subsidiaries enter into a transaction without recognizing that such transaction constitutes a related person transaction, the approval requirement will be satisfied if such transaction is ratified by a majority of the disinterested directors on the Board of Directors promptly after we recognize that such transaction constituted a related person transaction. Disinterested directors are directors that do not have a personal financial interest in the transaction that is adverse to our financial interest or that of our stockholders. The term “related person transaction” refers to a transaction required to be disclosed by us pursuant to Item 404 of Regulation S-K (or any successor provision) promulgated by the SEC. For purposes of determining whether such disclosure is required, a related person will not be deemed to have a direct or indirect material interest in any transaction that is deemed to be not materialimmaterial (or would be deemed not materialimmaterial if such related person was a director) for purposes of determining director independence pursuant to the Company’s categorical standards of director independence. Please refer to the categorical standards under “Proposal 1: Election of Directors – Director Independence” beginning on page 21.23. Since January 1, 2020,We lease 2,717 square feet of office space to a start-up company of which Mr. Klein, our Chairman, is the Chief Executive Officer. The start-up company made aggregate payments to the Company has paid a firm controlled by Mr. Raymond A. Ritchey’s brother aggregate leasing commissions of approximately $3,587,393. The$44,000 during the year ended 2021 and the total amount due to the Company expects to pay additional commissions to this firm during 2021. under the lease in 2022 is approximately $220,000.
In January 2018, Mr. Ritchey’s brother became an employee of a real estate firm with which the Company has entered into a contract for services that is nearly identical toservices. Since January 1, 2021, the previous contract with theCompany has paid this real estate firm controlled by Mr. Ritchey’s brother.approximately $2,231,758. Given current and anticipated leasing activity, the Company expects to pay equivalent or increased leasing commissions to thethis real estate firm that currently employs Mr. Ritchey’s brother in 2021 as compared to leasing commissions paid to the firm controlled by him in prior years.2022. Mr. Ritchey is the Senior Executive Vice President of Boston Properties.BXP. The Company believes the terms of the related agreements are comparable to and in most cases more favorable to us than, similar arrangements with other brokers in relevant markets. We are partners with affiliates of Norges Bank Investment Management in joint ventures that own Times Square Tower, 601 Lexington Avenue, 100 Federal Street and Atlantic Wharf Office. Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 1, 2021, Norges Bank (The Central Bank of Norway), an affiliate of Norges Bank Investment Management, is the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock. We lease office space at our Santa Monica Business Park property to an entity that was acquired by an affiliate of BlackRock, Inc. in August 2018. Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on January 27, 2021,2022, BlackRock is the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock. Since January 1, 2020,2021, BlackRock paid the Company $1,413,434approximately $1,002,058 in lease payments. | | | | | | | | 2022 Proxy Statement 120 | | |
STOCKHOLDER NOMINATIONS FOR DIRECTOR AND PROPOSALS FOR THE 20222023 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS › STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS SUBMITTED FOR INCLUSION IN OUR PROXY STATEMENT Any stockholder proposals submitted pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 14a-8 for inclusion in Boston Properties’BXP’s proxy statement and form of proxy for its 20222023 annual meeting of stockholders must be received by Boston PropertiesBXP on or before December 6, 20217, 2022 in order to be considered for inclusion in our proxy statement and form of proxy. The proposals must also comply with the requirements as to form and substance established by the SEC if they are to be included in the proxy statement and form of proxy. Any such proposal should be mailed to: Boston Properties, Inc., 800 Boylston Street, Suite 1900, Boston, Massachusetts 02199-8103, Attn.: Secretary. | | | | | | | | | | | | 2021 Proxy Statement
| | 109
|
› PROXY ACCESS DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS FOR INCLUSION IN OUR PROXY STATEMENT
In order for an eligible stockholder or group of stockholders to nominate a director candidate for election at Boston Properties’ 20222023 annual meeting pursuant to the proxy access provision of our By-laws, notice of such nomination and other required information must be received by Boston PropertiesBXP on or before December 6, 2021,7, 2022, unless our 20222023 annual meeting of stockholders is scheduled to take place before April 20, 202219, 2023 or after July 19, 2022.18, 2023. Our By-laws state that such notice and other required information must be received by Boston PropertiesBXP not less than 120 days prior to the anniversary of the date of the proxy statement for the prior year’s annual meeting of stockholders; provided, however, that in the event the annual meeting is scheduled to be held on a date more than 30 days before the anniversary of the date of the immediately preceding annual meeting, or the annual meeting anniversary date, or more than 60 days after the annual meeting anniversary date, or if no annual meeting was held in the preceding year, the deadline for the receipt of such notice and other required information shall be the close of business on the later of (1) the 180th day prior to the scheduled date of such annual meeting or (2) the 15th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such annual meeting is first made. In addition, our By-laws require the eligible stockholder or group of stockholders to update and supplement such information (or provide notice stating that there are no updates or supplements) as of specified dates. Notices and other required information must be received by our Secretary at our principal executive office, which is currently Boston Properties, Inc., 800 Boylston Street, Suite 1900, Boston, Massachusetts 02199-8103. › OTHER PROPOSALS OR NOMINATIONS Stockholder proposals and nominations of directors to be presented at Boston Properties’ 2022BXP’s 2023 annual meeting, other than stockholder proposals submitted pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 14a-8 for inclusion in Boston Properties’BXP’s proxy statement and form of proxy for our 20222023 annual meeting or submitted pursuant to the proxy access provision of our By-laws, must be received in writing at our principal executive office not earlier than January 20, 2022,19, 2023, nor later than March 6, 2022,5, 2023, unless our 20222023 annual meeting of stockholders is scheduled to take place before April 20, 202219, 2023 or after July 19, 2022.18, 2023. Our By-laws state that the stockholder must provide timely written notice of such proposal or a nomination and supporting documentation as well as be present at such meeting, either in person or by a representative. A stockholder’s notice shall be timely received by Boston PropertiesBXP at its principal executive office not less than 75 days nor more than 120 days prior to the annual meeting anniversary date; provided, however, that in the event the annual meeting is scheduled to be held on a date more than 30 days before the annual meeting anniversary date or more than 60 days after the annual meeting anniversary date, a stockholder’s notice shall be timely if received by Boston PropertiesBXP at its principal executive office not later than the close of business on the later of (1) the 75th day prior to the scheduled date of such annual meeting or (2) the 15th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such annual meeting is first made by Boston Properties.BXP. Proxies solicited by our Board of Directors will confer discretionary voting authority with respect to these proposals, subject to SEC rules and regulations governing the exercise of this | | | | | | | | | | 2022 Proxy Statement 121 |
authority. In addition, to comply with the universal proxy rules (once effective), stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than our nominees must provide notice that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act no later than March 20, 2023. Any such proposals must be received by our Secretary at our principal executive office, which is currently Boston Properties, Inc., 800 Boylston Street, Suite 1900, Boston, Massachusetts 02199-8103. | | | | | | | | | 110
| | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement 122 | | |
| | | 13› | | INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING |
INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING NOTICE OF INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS As permitted by SEC rules, to save money and help conserve natural resources, we are making this proxy statement and our 2021 Annual Report, including a copy of our annual report on Form 10-K and financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2021, available to our stockholders electronically via the Internet instead of mailing them. On or about April 6, 2022, we began mailing to many of our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (“Notice”) containing instructions on how to access this proxy statement and our annual report online, as well as instructions on how to vote. Also on or about April 6, 2022, we began mailing printed copies of these proxy materials to stockholders that have requested printed copies. If you received a Notice by mail, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials in the mail unless you request a copy. Instead, the Notice instructs you on how to access and review all of the important information contained in the proxy statement and annual report. The Notice also instructs you on how you may vote via the Internet. If you received a Notice by mail and would like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting such materials included in the Notice. Our 2021 annual report is not part of the proxy solicitation material. PURPOSE OF THE ANNUAL MEETING At the annual meeting, stockholders will be asked to vote upon the matters set forth in the accompanying notice of annual meeting, including the election of directors, an advisory resolution on NEO compensation, the approval of the Boston Properties, Inc. Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan and the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm. PRESENTATION OF OTHER MATTERS AT THE ANNUAL MEETING We are not currently aware of any other matters to be presented at the 2022 annual meeting other than those described in this proxy statement. If any other matters not described in this proxy statement are properly presented at the meeting, any proxies received by us will be voted in the discretion of the proxy holders. STOCKHOLDERS ENTITLED TO VOTE If you were a stockholder of record as of the close of business on March 23, 2022, you are entitled to receive notice of the annual meeting and to vote the shares of BXP common stock held as of the close of business on the record date. Each stockholder is entitled to one vote for each share of common stock you held as of the close of business on the record date. Holders of common units, LTIP units and deferred stock units are not entitled to vote those securities on any of the matters presented at the 2022 annual meeting. ATTENDING THE ANNUAL MEETING All stockholders of record of shares of BXP common stock at the close of business on the record date, or their designated proxies, are authorized to attend the annual meeting. Each stockholder and proxy will be asked to present a valid government-issued photo identification, such as a driver’s license or passport, before being admitted. If you are not a stockholder of record but you hold your shares in “street name” (i.e., your shares are held in an account maintained by a bank, broker or other nominee), then you should provide proof of beneficial ownership as of the record date, such as an account statement reflecting your stock ownership as of the record date, a copy of | | | | | | | | | | 2022 Proxy Statement 123 |
| | | 13› | | INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING |
the voting instruction card provided by your broker, bank or other nominee, or other similar evidence of ownership. We reserve the right to determine the validity of any purported proof of beneficial ownership. If you do not have proof of ownership, you may not be admitted to the annual meeting. Cameras, recording devices and other electronic devices will not be permitted, and attendees may be subject to security inspections and other security precautions. You may obtain directions to the annual meeting on our website at https://investors.bxp.com/proxy-materials. We intend to follow applicable local health protocols relating to the COVID-19 pandemic as such protocols exist on the meeting date (e.g., mask wearing and social distancing). You should not attend the meeting if you feel sick, have been recently exposed to COVID-19 or are awaiting COVID-19 test results. QUORUM FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING The presence, in person or by proxy, of holders of at least a majority of the total number of outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote is necessary to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the annual meeting. As of the record date, there were 156,707,176 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the annual meeting. Each share of common stock outstanding on the record date is entitled to one vote on each matter properly submitted at the annual meeting and, with respect to the election of directors, one vote for each director to be elected. Abstentions or “broker non-votes” (i.e., shares represented at the meeting held by brokers, as to which instructions have not been received from the beneficial owners or persons entitled to vote such shares and with respect to which, on one or more but not all matters, the broker does not have discretionary voting power to vote such shares) will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present for the transaction of business at the annual meeting. HOW TO VOTE › VOTING IN PERSON AT ANNUAL MEETING If you are a stockholder of record and attend the annual meeting you may vote your shares of BXP common stock in person at the meeting. If you hold your shares of BXP common stock in street name and you wish to vote in person at the meeting, you will need to obtain a “legal proxy” from the bank, broker or other nominee that holds your shares to attend, participate in and vote at the annual meeting. | | | | | | | | 2022 Proxy Statement 124 | | |
| | | 13› | | INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING |
› VOTING SHARES REGISTERED DIRECTLY IN THE NAME OF THE STOCKHOLDER OR HELD IN SHAREWORKS If you hold your shares of common stock in your own name as a holder of record with our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., you may instruct the proxy holders named in the proxy card how to vote your shares of common stock in one of the following ways: | | | | | Vote by Internet. You may vote via the Internet by following the instructions provided in the Notice or, if you received printed materials, on your proxy card. The website for Internet voting is printed on the Notice and also on your proxy card. Please have your Notice or proxy card in hand. Internet voting is available 24 hours per day until 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on May 18, 2022. You will receive a series of instructions that will allow you to vote your shares of common stock. You will also be given the opportunity to confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded. If you vote via the Internet, you do not need to return your proxy card. | | | | | Vote by Telephone. If you received printed copies of the proxy materials, you also have the option to vote by telephone by calling the toll-free number listed on your proxy card. Telephone voting is available 24 hours per day until 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on May 18, 2022. When you call, pleasehave your proxy card in hand. You will receive a series of voice instructions that will allow you to vote your shares of common stock. You will also be given the opportunity to confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded. If you did not receive printed materials and would like to vote by telephone, you must request printed copies of the proxy materials by following the instructions on your Notice. If you vote by telephone, you do not need to return your proxy card. | | | | | Vote by Mail. If you received printed materials, and would like to vote by mail, then please mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it promptly in the postage-paid envelope provided. If you did not receive printed materials and would like to vote by mail, you must request printed copies of the proxy materials by following the instructions on your Notice. |
› VOTING BY PROXY FOR SHARES REGISTERED IN STREET NAME If your shares of common stock are held in street name, then you will receive instructions from your broker, bank or other nominee that you must follow in order to have your shares of common stock voted. REVOKING PROXY INSTRUCTIONS You may revoke your proxy at any time before it has been exercised by: filing a written revocation with the Secretary of Boston Properties, Inc., 800 Boylston Street, Suite 1900, Boston, Massachusetts 02199-8103; submitting a new proxy by telephone, Internet or proxy card after the time and date of the previously submitted proxy; or attending the annual meeting and voting by ballot at the annual meeting. If you are a stockholder of record as of the record date attending the annual meeting, you may vote in person whether or not a proxy has been previously given, but your presence (without further action) at the annual meeting will not constitute revocation of a previously given proxy. | | | | | | | | | | 2022 Proxy Statement 125 |
| | | 13› | | INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING |
ACCESSING PROXY MATERIALS ELECTRONICALLY This proxy statement and our 2021 annual report are available at https://investors.bxp.com/proxy-materials. Instead of receiving copies of our future annual reports, proxy statements, proxy cards and, when applicable, Notices of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, by mail, we encourage you to elect to receive an email that will provide electronic links to our proxy materials and also will give you an electronic link to the proxy voting site. Choosing to receive your future proxy materials online will save us the cost of producing and mailing the proxy materials or Notices of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to you and help conserve natural resources. You may sign up for electronic delivery by visiting https://investors.bxp.com/proxy-materials. HOUSEHOLDING If you and other residents at your mailing address own shares of common stock in street name, your broker, bank or other nominee may have sent you a notice that your household will receive only one annual report, Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, notice of annual meeting and/or proxy statement. This procedure, known as “householding,” is intended to reduce the volume of duplicate information stockholders receive and also reduce our printing and postage costs. Under applicable law, if you consented or were deemed to have consented, your broker, bank or other nominee may send one copy of our annual report, Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, notice of annual meeting and/or proxy statement to your address for all residents that own shares of common stock in street name. If you wish to revoke your consent to householding, you must contact your broker, bank or other nominee. If you are receiving multiple copies of our annual report, Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, notice of annual meeting and/or proxy statement, you may be able to request householding by contacting your broker, bank or other nominee. If you wish to request extra copies free of charge of our 2021 annual report or proxy statement, please send your request to Investor Relations, Boston Properties, Inc., 800 Boylston Street, Suite 1900, Boston, Massachusetts 02199-8103; call us with your request at (617) 236-3822; or visit our website at http://www.bxp.com. EXPENSES OF SOLICITATION We will bear the cost of solicitation of proxies. In an effort to have as many votes cast at the annual meeting as possible, special solicitation of proxies may, in certain instances, be made personally or by telephone, electronic communication or mail by one or more of our employees. We also may reimburse brokers, banks, nominees and other fiduciaries for postage and reasonable clerical expenses of forwarding the proxy materials to their principals who are beneficial owners of shares of our common stock. In addition, we retained MacKenzie Partners, Inc., a proxy solicitation firm, to act as proxy solicitor on our behalf. We agreed to pay Mackenzie Partners a fee of $7,500 plus reimbursement of its reasonable out-of-pocket expenses. | | | | | | | | 2022 Proxy Statement 126 | | |
APPENDIX A BOSTON PROPERTIES, INC.DISCLOSURES RELATING TO NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
2021 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
SECTION 1. GENERAL PURPOSE OF THE PLAN; DEFINITIONS
The nameReconciliation of the plan is theNet Income Attributable to Boston Properties, Inc. 2021 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). The purpose of the Plan isCommon Shareholders to encourage and enable the officers, employees, Non-Employee Directors, Consultants and other key persons ofFunds From Operations (FFO) attributable to Boston Properties, Inc. (the “Company”) and the employees and other key persons of Boston Properties Limited Partnership (the “Operating Partnership”) and the Company’s other Subsidiaries, upon whose judgment, initiative and efforts the Company largely depends for the successful conduct of its business to acquire a proprietary interest in the Company. It is anticipated that providing such persons with a direct stake in the Company’s welfare will assure a closer identification of their interests with those of the Company and its stockholders, thereby stimulating their efforts on the Company’s behalf and strengthening their desire to remain with the Company.common shareholder
The following terms shall be defined as set forth below:
| | | | | | | | | | | For the year ended December 31, | | | | 2021 | | | 2020 | | | | (unaudited and in thousands, except per share amounts) | | | | | Net income attributable to Boston Properties, Inc. common shareholders | | $ | 496,223 | | | $ | 862,227 | | | | | Add: | | | | | | | | | | | | Preferred stock redemption charge | | | 6,412 | | | | — | | | | | Preferred dividends | | | 2,560 | | | | 10,500 | | | | | Noncontrolling interest—common units of the Operating Partnership | | | 55,931 | | | | 97,704 | | | | | Noncontrolling interests in property partnerships | | | 70,806 | | | | 48,260 | | | | | Net income | | | 631,932 | | | | 1,018,691 | | | | | Add: | | | | | | | | | | | | Depreciation and amortization | | | 717,336 | | | | 683,751 | | | | | Noncontrolling interests in property partnerships’ share of depreciation and amortization | | | (67,825 | ) | | | (71,850 | ) | | | | BXP’s share of depreciation and amortization from unconsolidated joint ventures | | | 71,966 | | | | 80,925 | | | | | Corporate-related depreciation and amortization | | | (1,753 | ) | | | (1,840 | ) | | | | Impairment loss on investment in unconsolidated joint venture(1) | | | — | | | | 60,524 | | | | | Less: | | | | | | | | | | | | Gain on sale of real estate included within (loss) income from unconsolidated joint ventures(2) | | | 10,257 | | | | 5,958 | | | | | Gains on sales of real estate | | | 123,660 | | | | 618,982 | | | | | Noncontrolling interests in property partnerships | | | 70,806 | | | | 48,260 | | | | | Preferred dividends | | | 2,560 | | | | 10,500 | | | | | Preferred stock redemption charge | | | 6,412 | | | | — | | | | | Funds from Operations (FFO) attributable to the Operating Partnership common unitholders (including Boston Properties, Inc.) | | | 1,137,961 | | | | 1,086,501 | | | | | Less: | | | | | | | | | | | | Noncontrolling interest—common units of the Operating Partnership’s share of funds from operations | | | 111,975 | | | | 108,310 | | | | | Funds from Operations attributable to Boston Properties, Inc. common shareholders | | | 1,025,986 | | | | 978,191 | | | | | Boston Properties, Inc.’s percentage share of Funds from Operations—basic | | | 90.16 | % | | | 90.03 | % | | | | Weighted average shares outstanding—basic | | | 156,116 | | | | 155,432 | | | | | FFO per share basic | | $ | 6.57 | | | $ | 6.29 | | | | | Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted | | | 156,376 | | | | 155,517 | | | | | FFO per share diluted(3) | | $ | 6.56 | | | $ | 6.29 | |
“Administrator” means either the Board or the compensation committee of the Board or a similar committee performing the functions of the compensation committee that is designated by the Board as the administrator of the Plan.
“Award” or “Awards,” means an award under the Plan and, except where referring to a particular category of grant under the Plan, shall include Incentive Stock Options, Non-Qualified Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock Awards, Restricted Stock Unit Awards, Unrestricted Stock Awards, Dividend Equivalent Rights, Cash-Based Awards and other equity-based awards as contemplated herein.
“Award Certificate” means a written or electronic agreement or document setting forth the terms and provisions applicable to an Award granted under the Plan. Each Award Certificate is subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan.
“Board” means the Board of Directors of the Company.
“Cash-Based Award” means an Award granted pursuant to Section 12 entitling the recipient to receive a cash denominated payment.
“Change in Control” means the occurrence of any one of the following events:
| (i) | | | | | | | | | 2022 Proxy Statement A-1 |
(1) | any “person,” as such term is usedThe impairment loss on investment in Sections 13(d) and 14(d)unconsolidated joint venture consists of an other-than-temporary decline in the fair value below the carrying value of our investment in the Dock 72 unconsolidated joint venture for the year ended December 31, 2020.
|
(2) | Consists of the Exchange Act (other thanportion of income from unconsolidated joint ventures related to the Company, anygain on sale of its Subsidiaries, or any trustee, fiduciary or other person or entity holding securities under any employee benefit plan or trustreal estate associated with the sale of our ownership interest in the Company or anyjoint venture that owned Annapolis Junction Buildings Six and Seven for the year ended December 31, 2021 and Annapolis Junction Building Eight and two land parcels for the year ended December 31, 2020. |
(3) | For the year ended December 31, 2021, includes a loss on extinguishment of its Subsidiaries), together with all “affiliates” and “associates” (as such terms are defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act)debt of such person, shall become the “beneficial owner” (as such term is defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing 25 percent or more of the combined voting power of the Company’s then- outstanding securities having the right to vote in an election of the Board (“Voting Securities”) (other than as a result of an acquisition of securities directly$0.25 per share resulting from the Company); |
| (ii) | persons who, asearly redemption in October 2021 of the Effective Date, constitute the Board (the “Incumbent Directors”) cease$1.0 billion of 3.85% unsecured senior notes that were scheduled to mature in February 2023, and $0.05 per share from acquisitions and dispositions. Excluding these transactions, diluted FFO per share for any reason, including, without limitation, as a result of a tender offer, proxy contest, merger or similar transaction, to constitute at least a majority of the Board, provided that any person becoming a director of the Company subsequent to such date shall2021 would be considered an Incumbent Director if such person’s election was approved by or such person was nominated for election by either (A) a vote of at least two-thirds of the Incumbent Directors or (B) a vote of at least a majority of the Incumbent Directors who are members of a nominating committee comprised, in the majority, of Incumbent Directors;
|
| (iii) | the consummation of (A) any consolidation or merger of the Company as a result of which the Voting Securities outstanding immediately prior to the consolidation or merger do not either (x) continue to represent 60 percent or more of the outstanding stock or other equity interests having the right to vote in an election of the board of directors (or other equivalent governing body) of the resulting or successor entity (or its ultimate parent, if applicable) immediately upon completion of such transaction or (y) convert into, or become immediately exchangeable for, 60 percent or more of the outstanding stock or other equity interest having the right to vote in an election of the board of directors (or other equivalent governing body) of the resulting or successor entity (or its ultimate parent, if applicable) immediately upon completion of such transaction, or$6.76.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement | | A-1
|
| (B) any sale, lease, exchange or other transfer to an unrelated party (in one transaction or a series of transactions contemplated or arranged by any party as a single plan) of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company; or
|
| (iv) | the stockholders of the Company shall approve any plan or proposal for the liquidation or dissolution of the Company.
|
Notwithstanding the foregoing, a “Change in Control” shall not be deemed to have occurred for purposes of the foregoing clause (i) solely as the result of an acquisition of securities by the Company which, by reducing the number of shares of Voting Securities outstanding, increases the proportionate number of shares of Voting Securities beneficially owned by any person (as defined in the foregoing clause (i)) to 25 percent or more of the combined voting power of all then outstanding Voting Securities; provided, however, that if such person shall thereafter become the beneficial owner of any additional shares of Voting Securities (other than pursuant to a stock split, stock dividend, or similar transaction or as a result of an acquisition of securities directly from the Company), then a “Change in Control” shall be deemed to have occurred for purposes of the foregoing clause (i).
“Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and any successor Code, and related rules, regulations and interpretations.
“Common Units” shall have the meaning set forth in the Partnership Agreement.
“Consultant” means any natural person that provides bona fide services to the Company, and such services are not in connection with the offer or sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction and do not directly or indirectly promote or maintain a market for the Company’s securities.
“Dividend Equivalent Right” means an Award entitling the grantee to receive credits based on cash dividends that would have been paid on the shares of Stock specified in the Dividend Equivalent Right (or other award to which it relates) if such shares had been issued to and held by the grantee.
“Effective Date” means the date on which the Plan becomes effective as set forth in Section 20.
“Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations thereunder.
“Fair Market Value” on any given date means the last reported sale price at which Stock is traded on such date or, if no Stock is traded on such date, the next preceding date on which Stock was traded, as reflected on the principal stock exchange or, if applicable, any other national stock exchange on which the Stock is traded or admitted to trading.
“Family Member” of a grantee means a grantee’s child, stepchild, grandchild, parent, stepparent, grandparent, spouse, former spouse, sibling, niece, nephew, mother-in-law,father-in-law,son-in-law,daughter-in-law,brother-in-law, or sister-in-law, including adoptive relationships, any person sharing the grantee’s household (other than a tenant of the grantee), a trust in which these persons (or the grantee) have more than 50% of the beneficial interest, a foundation in which these persons (or the grantee) control the management of assets, and any other entity in which these persons (or the grantee) own more than 50% of the voting interests.
“Incentive Stock Option” means any Stock Option designated and qualified as an “incentive stock option” as defined in Section 422 of the Code.
“LTIP Units” shall have the meaning set forth in the Partnership Agreement.
“Non-Employee Director” means a member of the Board who is not also an employee of the Company or any Subsidiary.
“Non-Qualified Stock Option” means any Stock Option that is not an Incentive Stock Option.
“Operating Partnership” means Boston Properties Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership, and any successor thereto.
“Partnership Agreement” means the Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Operating Partnership, dated as of June 29, 1998, among the Company, as general partner, and the limited partners who are parties thereto, as amended, restated or supplemented from time to time.
“Performance Criteria” means the performance objectives that the Administrator selects for purposes of earning or attaining an Award for a Performance Cycle. The Performance Criteria which shall be applicable to the organizational level specified by the Administrator, including, but not limited to, the Company or a unit, division, group, region, or Subsidiary of the Company, may include, but will not be limited to, any one or more of the following as selected by the Administrator: funds from operations (“FFO”), adjusted FFO, growth in FFO per share, leasing, rent growth, occupancy or percentage
| | | | | | | | | A-2 | | | | | 2021 Proxy Statement
|
leased, operating income and/or net annual recurring revenue, net operating income, total stockholder return, revenue, earnings per share, earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization for real estate (“EBITDAre”), cash flow (including, but not limitedReconciliation of Net Income Attributable to operating cash flow and free cash flow), balance sheet management, ratiosBoston Properties, Inc. Common Shareholders to BXP’s Share of net debt to EBITDAre and ratios of market capitalization, net income (loss) (either before or after interest, taxes, depreciation and/or amortization), stock price, economic value-added, acquisitions, dispositions, strategic transactions, portfolio or regional occupancy rates, return on capital, assets, equity, development, re-development, investment, capital deployment, development milestones or any other operational, financial or other performance metric selected by the Administrator, any of which may be (A) measured in absolute terms or compared to any incremental increase, (B) measured in terms of rate of change, (C) compared to another company or companies or to results of a peer group, (D) measured against the market as a whole and/or as compared to applicable market indices, (E) measured on an adjusted basis, by including or excluding categories of items specifically identified in advance by the Compensation Committee or, if not so specified, items that the Compensation Committee determines, in its discretion, are appropriate to include or exclude whether or not specifically identified in advance, (F) measured on a pre-tax or post-tax basis (if applicable), (G) measured on an annualized basis, and/or (H) measured for all or a portion of the Company’s portfolio, including on a same property basis and/or relating to “BXP’s share” (calculated as the consolidated amount calculated in accordance with GAAP, plus the Company’s share of the amount from the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures (calculated based upon the Company’s percentage ownership interest and, in some cases, after priority allocations), minus the Company’s partners’ share of the amount from the Company’s consolidated joint ventures (calculated based upon the partners’ percentage ownership interests and, in some cases, after income allocation to private REIT shareholders and their share of fees due to the Company)).
“Performance Cycle” means one or more periods of time, which may be of varying and overlapping durations, as the Administrator may select, over which the attainment of one or more Performance Criteria will be measured.
“Person” means any natural person, corporation, partnership, association, limited liability company, estate, trust, joint venture, any federal, state or municipal government or any bureau, department or agency thereof, any other legal entity, or a “group” as that term is used for purposes of Rule 13d-5(b) or Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act and any fiduciary acting in such capacity on behalf of the foregoing.
“Restricted Stock” means the shares of Stock underlying a Restricted Stock Award that remain subject to a risk of forfeiture or the Company’s right of repurchase.
“Restricted Stock Award” means an Award of Restricted Stock subject to such restrictions and conditions as the Administrator may determine at the time of grant.
“Restricted Stock Units” means the units underlying a Restricted Stock Unit Award, each of which represents the right to receive one share of Stock or a cash payment equal to the Fair Market Value of one share of Stock at the time and upon the conditions applicable to the Restricted Stock Unit Award.
“Restricted Stock Unit Award” means an Award of Restricted Stock Units subject to such restrictions and conditions as the Administrator may determine at the time of grant.
“Section 409A” means Section 409A of the Code and the regulations and other guidance promulgated thereunder.
“Service Relationship” means any relationship as an employee, director or Consultant of the Company or any Subsidiary; provided, however, a change in an individual’s status from a full-time employee or director to part-time employee or Consultant or from a director or Consultant to an employee shall be deemed to continue the Service Relationship.
“Stock” means the Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Company, subject to adjustments pursuant to Section 3.
“Stock Appreciation Right” means an Award entitling the recipient to receive shares of Stock (or cash, to the extent explicitly provided for in the applicable Award Certificate) having a value equal to the excess of the Fair Market Value of the Stock on the date of exercise over the exercise price of the Stock Appreciation Right multiplied by the number of shares of Stock with respect to which the Stock Appreciation Right shall have been exercised.
“Stock Option” means any option to purchase shares of Stock granted pursuant to Section 5.
“Subsidiary” means any corporation or other entity (other than the Company) in which the Company has at least a 50 percent interest, either directly or indirectly.
“Ten Percent Owner” means an employee who owns or is deemed to own (by reason of the attribution rules of Section 424(d) of the Code) more than 10 percent of the combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or any parent or subsidiary corporation.Same Property Net Operating Income (NOI) (excluding termination income)
| | | | | | | | | | | For the year ended December 31, | | | | 2021 | | | 2020 | | | | (unaudited and in thousands) | | | | | Net income attributable to Boston Properties, Inc. common shareholders | | $ | 496,223 | | | $ | 862,227 | | | | | Add: | | | | | | | | | | | | Preferred stock redemption charge | | | 6,412 | | | | — | | | | | Preferred dividends | | | 2,560 | | | | 10,500 | | | | | Noncontrolling interest—common units of the Operating Partnership | | | 55,931 | | | | 97,704 | | | | | Noncontrolling interests in property partnerships | | | 70,806 | | | | 48,260 | | | | | Interest expense | | | 423,346 | | | | 431,717 | | | | | Losses from early extinguishment of debt | | | 45,182 | | | | — | | | | | Loss from unconsolidated joint ventures | | | 2,570 | | | | 85,110 | | | | | Depreciation and amortization expense | | | 717,336 | | | | 683,751 | | | | | Transaction costs | | | 5,036 | | | | 1,531 | | | | | Payroll and related costs from management services contracts | | | 12,487 | | | | 11,626 | | | | | General and administrative expense | | | 151,573 | | | | 133,112 | | Less: | | | | | | | | | | | | Gains from investments in securities | | | 5,626 | | | | 5,261 | | | | | Interest and other income | | | 5,704 | | | | 5,953 | | | | | Gains on sales of real estate | | | 123,660 | | | | 618,982 | | | | | Direct reimbursements of payroll and related costs from management services contracts | | | 12,487 | | | | 11,626 | | | | | Development and management services revenue | | | 27,697 | | | | 29,641 | | | | | Net Operating (NOI) | | | 1,814,288 | | | | 1,694,075 | | Less: | | | | | | | | | | | | Termination income | | | 11,482 | | | | 8,973 | | | | | NOI from non Same Properties (excluding termination income) | | | 55,499 | | | | 48,423 | | | | | Same Property NOI | | | 1,747,307 | | | | 1,636,679 | | | | | Less: | | | | | | | | | | | | Partners’ share of NOI from consolidated joint ventures (excluding termination income and after income allocations to private REIT shareholders)(1) | | | 186,307 | | | | 161,677 | | | | | BXP’s share of NOI from non Same Properties from unconsolidated joint ventures (excluding termination income) | | | 26,100 | | | | 13,193 | | | | | Add: | | | | | | | | | | | | Partners’ share of NOI from non Same Properties from consolidated joint ventures (excluding termination income and after income allocations to private REIT shareholders) | | | 5,436 | | | | (1,160 | ) | | | | BXP’s share of NOI from unconsolidated joint ventures (excluding termination income)(2) | | | 106,975 | | | | 94,168 | | | | | BXP’s Share of Same Property NOI (excluding termination income) | | | 1,647,311 | | | | 1,554,817 | |
| | | | | | | | | | (1) | | 2021 Proxy Statement
| | A-3See “Consolidated Joint Ventures” in this Appendix for additional details.
|
“Unit” means units of partnership interest in the Operating Partnership, including, without limitation, Common Units, LTIP Units or one or more other classes of units that are convertible into Common Units or LTIP Units on a specified date or at the election of the recipient based on appreciation in the value of the Stock, appreciation in the value of the assets of the Operating Partnership, total return generated by a specified number of shares of Stock or Common Units or such other basis as may be determined by the Administrator. Units may include units of partnership interest in the Operating Partnership that are intended to constitute profits interests for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
“Unrestricted Stock Award” means an Award of shares of Stock free of any restrictions.
SECTION 2. ADMINISTRATION OF PLAN; ADMINISTRATOR AUTHORITY TO SELECT GRANTEES AND DETERMINE AWARDS
| (a)(2) | Administration of Plan. The Plan shall be administered by the Administrator.
|
| (b) | Powers of Administrator. The Administrator shall have the power and authority to grant Awards consistent with the terms of the Plan and otherwise administer the Plan and the Awards granted hereunder, including, without limitation, the power and authority:
|
| (i) | to select the individuals to whom Awards may from time to time be granted;
|
| (ii) | to determine the time or times of grant, and the extent, if any, of Incentive Stock Options, Non-Qualified Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock Awards, Restricted Stock Unit Awards, Unrestricted Stock Awards, Dividend Equivalent Rights and other equity-based awards, or any combination of the foregoing, granted to any one or more grantees;
|
| (iii) | to determine the number of shares of Stock to be covered by any Award;
|
| (iv) | to determine and modify from time to time the terms and conditions, including restrictions, not inconsistent with the terms of the Plan, of any Award, which terms and conditions may differ among individual Awards and grantees, and to approve the forms of Award Certificates; provided, however, that except as otherwise providedSee “Unconsolidated Joint Ventures” in Section 3(b), the Administrator is not permitted to reduce the exercise price of Stock Options through cancellation and re-grants or cancellation in exchangethis Appendix for cash;
|
| (v) | to accelerate at any time the exercisability or vesting of all or any portion of any Award;
|
| (vi) | subject to the provisions of Section 5(c), to extend at any time the period in which Stock Options may be exercised;
|
| (vii) | to determine at any time whether, to what extent, and under what circumstances Stock and other amounts payable with respect to an Award shall be deferred either automatically or at the election of the participant and whether and to what extent the Company shall pay or credit amounts constituting deemed interest, dividends, distributions or other earnings; and
|
| (viii) | at any time to adopt, alter and repeal such rules, guidelines and practices for administration of the Plan and for its own acts and proceedings as it shall deem advisable; to interpret the terms and provisions of the Plan and any Award (including related written instruments); to make all determinations it deems advisable for the administration of the Plan; to decide all disputes arising in connection with the Plan; and to otherwise supervise the administration of the Plan.
|
All decisions and interpretations of the Administrator shall be made in the Administrator’s sole and absolute discretion and shall be binding and conclusive on all persons, including the Company, the Operating Partnership, the Company’s other Subsidiaries and Plan grantees.
| (c) | Delegation of Authority to Grant Awards. Subject to applicable law, the Administrator, in its discretion, may delegate to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company all or part of the Administrator’s authority and duties with respect to the granting of Awards to individuals who are not subject to the reporting and other provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act. Any such delegation by the Administrator shall include a limitation as to the amount of Stock underlying Awards that may be granted during the period of the delegation and shall contain guidelines as to the determination of the exercise price and the vesting criteria. The Administrator may revoke or amend the terms of a delegation at any time but such action shall not invalidate any prior actions of the Administrator’s delegate or delegates that were consistent with the terms of the Plan.
|
| (d) | Award Certificate. Awards under the Plan shall be evidenced by Award Certificates that set forth the terms, conditions and limitations for each Award, which may include, without limitation, the term of an Award, and the provisions applicable in the event employment or service terminates.additional details.
|
| | | | | | | | | A-4
| | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement A-3 |
| (e) | Foreign Award Recipients. Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, in order to comply with the laws in other countries in which the Company and its Subsidiaries may from time to time operate or have employees or other individuals eligible for Awards, the Administrator, in its sole discretion, shall have the power and authority to: (i) determine which Subsidiaries shall be covered by the Plan; (ii) determine which individuals outside the United States are eligible to participate in the Plan; (iii) modify the terms and conditions of any Award granted to individuals outside the United States to comply with applicable foreign laws; (iv) establish subplans and modify exercise procedures and other terms and procedures, to the extent the Administrator determines such actions to be necessary or advisable (and such subplans and/or modifications shall be attached to this Plan as appendices); provided, however, that no such subplans and/or modifications shall increase the share limitations contained in Section 3(a) hereof; and (v) take any action, before or after an Award is made, that the Administrator determines to be necessary or advisable to obtain approval or comply with any local governmental regulatory exemptions or approvals. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Administrator may not take any actions hereunder, and no Awards shall be granted, that would violate the Exchange Act or any other applicable United States securities law, the Code, or any other applicable United States governing statute or law.
|
SECTION 3. STOCK ISSUABLE UNDER THE PLAN; MERGERS; SUBSTITUTIONReconciliation of Net Income Attributable to Boston Properties, Inc. Common Shareholders to BXP’s Share of Same Property Net Operating Income (NOI) – Cash (excluding termination income)
| | | | | | | | | | | For the year ended December 31, | | | | 2021 | | | 2020 | | | | (unaudited and in thousands) | | | | | Net income attributable to Boston Properties, Inc. common shareholders | | $ | 496,223 | | | $ | 862,227 | | | | | Add: | | | | | | | | | | | | Preferred stock redemption charge | | | 6,412 | | | | — | | | | | Preferred dividends | | | 2,560 | | | | 10,500 | | | | | Noncontrolling interest—common units of the Operating Partnership | | | 55,931 | | | | 97,704 | | | | | Noncontrolling interests in property partnerships | | | 70,806 | | | | 48,260 | | | | | Interest expense | | | 423,346 | | | | 431,717 | | | | | Losses from early extinguishment of debt | | | 45,182 | | | | — | | | | | Loss from unconsolidated joint ventures | | | 2,570 | | | | 85,110 | | | | | Depreciation and amortization expense | | | 717,336 | | | | 683,751 | | | | | Transaction costs | | | 5,036 | | | | 1,531 | | | | | Payroll and related costs from management services contracts | | | 12,487 | | | | 11,626 | | | | | General and administrative expense | | | 151,573 | | | | 133,112 | | | | | Less: | | | | | | | | | | | | Gains from investments in securities | | | 5,626 | | | | 5,261 | | | | | Interest and other income | | | 5,704 | | | | 5,953 | | | | | Gains on sales of real estate | | | 123,660 | | | | 618,982 | | | | | Direct reimbursements of payroll and related costs from management services contracts | | | 12,487 | | | | 11,626 | | | | | Development and management services revenue | | | 27,697 | | | | 29,641 | | | | | Net Operating (NOI) | | | 1,814,288 | | | | 1,694,075 | | | | | Less: | | | | | | | | | | | | Straight-line rent | | | 106,291 | | | | 108,355 | | | | | Fair value lease revenue | | | 4,204 | | | | 5,102 | | | | | Termination income | | | 11,482 | | | | 8,973 | | | | | Add: | | | | | | | | | | | | Straight-line ground rent expense adjustment(1) | | | 2,760 | | | | 3,208 | | | | | Lease transaction costs that qualify as rent inducements | | | 10,506 | | | | 9,314 | | | | | NOI—cash (excluding termination income) | | | 1,705,577 | | | | 1,584,167 | | | | | Less: | | | | | | | | | | | | NOI—cash from non Same Properties (excluding termination income) | | | 63,292 | | | | 45,541 | | | | | Same Property NOI—cash (excluding termination income) | | | 1,642,285 | | | | 1,538,626 | |
| (a) | | | | | | Stock Issuable. The maximum number | 2022 Proxy Statement A-4
| | |
| | | | | | | | | | | For the year ended December 31, | | | | 2021 | | | 2020 | | | | (unaudited and in thousands) | | | | | Less: | | | | | | | | | | | | Partners’ share of NOI—cash from consolidated joint ventures (excluding termination income and after income allocations to private REIT shareholders)(2) | | $ | 184,357 | | | $ | 145,856 | | | | | BXP’s share of NOI—cash from non Same Properties from unconsolidated joint ventures (excluding termination income) | | | 27,436 | | | | 16,046 | | | | | Add: | | | | | | | | | | | | Partners’ share of NOI—cash from non Same Properties from consolidated joint ventures (excluding termination income and after income allocations to private REIT shareholders) | | | 11,778 | | | | (136 | ) | | | | BXP’s share of NOI—cash from unconsolidated joint ventures (excluding termination income)(3) | | | 98,870 | | | | 91,431 | | | | | BXP’s Share of Same Property NOI—cash (excluding termination income) | | | 1,541,140 | | | | 1,468,019 | |
(1) | In light of shares of Stock reserved and available for issuance under the Plan shall be (i) 5,400,000 shares less (ii) one share for every one share of Stock underlying awards granted underfront-ended, uneven rental payments required by the Company’s 2012 Stock Option99-year ground and Incentive Plan (the “Prior Plan”) after March 4,air rights lease for the 100 Clarendon Street garage and Back Bay Transit Station in Boston, MA, and to make period-to-period comparisons more meaningful to investors, the adjustment does not include the straight-line impact of approximately $156 and $559 for the year ended December 31, 2021 subjectand 2020, respectively. As of December 31, 2021, the Company has remaining lease payments aggregating approximately $25.4 million, all of which it expects to adjustment as provided in this Section 3. For purposesincur by the end of this limitation,2023 with no payments thereafter. Under GAAP, the following sharesCompany is recognizing expense of Stock shall be added back$(348) per year on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. However, unlike more traditional ground and air rights leases, the timing and amounts of the rental payments by the Company correlate to the sharesuneven timing and funding by the Company of Stock available for issuance undercapital expenditures related to improvements at Back Bay Transit Station. As a result, the Plan and, to the extent permitted under Section 422 of the Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder, the shares of Stock that may be issued as Incentive Stock Options: (i) the shares of Stock underlying any Awards under the Plan and any awards under the Prior Plan that are forfeited, canceled or otherwise terminated (other than by exercise) and (ii) with respect to a full-value award under the Plan or the Prior Plan (i.e., an award other than a stock option, stock appreciation right or Unit with an economic structure similar to that of a stock option or stock appreciation right), (A) any shares tendered, held back or otherwise reacquiredamounts excluded from the grantee to cover tax withholding owed upon vesting, settlement or the occurrenceadjustment each quarter through 2023 may vary significantly. Excludes $(23.0) million of any other event with respect to such an award that results in amounts being includable in the gross income of the grantee for income tax purposes and (B) any shares previously reserved for issuance pursuant to such an award to the extent that such shares are not issued and are no longer issuable pursuant to such an award (e.g., in the event that a full-value award that may be settled in cash or by issuance of shares of Stock is settled in cash). Notwithstanding the foregoing, the following shares shall not be added to the shares authorized for grant under the Plan: (x) shares tendered or held back upon exercise of a Stock Option to cover the exercise price or tax withholding, and (y) shares subject to a Stock Appreciation Right that are not issuedprepaid ground rent expense in connection with the stock settlement of the Stock Appreciation Right upon exercise thereof. In the event the Company repurchases shares of Stock on the open market, such shares shall not be added to the shares of Stock available for issuance under the Plan. Subject to such overall limitations, shares of Stock may be issued up to such maximum number pursuant to any type or types of Award; provided, however, that no more than 5,400,000 shares of the Stock may be issuedground lease at Sumner Square located in the form of Incentive Stock Options. The shares available for issuance under the Plan may be authorized but unissued shares of Stock or shares of Stock reacquired by the Company.Washington, DC. |
| (b)(2) | ChangesSee “Consolidated Joint Ventures” in Stock. Subject to Section 3(c) hereof, if, as a result of any reorganization, recapitalization, reclassification, stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split or other similar changethis Appendix for additional details.
|
(3) | See “Unconsolidated Joint Ventures” in the Company’s capital stock, the outstanding shares of Stock are increased or decreased or are exchangedthis Appendix for a different number or kind of shares or other securities of the Company, or additional shares or new or different shares or other securities of the Company or other non-cash assets are distributed with respect to such shares of Stock or other securities, or, if, as a result of any merger or consolidation, sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company, the outstanding shares of Stock are converted into or exchanged for securities of the Company or any successor entity (or a parent or subsidiary thereof), the Administrator shall make appropriate equitable adjustments to the Plan and any outstanding Awards, which may include, without limitation, appropriate or proportionate adjustments in (i) the maximum number and kind of shares reserved for issuance under the Plan, including the maximum number and kind of shares that may be issued in the form of Incentive Stock Options, (ii) the number and kind of shares or other securities subject to any then outstanding Awards under the Plan, (iii) the repurchase price, if any, per share of Restricted Stock subject to each outstanding Restricted Stock Award, (iv) the exercise price for each share subject to any then outstanding Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights under the Plan, without changing the aggregate exercise price (i.e., the exercise price multiplied by the number of shares subject to Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights) as to which such Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights remain exercisable and (v) other applicable terms of the Plan and any outstanding Awards.details. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement | | A-5 |
| The Administrator shall also make equitable or proportionate adjustments in the number of shares subject to outstanding Awards and the exercise price and the terms of outstanding Awards to take into consideration cash dividends paid other than in the ordinary course or any other extraordinary corporate event. The adjustment by the Administrator shall be final, binding and conclusive. No fractional shares of Stock shall be issued under the Plan resulting from any such adjustment, but the Administrator in its discretion may make a cash payment in lieu of fractional shares.
|
| (c) | Mergers. In contemplation of and subject to the consummation of a consolidation or merger or sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company in which outstanding shares of Stock are exchanged for securities, cash or other property of an unrelated corporation or business entity or in the event of a liquidation of the Company (in each case, a “Transaction”), the Board, or the board of directors of any corporation assuming the obligations of the Company, may, in its discretion, take any one or more of the following actions, as to outstanding Awards: (i) provide that such Awards shall be assumed or equivalent awards shall be substituted, by the acquiring or succeeding corporation (or an affiliate thereof), and/or (ii) upon written notice to the participants, provide that all Awards will terminate upon the consummation of the Transaction. In the event that, pursuant to clause (ii) above, Awards will terminate upon the consummation of the Transaction, all Awards shall become vested and fully exercisable as of the effective time of such Transaction (unless otherwise specified in the applicable Award Certificate or other agreement between the holder of such Award and the Company) and vested Awards, other than Stock Options, shall be fully settled in cash or in kind at such appropriate consideration as determined by the Administrator in its sole discretion after taking into account the consideration payable per share of Stock pursuant to the business combination (the “Merger Price”) and all Stock Options shall be fully settled, in cash or in kind, in an amount equal to the difference between (A) the Merger Price times the number of shares of Stock subject to such outstanding Stock Options (to the extent then exercisable at prices not in excess of the Merger Price) and (B) the aggregate exercise price of all such outstanding Stock Options; provided, however, that each participant may be permitted, within a specified period determined by the Administrator prior to the consummation of the Transaction, to exercise all outstanding Stock Options, including those that are not then exercisable, subject to the consummation of the Transaction.
|
| (d) | Substitute Awards. The Administrator may grant Awards under the Plan in substitution for stock and stock based awards issued by another corporation or other entity that is acquired by the Company or a Subsidiary; provided that the recipient of such substituted Award is eligible to be granted an Award under the Plan. The Administrator may direct that the substitute Awards be granted on such terms and conditions as the Administrator considers appropriate in the circumstances. Substitute Awards will not reduce the number of shares of Stock authorized for grant under the Plan.
|
SECTION 4. ELIGIBILITYConsolidated Joint Ventures
Grantees underfor the Plan will be such full- or part-time officersyear ended December 31, 2021
(unaudited and other employees, Non-Employee Directors and Consultants of the Company and its Subsidiaries as are selected from time to time by the Administratordollars in its sole discretion and such other Persons (to the extent the issuance of shares of Stock to such Person under the Plan may be registered by the Company on Form S-8 and would be permitted in an “employee benefit plan” as defined in Rule 405 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended) as are selected from time to time by the Administrator in its sole discretion. For avoidance of doubt, no Award may be granted under the Plan to a Person unless the issuance of shares of Stock to such Person under the Plan may be registered by the Company on Form S-8 and such Person is permitted to participate in an “employee benefit plan” as defined in Rule 405 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. SECTION 5. STOCK OPTIONSthousands)
| (a) | Award of Stock Options. The Administrator may grant Stock Options under the Plan. Any Stock Option granted under the Plan shall be in such form as the Administrator may from time to time approve.
|
Stock Options granted under the Plan may be either Incentive Stock Options or Non-Qualified Stock Options. Incentive Stock Options may be granted only to employees of the Company or any Subsidiary that is a “subsidiary corporation” within the meaning of Section 424(f) of the Code. To the extent that any Stock Option does not qualify as an Incentive Stock Option, it shall be deemed a Non-Qualified Stock Option.
Stock Options granted pursuant to this Section 5 shall be subject to the following terms and conditions and shall contain such additional terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the terms of the Plan, as the Administrator shall deem desirable. If the Administrator so determines, Stock Options may be granted in lieu of cash compensation at the optionee’s election, subject to such terms and conditions as the Administrator may establish.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Norges Joint Ventures | | | | | | | | | | Times Square Tower | | | | | | | | | | | 767 Fifth Avenue (The GM Building) | | | 601 Lexington Avenue / One Five Nine East 53rd Street 100 Federal Street Atlantic Wharf Office | | | Total Consolidated Joint Ventures | | | | | | Revenue | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Lease(1) | | $ | 290,894 | | | $ | 393,385 | | | $ | 684,279 | | | | | | Write-offs associated with accounts receivable, net | | | — | | | | 3 | | | | 3 | | | | | | Straight-line rent | | | 9,887 | | | | 2,327 | | | | 12,214 | | | | | | Write-offs associated with straight-line rent, net | | | — | | | | (217 | ) | | | (217 | ) | | | | | Fair value lease revenue | | | (1,405 | ) | | | 352 | | | | (1,053 | ) | | | | | Termination income | | | (5 | ) | | | — | | | | (5 | ) | | | | | Total lease revenue | | | 299,371 | | | | 395,850 | | | | 695,221 | | | | | | Parking and other | | | — | | | | 4,255 | | | | 4,255 | | | | | | Insurance proceeds | | | — | | | | 5,250 | (2) | | | 5,250 | | | | | | Total rental revenue | | | 299,371 | | | | 405,355 | | | | 704,726 | | | | | | Expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Operating | | | 112,543 | | | | 139,091 | | | | 251,634 | | | | | | Restoration expenses related to insurance claim | | | — | | | | 5,335 | (2) | | | 5,335 | | | | | | Total expenses | | | 112,543 | | | | 144,426 | | | | 256,969 | | | | | | Net Operating Income (NOI) | | | 186,828 | | | | 260,929 | | | | 447,757 | | | | | | Other income (expense) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Development and management services revenue | | | — | | | | 9 | | | | 9 | | | | | | Interest and other income | | | 1 | | | | 216 | | | | 217 | | | | | | Loss from early extinguishment of debt | | | — | | | | (104 | ) | | | (104 | ) | | | | | Interest expense | | | (84,712 | ) | | | (29,951 | ) | | | (114,663 | ) | | | | | Depreciation and amortization expense | | | (63,589 | ) | | | (89,903 | ) | | | (153,492 | ) | | | | | General and administrative expense | | | (230 | ) | | | (394 | ) | | | (624 | ) | | | | | Total other income (expense) | | | (148,530 | ) | | | (120,127 | ) | | | (268,657 | ) | | | | | Net income | | $ | 38,298 | | | $ | 140,802 | | | $ | 179,100 | | | | | | BXP’s nominal ownership percentage | | | 60.00% | | | | 55.00% | | | | | | | | | | Partners’ share of NOI (after income allocation to private REIT shareholders)(3) | | $ | 72,213 | | | $ | 114,091 | | | $ | 186,304 | |
| | | | | | | | | A-6
| | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement A-6 | | |
| (b) | Exercise Price. The exercise price per share for the Stock covered by a Stock Option granted pursuant to this Section 5 shall be determined by the Administrator at the time of grant but shall not be less than 100 percent of the Fair Market Value on the date of grant. In the case of an Incentive Stock Option that is granted to a Ten Percent Owner, the exercise price of such Incentive Stock Option shall be not less than 110 percent of the Fair Market Value on the grant date. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Stock Options may be granted with an exercise price per share that is less than 100 percent of the Fair Market Value on the date of grant (i) pursuant to a transaction described in, and in a manner consistent with, Section 424(a) of the Code, (ii) to individuals who are not subject to U.S. income tax on the date of grant or (iii) the Stock Option is otherwise compliant with Section 409A.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Norges Joint Ventures | | | | | | | | | | Times Square Tower | | | | | | | | | | | 767 Fifth Avenue (The GM Building) | | | 601 Lexington Avenue / One Five Nine East 53rd Street 100 Federal Street Atlantic Wharf Office | | | Total Consolidated Joint Ventures | | | | | | BXP’s share of NOI (after income allocation to private REIT shareholders) | | $ | 114,615 | | | $ | 146,838 | | | $ | 261,453 | | | | | | Unearned portion of capitalized fees(4) | | $ | 1,122 | | | $ | 3,597 | | | $ | 4,719 | | | | | | Reconciliation of Partners’ share of Net Operating Income (NOI)(3) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Rental revenue | | $ | 119,749 | | | $ | 182,410 | | | $ | 302,159 | | | | | | Less: Termination income | | | (2 | ) | | | (1 | ) | | | (3 | ) | | | | | Rental revenue (excluding termination income) | | | 119,751 | | | | 182,411 | | | | 302,162 | | | | | | Less: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Operating expenses (including partners’ share of management and other fees) | | | 47,536 | | | | 68,361 | | | | 115,897 | | | | | | Income allocation to private REIT shareholders | | | — | | | | (42 | ) | | | (42 | ) | | | | | NOI (excluding termination income and after income allocation to private REIT shareholders) | | $ | 72,215 | | | $ | 114,092 | | | $ | 186,307 | | | | | | Rental revenue (excluding termination income) | | $ | 119,751 | | | $ | 182,411 | | | $ | 302,162 | | | | | | Less: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Straight-line rent | | | 3,955 | | | | 948 | | | | 4,903 | | | | | | Fair value lease revenue | | | (562 | ) | | | 157 | | | | (405 | ) | | | | | Add: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Lease transaction costs that qualify as rent inducements | | | (118 | ) | | | 2,666 | | | | 2,548 | | | | | | Subtotal | | | 116,240 | | | | 183,972 | | | | 300,212 | | | | | | Less: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Operating expenses (including partners’ share of management and other fees) | | | 47,536 | | | | 68,361 | | | | 115,897 | | | | | | Income allocation to private REIT shareholders | | | — | | | | (42 | ) | | | (42 | ) | | | | | NOI - cash (excluding termination income and after income allocation to private REIT shareholders) | | $ | 68,704 | | | $ | 115,653 | | | $ | 184,357 | |
| (c)(1) | Stock Option Term. The termLease revenue includes recoveries from tenants and service income from tenants.
|
(2) | Amounts relate to damage at one of each Stock Option shall be fixed by the Administrator, but no Stock Option shall be exercisable more than ten years after the date the Stock Option is granted. In the case of an Incentive Stock Option that is grantedCompany’s properties in New York City due to a Ten Percent Owner, the term of such Stock Option shall be no more than five years from the date of grant.water main break. |
| (d)(3) | Exercisability; Rights of a Stockholder. Stock Options shall become exercisable at such time or times, whether or not in installments, as shall be determined byAmounts represent the Administrator at or after the grant date. An optionee shall have the rights of a stockholder only as to shares acquired upon the exercise of a Stock Option and not as to unexercised Stock Options.partners’ share based on their respective ownership percentage.
|
| (e)(4) | MethodCapitalized fees are eliminated in consolidation and recognized over the life of Exercise. Stock Options may be exercised in whole or in part, by giving written or electronic notice of exercisethe asset as depreciation and amortization are added back to the Company, specifying the number of shares to be purchased. Payment of the purchase price may be made by one or more of the following methods to the extent provided in the applicable Award Certificate:
|
| (i) | In cash, by certified or bank check or other instrument acceptable to the Administrator;
|
| (ii) | Through the delivery (or attestation to the ownership following such procedures as the Company may prescribe) of shares of Stock that are not then subject to restrictions under any Company plan. Such surrendered shares shall be valued at Fair Market Value on the exercise date;
|
| (iii) | By the optionee delivering to the Company a properly executed exercise notice together with irrevocable instructions to a broker to promptly deliver to the Company cash or a check payable and acceptable to the Company for the purchase price; provided that in the event the optionee chooses to pay the purchase price as so provided, the optionee and the broker shall comply with such procedures and enter into such agreements of indemnity and other agreements as the Company shall prescribe as a condition of such payment procedure; or
|
| (iv) | With respect to Stock Options that are not Incentive Stock Options, by a “net exercise” arrangement pursuant to which the Company will reduce the number of shares of Stock issuable upon exercise by the largest whole number of shares with a Fair Market Value that does not exceed the aggregate exercise price and the remainder of the aggregate exercise price to be paid by the optionee in cash or other method of payment permitted hereunder.
|
Payment instruments will be received subject to collection. The transfer to the optionee on the records of the Company or of the transfer agent of the shares of Stock to be purchased pursuant to the exercise of a Stock Option will be contingent upon receipt from the optionee (or a purchaser acting in his stead in accordance with the provisions of the Stock Option) by the Company of the full purchase price for such shares and the fulfillment of any other requirements contained in the applicable Award Certificate or applicable provisions of laws (including the satisfaction of any withholding taxes that the Company is obligated to withhold with respect to the optionee). In the event an optionee chooses to pay the purchase price by previously-owned shares of Stock through the attestation method, the number of shares of Stock transferred to the optionee upon the exercise of the Stock Option shall be net of the number of attested shares. In the event that the Company establishes, for itself or using the services of a third party, an automated system for the exercise of Stock Options, such as a system using an internet website or interactive voice response, then the paperless exercise of Stock Options may be permitted through the use of such an automated system.
| (f) | Annual Limit on Incentive Stock Options. To the extent required for “incentive stock option” treatment under Section 422 of the Code, the aggregate Fair Market Value (determined as of the time of grant) of the shares of Stock with respect to which Incentive Stock Options granted under this Plan and any other plan of the Company or its parent and subsidiary corporations become exercisable for the first time by an optionee during any calendar year shall not exceed $100,000. To the extent that any Stock Option exceeds this limit, it shall constitute a Non-Qualified Stock Option.Company’s net income.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement | | A-7 |
SECTION 6. STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTSConsolidated Joint Ventures
for the year ended December 31, 2020 (unaudited and dollars in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Norges Joint Ventures | | | | | | | | | | Times Square Tower | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 601 Lexington Avenue / One Five Nine East 53rd Street | | | | | | | 767 Fifth Avenue (The GM Building) | | | 100 Federal Street Atlantic Wharf Office | | | Total Consolidated Joint Ventures | | | | | | Revenue | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Lease(1) | | $ | 250,939 | | | $ | 363,728 | | | $ | 614,667 | | | | | | Write-offs associated with accounts receivable, net | | | (1,652 | ) | | | (8,330 | ) | | | (9,982 | ) | | | | | Straight-line rent | | | 47,831 | | | | 18,988 | | | | 66,819 | | | | | | Write-offs associated with straight-line rent, net | | | (1,357 | ) | | | (21,938 | ) | | | (23,295 | ) | | | | | Fair value lease revenue | | | (1,013 | ) | | | 436 | | | | (577 | ) | | | | | Termination income | | | 1,845 | | | | 1,049 | | | | 2,894 | | | | | | Total lease revenue | | | 296,593 | | | | 353,933 | | | | 650,526 | | | | | | Parking and other | | | 2 | | | | 4,092 | | | | 4,094 | | | | | | Total rental revenue | | | 296,595 | | | | 358,025 | | | | 654,620 | | | | | | Expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Operating | | | 120,426 | | | | 139,088 | | | | 259,514 | | | | | | Net Operating Income (NOI) | | | 176,169 | | | | 218,937 | | | | 395,106 | | | | | | Other income (expense) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Development and management services revenue | | | — | | | | 2 | | | | 2 | | | | | | Interest and other income | | | 404 | | | | 883 | | | | 1,287 | | | | | | Loss from early extinguishment of debt | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | Interest expense | | | (85,138 | ) | | | (19,848 | ) | | | (104,986 | ) | | | | | Depreciation and amortization expense | | | (69,429 | ) | | | (90,946 | ) | | | (160,375 | ) | | | | | Other | | | (45 | ) | | | (258 | ) | | | (303 | ) | | | | | Total other income (expense) | | | (154,208 | ) | | | (110,167 | ) | | | (264,375 | ) | | | | | Net income | | $ | 21,961 | | | $ | 108,770 | | | $ | 130,731 | | | | | | BXP’s nominal ownership percentage | | | 60.00 | % | | | 55.00 | % | | | | | | | | | Partners’ share of NOI (after income allocation to private REIT shareholders)(2) | | $ | 67,787 | | | $ | 95,100 | | | $ | 162,887 | | | | | | BXP’s share of NOI (after income allocation to private REIT shareholders) | | $ | 108,382 | | | $ | 123,837 | | | $ | 232,219 | |
| (a) | | | | | | Award of Stock Appreciation Rights. The Administrator may grant Stock Appreciation Rights under the Plan. A Stock Appreciation Right is an Award entitling the recipient to receive shares of Stock (or cash, to the extent explicitly provided for in the applicable Award Certificate) having a value equal to the excess of the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the date of exercise over the exercise price of the Stock Appreciation Right multiplied by the number of shares of Stock with respect to which the Stock Appreciation Right shall have been exercised. | 2022 Proxy Statement A-8
| | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Norges Joint Ventures | | | | | | | | | | Times Square Tower | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 601 Lexington Avenue / One Five Nine East 53rd Street | | | | | | | 767 Fifth Avenue (The GM Building) | | | 100 Federal Street Atlantic Wharf Office | | | Total Consolidated Joint Ventures | | | | | | Unearned portion of capitalized fees(3) | | $ | 294 | | | $ | 1,537 | | | $ | 1,831 | | | | | | Reconciliation of Partners’ share of Net Operating Income (NOI)(2) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Rental revenue | | $ | 118,639 | | | $ | 161,111 | | | $ | 279,750 | | | | | | Less: Termination income | | | 738 | | | | 472 | | | | 1,210 | | | | | | Rental revenue (excluding termination income) | | | 117,901 | | | | 160,639 | | | | 278,540 | | | | | | Less: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Operating expenses (including partners’ share of management and other fees) | | | 50,852 | | | | 66,053 | | | | 116,905 | | | | | | Income allocation to private REIT shareholders | | | — | | | | (42 | ) | | | (42 | ) | | | | | NOI (excluding termination income and after income allocation to private REIT shareholders) | | $ | 67,049 | | | $ | 94,628 | | | $ | 161,677 | | | | | | Rental revenue (excluding termination income) | | $ | 117,901 | | | $ | 160,639 | | | $ | 278,540 | | | | | | Less: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Straight-line rent | | | 18,589 | | | | (1,327 | ) | | | 17,262 | | | | | | Fair value lease revenue | | | (406 | ) | | | 196 | | | | (210 | ) | | | | | Add: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Lease transaction costs that qualify as rent inducements | | | 294 | | | | 937 | | | | 1,231 | | | | | | Subtotal | | | 100,012 | | | | 162,707 | | | | 262,719 | | | | | | Less: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Operating expenses (including partners’ share of management and other fees) | | | 50,852 | | | | 66,053 | | | | 116,905 | | | | | | Income allocation to private REIT shareholders | | | — | | | | (42 | ) | | | (42 | ) | | | | | NOI - cash (excluding termination income and after income allocation to private REIT shareholders) | | $ | 49,160 | | | $ | 96,696 | | | $ | 145,856 | |
| (b)(1) | Exercise Price of Stock Appreciation Rights. The exercise price of a Stock Appreciation Right shall not be less than 100 percentLease revenue includes recoveries from tenants and service income from tenants.
|
(2) | Amounts represent the partners’ share based on their respective ownership percentage. |
(3) | Capitalized fees are eliminated in consolidation and recognized over the life of the Fair Market Value of the Stock on the date of grant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Stock Appreciation Rights may be granted with an exercise price per share that is less than 100 percent of the Fair Market Value on the date of grant (i) pursuant to a transaction described in,asset as depreciation and in a manner consistent with, Section 424(a) of the Code, (ii) to individuals whoamortization are not subject to U.S. income tax on the date of grant or (iii) the Stock Appreciation Right is otherwise compliant with, or is not subject to, Section 409A. |
| (c) | Grant and Exercise of Stock Appreciation Rights. Stock Appreciation Rights may be granted by the Administrator independently of any Stock Option granted pursuant to Section 5 of the Plan.
|
| (d) | Terms and Conditions of Stock Appreciation Rights. Stock Appreciation Rights shall be subject to such terms and conditions as shall be determined on the date of grant by the Administrator. The term of a Stock Appreciation Right may not exceed ten years. The terms and conditions of each such Award shall be determined by the Administrator, and such terms and conditions may differ among individual Awards and grantees.
|
SECTION 7. RESTRICTED STOCK AWARDS
| (a) | Nature of Restricted Stock Awards. The Administrator may grant Restricted Stock Awards under the Plan. A Restricted Stock Award is any Award of Restricted Stock subject to such restrictions and conditions as the Administrator may determine at the time of grant. Conditions may be based on continuing employment (or other Service Relationship) and/or achievement of pre-established performance goals and objectives.
|
| (b) | Rights as a Stockholder. Upon the grant of a Restricted Stock Award and payment of any applicable purchase price, a grantee shall have the rights of a stockholder with respectadded back to the Restricted Stock granted thereunder, including voting of the Restricted Stock and receipt of dividends; provided that if the lapse of restrictions with respect to the Restricted Stock Award is tied to the attainment of vesting conditions, the Administrator may require any cash dividends paid by the Company during the vesting period with respect to unvested Restricted Stock to be retained by, or repaid by the grantee to, the Company. Unless the Administrator shall otherwise determine, (i) uncertificated Restricted Stock shall be accompanied by a notation on the records of the Company or the transfer agent to the effect that they are subject to forfeiture until such Restricted Stock is vested as provided in Section 7(d) below, and (ii) certificated Restricted Stock shall remain in the possession of the Company until such Restricted Stock is vested as provided in Section 7(d) below, and the grantee shall be required, as a condition of the grant, to deliver to the Company such instruments of transfer as the Administrator may prescribe.
|
| (c) | Restrictions. Restricted Stock may not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise encumbered or disposed of except as specifically provided herein or in the Restricted Stock Award Certificate. Except as may otherwise be provided by the Administrator either in the Award Certificate or, subject to Section 17 below, in writing after the Award is issued, if a grantee’s employment (or other Service Relationship) with the Company and its Subsidiaries terminates for any reason, any Restricted Stock that has not vested at the time of termination shall automatically and without any requirement of notice to such grantee from or other action by or on behalf of, the Company be deemed to have been reacquired by the Company at its original purchase price (if any) from such grantee or such grantee’s legal representative simultaneously with such termination of employment (or other Service Relationship), and thereafter shall cease to represent any ownership of the Company by the grantee or rights of the grantee as a stockholder. Following such deemed reacquisition of Restricted Stock that is represented by physical certificates, a grantee shall surrender such certificates to the Company upon request without consideration.
|
| (d) | Vesting of Restricted Stock. The Administrator at the time of grant shall specify the date or dates and/or the attainment of pre-established performance goals, objectives and other conditions on which the non-transferability of the Restricted Stock and the Company’s right of repurchase or forfeiture shall lapse. Subsequent to such date or dates and/or the attainment of such pre-established performance goals, objectives and other conditions, the shares on which all restrictions have lapsed shall no longer be Restricted Stock and shall be deemed “vested.”net income.
|
| | | | | | | | | A-8
| | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement A-9 |
SECTION 8. RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARDSUnconsolidated Joint Ventures
for the year ended December 31, 2021 (unaudited and dollars in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Boston | | | Los Angeles | | | New York | | | San Francisco | | | Seattle | | | Washington, DC | | | Total Unconsolidated Joint Ventures | | Revenue | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Lease(1) | | $ | 54,721 | | | $ | 123,020 | | | $ | 11,598 | | | $ | 45,920 | | | $ | 8,988 | | | $ | 101,167 | | | $ | 345,414 | | | | | | | | | | Write-offs associated with accounts receivable, net | | | — | | | | (13 | ) | | | 233 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 220 | | | | | | | | | | Straight-line rent | | | 969 | | | | 10,918 | | | | 467 | | | | 1,252 | | | | 797 | | | | 2,852 | | | | 17,255 | | | | | | | | | | Write-offs associated with straight-line rent | | | — | | | | (81 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (186 | ) | | | (267 | ) | | | | | | | | | Fair value lease revenue | | | — | | | | 1,307 | | | | — | | | | 168 | | | | 1,526 | | | | — | | | | 3,001 | | | | | | | | | | Termination income | | | 1,600 | | | | (41 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,559 | | | | | | | | | | Total lease revenue | | | 57,290 | | | | 135,110 | | | | 12,298 | | | | 47,340 | | | | 11,311 | | | | 103,833 | | | | 367,182 | | | | | | | | | | Parking and other | | | 75 | | | | 9,848 | | | | — | | | | 4 | | | | 365 | | | | 4,639 | | | | 14,931 | | | | | | | | | | Total rental revenue | | | 57,365 | | | | 144,958 | | | | 12,298 | | | | 47,344 | | | | 11,676 | | | | 108,472 | | | | 382,113 | | Expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Operating | | | 24,268 | | | | 49,795 | | | | 14,309 | (2) | | | 18,518 | | | | 4,257 | | | | 46,433 | | | | 157,580 | | | | | | | | | | Net operating income/(loss) | | | 33,097 | | | | 95,163 | | | | (2,011 | ) | | | 28,826 | | | | 7,419 | | | | 62,039 | | | | 224,533 | | Other income/(expense) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Development and management services revenue | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,260 | | | | 245 | | | | — | | | | 3 | | | | 1,508 | | | | | | | | | | Interest and other income | | | — | | | | 20 | | | | — | | | | 8 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 28 | | | | | | | | | | Interest expense | | | (11,958 | ) | | | (47,760 | ) | | | (8,869 | ) | | | (6 | ) | | | (2,105 | ) | | | (38,186 | ) | | | (108,884 | ) | | | | | | | | | Transaction costs | | | — | | | | — | | | | (463 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (7 | ) | | | (470 | ) | | | | | | | | | Depreciation and amortization expense | | | (22,235 | ) | | | (50,855 | ) | | | (10,738 | ) | | | (22,584 | ) | | | (6,783 | ) | | | (33,926 | ) | | | (147,121 | ) | | | | | | | | | General and administrative expense | | | (43 | ) | | | (459 | ) | | | (75 | ) | | | (4 | ) | | | (2 | ) | | | (335 | ) | | | (918 | ) | | | | | | | | | Total other income/(expense) | | | (34,236 | ) | | | (99,054 | ) | | | (18,885 | ) | | | (22,341 | ) | | | (8,890 | ) | | | (72,451 | ) | | | (255,857 | ) | | | | | | | | | Net income/(loss) | | $ | (1,139 | ) | | $ | (3,891 | ) | | $ | (20,896 | ) | | $ | 6,485 | | | $ | (1,471 | ) | | $ | (10,412 | ) | | $ | (31,324 | ) |
| (a) | | | | | | Nature | 2022 Proxy Statement A-10
| | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Boston | | | Los Angeles | | | New York | | | San Francisco | | | Seattle | | | Washington, DC | | | Total Unconsolidated Joint Ventures | | | Reconciliation of BXP’s share of Net Operating Income/(Loss) | | | | | | | | | | BXP’s share of rental revenue | | $ | 28,685 | | | $ | 77,957 | (3) | | $ | 6,148 | | | $ | 23,861 | (4) | | $ | 3,931 | | | $ | 41,131 | (5) | | $ | 181,713 | | | | | | | | | | BXP’s share of operating expenses | | | 12,134 | | | | 26,315 | | | | 6,812 | | | | 9,710 | | | | 1,433 | | | | 17,554 | (5) | | | 73,958 | | | | | | | | | | BXP’s share of net operating income/(loss) | | | 16,551 | | | | 51,642 | (3) | | | (664 | ) | | | 14,151 | (4) | | | 2,498 | | | | 23,577 | (5) | | | 107,755 | | | | | | | | | | Less: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | BXP’s share of termination income | | | 801 | | | | (21 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 780 | | | | | | | | | | BXP’s share of net operating income/(loss) (excluding termination income) | | | 15,750 | | | | 51,663 | | | | (664 | ) | | | 14,151 | | | | 2,498 | | | | 23,577 | (5) | | | 106,975 | | | | | | | | | | Less: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | BXP’s share of straight-line rent | | | 485 | | | | 6,419 | (3) | | | 350 | | | | 685 | (4) | | | 268 | | | | 801 | (5) | | | 9,008 | | | | | | | | | | BXP’s share of fair value lease revenue | | | — | | | | 1,956 | (3) | | | — | | | | (829 | )(4) | | | 514 | | | | — | | | | 1,641 | | | | | | | | | | Add: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | BXP’s share of straight-line ground rent expense adjustment | | | — | | | | — | | | | 821 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 821 | | | | | | | | | | BXP’s share of lease transaction costs that qualify as rent inducements | | | — | | | | 565 | | | | 1,222 | | | | — | | | | 22 | | | | (86 | )(5) | | | 1,723 | | | | | | | | | | BXP’s share of net operating income/(loss) - cash (excluding termination income) | | $ | 15,265 | | | $ | 43,853 | (3) | | $ | 1,029 | | | $ | 14,295 | (4) | | $ | 1,738 | | | $ | 22,690 | (5) | | $ | 98,870 | |
(1) | Lease revenue includes recoveries from tenants and service income from tenants. |
(2) | Includes approximately $1,643 of Restricted Stock Unit Awards. straight-line ground rent expense. |
(3) | The Administrator may grant Restricted Stock Unit AwardsCompany’s purchase price allocation under ASC 805 for Colorado Center differs from the Plan. A Restricted Stock Unit Award is an Awardhistorical basis of Restricted Stock Units that, subjectthe venture resulting in the majority of the basis differential for this region. |
(4) | The Company’s purchase price allocation under ASC 805 for Gateway Commons differs from the historical basis of the venture resulting in the majority of the basis differential for this region. |
(5) | Reflects the allocation percentages pursuant to the terms and conditionsachievement of the applicable Award Certificate, may be settled in shares of Stock (or cash, to the extent explicitlyspecified investment return thresholds as provided for in the Award Certificate) upon the satisfactionjoint venture agreement of applicable restrictions and conditions at the time of grant. Conditions may be based on, among other things, continuing employment (or other Service Relationship) and/or achievement of pre-established performance goals and objectives. The terms and conditions of each such Award shall be determined by the Administrator, and such terms and conditions may differ among individual Awards and grantees. To the extent permitted by the Administrator, the settlement of Restricted Stock Units may be deferred to one or more dates specified in the applicable Award Certificate or elected by the grantee. Restricted Stock Unit Awards with a deferred settlement date may be referred to as Deferred Stock Unit Awards. Each Restricted Stock Unit Award that is subject to Section 409A may contain such additional terms and conditions as the Administrator shall determine in its sole discretion in order to comply with the requirements of Section 409A. |
| (b) | Election to Receive Restricted Stock Unit Awards in Lieu of Compensation. The Administrator may, in its sole discretion, permit a grantee to elect to receive cash compensation otherwise due to such grantee in the form of a Restricted Stock Unit Award. Any such election shall be made in writing and shall be delivered to the Company no later than the date specified by the Administrator and in accordance with such rules and procedures established by the Administrator, which shall include rules and procedures intended to ensure compliance with Section 409A. Unless provided by the Administrator, any such cash compensation that the grantee elects to receive in Restricted Stock Units shall be converted to a fixed number of Restricted Stock Units based on the Fair Market Value of Stock on the date the compensation would otherwise have been paid to the grantee if such election had not been made. The Administrator shall have the sole right to determine whether and under what circumstances to permit such elections and to impose such limitations and other terms and conditions thereon as the Administrator deems appropriate. Any Restricted Stock Units that are elected to be received in lieu of cash compensation shall be fully vested, unless otherwise provided in the Award Certificate.
|
| (c) | Rights as a Stockholder. A grantee shall have the rights as a stockholder only as to shares of Stock acquired by the grantee upon settlement of Restricted Stock Units; provided, however, that the grantee may be credited with Dividend Equivalent Rights with respect to the stock units underlying his Restricted Stock Units, subject to the provisions of Section 10 and such terms and conditions as the Administrator may determine.
|
| (d) | Termination. Except as may otherwise be provided by the Administrator either in the Award Certificate or, subject to Section 17 below, in writing after the Award is issued, a grantee’s right in all Restricted Stock Units that have not vested shall automatically terminate upon the grantee’s termination of employment (or cessation of Service Relationship) with the Company and its Subsidiaries for any reason.
|
SECTION 9. UNRESTRICTED STOCK AWARDS
Grant or Sale of Unrestricted Stock. The Administrator may grant (or sell at par value or such higher purchase price determined by the Administrator) an Unrestricted Stock Award under the Plan. An Unrestricted Stock Award is an Award of Stock free of any restrictions under the Plan. Unrestricted Stock Awards may be granted in respect of past services or other valid consideration, or in lieu of cash compensation due to such grantee.
SECTION 10. DIVIDEND EQUIVALENT RIGHTS
| (a) | Dividend Equivalent Rights. The Administrator may grant Dividend Equivalent Rights under the Plan. A Dividend Equivalent Right is an Award entitling the grantee to receive credits based on cash dividends that would have been paid on the shares of Stock specified in the Dividend Equivalent Right (or other Award to which it relates) if such shares had been issued to the grantee. A Dividend Equivalent Right may be granted hereunder to any grantee as a component of an Award, including a Restricted Stock Unit Award, or as a freestanding award. The terms and conditions of Dividend Equivalent Rights shall be specified in the applicable Award Certificate. Dividend equivalents credited to the holder of a Dividend Equivalent Right may be paid currently, may be deemed to be reinvested in additional shares of Stock, which may thereafter accrue additional equivalents, or may otherwise accrue. Unless otherwise provided in the Award Certificate or by the Administrator, any such reinvestment shall be at Fair Market Value on the date of reinvestment or such other price as may then apply under a dividend reinvestment plan sponsored by the Company, if any. Dividend Equivalent Rights may be settled in cash or shares of Stock or a combination thereof, in a single installment or installments.901 New York Avenue.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement | | A-9 A-11 |
| (b) | Termination. Except as may otherwise be provided by the Administrator either in the Award Certificate or, subject to Section 17 below, in writing after the Award is issued, a grantee’s rights in all Dividend Equivalent Rights shall automatically terminate upon the grantee’s termination of employment (or cessation of Service Relationship) with the Company and its Subsidiaries for any reason.
|
SECTION 11. OTHER EQUITY-BASED AWARDSUnconsolidated Joint Ventures
The Administrator shall have the right (i) to grant other Awards based upon the Stock having such terms and conditions as the Administrator may determine, including, without limitation, the grant of convertible preferred shares, convertible debentures and other exchangeable or redeemable securities or equity interests, (ii) to grant limited-partnership or any other membership or ownership interests (which may be expressed as units or otherwise) in a Subsidiary or operating or other partnership, including, without limitation, Units, with any Stock being issued in connection with the conversion of (or other distribution on account of) an interest granted under the authority of this clause (ii) to be subject, for the avoidance of doubt, to Section 3year ended December 31, 2020
(unaudited and the other provisions of the Plan, and (iii) to grant Awards valued by reference to book value, fair value or performance parameters relative to the Company or any Subsidiary or group of Subsidiaries.dollars in thousands) SECTION 12. CASH-BASED AWARDS
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Boston | | | Los Angeles | | | New York | | | San Francisco | | | Washington, DC | | | Total Unconsolidated Joint Ventures | | Revenue | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Lease(1) | | $ | 32,359 | | | $ | 136,162 | | | $ | 2,608 | | | $ | 44,946 | | | $ | 90,896 | | | $ | 306,971 | | | | | | | | | Write-offs associated with accounts receivable, net | | | (1,440 | ) | | | (352 | ) | | | — | | | | (628 | ) | | | (596 | ) | | | (3,016 | ) | | | | | | | | Straight-line rent | | | 7,253 | | | | 6,411 | | | | 12,990 | | | | 1,338 | | | | 10,583 | | | | 38,575 | | | | | | | | | Write-offs associated with straight-line rent | | | (1,789 | ) | | | (4,056 | ) | | | (15,190 | ) | | | 96 | | | | (27,740 | ) | | | (48,679 | ) | | | | | | | | Fair value lease revenue | | | — | | | | 3,642 | | | | — | | | | 261 | | | | — | | | | 3,903 | | | | | | | | | Termination income | | | — | | | | 870 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 870 | | | | | | | | | Total lease revenue | | | 36,383 | | | | 142,677 | | | | 408 | | | | 46,013 | | | | 73,143 | | | | 298,624 | | | | | | | | | Parking and other | | | 156 | | | | 12,948 | | | | 264 | | | | 8 | | | | 5,244 | | | | 18,620 | | | | | | | | | Total rental revenue | | | 36,539 | | | | 155,625 | | | | 672 | | | | 46,021 | | | | 78,387 | | | | 317,244 | | Expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Operating | | | 16,988 | | | | 51,982 | | | | 9,690 | (2) | | | 17,351 | | | | 47,423 | | | | 143,434 | | | | | | | | | Net operating income/(loss) | | | 19,551 | | | | 103,643 | | | | (9,018 | ) | | | 28,670 | | | | 30,964 | | | | 173,810 | | Other income/(expense) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Development and management services revenue | | | — | | | | — | | | | 313 | | | | 16 | | | | 125 | | | | 454 | | | | | | | | | Interest and other income | | | 1,278 | | | | 202 | | | | 135 | | | | 7 | | | | 241 | | | | 1,863 | | | | | | | | | Interest expense | | | (10,869 | ) | | | (48,014 | ) | | | (4,925 | ) | | | 2 | | | | (34,246 | ) | | | (98,052 | ) | | | | | | | | Transaction costs | | | — | | | | — | | | | (340 | ) | | | — | | | | (687 | ) | | | (1,027 | ) | | | | | | | | Depreciation and amortization expense | | | (18,225 | ) | | | (57,514 | ) | | | (6,025 | ) | | | (27,366 | ) | | | (32,723 | ) | | | (141,853 | ) | | | | | | | | General and administrative expense | | | (90 | ) | | | (520 | ) | | | (10 | ) | | | (148 | ) | | | (145 | ) | | | (913 | ) | | | | | | | | Gain on sale of real estate | | | — | | | | — | | | | 215 | | | | — | | | | 11,522 | | | | 11,737 | | | | | | | | | Total other income/(expense) | | | (27,906 | ) | | | (105,846 | ) | | | (10,637 | ) | | | (27,489 | ) | | | (55,913 | ) | | | (227,791 | ) | | | | | | | | Net income/(loss) | | $ | (8,355 | ) | | $ | (2,203 | ) | | $ | (19,655 | ) | | $ | 1,181 | | | $ | (24,949 | ) | | $ | (53,981 | ) | | Reconciliation of BXP’s share of Net Operating Income/(Loss) | | | | | | | | | BXP’s share of rental revenue | | $ | 18,270 | | | $ | 85,324 | (3) | | $ | 332 | | | $ | 24,479 | (4) | | $ | 35,011 | (5) | | $ | 163,416 | | | | | | | | | BXP’s share of operating expenses | | | 8,494 | | | | 27,428 | | | | 4,846 | | | | 9,549 | | | | 18,160 | (5) | | | 68,477 | | | | | | | | | BXP’s share of net operating income/(loss) | | | 9,776 | | | | 57,896 | (3) | | | (4,514 | ) | | | 14,930 | (4) | | | 16,851 | (5) | | | 94,939 | |
The Administrator may, in its sole discretion, grant Cash-Based Awards to any participant in such number or amount and upon such terms, and subject to such conditions, as the Administrator shall determine at the time of grant. The Administrator shall determine the Performance Cycle and Performance Criteria applicable to such Cash-Based Award, the amount of cash to which the Cash-Based Award pertains, the conditions upon which the Cash-Based Awards shall become vested or payable, and such other provisions as the Administrator shall determine. Each Cash-Based Award shall specify a cash-denominated payment amount, formula or payment ranges as determined by the Administrator, which may include either a “target” (100 percent attainment of the Performance Criteria) and/or a “minimum” hurdle and/or a “maximum” amount. Payment, if any, with respect to a Cash-Based Award shall be made in accordance with the terms of the Award and may be made in cash or in shares of Stock, as the Administrator determines.
SECTION 13. TRANSFERABILITY OF AWARDS
| (a) | | | | | | Transferability. Unless otherwise provided in the Award Certificate or by the Administrator, during a grantee’s lifetime, his or her Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights shall be exercisable only by the grantee, or by the grantee’s legal representative or guardian in the event of the grantee’s incapacity. Except as provided in Section 13(b) below and unless otherwise provided in the Award Certificate or by the Administrator, no Awards shall be sold, assigned, transferred or otherwise encumbered or disposed of by a grantee other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution or pursuant to a domestic relations order; provided that, for the avoidance of doubt, the foregoing shall not apply to shares of Stock issued pursuant to an Award following the date on which such shares are vested. No Awards shall be subject, in whole or in part, to attachment, execution, or levy of any kind, and any purported transfer in violation hereof shall be null and void. | 2022 Proxy Statement A-12
| | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Boston | | | Los Angeles | | | New York | | | San Francisco | | | Washington, DC | | | Total Unconsolidated Joint Ventures | | | Reconciliation of BXP’s share of Net Operating Income/(Loss) | | | | | | | | | Less: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | BXP’s share of termination income | | $ | — | | | $ | 771 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 771 | | | | | | | | | BXP’s share of net operating income/(loss) (excluding termination income) | | | 9,776 | | | | 57,125 | | | | (4,514 | ) | | | 14,930 | | | | 16,851 | (5) | | | 94,168 | | | | | | | | | Less: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | BXP’s share of straight-line rent | | | 2,731 | | | | 3,163 | (3) | | | (1,099 | ) | | | 815 | (4) | | | (2,683 | )(5) | | | 2,927 | | BXP’s share of fair value lease revenue | | | — | | | | 3,743 | (3) | | | — | | | | (741 | )(4) | | | — | | | | 3,002 | | | | | | | | | Add: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | BXP’s share of straight-line ground rent expense adjustment | | | — | | | | — | | | | 398 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 398 | | | | | | | | | BXP’s share of lease transaction costs that qualify as rent inducements | | | 261 | | | | 646 | | | | 1,233 | | | | — | | | | 654 | (5) | | | 2,794 | | | | | | | | | BXP’s share of net operating income/(loss) - cash (excluding termination income) | | $ | 7,306 | | | $ | 50,865 | (3) | | $ | (1,784 | ) | | $ | 14,856 | (4) | | $ | 20,188 | (5) | | $ | 91,431 | |
| (b)(1) | Administrator Action. Notwithstanding Section 13(a),Lease revenue includes recoveries from tenants and service income from tenants.
|
(2) | Includes approximately $785 of straight-line ground rent expense. |
(3) | The Company’s purchase price allocation under ASC 805 for Colorado Center differs from the Administrator, in its discretion, may provide eitherhistorical basis of the venture resulting in the Award Certificate regarding a given Award or by subsequent written approval that the grantee may transfer his or her Awards (other than Incentive Stock Options) to his or her Family Members for no value or consideration; provided that the transferee agrees in writing to be bound by allmajority of the terms and conditions ofbasis differential for this Plan and the applicable Award.region. |
| (c)(4) | DesignationThe Company’s purchase price allocation under ASC 805 for Gateway Commons differs from the historical basis of Beneficiary. To the extent permitted byventure resulting in the Company, each granteemajority of the basis differential for this region.
|
(5) | Reflects the allocation percentages pursuant to whom an Award has been made under the Plan may designate a beneficiary or beneficiaries to exercise any Award or receive any payment under any Award payable on or after the grantee’s death. Any such designation shall be on a formachievement of specified investment return thresholds as provided for that purpose by the Company and shall not be effective until received by the Company. If no beneficiary has been designated by a deceased grantee, or if the designated beneficiaries have predeceased the grantee, the beneficiary shall be the grantee’s estate. |
SECTION 14. TAX WITHHOLDING
| (a) | Payment by Grantee. Each grantee shall, no later than the date as of which the value of an Award or of any Stock or other amounts received thereunder first becomes includable in the gross incomejoint venture agreement of the grantee for Federal income tax purposes, pay to the Company, or make arrangements satisfactory to the Administrator regarding payment of, any901 New York Avenue.
|
| | | | | | | | | A-10
| | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement A-13 |
APPENDIX B BOSTON PROPERTIES, INC. NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PLAN SECTION 1. PURPOSE OF THE DIRECTOR PLAN This Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan (the “Director Plan”) is intended to establish the cash compensation and equity grants payable to members of the board of directors of Boston Properties, Inc. (the “Company”), as constituted from time to time (the “Board”), who are not employees of the Company or any subsidiary of the Company (“Non-Employee Directors”). All equity grants made under the Director Plan shall be made pursuant to the Boston Properties, Inc. 2021 Stock Incentive Plan (as amended from time to time, the “2021 Plan”) or any other equity plan of the Company designated by the Board pursuant to which the grants provided for herein may be made (the “Incentive Plan”). Except as otherwise noted herein, the cash compensation and equity grants described in the Director Plan shall be paid or be made, as applicable, to each Non-Employee Director automatically and without any further action by the Board. All capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the respective meanings ascribed thereto in the 2021 Plan. SECTION 2. ADMINISTRATION OF THE DIRECTOR PLAN The Director Plan shall be administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board (the “Committee”). All decisions and interpretations of the Committee shall be made in the Committee’s sole and absolute discretion and shall be final and binding on all persons, including the Company and Non-Employee Directors. SECTION 3. BOARD AND COMMITTEE SERVICE FEES | a. | Federal, state,Board Service. Each Non-Employee Director shall receive an annual cash retainer of $85,000 for serving on the Board. Non-Employee Directors shall not receive meeting attendance fees for any meeting of the Board or local taxes of any kind required by law to be withheld by the Company with respect to such income. The Company and its Subsidiaries shall, to the extent permitted by law, have the right to deduct any such taxes from any payment of any kind otherwise due to the grantee. The Company’s obligation to deliver evidence of book entry (or stock certificates) to any grantee is subject to and conditioned on tax withholding obligations being satisfied by the grantee.a committee thereof that he or she attends.
|
| (b)b. | Chairman of the Board/Lead Independent Director. A Non-Employee Director serving as Chairman of the Board shall receive an annual cash retainer of $125,000 for such service. A Non-Employee Director serving as Lead Independent Director shall receive an annual cash retainer of $50,000 for such service. |
| c. | Compensation Committee. Each Non-Employee Director who serves on the Committee shall receive an annual cash retainer of $10,000 for such service. In addition, the Non-Employee Director serving as the chair of the Committee shall receive an additional annual cash retainer of $15,000 for service as chair. |
| d. | Audit Committee. Each Non-Employee Director who serves on the Audit Committee shall receive an annual cash retainer of $15,000 for such service. In addition, the Non-Employee Director serving as the chair of the Audit Committee shall receive an additional annual cash retainer of $20,000 for service as chair. |
| e. | Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Each Non-Employee Director who serves on the Nominating and Corporate Governance (“NCG”) Committee shall receive an annual cash retainer of $10,000 for such service. In addition, the Non-Employee Director serving as the chair of the NCG Committee shall receive an additional annual cash retainer of $15,000 for service as chair. |
| f. | Other Standing Committees. Each Non-Employee Director who serves on any other standing committee of the Board that may be established from time to time by the Board shall receive an annual cash retainer of $10,000 for such service. In addition, the Non-Employee Director serving as the chair of such standing committee, if any, shall receive an additional annual cash retainer of $15,000 for service as chair. |
| g. | Payment in Stockand Deferral of Service Fees. SubjectUnless otherwise deferred pursuant to approval by the Administrator,Director Deferral Program (as defined below), the sum of all annual cash retainers to which each Non-Employee Director is entitled pursuant to Sections 3(a)-(f) shall be paid quarterly in arrears, subject to proration for periods of service less than a grantee may electfull quarter or full year in length, as applicable. |
| | | | | | | | | | 2022 Proxy Statement B-1 |
SECTION 4. EQUITY COMPENSATION | a. | Annual Equity Award. Unless otherwise deferred pursuant to havethe Director Deferral Program, on the fifth business day after each annual meeting of the Company’s required tax withholding obligation satisfied, in wholestockholders (or, if any annual meeting is not completed on a single date, the date on which the polls are closed for voting on the election of directors at such annual meeting) (the “Annual Meeting”), each Non-Employee Director continuing to serve as a member of the Board immediately following the election and qualification of the directors elected at such Annual Meeting shall be granted, at his or in part, by authorizing the Company to withhold from shares of Stock to be issued pursuant to any Award (or, in the case of a Restricted Stock Award, to reacquire shares of Stock previously issued pursuant such Restricted Stock Award)her election, either a number of LTIP Units in Boston Properties Limited Partnership, or any successor thereto, or a number of restricted shares with an aggregate Fair Market Value (as of the dateCompany’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Common Stock”) (or a combination of LTIP Units and Common Stock), pursuant to the withholding is effected) that would satisfy the withholding amount due; provided, however, that the amount withheld does not exceed the maximum statutory tax rate or such lesser amount as is necessaryIncentive Plan equal to avoid adverse accounting treatment or as determined$165,000 divided by the Administrator. The Administratorclosing market price of the Company’s Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the grant date, which grant will vest on the earlier of (i) the first anniversary of the grant date and (ii) the date of the next Annual Meeting (the “Annual Equity Award”), subject to potential acceleration as set forth in the Incentive Plan or the applicable award agreement. |
| b. | Initial Equity Awards. Unless otherwise deferred pursuant to the Director Deferral Program, on the fifth business day after the appointment of any new Non-Employee Director, such Non-Employee Director shall be granted, at his or her election, either a number of LTIP Units in Boston Properties Limited Partnership, or any successor thereto, or a number of restricted shares of Common Stock (or a combination of LTIP Units and Common Stock), pursuant to the Incentive Plan equal to $165,000 (prorated based on the number of months from the effective date of the appointment of the Non-Employee Director to the Board to the first anniversary of the most recent prior Annual Meeting) divided by the closing market price of the Company’s Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the grant date, which grant will vest on the earlier of (i) the first anniversary of the grant date and (ii) the date of the next Annual Meeting (the “Initial Equity Award”), subject to potential acceleration as set forth in the Incentive Plan or the applicable award agreement. |
| c. | Form of Equity Awards. Notwithstanding Sections 4(a) and (b), prior to the grant date of any Annual Equity Award or Initial Equity Award, the Committee may, also requirein its sole discretion, determine to (i) grant such Annual Equity Award or Initial Equity Award in the form of any full value Award (as defined in the Incentive Plan) issuable from time to time pursuant to the Incentive Plan (i.e., an Award other than an option or stock appreciation right) or (ii) discontinue any ability for the Non-Employee Directors to elect to receive the form of equity for any such grants, in which case all equity awards granted hereunder shall be in the form of restricted shares of Common Stock. All equity awards granted hereunder shall be made pursuant to forms of award agreement having terms consistent with those set forth herein, as approved by the Committee or the Board from time to time for such purpose. |
| d. | Availability of Awards to. All equity grants made hereunder shall be subject to mandatory share withholding upthe availability of shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance pursuant to the required withholding amount. For purposesIncentive Plan, and the Director Plan does not increase such number of share withholding,available shares. To the extent insufficient shares of Common Stock are reserved and available to make the equity grants set forth herein, or at the discretion of the Board, any portion of any equity grant to which a Non-Employee Director is entitled shall be added to the next cash payment of annual cash retainers payable pursuant to Section 3 in an amount equal to the Fair Market Value of withheld shares shallany such ungranted equity compensation, to be determinedpaid at such times and in the same manner asset forth in Section 3, unless otherwise determined by the value of Stock includible in income of the grantees. The Administrator may also require the Company’s tax withholding obligation to be satisfied, in whole or in part, by an arrangement whereby a certain number of shares of Stock issued pursuant to any Award are immediately sold and proceeds from such sale are remitted to the Company in an amount that would satisfy the withholding amount due.Board. |
SECTION 15.5. TAX WITHHOLDING Except to the extent required by applicable law, each Non-Employee Director shall be solely responsible for any tax obligations he or she incurs as a result of any compensation received under the Director Plan. SECTION 6. DEFERRAL Each Non-Employee Director may elect, in accordance with the Boston Properties, Inc. Amended and Restated Rules and Conditions for Directors’ Deferred Compensation Program or any other plan of the Company designated or established by the Board for such purpose, as (the “Director Deferral Program”), to defer the cash compensation described in the Director Plan. | | | | | | | | 2022 Proxy Statement B-2 | | |
SECTION 7. SECTION 409A AWARDS Awards are intendedThe provisions regarding all payments to be exempt from Section 409A to the greatest extent possible and to otherwise comply with Section 409A. The Plan and all Awardsmade hereunder shall be interpreted in accordancesuch a manner that all such payments either comply with such intent.Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), or are exempt from the requirements of Section 409A of the Code as “short-term deferrals” as described in Section 409A of the Code. To the extent that any Award isamounts payable hereunder are determined to constitute “nonqualified deferred compensation” within the meaning of Section 409A (a “409A Award”),of the AwardCode, such amounts shall be subject to such additional rules and requirements as specified by the AdministratorCommittee from time to time in order to comply with Section 409A. In this regard, if any amount under a 409A Award is payable upon a “separation from service” (withinof the meaning of Section 409A) to a grantee who is then considered a “specified employee” (withinCode and the meaning of Section 409A), then no such payment shall be made prior to the date that is the earlier of (i) six months and one day after the grantee’s separation from service, or (ii) the grantee’s death, but only to the extent such delay is necessary to prevent such payment from being subject to interest, penalties and/or additional tax imposed pursuant to Section 409A. Further, the settlement of any 409A Awardsuch amounts may not be accelerated or delayed except to the extent permitted by Section 409A.409A of the Code. The Company makes no representation or warranty and shall have no liability to any Non-Employee Director or any other person if any payments under any provisions of the Director Plan are determined to constitute deferred compensation under Section 409A of the Code that are subject to the twenty percent (20%) additional tax under Section 409A of the Code.
SECTION 16. TERMINATION OF SERVICE RELATIONSHIP, TRANSFER, LEAVE OF ABSENCE, ETC. | (a) | Termination of Service Relationship. If the grantee’s Service Relationship is with a Subsidiary and such Subsidiary ceases to be a Subsidiary, the grantee shall be deemed to have terminated his or her Service Relationship for purposes of the Plan.
|
| (b) | For purposes of the Plan, the following events shall not be deemed a termination of a Service Relationship:
|
| (i) | a transfer to the employment of the Company from a Subsidiary or from the Company to a Subsidiary, or from one Subsidiary to another; or
|
| (ii) | an approved leave of absence for military service or sickness, or for any other purpose approved by the Company, if the employee’s right to re-employment is guaranteed either by a statute or by contract or under the policy pursuant to which the leave of absence was granted or if the Administrator otherwise so provides in writing.
|
SECTION 17.8. AMENDMENTS AND TERMINATION
The Board may,reserves the right to amend or terminate the Director Plan at any time amendin its sole discretion. SECTION 9. NON-EXCLUSIVITY; NO BOARD SERVICE RIGHTS The Director Plan is not intended to be exclusive and nothing contained in the Director Plan shall prevent the Board from adopting other or discontinueadditional compensation arrangements with respect to any Non-Employee Directors or otherwise. The adoption of the Director Plan and the Administrator may, atpayment of compensation hereunder shall not confer upon any time, amend or cancelNon-Employee Director any outstanding Award forright to continued service on the purpose of satisfying changes in law or for any other lawful purpose, but no such action shall materially and adversely affect rights under any outstanding Award without the holder’s consent. Except as provided in Section 3(b), without prior stockholder approval, in no event may the Administrator exercise its discretion to reduce the exercise price of outstanding Stock Options or Stock Appreciation Rights or effect repricing through cancellation and re-grants or cancellation of Stock Options or Stock Appreciation Rights in exchange for cash or other Awards. The Board, in its discretion, may determine to make any Plan amendments subject to the approval of the Company’s stockholders for purposes of complying with the rules of any securities exchange or market system on which the Stock is listed or ensuring that Incentive Stock Options granted under the Plan are qualified under Section 422 of the Code. Nothing in this Section 17 shall limit the Administrator’s authority to take any action permitted pursuant to Section 3(b). | | | | | | | | | | | | 2021 Proxy Statement
| | A-11
|
SECTION 18. STATUS OF PLAN
With respect to the portion of any Award that has not been exercised and any payments in cash, Stock or other consideration not received by a grantee, a grantee shall have no rights greater than those of a general creditor of the Company unless the Administrator shall otherwise expressly determine in connection with any Award or Awards. In its sole discretion, the Administrator may authorize the creation of trusts or other arrangements to meet the Company’s obligations to deliver Stock or make payments with respect to Awards hereunder, provided that the existence of such trusts or other arrangements is consistent with the foregoing sentence.Board.
SECTION 19. GENERAL PROVISIONS | (a) | No Distribution. The Administrator may require each person acquiring Stock pursuant to an Award to represent to and agree with the Company in writing that such person is acquiring the shares without a view to distribution thereof.
|
| (b) | Delivery of Stock. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the Company shall not be required to issue shares of Stock or deliver any certificates evidencing shares of Stock pursuant to the exercise of any Award, unless and until the Administrator has determined, with advice of counsel (to the extent the Administrator deems such advice necessary or advisable), that the issuance and/or delivery of such certificates is in compliance with all applicable laws, regulations of governmental authorities and, if applicable, the requirements of any exchange on which the shares of Stock are listed, quoted or traded. All Stock delivered pursuant to the Plan shall be subject to any stop-transfer orders and other restrictions as the Administrator deems necessary or advisable to comply with federal, state or foreign jurisdiction, securities or other laws, rules and quotation system on which the Stock is listed, quoted or traded. The Administrator may place legends on any Stock certificate or in the records of the Company or the transfer agent to reference restrictions applicable to the Stock. In addition to the terms and conditions provided herein, the Administrator may require that an individual make such reasonable covenants, agreements, and representations as the Administrator, in its discretion, deems necessary or advisable in order to comply with any such laws, regulations, or requirements. The Administrator shall have the right to require any individual to comply with any timing or other restrictions with respect to the settlement or exercise of any Award, including a window-period limitation, as may be imposed in the discretion of the Administrator.
|
| (c) | Other Compensation Arrangements; No Employment Rights. Nothing contained in this Plan shall prevent the Board from adopting other or additional compensation arrangements, including trusts, and such arrangements may be either generally applicable or applicable only in specific cases. The adoption of this Plan and the grant of Awards do not confer upon any employee any right to continued employment with the Company or any Subsidiary.
|
| (d) | Trading Policy Restrictions. All actions taken with respect to Awards under the Plan shall be subject to the Company’s insider trading policies and procedures, as in effect from time to time.
|
| (e) | Clawback Policy. Awards under the Plan shall be subject to the Company’s Policy for Recoupment of Incentive Compensation, as in effect from time to time, to the extent holders thereof are subject to such policy.
|
| (f) | No Further Awards Under the Prior Plan. On and after the Effective Date, no further awards will be issued under the Prior Plan, but outstanding awards granted under the Prior Plan prior to the Effective Date shall continue to be governed by the terms and conditions of the Prior Plan.
|
SECTION 20.10. EFFECTIVE DATE OF DIRECTOR PLAN
ThisThe Director Plan shall become effective upon stockholder approval in accordance with Delaware law and the Company’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws, each as amended. No grants of Awards may be made hereunder after the tenth anniversary of the Effective Date and no grants of Incentive Stock Options may be made hereunder after the tenth anniversary of the date the Plan is approved by the Board.law.
SECTION 21.11. GOVERNING LAW ThisThe Director Plan and all Awards and actions taken thereunder shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Delaware, applied without regard to conflict of law principles.
DATE APPROVEDOF APPROVAL OF DIRECTOR PLAN BY BOARD OF DIRECTORS: MarchBOARD: January 18, 20212022 DATE APPROVEDOF APPROVAL BY STOCKHOLDERS: | | | | | | | | | A-12
| | | | | 20212022 Proxy Statement B-3 |
BOSTON PROPERTIES, INC.
800 BOYLSTON STREET, SUITE 1900 BOSTON, MA 02199 ATTN: INVESTOR RELATIONS
VOTE BY INTERNET
Before The Meeting - Go to www.proxyvote.com or scan the QR Barcode above Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information. Vote by 11:59 P.M. ET on May 19, 2021 for shares held directly and by 11:59 P.M. ET on May 17, 2021 for shares held in a Shareworks account.18, 2022. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.
During The Meeting - Go ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS If you would like to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/BXP2021
You may attendreduce the meetingcosts incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. Have the information that is printed in the box marked with the arrow available andTo sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions. instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years. VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions. Vote by 11:59 P.M. ET on May 19, 2021 for shares held directly and by 11:59 P.M. ET on May 17, 2021 for shares held in a Shareworks account.18, 2022. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.
VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.
TO VOTE, MARK THE BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:
D40576-P49725
KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY
| | | | | | | TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: | | | | | | | | | D76781-P67225 | | | KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS | | — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — | |
| DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY |
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.
BOSTON PROPERTIES, INC.
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR all of the nominees for director listed.
For Against Abstain
1. Election of Directors:
Nominees:
1a. Joel I. Klein
1b. Kelly A. Ayotte
1c. Bruce W. Duncan
1d. Karen E. Dykstra
1e. Carol B. Einiger
1f. Diane J. Hoskins
1g. Douglas T. Linde
1h. Matthew J. Lustig
1i. Owen D. Thomas
1j. David A. Twardock
1k. William H. Walton, III
For Against Abstain
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals 2, 3 and 4.
2. To approve, by non-binding, advisory resolution, the Company’s named executive officer compensation.
3. To approve the Boston Properties, Inc. 2021 Stock Incentive Plan.
4. To ratify the Audit Committee’s appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021.
NOTE: In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon any other matters that are properly brought by or at the direction of the Board of Directors before the Annual Meeting and at any adjournments or postponements thereof.
| | | | | | | Nominees: | | For | | Against | | Abstain | | | | | 1a. Joel I. Klein | | ☐ | | ☐ | | ☐ | | | | | 1b. Kelly A. Ayotte | | ☐ | | ☐ | | ☐ | | | | | 1c. Bruce W. Duncan | | ☐ | | ☐ | | ☐ | | | | | 1d. Carol B. Einiger | | ☐ | | ☐ | | ☐ | | | | | 1e. Diane J. Hoskins | | ☐ | | ☐ | | ☐ | | | | | 1f. Mary E. Kipp | | ☐ | | ☐ | | ☐ | | | | | 1g. Douglas T. Linde | | ☐ | | ☐ | | ☐ | | | | | 1h. Matthew J. Lustig | | ☐ | | ☐ | | ☐ | | | | | 1i. Owen D. Thomas | | ☐ | | ☐ | | ☐ | | | | | 1j. David A. Twardock | | ☐ | | ☐ | | ☐ | | | | | 1k. William H. Walton, III | | ☐ | | ☐ | | ☐ |
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date
Signature (Joint Owners) Date | | | | | | | | | The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals 2, 3 and 4. | | For | | Against | | Abstain | | | | | | 2. | | To approve, by non-binding, advisory resolution, the Company’s named executive officer compensation. | | ☐ | | ☐ | | ☐ | | | | | | 3. | | To approve the Boston Properties, Inc. Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan. | | ☐ | | ☐ | | ☐ | | | | | | 4. | | To ratify the Audit Committee’s appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022. | | ☐ | | ☐ | | ☐ | | | | | NOTE: In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon any other matters that are properly brought by or at the direction of the Board of Directors before the Annual Meeting and at any adjournments or postponements thereof. | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] | | Date | | | | Signature (Joint Owners) | | Date | | |
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholders Meeting to be Held on May 20, 2021: The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Stockholders are available at www.proxyvote.com
D40577-P49725
BOSTON PROPERTIES, INC.
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON MAY 20, 2021
The undersigned hereby appoints Douglas T. Linde and Frank D. Burt, and each of them, as proxies for the undersigned, each with the power to appoint his substitute, and hereby authorizes them to attend the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Boston Properties, Inc. (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held virtually via live audio webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/BXP2021 on May 20, 2021 at 9:00 a.m., Eastern Time, and at any adjournments or postponements thereof, to vote, as designated on the reverse side, all of the shares that the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting and otherwise to represent the undersigned with all of the powers the undersigned would possess if personally present at the Annual Meeting. The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the Proxy Statement and the Annual Report to Stockholders and revokes any proxy heretofore given with respect to the Annual Meeting.
THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED HEREIN. UNLESS DIRECTION IS GIVEN TO THE CONTRARY, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED “FOR” ALL NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR AND “FOR” PROPOSALS 2, 3 AND 4. IN THEIR DISCRETION, THE PROXIES ARE AUTHORIZED TO VOTE ON SUCH OTHER MATTERS THAT ARE PROPERLY BROUGHT BY OR AT THE DIRECTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS BEFORE THE ANNUAL MEETING AND AT ANY ADJOURNMENTS OR POSTPONEMENTS THEREOF, INCLUDING WHETHER OR NOT TO ADJOURN THE ANNUAL MEETING. THIS PROXY ALSO CONFERS DISCRETIONARY AUTHORITY ON THE PROXIES TO VOTE WITH RESPECT TO THE ELECTION OF ANY INDIVIDUAL FOR DIRECTOR WHERE ONE OR MORE NOMINEES ARE UNABLE TO SERVE, OR FOR GOOD CAUSE WILL NOT SERVE, AND WITH RESPECT TO MATTERS INCIDENTAL TO THE CONDUCT OF THE ANNUAL MEETING.
Continued and to be signed on reverse side
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting to be Held on May 19, 2022: The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Stockholders are available at www.proxyvote.com. | | | | |
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — D76782-P67225 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | BOSTON PROPERTIES, INC. THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR THE 2022 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 19, 2022 | | | The undersigned hereby appoints Douglas T. Linde and Frank D. Burt, and each of them, as proxies for the undersigned, each with the power to appoint his substitute, and hereby authorizes them to attend the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Boston Properties, Inc. (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held at Metropolitan Square, 655 15th Street NW, 2nd Floor, Washington, DC 20005 on May 19, 2022 at 9:00 AM EDT, and at any adjournments or postponements thereof, to vote, as designated on the reverse side, all of the shares that the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting and otherwise to represent the undersigned with all of the powers the undersigned would possess if personally present at the Annual Meeting. The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the Proxy Statement and the Annual Report to Stockholders and revokes any proxy heretofore given with respect to the Annual Meeting. | | | | | THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED HEREIN. UNLESS DIRECTION IS GIVEN TO THE CONTRARY, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED “FOR” ALL NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR AND “FOR” PROPOSALS 2, 3 AND 4. IN THEIR DISCRETION, THE PROXIES ARE AUTHORIZED TO VOTE ON SUCH OTHER MATTERS THAT ARE PROPERLY BROUGHT BY OR AT THE DIRECTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS BEFORE THE ANNUAL MEETING AND AT ANY ADJOURNMENTS OR POSTPONEMENTS THEREOF, INCLUDING WHETHER OR NOT TO ADJOURN THE ANNUAL MEETING. THIS PROXY ALSO CONFERS DISCRETIONARY AUTHORITY ON THE PROXIES TO VOTE WITH RESPECT TO THE ELECTION OF ANY INDIVIDUAL FOR DIRECTOR WHERE ONE OR MORE NOMINEES ARE UNABLE TO SERVE, OR FOR GOOD CAUSE WILL NOT SERVE, AND WITH RESPECT TO MATTERS INCIDENTAL TO THE CONDUCT OF THE ANNUAL MEETING. Continued andto be signed on reverse side | | |
|
|